Showing posts with label ARP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ARP. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Ben Robinson

Ben Robinson is a poet, musician and librarian. His first book, The Book of Benjamin, an essay on naming, birth, and grief was published by Palimpsest Press in 2023. His poetry collection, As Is, was published by ARP Books in September 2024. He has only ever lived in Hamilton, Ontario on the traditional territories of the Erie, Neutral, Huron-Wendat, Haudenosaunee, and Mississaugas. You can find him online at benrobinson.work.

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My first chapbook helped me meet poets. It took this thing—poetry—that I was spending an increasing amount of time thinking about, and gave me a way to connect with like-minded folks through reading and mailing and editing and exchanging.

My first book was maybe an extension of this, but also its opposite. For all of the grief about the decline of the book, I think there’s still a certain amount of cultural capital attached to the idea of having published a book, such that my first one brought me back into contact, even briefly, with old neighbours, former classmates, friends from out of the country, etc.

As for how my most recent book, As Is, compares to the earlier work, I think there are common concerns around closely investigating inherited pieces of my identity, like my name, my relationship to Christianity, or my hometown, and trying to come to both a deeper understanding of the way these forces have shaped me, and also how I might want to relate to them in the future. That sounds somewhat individualistic, but I hope these reflections also scale up, that they might contribute to broader conversations.

I think As Is differs from my past work in that it’s perhaps the most explicitly political. Perhaps that’s because it’s about place and, while I share other aspects of my identity, the communal aspect is undeniable when thinking about a city.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I’m not sure that I did come to poetry first. I used to write short fiction but it never felt quite right. I took a lot of my early work in many genres to the various writers-in-residence at the Hamilton Public Library. One WiR that I took stories to helped me, in maybe an inadvertent way, to see that I didn’t really care about the rules of fiction, or at least conventional fiction. I would bring in a story and she would ask these questions about plot and character development that I had no clue about and ultimately wasn’t interested in. I’d say that I came to poetry because of its comparative openness. I’m not always sure that what I write are 100% poems, but there seems to be a higher tolerance for divergence in the poetry world.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I’m a real notebook writer. The poems often come when I find the connection between a couple of images or lines in my notes, when it feels like there’s a charge, like there’s something that merits exploring. Sometimes it takes a while to find exactly why I’m drawn to a line or how it might be used, but once I find that connection, the poem tends to emerge quickly as I find it difficult to think about much else in the meantime.

Lately, I’ve been trying to keep my drafts unsettled for as long as possible. I often find it hard to get back to the generative space with a piece once I’ve gone into editing mode, so I’ve been letting my poems stay unfinished for as long as possible, giving them time to morph and stretch.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

A bit of both, I think. I wrapped up writing As Is at the start of 2023 and I wasn’t sure what would be next. I didn’t write any new poems for almost a year, and when the new ones did come, I didn’t immediately see what the connections were, but it’s exciting to watch the themes slowly emerge and start to coalesce; there's something akin to the way a poem reveals itself in the writing that can also happen with a collection, I think.

The first new poems I wrote were about my experience of fatherhood and then, seemingly out of nowhere, I wrote a couple of poems about bad advice I’d received in my life, almost exclusively from men. While the connection might seem obvious now, at the time I wasn’t convinced these two sets of poems were part of the same project. I’m trying to increase my tolerance for that divergence, trusting that the variety will ultimately make for a more interesting and less predictable collection as opposed to working backward from a theme and intentionally writing poems on particular subjects.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I think it depends when you ask me. On the day of a reading, I might say that they’re counter to my process because I find the anticipation kind of immobilizing, whereas once I’m about two minutes into a reading or after, I’d probably say they’re part of the process. It’s great to meet other poets and readers of poetry, to share the poems I’ve been tinkering with in solitude, but it takes a lot out of me. Maybe the nerves will go away one day, but they haven’t yet. Now I just know to expect them and keep going.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I find this kind of question hard to answer. I did an interview with Kevin Heslop for my last book and it felt like a kind of creative therapy—he had such great language for the connections between my projects that I’m not all that conscious of. Each project has its particular theoretical concerns, but the broader ones are more elusive. I guess I’m interested in the big questions: How should we live? What to do with life’s many coincidences and contradictions?

I think I’m more concerned with the effect of my writing. The books that I love feel essential, both as pieces of writing, and also to my life in general; they keep me attuned to the many nuances of experience that tend to get flattened out in daily living. I read a blurb once that talked about “obliterating cliche” [Anne Boyer, The Undying] which I like—to take the old standards (life, death, love, home, family, etc.) and find some small particularity that might make them feel urgent again.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

I’m not sure that I operate in the larger culture, but I’m okay with small. The writers I respect, even in their limited and local ways, are doing the difficult work of thinking deeply, of escaping the rut of what has already been thought, or written down, or is Googleable and are revealing how much more complex life is out beyond the bounds of the feasible, the realistic or the expedient.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

Yes, certainly both. I’ve tried to get better at emotionally preparing myself for editing, to resist defensiveness. My default position tends to be either wholesale acceptance or rejection of suggestions, but I’ve been getting better at slowing down and evaluating edits individually.

Lately, I’ve had the opportunity to work with some great editors (as well as poets in their own rights) like Karen Solie and Annick MacAskill. My work is much stronger for their engagements with it, but, despite the fact that they are both unfailingly lovely people, it’s a vulnerable process for me. Ultimately, I try to remind myself that there are plenty of people in my life (thankfully) that I could go to for simple praise, to tell me that the poems are “good,” and while praise is certainly nice and, to an extent, necessary, constructive and insightful feedback is so much harder to come by and is a real gift that ought to be treated as such.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

Put the problem into the poem - Robert Hass. This one works for both writing and life, I think.

Sometimes I’ll make lists of my worries about a given piece, about what might be missing, about how it might be misread. Some of these worries just need to be written down and then moved on from, others help reveal what might be missing in the project. When I was writing “Between the Lakes” which is a long poem that threads throughout As Is, I was concerned that the poem, which is trying to engage with the land, was doing so largely from within the confines of a car which was of course actively degrading that same land. After reading Gabriel Guddings' Rhode Island Notebook where he obsessively lists his mileage and direction of travel, I realized that I needed to address this tension in the poem and so, in the final version, I included moments where the smeared windshield, or the gas station—the material conditions of the poem’s construction—are visible and I think the piece is stronger for it.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to reviews to music)? What do you see as the appeal?

I don’t think of the transitions in terms of ease or difficulty. As much as I love poetry, there are only so many hours I can spend with it in a given day, and when I reach that saturation point, it’s not easy or difficult to transition, just necessary. They are all pursuits that I enjoy and they certainly feed one another, but I move between them in the same way that I might leave off writing a poem to ride my bike, or make dinner: because I think it’s important and valuable to fill a life with many different endeavours.

The reviews or interviews are a bit more related, but I think they started as, and continue to be, a natural outflow of my reading practice, of trying to think deeply about poetry and then wanting to offer some of that time and effort to others. They are another way to participate in a literary community, to escape the limits of introversion and ask brilliant people about their practice in a structured environment that also hopefully serves to bring more readers to work that I think is useful or excellent or interesting.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

My routine has shifted a lot lately. Right now, with it being summer and having both my sons home all the time, my routine is no routine—writing a bit on the bus to work, in the back room of the library on my lunch hour, at the kitchen counter while the little one naps and the big one watches his shows, in the rare moments where the boys play quietly together and I try to stay as still as possible, so as not to disrupt them.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

Like many, I turn back to reading. I go back to the books that have resonated with me or go looking for something new that will show me fresh possibilities. I ride my bike, which seems to open up a less conscious part of my brain that is capable of quickly solving problems I’ve been fussing with for hours.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

I have a poor sense of smell, to be honest. We have a lilac bush in the yard and my wife loves lilacs so maybe that? My kids love bananas, or at least the first two bites of a banana, so perhaps the remaining 80% of the banana that is then abandoned beneath the couch or somewhere similarly out of the way. Flowers and decaying fruit, like a Caravaggio. There are many things I like about our house, but its “fragrance” isn’t always top of the list.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

Well for As Is, the book came from historical plaques, local newspapers, neighbourhood watch Facebook groups, archives, old maps, Google Maps, the land itself, by-laws, lawn signs, murals, government forms, realtor fliers, and road signs.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

The aforementioned Gabriel Gudding’s Rhode Island Notebook, C.D. Wright, Juliana Spahr’s Well Then There Now, Solmaz Sharif’s Look, Ari Banias’s A Symmetry, Layli Long Soldier’s “38,” Doug Williams’s Michi Saagiig Nishnaabeg, Catherine Venable Moore’s introduction to Muriel Rukeyser’s The Book of the Dead, Susan Howe, bpNichol’s The Martyrology Book 5, Greg Curnoe’s Deeds/Abstracts, Emma Healey’s “N12”, and Zane Koss’s Harbour Grids.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Escape monolingualism.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

My first thoughts were all writer-adjacent: journalist, podcaster, documentarian.

There was a time when I wanted to be a recording engineer. I find cutting audio meditative.

Increasingly, I’m fascinated by photography, but I don’t imagine the career prospects are much better than poetry.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

Probably some mix of the low barrier to entry, a preference toward working alone, being content to sit in one place for long periods of time, and an inability to move on from the structure of school.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

I loved Joyelle McSweeney’s Death Styles. The music in her poems is blaring and raucous. And she went so far into the underworld for this one, at once viscerally engaging with the unimaginable heartbreak of losing a newborn but also venturing off into all the other realms where poets dwell. It’s both mythic and materialist in the best way.

As for movies, those seem to be the one art form that I haven’t figured out how to fit into life as a parent without splitting a 2-hour film across four sittings. I have a Google spreadsheet of Movies to Watch, like a 2005 version of Letterboxd, which I have not made much progress on lately. The odd time when my family goes away without me, I watch as many movies as I can to make up for it. Kelly Reichardt’s Showing Up was a highlight of my last binge—a moving but unassuming look at how art comes from, and is also thwarted by, daily life. Some great weirdos in it, dysfunctional family, but gentle and nearly plotless like many of my favourites.

20 - What are you currently working on?

As I mentioned above, I’m working on a collection of poems that seems to be focused on fatherhood. I have two young boys who (often delightfully) take up much of my time and energy, so like Hass says, I am putting the problem into the poem, trying to engage with an experience that is often either absent from literature or overly sentimentalized, to document some of the amazing thinking that children do.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Monday, August 30, 2021

Colin Smith, Permanent Carnival Time

In a different world, my labour at the car wash would have me as a member of IU 670 – for making cars, IU 440 – for retail clerkhood, IU 660 – for making books and magazines and newspapers happen, IU 450 – for making anarchic art and visions available to a public, IU 620 – for making radio, IU 560 – for being a poet, IU 630. “Professional entertainer.”

 

Dear
Saint
Rike:
 

 

You must change their life!

 

Dismember
CentreVenture.

 

SmashTheDishes.

 

Because if we don’t resist
or “riot”, we’ll wind up with
no civil rights whatsoever.
 

 

Revolution as absolute
hankering. (“Necessities for the Whole Hog”)

From Winnipeg-based poet Colin Smith comes Permanent Carnival Time (Winnipeg MB: ARP Books, 2021), furthering his exploration of civil discourse, neoliberal capitalism and chronic pain amid Kootenay School of Writing-infused poetics. Permanent Carnival Time engages with the prairies, including the historic Winnipeg General Strike, writing a wry engagement of language gymnastic and ruckus humour. “Labour is entitled to all it creates.” he writes, as part of the second poem, “Necessities for the Whole Hog.” Sparking asides, leaps and fact-checks, Smith’s lengthy poetic calls out culture and capitalism on their nonsense, deflection and outright lies, composing a lyric out of compost and into a caustic balm against capitalism’s ongoing damage. “Money with more civil rights than you.” he writes, as part of “Folly Suite”: “Luckless bustard.”

Smith is the author of 8x8x7 (San Francisco CA: Krupskaya, 2008), as well as the out-of-print Multiple Poses (Vancouver BC: Tsunami Editions, 1997) and Carbonated Bippies! (Vancouver BC: Nomados, 2012), both of which were included as part of the collection Multiple Bippies (Vancouver BC: CUE, 2014) [see my review of such here]. As part of his 2016 Touch the Donkey interview, he spoke of the ongoing mutability of his writing, and his interest in refusing to remain static:

Six cans of Kokanee, half a dozen Mooseheads. Part contrivance, part intuition. While I mostly work in free verse, I don’t ever want to be exclusive about it.  

Considerations of aesthetic fit are the endless trump here, and should be. Finding the best strategy and vocabulary for each poem. The world is lumbered with more than enough limitations without me adding to them! I always thought that one of poetry’s better angels (or angles) was that it could help make our considerations of the world larger (I still believe this). So, no language need be excluded, no tactic need be forbidden.  

Although, having just issued a version of “everything is permitted” with that last sentence, I’ll now qualify it by saying that it’s morally noxious to maim the afflicted — one should just flat-out not do it. 

The linguistic cargo of a sonnet can be very different from a LangPo word-salad approach. If you want to, and you have the technical moxie to get away with it, why not do both? Why not head for other possibilities as well?

Permanent Carnival Time is structured into nine extended poem-sections, including “Folly Suite,” a suite of nine shorter poems. For each poem-section, Smith’s scale is expansive, referencing a slate of high stakes, calling out fascism, punitive legislation, capitalism, pollution and even references to the Highland Clearances, from “Human whites ratch. // Jacobites / stomped (Clearances / to follow).” of “Fiddlesticks,” the second poem of the “Folly Suite,” to the fifth poem, “Twaddle,” that offers: “If the Highland Clearances hadn’t happened / these poems would have been written in Gaelic.” Through a gymnastic collage, Smith offers both wry commentary and straightforward notation, connecting capitalism’s insistence on itself beyond all else, including human sustainability. As he writes as part of “Transmutable,” “Something you can’t talk your way out of. / A booing economy.”

There aren’t that many poetry collections that write on the Winnipeg General Strike of 1919, so it is interesting that Smith also offers Vancouver poet Rob Manery’s It’s Not As If It Hasn’t Been Said Before (Vancouver BC: Tsunami Editions, 2001) in his notes at the end as a recommended title for further reading. On his part, Smith writes: “30,000 Winnipeg workers withdraw / their permission, walk away / from the marketplace. The Hello Girls / say their goodbyes numerous / and numinous. /// A scant 40 minutes / to pass a clampdown / amendment through Parliament. /// Austerity / follies.” (“Necessities for the Whole Hog”). In certain ways, Smith’s work has a structural echo of a poet such as American poet Sawako Nakayasu [see my review of her latest here], except with a very different set of ways through which he arrives. As part of a writing prompt Nakayasu wrote for Woodland Pattern not long ago, she offered:

1. Choose an object or concept. Let’s call this thing “X.”

2. Tell yourself, in some fashion, that every poem you write from now on is going to be “about X” or “an X poem” or features an “X.”

3. Write poems in this manner for as long as you can.

There are ways in which one could see Smith’s expansive and accumulated poems following a similar trajectory, but through a single, extended piece over Nakayasu’s book-length project. As well, where Smith contrasts from others of the loose assemblage of Kootenay School of Writers poets of the past twenty-plus years is through that ability to write around an idea or a subject, pulling it apart from every perspective, and tossing in a collage of sly commentary, jokey phrases and gymnastic, as he calls it, “word-salad.” Unlike such poets as Jeff Derksen, Louis Cabri or Dorothy Trujillo Lusk, Smith appears to originate with meaning, utilizing language as the means through which he plays, displays and explores that meaning, over a kind of composition that begins with language or sound. As well, Smith might utilize theory, but as a part of a larger structure that remains focused the ways through which people are affected by such policies, pollutions and punditries. His foundation of anti-capitalist ethos remains, and remains strong, but the poem “Necessities for the Whole Hog” begins with the history of the Winnipeg General Strike; the poem “Essaying Pain” speaks to his ongoing experience with chronic pain, etcetera. One could say that his Kootenay School of Writing poetics is also one intertwined with a deep empathy (and a curt tongue), writing out his anxieties for the possibility of human sustainability, down to a deeply personal level. As he writes as part of “Essaying Pain”:

What seems to be missing from “the literature”
is description of chronic pain or permanent affliction
that shows in any meaningful way

what, what, what, what, what
a deep-dish and ineluctable tedium it is.
 

Roaring at the sky, do you
expect a reply?

All the good temper of a rhino.

Saturday, October 31, 2020

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Fawn Parker

Fawn Parker is the author of Set-Point (ARP, 2019), Jolie Laide (Palimpsest, 2021), and Dumbshow (ARP, 2021). She is co-founder of BAD NUDES Magazine and The Parker Agency.

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?


I felt when I was young that publishing a book was an impossible and necessary thing. When I got my first book contract, I felt a sense of peace, like I could finally relax and take a look around, and see where I wanted to go next.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I first wrote poetry in childhood, around 9 or 10, and posted it on those old writing forums where users would critique each other. My mom got upset because the other writers assumed I was an adult and told me I was talentless, but I loved it and felt that bad reviews were the best way to become a better writer.
 
3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

It is very quick for me, especially prose. I write a draft as fast as I can, and then I send it out too early and nobody likes it. My final drafts are always a whole different book. My notes always come later, when I'm trying to refine something.

4 - Where does a poem or work of fiction usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

A poem begins with a line or an image, usually something that sounds like it would be in a poem. Often I will see something and imagine Frank O'Hara would probably have written about it, so I try to do that. Or, if I've most recently read something less observational, like I was really interested in Sharon Olds earlier this year, I found her tone stuck with me and I was having more "Sharon Olds" style ideas.

With fiction I tend to imagine a scene that feels powerful to me and then build a book around it. For example my most recent manuscript is about a senile writer who watches old interviews with himself and tries to re-learn his own personality. I imagined an older man watching himself on an iPad, repeating his lines, and that is where the book began.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

Readings don't feel connected to the creative process for me. They're something I like to do because I like to see my friends and it also all feels sort of necessary. I used to like to host events and be up on stage more but now I find I am liable to act embarrassing.
 
6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

This is the same question I am trying to answer in my PhD applications right now and really I don't know. I am interested in women, always, and mental illness. What I like to do with fiction is offer a perspective, and I like to be realistic in a jarring way. It's what I like to read too—when something is described in a surprising new way and I think, "that is how that is."

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

I think the role of the writer changes depending on the writer. It is a good way of recording a more creative (and honest) version of history sometimes. Reading helps us empathize too. And I think using language in new ways keeps it alive.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

It feels good in its professionality. Usually if I am working with an editor it is because I have a contract already or I'm working on an academic thesis, etc., and those things feel productive so I enjoy them. However the work itself is hard for me and I don't enjoy it the way I enjoy writing a first draft alone in my office.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?


My dad who was a banker and a tax lawyer always says, "If you're not making money you're losing money." I think about my productivity that way, which is unhealthy maybe.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to fiction)? What do you see as the appeal?

What makes it easy for me is I've never considered myself a poet, so writing poetry is low stakes. However I've always done it, even when I've consciously decided to take a break from all writing. A line or a stanza will just happen in my head. With fiction I more often sit down and think, "it's time to write fiction."

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

If I'm writing or reworking a novel with a deadline, which I'm doing now, I write a list of every scene in the book in my notebook. Then I count how many scenes I have to work on per day to finish by the deadline, and divide them up. Right now for example I'm reworking three scenes per day, every day until the end of August. I wake up early and drink 3 or 4 cups of coffee while I work, then stop around lunch time. If I'm interrupted, sometimes I'll work again at night with a glass of wine.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I read/watch interviews with writers about their work or read a book. If I am really stuck I feel depressed for a little while and eventually it resolves itself.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Patchouli reminds me of my dad, and I inherited my mom's perfume when she passed away so that reminds me of her.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

I have always been a bad reader. I used to be really proud of the fact that I never read a single book assigned to me in high school or in my bachelors degree, which really is not an impressive example of my character. I think because I read so little in my formative years my writing is mostly influenced by my real life experiences, and a little bit by things like music and TV.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?


Reading some of Richard Brautigan's novels was a big part of what made me feel excited about writing when I was a teenager. And Donald Barthelme. In my adult life I think a lot about Amy Hempel and Gail Scott when I am deciding what is important in a book, and what it should do.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?


I would like to write a long poem.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

Before my BA I was in school training to be an American Sign Language interpreter. That's what I wanted to do all through my teens and I imagine I will go back and get my certification one day unless I get some giant film deal or sell a million copies of a novel.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?


Growing up I always felt like the "dumb one" in my family of academics, so being creative was always an important part of my identity. I also was a really shy kid so writing was a way of expressing myself.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?


Maybe it doesn't count because I'm not finished yet but I'm reading Bubblegum by Adam Levin and it's great. A couple months ago I watched Good Time, the Safdie Brothers film.

20 - What are you currently working on?


I'm working on my masters thesis and editing a novel that'll be out with ARP Books next fall. It's a campus novel based on Shakespeare's Henriad, set in contemporary Toronto.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;