Stephanie Cawley’s My
Heart But Not My Heart, I want to say, is a book of refusals. The losses
and grief that refuse language, the poet’s own refusal of certain performances,
the poem’s refusal of expected forms, the speaker’s refusal to slap a manicure
on and understand it as self-care, despite the therapist’s best intentions. It is
in part about the ways in which our refusals, and our passivity, brought about
often by external forces and pressures are then pathologized, medicated,
explained away in the dismal language of diagnosis. Grieving the death of a
father, for example, becomes ‘depression’ because it refuses the timeline and
containment of whatever supposedly healthy grief is. And these pathologies are
gendered, of course. The letting go of depression and the woman who ‘lets
herself go’ slide into each other as the collection points to all the forced
performances of okayness we are expected to participate in. That health means to
keep moving, and this means, too, a capitalist health of go, go, go. (Solmaz
Sharif, “INTRODUCTION”)
I
was curious to see southern New Jersey poet Stephanie Cawley’s second full
length collection, My Heart But Not My Heart (Bristol NH: Slope Editions,
2020). Carved into quartets, My Heart But Not My Heart is a book-length
lyric suite on grief, prompted by the sudden death of the author’s father. As she
writes to open the second section:
The brain, good at
forgetting pain, becomes a fist closed around a stone.
If you believe an algorithm
can reanimate the beloved dead, a text body,
a voice brought back to
life through words, you will never stop grieving.
The end of grief is [ ]. This is my question.
As
I write this, I am two and a half months beyond the death of my own father, so there
are elements throughout that I can identify with, as she asks: “How the brain
can fold itself around a knot of pain, glass beneath skin, that / twinge, how
it feels permanent, and if it isn’t, even worse, how close it is / to being [ ], again, open.” Cawley explores the lyric space of grief, and the ongoingness of it, as well as
allowing for the unspeakable, unquantifiable and unknowable, in part through
the use of square brackets and empty space. Cawley composes a series of lines
around the absences she is otherwise unable to articulate, providing the outlines
of those absences through what lines she can write. This is a book of moments, and
questions, and explorations, from the abstract of grief to the specifics of medical
knowledge. Cawley works through a meditation on the mechanics of grief, and of
death, researching the elements of both, and how the breakdown of one is
prompted by the breakdown of the other.
The question is whether
death instantiates a change in form. One thing
becoming another, and by
what laws. The old myth that what leaves the
body, [ ], can be measured in grams.
There are questions you
desire to ask and know you never can. There are
those who would tell even
the darkest moments in full detail, for the sake
of it, and those who wouldn’t.
The length of time between
when the heart stops and the body is declared
dead has lengthened
because of new medical technologies. The question
of whether or how else my
father could have survived transforms then.
No comments:
Post a Comment