Sunday, January 11, 2026

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Aaron Fagan

Aaron Fagan [photo credit: Camilla Ha] is the author of four previous poetry collections, including Pretty Soon and A Better Place Is Hard to Find. His poems have appeared in Harper’s, Granta, The New Republic, and other publications.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My first book changed my life by showing me that culmination is less about arrival and more about departure. In that sense, the new work mirrors the old; it revisits the same enduring questions but through a shifting lens, say, the way Powers of Ten by Charles and Ray Eames moves closer and farther from a single point of view.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
I came to poetry thumbing around in an English textbook in the 6th grade. Our class almost entirely ignored the poetry section, but I stumbled across an Edgar Allan Poe poem, “A Dream Within a Dream,” and that made me a true believer in the magic trick of poetry that happens by virtue of breaking short of the margins.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
At this point, I write consistently, not in a set way; it’s become a recognizable feeling, a physiological pang no activity will satisfy but writing itself. It comes in stops and starts, and I don’t fight the rhythm it takes. Up to now, I have not been a project-based writer with a clear thematic subject in mind. The sonnets were an exercise in constraint that interested me, but they are tied together by an informal exploration of that form, not by any explicit unified vision.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

Poems can begin in a few ways. They can arrive in a flash, and I race to write them down before I forget them. I can misunderstand something in a way that feels interesting and write down a line or grab a group of abandoned poems, and then I dump what I have collected into something new and play musical chairs until it feels satisfying. Books come together the way poems come together, critical mass is reached, and some intangibly emergent quality arises, but no book I have published resembles its first manuscript in any way.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
I love reading; I rarely have the opportunity. I do think a poem working in its own way, read aloud, is part of its completion, even if it’s a challenging piece that would be hard for a reader to absorb on the spot.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I have some personal philosophical preoccupations that come out sideways in the work, but I do not write about things directly, and philosophies are always provisional, always doomed to fail. If anything, I write to shed my philosophies rather than reinforce them. Answers don’t interest me, but refining questions in the open-ended theater of awareness does.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in the larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
There may have been a time when the writer played some kind of role in culture, but that seems utterly anachronistic at this point. And the notion of the sage, the shaman, the canary in the coal mine, and the prophet all seem to have become suspicious enterprises. I wholeheartedly reject the Shelleyan assertion that poets are “the unacknowledged legislators of the world.”

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
I can’t say as though I have ever had the experience of an actual, extensive discussion of my work with an editor or anyone, where poems or books are engaged with any degree of depth and consideration. That absence has probably shaped my independence of mind, for better or worse.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
Yusef Lateef, an advisor of mine when I was a student at Hampshire College, once corrected me for using the word “jazz” in his presence. He said, “I have never heard of this jazz that you speak of,” then wrote on a piece of paper, “Autophysiopsychic Music Definition: Music from one’s physical, mental, and spiritual self.” That has probably taught me more about poetry than I am even aware of. He was a paragon of artistic integrity.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I write when I feel the need to write, which is not to say I have something to say. My day begins with coffee, walking the dogs, and enjoying time with my wife before I drive her to work and then come home to do what I need to do for the gear engineering magazine I edit.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I don’t think in terms of my writing ever getting stalled. I trust the ebb and flow. Inspiration has never been a part of the equation for me. I do not wait for it; it only comes through making. Inspiration is a byproduct of action. If I have ever felt inspired to write something, it almost always ends in a disaster.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
My wife loves to burn Palo Santo. And she has a ranging perfume collection, so every day there is a rotating sillage to experience.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science, or visual art?
Too many visual artists to name, but lately I feel the closest kinship with Richard Prince and Paul McCarthy. Music in rotation lately is The Moon Lay Hidden Beneath a Cloud, Magic Is Küntmaster, Amanaz, Broadcast, and Solid Space. Quanta magazine to stay up on physics. Too many movies to name, but I did watch Synecdoche, New York and Dead Poets Society again recently.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
Eliot and Ashbery are poets I found impenetrable, and now I can’t imagine my life without them. Osip Mandelstam, Yehuda Amichai, and Alan Dugan were once indispensable to me. But not any longer, which saddens me. Albert Camus. Joseph Campbell. Gaston Bachelard. Haruki Murakami. Rene Ricard. John Berryman. Chögyam Trungpa. Denis Johnson. Mark Ford. Carl Jung.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Read for more than ten minutes at a literary event.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
My dream has always been to teach creative writing or return to editing a literary journal. I was the Assistant Editor of Poetry from 1998–2002 and that experience was the joy and education of a lifetime.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
The low cost. I loved painting, film, and photography, but those are expensive media.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
The Cool School, edited by Glenn O’Brien, and rewatched The American Astronaut and Moments Like This Never Last.

19 - What are you currently working on?
I am writing a nonfiction book about DNA as the Dynamic Narrative Archetype.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Stacy Szymaszek, Essay

 

            The sunshine hit in such a way
            meticulously tracked since the 1600’s
                       on that May day recovering from food poisoning it was brighter
than my own flame and ushered in an awareness of eternity the
            light on my face within the Victorian house now in our care
touched in its duller burning days the faces of poets philosophers farmers actors
                                     I tried for weeks to say even this much
                                                 to find a tone to live in for a while.

The latest from Hudson Valley, New York poet Stacy Szymaszek is Essay (Krupskaya, 2025), a book-length sequence of twenty-five extended observational lyrics—twenty-four numbered journal-poems, each titled “ESSAY,” along with “EPILOGUE: COW PARADE”—that ebb and flow across daily rural musings and other activity. “I drove through valleys of fog day after day,” begins “ESSAY 13,” “in the El Niño winter Catskill Creek overspilled its western bank / by over 200 feet swept away an elderly woman in her car / who drove around the road flooded sign / people are surprised by how easily water can overpower us / this is what my dad said followed by advice the trick / is to roll down your window before submersion / otherwise you’ll never get the door open [.]” Composed in a style familiar to regular readers of Szymaszek’s work, Essay records the details and nuance of daily activity, thinking and movement, composing a book-length poems on and around cows, as the author spends time in a Victorian house on a working farm. As the first poem offers: “A former student thought I was a farm / hand but mine is an office job on a small fairy farm right next to the milking / barn I visit the cows to stretch my legs and rotate my neck / to address conditions brought on by decades / of sitting at a desk.”

The publication of Essay follows numerous trade collections and chapbooks by Szymaszek, including austerity measures (Fewer & Further Press, 2012) [see my review of such here], JOURNAL STARTED IN AUGUST (Projective Industries, 2015) [see my review of such here], Journal of Ugly Sites & Other Journals (Albany NY: Fence Books, 2016) [see my review of such here], The Pasolini Book (NC/NY: Golias Books, 2022) and Famous Hermits (Brooklyn NY: Archway Editions, 2022) [see my review of such here]. Szymaszek’s book-length poem flows and moves intricately, slowly, casually and meticulously across meditation and first-person interaction, including relationships the author maintains, from their partner to extended family, farm-hands and various of the animals (mostly cows). The focus is reminiscent of Lydia Davis’ own chapbook-length short story, The Cows (Louisville KY: Sarabande Books, 2011) [see my review of such here], or even Michael Ondaatje’s early poem, “As Thurber would say – C*ws” from his debut collection, The Dainty Monsters (Toronto ON: Coach House Press, 1967), a poem previously seen in Raymond Souster’s infamous anthology New Wave Canada: The New Explosion in Canadian Poetry (Toronto ON: Contact Press, 1966). The former farm-lad in me might wonder, what is it about cows that attracts the attention of these urban writers?

There is such beauty in the movement, in the pacing, of these lines, providing echoes of New York School poetics, the “I did this, I did that” of Frank O’Hara or experimental journal-lyrics of Bernadette Mayer, but one with the added factor of ethos, writing of the relationships, and the inherent responsibilities, between human and livestock. Within these documented, journaled lines, it is precisely the relationships and their significances that become highlighted, not simply a document of the day or the movement or the thinking. “Two cows were in labor they carry for nine months,” Szymaszek writes, as part of “ESSAY 10,” “‘just like us’ she said ‘yes’ / and then disappeared into a task / with no parting words. I was aware my own womb/ had been up to some crazy shit all week messing up my / menopause dreams the brain dissolves as the body smarts / in all of this bio harmony with the wombs of old culled cows / in quiescence in estrus which is not menopause / the philosopher’s words like naked slats of wood / the height of the roof in constant flux / the thing is ‘the human form is as unknown / to us as the nonhuman’ (said Bruno Latour) my body is as unknown / to me as the cow’s body as Donna’s body / which I did not eat.”

There was something that caught my eye that Szymaszek wrote as part of their essay “VIVA PASOLINI!” in the anthology Other Influences: An Untold History of Feminist Avant-Garde Poetry, edited by Marcella Durand and Jennifer Firestone (London UK/Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2024) [see my review of such here]: a sense of the poem and poet connected to civic responsibility: “[Pier Paolo] Pasolini is the first poet who teaches me to turn existing poetry spaces into spaces for poets to be possessed by civic poetry, a poetry that is imbued with reciprocity between the individual poet and society.” There is something fundamental, perhaps, in that kind of thinking, that kind of approach, and the poems in Essay do seem simultaneously lighter, and deeper, than their prior work; attempting to articulate not simply of dailyness, but of something more weighty, more ongoing. Or, as the first poem in Szymaszek’s Essay closes, with an opening as wide as any kind of possibility:

            I don’t really know how to do the job but I survive
            by showing up everyday as a poet. Sometimes I can’t
believe how silly I am but then I remember I am very young
                        and have so much to learn.

Friday, January 09, 2026

Book Your Own Reading, ed. Scott Inniss

 

Light lengthens in the evening.

Light lengthens in the evening as the day is swallowed by the horizon.

Light lengthens, casts shadows, reflects on surfaces.

Light lengthens, casts shadows, reflects on surfaces, is captured by an apparatus. 

An apparatus is designed for the capturing of light to reflect an image of the world as it is.

An apparatus is designed for the capturing of light to reflect the world as one imagines it. (“A and Not A,” A Jamali Rad)

I’m intrigued by Book Your Own Reading (Vancouver BC: Publication Studio Vancouver/Bookmachine Editions, 2025), a small anthology edited by Vancouver poet and critic Scott Inniss, and offering work by Cam Scott, Fintan Calpin, Dorothy Trujillo Lusk, Scott Inniss, A Jamali Rad, Jeff Derksen, Fan Wu, Weldon Gardner Hunter, Andrew Mbaruk and Ryan Fitzpatrick. As Inniss’ “Editor’s Note” at the end of the collection offers: “Book Your Own Reading is a companion to the Bring Your Own Reading Series. It presents material from poets for whom I helped to organize readings in 2023 and 2024. The title is a riff on the DIY punk tour supplement that Maximum Rocknroll used to publish annually until the Internet did away with analog print endeavours of this sort.” He continues:

BYO(f)R finds its initial impulse in the years immediately following the COVID-19 lockdowns, a long moment of social isolation and crisis from which poetry as a (counter)public still struggles to recover. In its most utopian aspect, what confronts poetry in Vancouver today is an economy of scarcity around the reading as a social event and relational form. Without making too big of a deal about it, BYO(f)R aims to put a dent in this scarcity. It exists to provide space for alternate social and performance forms, for experimental work or work in progress, for the testing of material, for poems that risk uncertainty and failure, or whose viability is at once fervent and tenuous.

BYO(f)R strives to maintain a productive informality as regards relations between writers and audiences (as equal and active participants). It wants to help maintain a supportive, non-judgmental, anti-hierarchial space in which to discuss poetry and its critical relation to the social.

Anthologies, whether large or small, for reading series are few and far between, but become important documents for a particular kind of on-the-ground activity within particular cities, particular communities, that aren’t always known or obvious from the outside (and even from within, at times). Toronto poet Paul Vermeersch edited The I.V. Lounge Reader (Toronto ON: Insomniac Press, 2001) to document some of the activity through the series he curated and co-created, just by the Art Gallery of Ontario; Wayde Compton and Renée Sarojini Saklikar co-edited The Revolving City: 51 Poems and the Stories Behind Them (Vancouver BC: Anvil Press/Simon Fraser University, 2015) [see my review of such here] to document some of the activity through their series Lunch Poems at SFU; outgoing directors James Moran and Jennifer Mulligan edited a celebratory anthology, Twenty-Five Years of Tree (Ottawa ON: BuschekBooks, 2005), highlighting some past readers to Ottawa’s infamous long-running standard, The TREE Reading Series (a series which, sadly, fell apart during the Covid-era) [see my mention of the collection here]. There are probably lots of other examples I’m not even remembering at the moment. What is happening on the ground in Vancouver right now? Here’s the answer, and the range and quality of the experimentation is absolutely wild. And kudos to anyone who is able to publish work by the woefully-underpublished marvel that is Vancouver poet Dorothy Trujillo Lusk:

Under begin, that’s left twice, hunker, laugh the notion, shiver. I’m on my knees, sicken, walks fridge and stoves as fiction, as autographical shortwaves distance. As evacuation as product and banishment tunes, thus avoiding seller’s defeat among lions’ feet.

Lexicaloric ever long nuts around dogs the area. Any monster is bags full, bags full. Here’s monkey out of molehills littering the peat. Tiddly fear posterior bug romance till rectitude. Subordinate substance finest finite eschewer.

Heard all palatable as “jeez still.” Nominal mumble moderates. Vigorous soft bonnets, our nieces’ proportion, heading down the predicate, as circumstances most palpable, grizzlies allow about it. Tadpoles worrying about a drag like us at home. Little most against hardly ugly dun. (Dorothy Trujillo Lusk)

While the work of most of the names within this collection I’m aware of, I had to look up information on Fintan Calpin (a poet who “recently competed his doctorate in English Literature at King’s College London researching contemporary poetry from the UK and North America,” and author of the 2025 publication Terminal City, a work that emerged from his year in Vancouver), Weldon Gardner Hunter (author of Four Poems, published by Small Ghosts in 2012) and Andrew Mbaruk (“a Black post-Canadian poet dwelling on Xʷməθkʷəy̓əm, Səl̓ilwətaɁɬ, and Swx̱wú7mesh territories . . . author of Oiseau=textual: the flying rap album and Hydro=textual: the underwater rap album”), as there aren’t author biographies included in this sleek collection, although it isn’t hard to look up at least basic information. All three of these new-to-me are doing intriguing work (as is everyone in the collection, really), but, of the trio, it was Calpin’s work that really struck:

POEM FOR GRANTA 

That’s the problem at night
    all cows are black
    perhaps comfort
means vigilance or some joke
desire plays on habit. Like
    having a cow
    & milking it too
there’s no use guessing what
    the farmer wants.
My landlord died now I have
    a landlord.
    How come
the sparrow’s at its seed though
   the squirrel’s baffled?
The board of trustees has
    been alerted.
What follows are big sad words
    like “sore ear”
though you seemed more
    like a sparrow
    in the hand.
Is it a problem with cows
   or the night?