Sunday, February 15, 2026

Rainer Diana Hamilton, Lilacs

 

When something is sensed, it repeats
in the sensor’s body, helping them remember
it: the iconic (fleeting images), the echoic, 

the haptic, the proprioceptive. Sometimes the repetition
lingers longer than it ought – a sound keeps ringing – or appears
    before
it should be sensible – anticipatory nipple pain – or as it shouldn’t –
a person sees a friend whom others insist is imaginary – but
sense memory is mostly timely. In Keat’s Odes:
A Lover’s Discourse, Anahid Nersessian introduces 

the poet as sensitive, and this vulnerability
to sensory experience as a source of suffering:
his “senses always strain, are always under stress.” (“SENSES LILAC”)

The latest from Brooklyn-based writer and critic Rainer Diana Hamilton, and the first I’ve seen, is Lilacs (Krupskaya, 2025), a book-length lyric suite that explodes wonderfully from a single point, and spends the remaining space expanding ever outward in lyric prose, perpetually forward and ever wider with such a lovely and consistent and engaged propulsive exploration. I hadn’t heard of Hamilton prior to this, and they are also the author of Okay, Okay (Truck Books 2012), The Awful Truth (Golias Books 2017) and God Was Right (Ugly Duckling Presse 2018), as well as the forthcoming This Reasonable Habit (Spunk, 2026), a collaboration with Violet Spurlock, so I’m clearly behind on what they’ve been doing, for some time now.

We have some obligation to notice

and to remember what we noticed.

Hamilton’s Lilacs, naturally, begins with lilacs, begins with memory; begins with the scent of memory and lilacs, moving ever out, riffing and extending, in a book that reveals itself as a book focused on attention. What do you know, and what can you see, what can you remember? There’s something impactful about Hamilton’s focus on attention, hinting at the consideration that we are not only an accumulation of our experiences, but what experiences, including sensory, we can actually recall. “And this route from story to smell could be,” they write, early on in the collection, “again, reversed: on the last night of my illness, desperate for cinnamon’s return, I layered perfumes before sleep, knowing that, despite being unable to sense them, I’d be comforted by the certainty it would be wild if I could: first, on the sternum, a sample from Le Labo that, in the store, had the complexity of sitting fire side with someone you’re trying to get the nerve to kiss but then, at home, seemed like a cheap McCormick’s spice blend, […].” Hamilton moves through lilacs from a litany of literary references, including Anne Rice, T.S. Eliot, John Berger, Walt Whitman and Kenneth Koch. Hamilton finds lilacs across Elizabeth Willis, Zuzanna Ginczanka, John Wieners, Maria Sledmere, Amy De’Ath, William Carlos Williams, Bernadette Mayer and Lorine Niedecker. A blend of lyric prose, prose poem and lyric essay, the book tendrils through lilacs and memory, in a work highly engaged and readable, thick with possibility. There are some incredible passages here, all of which accumulate into a kind of thesis. There’s something of this collection that could have appeared as a prose title through Essay Press just as easily, I would say, although the titles lately through Krupskaya [see my reviews of further recent titles by the press by Jennifer Soong, Noah Ross and Stacy Szymaszek] hold to a clear interest by the press: book-length suites incorporating prose and poetry across a cohesive lyric. As well, I am quite taken with the end-note by the author, articulating how this title was prompted, and came to be, ideas I’m tempted to echo and possibly attempt as well, at some point. As Hamilton writes:

A “Lilac” is a poem written, prosaically, in an artificially-induced trance-like state, for the purposes of remembering something sensual.

In December of 2019, charles theonia told me they’d been assigned, by Mónica de la Torre, to write an essay in a trance, and I decided to do their homework, myself: I listened to Donna Summer on repeat, visualized my block, and wrote down every image I could remember.

That month, I had been plagued by a strange amnesia; I kept turning down the wrong street on my way home. I titled the poem “Trance Essay for Remembering Images,” since I had set out to document the few visual details of the surrounding area I could remember in order to facilitate better remembering in the future. At the time, I had also wanted to write ‘poetic images’ that were as straightforward as possible. I had been reading a lot of H.D., and while I couldn’t muster a ‘Sea Rose,’ I thought I could conjure the common lilac.


Saturday, February 14, 2026

Elizabeth Bachinsky, Real Grownup

my review of New Westminster, British Columbia poet Elizabeth Bachinsky’s sixth full-length poetry title, Real Grownup (Gibsons BC: Nightwood Editions, 2026), is now online at periodicities: a journal of poetry and poetics. See my review of The Hottest Summer in Recorded History (Nightwood Editions, 2013) here and my interview with her when she was on the shortlist for thatyear’s Pat Lowther Memorial Award. I also did reviews of Curio (Toronto ON: BookThug, 2005) here, Home of Sudden Service (Nightwood Editions, 2006) here, God of Missed Connections (Nightwood Editions, 2006) here and I Don’t Feel So Good (BookThug, 2012) here.

Friday, February 13, 2026

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Paul Moorehead

Paul Moorehead is a writer and physician living in Conception Harbour, Newfoundland and Labrador with his partner, their three children, and their one cat. His poetry has appeared in Pinhole Poetry, Riddle Fence, Horseshoe Literary Magazine, newpoetry.ca, and other places. His debut poetry collection, Green, was published by Breakwater Books in 2025. 

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

The nice thing about writing a book of poetry is that there is no temptation toward any outsize expectations. My book is not going to be a bestseller, nobody is going to make it into a show for a streaming service. So I just get to enjoy the book, that it exists, that I wrote it, that it occasionally finds its way into the hands of someone who might connect with it. I wrote a book! Of poetry! If my life is different in some way, it’s that I feel more like a writer now than I did before the book. Which is encouraging: if I'm a writer, then I can write more. Maybe there’s another book in me.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

My writing dreams have always been of writing fiction and essays. But during the pandemic I did some online poetry workshops with a friend, George Murray. I’d always been a little wary of poetry, both as a reader and a writer, but I came to it at just the right moment, I think, and in just the right setting, with a very supportive mentor and a very welcoming community.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

Starting things is easy and quick. Most of those things die pretty quickly, although usually that’s a form of mercy killing. (I have a few partially finished novels in my “drawer”; they should probably never be seen by human eyes.) Once I’m on to something that I think has some force, the writing can come quickly. I wrote the poems that would eventually become Green, plus a bunch that did not end up in the book, in about two years, and that was starting from zero miles per hour as a poet. I’m a bit of an editor/revisor, so things often change pretty substantially from first concept to final version.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

My book, Green, was formed from individual poems that I wrote as I was beginning to learn to write poetry. There was no idea, at least not at the beginning, that these poems could or would become a book. What I’m working on now is a little more coherent around a concept.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I like doing readings, although I find reading for people to be emotional. I’m trying to get better at reading my work aloud. So many poets, even very accomplished ones, are not very good at reading. They come off as disinterested, perhaps they’re trying to let the work speak for itself, without the need for any kind of human vector. Must be nice to be so convinced of the genius of one’s work. But I’d like to get better at having the reading bring something extra that creates a temporary version of the poem that is not just the printed words.
I’m very attentive to the sound of my poems, so I’m often thinking as I write about whether a piece could be usefully be read aloud. In that sense, the possibility of reading guides what I’m doing on the page. Not that I won’t write a poem that can’t be read aloud, but if I have an idea that a particular piece might be one I’d read, I need to make sure that it stays that way.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I’m trying to write a poetry of “what is”, at the risk of seeming like some kind of antiquated rational materialist. (Guilty.) What you believe has consequences: if you believe in the literal existence of Santa, you need to wrestle with the existence of the surveillance apparatus implied by that belief, you need to acknowledge that this authority in which you believe prefers rich kids, and so on.

So I’m trying to write about the marvellous world we live in, which means that I write about natural phenomena, often through the explanatory lens of science. I deliberately avoid mysticism, metaphysics, spiritualism, and other forms of woo that are pretty commonplace in contemporary poetry. But I don’t think that the transcendent and the numinous — the truly wonderful — are the property of those modes of thinking. I’m trying to write about what it’s like to be in this world, to live in it, to experience its aesthetics and poetics. This is a bit different than the way that many poets write about science and nature: either the natural phenomenon is used solely as a metaphor, as in “I wandered lonely as a cloud”, or the poem is a hymn to the phenomenon. (Grossly oversimplifying here.) I’m trying to do something different with my poetry, to write about the world as it is and about our experience of it.

Adjacent to this is a technical question I’m interested in, which has to do with how poems might be constructed differently. If we imagine that words and lines are the atoms and molecules, respectively, of poetry, what happens if we do chemistry with these? If we pull them apart and put them together. This experiment already exists in poetry, of course, in, for example, enjambment or Manley Hopkins-esque portmanteaux. But how far can this be pushed? To what poetic end? Do there exist poetic polymers and macromolecules? What do they look like? What are they for?

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

Truth is taking a beating from all sides these days. So the role of writers of all kinds ought to be to tell the truth. But to tell it wisely and beautifully.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

I really like revising and editing, so working with an editor can be a really generative experience, so long as the editor has an idea of what I’m trying to do. Poetry is a good space in which to find such editors. (My other publishing experience is in academic medicine, where the “editorial” process consists of some pretty ham-fisted copyediting and the dubious activity of peer review. The aim of most peer reviewers seems to be to convince you that your work is dumb and that you’re ignorant. It’s not hard to understand the smallness and insecurity that lead to these attitudes, but these traits seem harder to find in the poetry community than in the academy or in medicine.)

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
Writing advice? In Bird by Bird, Anne Lamott, using the metaphor of chopping firewood, advises to “aim through the wood”. Have some idea of what you’re trying to do, and swing as hard as you can to do it, swing through the resistance of the task itself.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

Routine? That’s funny. I have a day job, although I’m on leave at the moment, and three small kids. I snatch moments for writing when I can. The dream is a life that allows more space for writing, where I could have something resembling a routine for writing and reading.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I don’t often get stalled, honestly. There are just too many ideas. (That’s something beautiful about poetry: you can write a poem about the elasticity of nice socks much more readily than you could write a screenplay about the same thing.) The world we live in is so varied, so detailed, so deep, how could you run out of ideas? My problem is finding the time to get what’s in my head out onto the page. Which is one of them good problems, I suppose.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Cats. Waffles. A nice Irish whiskey.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

Nature and the use of science to attempt to understand it, absolutely. I love music, although I don’t know that my work is particularly musical. I love stories in nearly all forms (musical theatre being the exception) and some of my poetry has a narrative element. I would love to write a big epic poem.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

This will be a woefully incomplete listing. I’m learning a lot from Paul Muldoon. Dean Young, although I’m not really interested in trying to write that kind of surrealism; his approach to lining and pacing are wonderful. Robyn Hitchcock is a musician I love, not least because of the poetry of his lyrics. Ditto for Wilco’s Jeff Tweedy. Sue Goyette is my favourite Canadian poet, I think, and the audacity of her work is really inspiring. When I think about trying to write an epic poem, Goyette is the contemporary poet I think about.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Write a second book. A really good one. Or maybe a really good third book.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I’ve been a math teacher, and I’m currently a physician. I should have been a physicist, but fear and laziness prevented this. Some days I think I’d like to be a Zamboni driver, or the guy who drives the rake around the infield at a baseball stadium.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I don’t know. But something makes me write. Something that is very unhappy when I’m not writing. It’s been there since I was a kid. It’s been pretty unhappy a lot of the time, unfortunately, until recently. I’m trying to feed it better now.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Chloe Zhao’s Hamnet is an absolutely wonderful ode to the power of art. I don’t know if it’s the last great book that I read, but Dorian Lynskey’s The Ministry of Truth is a fantastic examination of Orwell’s 1984. We should all be reading 1984 on repeat at the moment.

19 - What are you currently working on?

A few things. I’m putting together the poems that I hope will be a second book. And I’m working on several chapbook-length things, one about water, another about hockey, and a third about a French mathematician. Trying to get my author’s website up and running — I’m not technically inept but I find it hard to be bothered with this kind of thing — and trying to get a Substack about Marvel movies on the go as well.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Thursday, February 12, 2026

Three Count Pour Chapbooks : Elizabeth Robinson + Randy Prunty,

 

baptism

What if a hand

came from behind,

 

if it wetted the hair. A gesture that neither 

understood nor misunderstood

 

what the hand could measure

when the sound was not water, was

 

instead

the fall of nakedness from

the body. The surrender, the squander, the thing

that could not adhere, submerged below its surface. (Elizabeth Robinson)

I’m intrigued by these lovely new chapbooks by American poets Elizabeth Robinson and Randy Prunty, apparently two of a cluster of four new chapbooks by Bay Area poets produced in 2025 by Three Count Pour, an imprint of Chicago publisher selva obscura pressRobinson’s for the catechists (2025) and Prunty’s Gravity Catches All Things (2025). Elizabeth Robinson is the author of a slew of poetry books and chapbooks over the past two-plus decades—see my review of her latest, vulnerability index (Curbstone Books/Northwestern University Press, 2025), for example—and this new title follows her relatively more recent trajectory into elements of faith, offering lyric conversations through and around scripture. What is interesting, also, is how the book is structured as a kind of abecedarian, offering fourteen lettered section-clusters, most of which hold but one or two poems, but the section “s” holding six poems, with all poem titles within each section beginning with that section’s featured letter. That same “s” section, for example, offering poems “sacred heart,” “shofar,” “shroud,” “sola scriptura,” “soul” and “spirit.” The abecedarian structure hints, perhaps, at a far larger collection of these pieces, which is interesting, and something I would be eager to see. Robinson’s language is sharp and dense, and there’s an approach to and through her subject matter propelled, first and foremost, through the language. “Echolalic with odor,” she writes, as part of the poem “carnal,” “the creature is able to smile, to fill / countenance with perception, mill / its arms around, its legs, loll or hunt / its field, its plural. /// Critter in fur, incarnate howl, / call, mineral tang of voice, voice stalled. Its / whiff transferred, diurnal. Only paw and pall, little /// hell of beingness, crawl to haven.” I haven’t seen much of Randy Prunty’s work prior to this, but the title of his Gravity Catches All Things is quite good, I must say. The pieces assembled here are composed as fourteen word/line sonnets, one word per line, what Ottawa poet Seymour Mayne has referred to as “word sonnets,” although Prunty’s are far more precise, exact. There’s such thinking between these lines, these words; such marvellous density, one word set upon another, offering a kind of silence throughout each piece, even as the poem speaks. One hopes that, or even wonders if, Prunty’s reading style allows for the line breaks, the spaces between words, and not the way Canadian poet Ken Norris once told me of the reading style of American poet William Carlos Williams (1883-1963): reading sans line break, as though his poems but a kind of ongoing sentence, making one wonder why those line breaks were even there at all.

Back Porch Sonnet

When
there’s
no
space
between
thinking
it
and
saying
it,
you
know
you’re
home.