Monday, October 26, 2020

above/ground press: 2021 subscriptions now available!

TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS! The race to the half-century continues! And with more than ONE THOUSAND TITLES produced to date through above/ground press, there’s been a ton of press activity over the past year, including some FORTY-TWO CHAPBOOKS (so far) produced in 2020 alone (including poetry chapbooks by Franco Cortese, Billy Mavreas, ryan fitzpatrick, Sarah Burgoyne and Susan Burgoyne, Paul Perry, Jérôme Melançon, Kemeny Babineau, Rose Maloukis, Sarah Burgoyne, Buck Downs, Kevin McPherson Eckhoff, Orchid Tierney, Derek Beaulieu, Julia Drescher (she’s had two this year!), Misha Solomon, Dani Spinosa, Andrew Cantrell, Mark Scroggins, Michael e. Casteels + Nick Papaxanthos, Ashley Yang-Thompson + Mikko Harvey, Ben Robinson, Khashayar Mohammadi, Melissa Eleftherion, Andrea Rexilius, Lance La Rocque, George Stanley, Rachel Kearney, J.R. Carpenter, Amanda Deutch, Stan Rogal, Guy Birchard, Razielle Aigen, rob mclennan, Anthony Etherin, Leesa Dean, Eric Baus, Ian McCulloch and Dale Tracy, all of which are still in print), as well as issues of the poetry journals Touch the Donkey [a small poetry journal], G U E S T [a journal of guest editors] and The Peter F. Yacht Club. Obviously The Factory Reading Series is on hold for the time being (until I have the time and energy to begin to try to figure out something else, I suppose), but have you seen the virtual reading series over at periodicities: a journal of poetry and poetics (with new monthly online content, by the way; the new pandemic-era extension of above/ground press).

Oh, and did you see that above/ground press has announced a new prose chapbook series? With new titles by Amanda Earl, Jane Eaton Hamilton and rob mclennan, and a forthcoming title by Keith Waldrop!

Just what else might happen? Forthcoming items also include works by Edward Smallfield, Joseph Mosconi, Brenda Iijima, Jamie Townsend, Franklin Bruno (two!), Ava Hofmann, Amish Trivedi, N.W. Lea, Alexander Joseph, Amish Trivedi (two!), David Miller, Sa’eed Tavana’ee Marvi (trans. Khashayar Mohammadi), katie o'brien, Nathanael O’Reilly, Amelia Does, Andrew Brenza, Genevieve Kaplan, Geoffrey Olsen, Franco Cortese (three more forthcoming!), Zane Koss, Dennis Cooley, Barry McKinnon and Cecilia Tamburri Stuart as well as a whole slew of publications that haven't even been decided on yet.

2021 annual subscriptions (and resubscriptions) are now available: $75 (CAN; American subscribers, $75 US; $100 international) for everything above/ground press makes from the moment you subscribe through to the end of 2021, including chapbooks, broadsheets, The Peter F. Yacht Club and G U E S T and quarterly poetry journal Touch the Donkey (have you been keeping track of the dozens of interviews posted to the Touch the Donkey site?). Honestly: if I’m making this many chapbooks per calendar year, wouldn’t you call that a good deal? I mean, it all does seem ridiculous.

Anyone who subscribes on or by November 1st will also receive the last above/ground press package (or two or three) of 2020, including those exciting new titles by all of those folk listed above, plus whatever else the press happens to produce before the turn of the new year, as well as Touch the Donkey #27 (scheduled to release on October 15), a journal that turned seven years old in 2021!

Why wait? You can either send a cheque (payable to rob mclennan) to 2423 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 7M9, or send money via PayPal or e-transfer to rob_mclennan (at) hotmail.com (or through the PayPal button at robmclennan.blogspot.com).

Stay safe! Stay home! Wear a mask! Wash your damned hands!

Sunday, October 25, 2020

RM Vaughan (1965-2020)

I don’t know what to do with this. Nearly two weeks after he had been reported missing in Fredericton, Canadian poet, writer, critic and artist RM (Richard Murray) Vaughan was found dead on Friday. At the time of this writing, there haven’t been any further details, apart from the fact that police do not suspect foul play, a piece of information that is simultaneously better and worse. I don’t even know. He had been in Fredericton as writer-in-residence at the University of New Brunswick as part of the 2019-20 academic year, but remained in the city due, I suspect, in large part, to Covid, and living with writers Nathaniel G. Moore and Amber McMillan [see Nathaniel G. Moore's piece today in The Toronto Star]. As he wrote me in an email on September 22nd of this year: “I’m waiting out the pandemic in NB. It’s sweet, quiet, cheap. Montreal can live without me for a bit.”

I first heard of Richard and his work somewhere around 1994-5 through Joe Blades [see my obituary for Joe here, who also died this year], back when Richard (originally from Saint John, New Brunswick) was still living in Halifax. Richard was writing poetry and plays, and making small films, if my recollections are correct. Or was he in Toronto by then, having relocated from Halifax? I know I caught his work in the anthologies Plush, ed. Michael Holmes and Lynn Crosbie (Coach House Press, 1995) and The Last Word, ed. Michael Holmes (Insomniac Press, 1995). It was around that time that I began to visit Toronto a couple of times a year, hanging out with Michael O’Connor (publisher of Insomniac) and Michael Holmes, among others, and Richard was just around. He was a couple of years my elder, and he seemed to be everywhere. I saw him at readings, social gatherings and on the street; I saw his work in journals and anthologies, and heard him read. We spoke of his poetry manuscript-in-progress, the book that became his full-length debut, a selection of dazzling scarves (ECW Press, 1996). I might have been the only one who preferred his prior title, “the sand that is everywhere,” and I even tried to use the title myself, given he wasn’t. I couldn’t quite manage to write anything that properly fit (perhaps he had the same issue; perhaps this was the issue all along). My poem for Richard, utilizing his title, appeared in my own first ECW title a couple of years later.

This was back in the Toronto days of Blood & Aphorisms magazine, of Tortoiseshell & Black, of the Toronto Small Press Book Fair, of Insomniac Press’ monthly reading series at Tower Records, all of which Richard seemed to be around for, whenever I floated through town. There was Richard alongside contemporaries such as Mike O’Connor, Phlip Arima, Stan Rogal, Stephen Cain, Nancy Dembowski, Jay MillAr, Natalee Caple, Stuart Ross, Death Waits (now known as Jacob Wren) and John Barlow, etcetera. During those days, Richard was actively working on poetry, plays, fiction and film, which eventually moved into writing on visual art, all of which he seemed enthusiastic about, even if he did also produce the occasional (often witty) caustic remark. It was part of the package of Richard, to comment at some disappointment or foolishness, that it could all be done better. Why isn’t it being done better?

Richard had such great titles. I included his poem “HOW TO SPEND MOST OF YOUR TIME ALONE AND STILL WRITE CONVINCINGLY ABOUT SEX” in an issue of STANZAS (#8, May 1996) alongside “The Big Fuck,” by Judith Fitzgerald [see my obituary for her here], a gesture that seemed ridiculously appropriate, and even perfect. How could I ever have been so lucky? I included some of his work in an issue of Missing Jacket (#5, April 1997). I published his poem “the seven good reasons why The Boys In The Band could be a musical     or, I am the dollar in the dolorosa” asn an above/ground press broadside (#44, 1997), most likely timed for some event I knew I would see him at. See what I mean? His titles were magnificent. Not long after that, I published his single-poem chapbook 14 Reasons Not To Eat Potato Chips On Church Street (April, 1999), composed as a list poem, and as a love poem (with snarky comments and critiques) for Toronto’s Gay Village. As the poem reads:

3.         If you have to drop by The 519, the tight-faced lesbian at the front counter will remind you, correctly, that queer youth of colour are being physically and verbally absued in Third World sport shoe factories owned by the parent company of Frito Lay.
           
How could you?

4.         And what are you gonna do with the bag? It can’t be recycled (see #3).

He would mail me items occasionally, and randomly. Small notes, occasionally on print-outs of images not fit for all audience. All sent mischievously, and with a positive note and a great deal of love. The piece Alana Wilcox posted yesterday over at Coach House reminded me of such.

And of course I can’t find my copy of his second poetry collection, Invisible to Predators (ECW Press, 1999), to verify how much or how little of that material might have appeared there. I really don’t know. If not, that would presume that these pieces never made it into print beyond these small bits of ephemera. During this same period (most likely in 1997, possibly as a tour for his poetry debut), he read for my reading series, The Factory Reading Series at Gallery 101, when the series was still called “poetry 101,” and held in the gallery space above Wallacks, at Bank and Lisgar Streets. He was reading with British Columbia poet Joe Rosenblatt, who had returned to town to read from a volume of selected poems and visual art that had been refused by the original printer (a whole other story), thus missing the event that had already passed by, the opening of Rosenblatt’s gallery show at the Carleton University Gallery. I think the week that fit into their schedule was one that had held a number of other literary events, which meant our audience was but two people. Rosenblatt didn’t seem to expect much (the empty liquor bottle underneath his chair after he had left provided some answers to Joe's casual indifference to the small crowd), thanks to the printer of the book, and Richard just seemed amused by it. Richard read first, and one of the audience, most likely not prepared for Richard’s openly gay content, walked out during his reading. Richard seemed delighted by this, and said after that he was going to tell people that “half of his audience walked out” at the Ottawa launch. And in hindsight, Richard's response to this one lone audience member underscores the realities of his approach to life and to art, having come out as a gay man during a period of time that wasn't necessarily safe or welcoming; and the fact that he was an openly, and seemingly comfortable, gay man exploring some of this content in his work, makes it that much more remarkable. He wasn't the first, not even of his generation, to be writing out gay themes and issues, but from the time I first became aware of him, he was consistently producing work, writing and publishing and exploring, in a way that might have provided him enormous difficulty, or even harm. Simply by being himself; his own delightful, funny and scathingly-witty self.

9.         Drop one chip, just one, and you’re increasing the typhus-carrying microbe population by about 2 billion. Thanks a lot.

10.        One publically-consumed bag of chips is sexually counter equal to: one flattering new haircut, 3 subtle yet penetrating colognes, any favourite, loose-fitting flannel shirt, plus a whole week’s worth of consciously sucking in your stomach at 30 seccond intervals. Double the ratios for Ketchup flavour.
           
Math never lies.

I remember having conversations about him about adoption, as he too was adopted. I had always been interested, and been looking; he was less interested, and published a lengthy article on Parent Finders as being useless and a big scam, basically. The title of a 2018 opinion piece he wrote for The Globe and Mail offered much of what his thoughts on the matter seemed to be: “As a person who was adopted, I'm not lost, I’m lucky.” In March 2014, Richard was in Ottawa (for an arts jury, we think; most likely with the Canada Council) and came over to visit. We spent an evening—Christine, Richard and myself (with four month old Rose)—in our sunroom, talking about everything and anything, and drinking wine. We talked for hours, as though there hadn't been years since I'd seen him. Why didn’t we take any photographs while he was here? He took a cab here, and we hung out for hours in the sunroom, before he wandered off again in another cab. He was charming and witty and delightful, and I most likely loaded him down with chapbooks.

Later on, he responded via email to my journal G U E S T with enthusiasm as well, asking if he could edit an issue as well, not realizing it was a journal for current or former editors of small presses. Earlier this year, when I suggested he could do with what he wished for periodicities, he became immediately enthused, and worked on editing a folio of Queer poets from New Brunswick. After we had posted it, Shane Neilson of Frog Hollow Press had requested Richard expand the project, for the sake of a chapbook, which Richard was very excited about, and actively working on. Might that book still be possible? I had been looking forward to seeing it. The folio also meant that we’d been corresponding over email quite a lot since March (and the essay I posted of his in April, as part of the “Talking Poetics” series), with multiple back-and-forths, including photographs he’d send along, including one of the dog he said he was living with, of whom Richard seemed quite fond. He was excited on my behalf for the half-sibling and birth mother updates and photos I’d been sending him. On March 4th, he responded with: “Your new found siblings are adorable! As, of course, are you. And I'm glad to hear things are better for your dad and Christine. You've been through quite a bit the last few years. Can you go on strike? Tried that once, didn't really work for me, but hey?”

He was warm, generous, energetic, cranky and enthusiastic. He was a champion for those who needed it, and very much attentive to the kinds of assistance he could provide to younger writers. He even wrote on above/ground press's 25th anniversary, when no one else would. How would he have felt about trending on Twitter, I wonder? I know he would have absolutely hated that the original notification from the Fredericton police was his driver's licence photo (both photographs here of Richard were provided by Richard himself, earlier this year). And oh, that wicked wit. I liked him very much and I will miss him a great deal.

And now I’ve been more than two hours seeking out his Invisible to Predators on my bookshelves. Unsuccessfully, I might add, although I did find my copy of his third poetry book, ruined stars (2004), a book that writes about, among other subjects, trauma, visual art, pop culture and queer identity, including this, from a collaboration with the painter William Forrestall, “Conversations with Will”:

(I don’t know about you) But
I’m tired of running around, spending my days
absorbing, absorbing, absorbing
 

being smart and unhappy at the same time

It’s too much, it makes my hair gray it keeps me up at night it makes me eat
more than I want to
it drowns out the me in things
 

simple things, the stink of an apple   the weight of a full mug
the heartlessness of the cold air when I walk
home or –
 

Yes, that Me, that conceit     is just Desire
           
Sure, but      who doesn’t want the world?

 

Saturday, October 24, 2020

essays in the face of uncertainties

One element I’ve appreciated is how well our two young ladies play together, making up games and stories and songs. We knew of this prior, but our appreciation deepens. Once we wrestle them off the tablets, our first couple of weeks included the television on in the basement, which quickly became background to their attentions. After a while, they stopped even bothering going downstairs at all, unless they were wrapped up in some complicated game involving forts or babies or Cinderella. How many times has our dining room table become centre-stage for one of their structures, or where they’ve self-determined a Lego city, a mound of drawings or some other invention? Today, self-slathered in sunscreen, they navigate the hose and their wading pool out in the backyard, occupying themselves for hours. I grew up on a farm, after all, so I very early on learned the benefit of managing my own time, wandering the fields and collecting stones. The last thing I want to do is micromanage the young ladies, although I do attempt to get Rose to draw daily in one of her notebooks, and report on her drawing. We’ve only managed this once, but I keep trying her. I check in on them, regularly. Or they come inside, seeking freezies. Little wet footprints on the floor of my office that run down the hall.

Another element is the array of stories that have drifted up, out of the ether, of comparable stories from days-gone-past. This is not the first time in memory that those in the world have lived through such a situation, even if some of the details might be slightly different. Public television offers a small tale of a centenarian who is living through the current pandemic, born during the lock-down of the Spanish Flu, her mother somehow managing solo throughout birth and her newborn daughter’s first few months. You can do this, the piece offers. You can get through this. In the June issue of Smithsonian Magazine, Emily Moon writes “How the U.S. Fought the 1957 Flu Pandemic.” Her short article begins:

In April 1957, a new strain of a lethal respiratory virus emerged in East Asia, caught local health authorities by surprise and eventually killed masses of people worldwide. Today, in the age of Covid-19, that scenario sounds frighteningly familiar—with one key difference. Maurice Hilleman, an American microbiologist then running influenza monitoring efforts at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, saw the problem coming and prepared the United States ahead of time. “This is the pandemic,” he recalled saying. “It’s here.”

This is not historically abstract in the way the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic might appear to us, but something, for numerous people, that occurred within living memory. To remember the 1957 pandemic, one might say, would put you disproportionally right in the path of Covid-19. Back then, there was notice, notification and response, and 116,000 Americans succumbed to the disease, although far more could have been killed. Over email, Bay Area poet Susanne Dyckman offers her own:

When I was a baby I had scarlet fever, and the Chicago Board of Health tacked a quarantine notice on our basement apartment door.  My mother’s not alive (gone too early) but I so wish I could talk to her about it, how she managed with an infant and a five year old, even something as basic as how she got groceries. All she ever told me was that we, as a family, were under quarantine (of course, somehow my doing?)  Later, still being a kid when she told me the story, I didn’t think to ask questions.  Now I’m beginning to see what it takes to manage.

According to family lore, my mother caught scarlet fever while babysitting, although I’ve no clue if there were any quarantines for her, still living at home with her parents, and four of six siblings. It was this that, according to family lore, affected her health and began the eventual loss of her kidneys, and her inability to have children of her own. Isolated incidents are never that, and there are lessons to learn from any situation. And yet, we can watch in real time as segments of the population refuse the lessons and warnings of history.

It is hard to look at those numbers and see, on the other side, individuals holding up hand-made signs with “I want a haircut!” With fear comes desperation. And there is little logic to, or argument against, desperation. Someone on Twitter suggests that of course there are those who consider haircuts, the casino and other short-term pleasures worth the risk. Because they’ve no hope for anything else.


essays in the face of uncertainties


Friday, October 23, 2020

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Norm Boucher

Norm Boucher’s memoir Horseplay is due to be released in November 2020 and is an account of his time spent as an RCMP undercover officer working with heroin addicts on Vancouver’s Granville Strip. He retired after a successful and rewarding career in the RCMP, and now resides in Ottawa.

How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My first book is coming out in a few weeks. Initially, it gave me personal pride just to know that I had finished what I had set out to do. Then, when my publisher (Newest Press) called, a new dimension was added to my life. My feelings went from pride to being thankful. I am still adjusting to the public side of writing.

2 - How did you come to memoir first, as opposed to, say, fiction or poetry?

The story dictated what would come first. I knew that my time spent on the Granville Strip, in Vancouver was a story I wanted to tell, so I committed to it before everything else. Meanwhile, I kept writing and studying all forms of writing, for which I still keep an interest.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I usually begin writing only when I have a picture in my mind of what I want to say. Then I think of the structure and write the main elements down. After that it’s a slow process. I do multiple drafts and am constantly revising. It took me close to ten years to write “Horseplay”.

4 - Where does a work of prose usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

I like to start with an image and build from there, finding the elements that makes the story  worth telling.  An image brings along all the questions a writer needs to answer: how did I get here? What does it mean?  I don’t think too much about the length of the piece. When writing “Horseplay” I remembered driving away for the last time from Granville Street and thinking of the people I had met and what had happened. I had strong feelings about it and I knew that had become a different person than at the time the undercover operation started. That image carried me through the story.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I haven’t done public readings yet and I hope to enjoy it. Maybe it will make me look at my own writing in a different light. I don’t feel comfortable reading what I have written in the past unless it is to re-write or edit, so this is a new experience for me.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

Finding the basic human traits we all have, even if they lay deeper in some of us due to circumstances, is what interests me. On a lighter note, I just like a good story, and knowing that someone will find a welcome escape in my writing would be enough for me to keep writing.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

I believe that giving someone an opportunity to explore and live a situation that is foreign to them is the main role of a writer. It helps us understand each other and reflect on our own place in life. But for that to happen, the work also has to be interesting and entertaining.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

It is essential and should not be more difficult than the writing itself. An outside editor is an extension of what a writer does every day. It should be looked at in the same light. Disagreements should be welcomed and the writer should not be afraid of making hard decisions. Decisions are a part of every sentence, and every word you put down.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

When you’re done writing, leave something for the next day. Sometimes this means writing the first sentence of the next chapter or paragraph before closing the laptop. I believe Hemingway said it (not the laptop part…). It is so much easier to sit at the table and have something in mind before you start. It also gives you something to think about while you are not writing.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I like writing in the morning, if I can. Or after having been outside doing something physical. Otherwise, I don’t really have a schedule and I blend my writing time into my life. This is something I learned to do while holding a full time job and raising a family with my wife.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I leave it and go jogging or ride my bike. When I find myself writing the story in my mind as I run or bike, or watch a movie, I know that it is time to go back to it and write.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

The hoppy smell of a brewing plant, mixed with a food factory, and a distillery. I am from a factory town and I remember smelling it coming home from camping trips with the family. I knew then that I was home. I still like it.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

Paintings, movies, and music all work for me. I often feel like writing after visiting an art gallery.  It all seems to work off the same muscles.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

I love fiction that is true to its characters and places. This is something I appreciate more in Canadian fiction than in anywhere else. I also love to return to the classics, some of which I can open anywhere on a page and enjoy reading a paragraph or two. I like how some books can capture a time and place as Hemingway and Steinbeck did in the 30’s, the Beat Generation’s On the Road and Naked Lunch in the fifties, and Updike’s in the sixties. Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Jose Cela, and James Joyce, among others, also had an impact on me.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

My life so far has been very fulfilling and my goal is to keep writing.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I am fascinated by scientists who travel to remote places, such as New Guinea and the Amazon to study an insect, a lost civilization, or a type of rock formation. It seems that we still have a lot to figure out about this planet and it would be exciting to be a part of that.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I remember having an picture in my mind as a kid and writing the story behind it so that the picture became alive on the page. I felt good believing that I had done it and I have been writing ever since.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Book: The Innocents: A novel by Michael Crummey

Film: Double Jeopardy a film noir set in LA about an insurance salesman who gets involved in a murder.

19 - What are you currently working on?

I spent the last ten years dedicating my writing to “Horseplay” and am eager to explore and undertake new writing challenges. I have also started to put some words down on a new project, but it is too early for me to really talk about it.


12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Thursday, October 22, 2020

Pearl Pirie, footlights

 

plumbing

the guest cabin’s dimensions
are those of Thoreau’s, the boards
and logs, rough hewn.
 

there is a sink with a tube
to a bucket, plastic keg of water
which forms a modern luck of birth.
 

spring blossoms white. the diva cup
is full, squatting to pinch it out
it spills into the thirsty floor.
 

a sin, a repenting. I have made
a blood sacrifice yet feel guilty
more keenly than before.
 

I scrub but it’s absorbed. I pour
water: the water stains, worse,
watermarks a ripple in the grain.
 

the tree still feels the season—
spring bursts a bead of sap
from cut limbs, immortal pine.

Composed from the wilds of her rural Quebec home, poet, editor and publisher Pearl Pirie’s fourth full-length poetry title is footlights (Regina SK: Radiant Press, 2020), following on the heels of been shed bore (Ottawa ON: Chaudiere Books, 2010), Thirsts (Montreal QC: Snare Books, 2011), which won the Robert Kroetsch Award for Innovative Poetry, and the pet radish, shrunken (Toronto ON: Book*hug, 2015), which won the Archibald Lampman Award (Radiant Press is the publishing house formerly known as Hagios Press, in case you were unaware). There is something I’ve only been realizing recently, with the publication of Perth, Ontario poet Phil Hall’s latest poetry title, NIAGARA & GOVERNMENT (St. John’s, Newfoundland: Pedlar Press, 2020) [see my review of such here]: the extent to which Pirie’s writing has been influenced by Hall’s rhythms, cadences and lyrical impulses. Knowing full well that Hall came first, I could hear numerous examples of overlap when reading Hall’s latest, an idea that is simply reinforced through my reading of Pirie’s footlights. “no cattle were harmed / in the making of these statements.” she writes, to close out the poem “what used to work with me,” a notion and notation that could easily have emerged from one of Hall’s own poems. Not that there’s anything wrong with influence, whether through Hall or anyone else, and Hall’s attentions to and pauses around the small, even within such large, complex and often emotionally difficult realms, is worthy of larger and repeated influence [full disclosure: I worked my own Hall variations for a few years, circa 2004-7, around the time I was deeply immersed in his writing for the first time].

Whereas Hall works the full-length poetry book as his unit of composition, composing poems as extensions of each other into a singular, collaged purpose, Pirie’s book-length constructions are more attentive to the self-contained poem. It is as though Pirie’s attention doesn’t emerge through the impulse of the book-length sequence via Hall’s (where my own attentions leaned into his work). Instead, her poems cohere together differently; grouping as gatherings that are then themselves gathered, to form book manuscripts. Her poems are less sequential than an impulse of cohering molecules, that assemble for the sake of a larger, singular shape and structure.

Still, one should also note that, much like her Ottawa contemporary, Amanda Earl, Pirie is constantly experimenting with form, and the structural elements of her poems appear to shift between projects: while one particular chapbook or book-length work might lean toward longer, more extended poems within the larger structure, this particular work favours (although not exclusively) either the couplet or three-line stanza, extending her individual lyrics no further than a page. And increasingly across her published work, hers is a deep attention in a short space, in a density composed with quick turns and snap. “is it stoicism to be prepared,” she writes, to end “the door of birdsong,” “to dig the darling’s grave // or depression’s eye-slits / in feathered masquerade? // as if leaving a movie, blink to / these hundreds of greens.”

And while there are certainly elements of Hall’s halts, breaks and pauses in her work, Pirie is more magpie than killdeer, picking up elements to incorporate into the structures of her simultaneously sketched and crafted moments of accident, interaction, meditation, observation and description. Her poems seem composed as ways in which one might not just work to articulate the world, but through speaking, better comprehend. “there’s something that isn’t / intention.” she writes, to open “in the room grown dark,” the first poem in the collection. Much like Hall, her narratives are thoughtful, carefully casual, intimate and provide the sheen of disjointed, bouncing across sound and language while covering a much larger and connected ethic. “grey is not the season for eyes,” she writes, to open the poem “as the tops die,” “but for hands, tongues. / under overcast skies / cup from the frost-wet earth / potatoes.”

Her poems seek and search, and work to gather and absorb as much as possible. “what if the universe isn’t moral?” she asks, to open “homogenized script,” “what if most people are not, in fact, lost?” We three might all have emerged from different corners of rural Ontario, but there is an articulation, a hint, of violence that exist within the work of both Hall and Pirie; external forces beyond their control that they have endured, attempting since to process, and potentially move beyond. There is something just under the surface of these poems that she both teases and tears at, working to move through and move past, as though her poems have finally become mature enough to allow her to wrestle with it in a slightly more overt form. And yet, at the same time, one could argue that Hall’s entire work-to-date is made up of a single, life-long poem if you set his books end-to-end; Pirie’s might be as well, although with less linear a trajectory between concurrently-produced projects, books and poems, composed more as an assemblage of fractals from the central point of Pirie herself, writing within the hub of a lyric trajectory of exhuberent chaos and carefully composed poem-thoughts.

bless

for years I would inherit the earth
but I’m no longer meek enough

to nod, receive the destruction,
the stripped & the desecrated.

oaks continue to drop acorns.
pupating in cotton & predawn light

dubbing his dick move a teapot
does nothing towards a cup of tea.

so he brags about being a bastard…
what right have I to override

his sense of self? acorns drop.
those who consume them will.

footlights is organized into five sections—“even electricity wants to continue,” “footlights,” “for the purposes of night,” “ample misadventures” and “pretending there are distinctions”—foregoing her occasional interest in sequences for groupings, or even suites, of short lyrics. In an interview posted July 14, 2019 as part of the Wombwell Rainbows Interviews series, she refers to the poems in this collection as “more zany and offbeat poems,” and there are pieces here that reference overly confident young poets who read in open sets (but leave prior to the featured reader), staff at chain bookstores, birdsong, gardening centres and food shopping. In short self-contained bursts, Pirie’s poems in footlights include anything and everything you might imagine, whether a New Year’s Eve party where the narrator wishes everyone would leave, already, at 2am, or grocery shopping, as the distance of commentary provide an immediacy to these poems, one that also provides the impression of the notebook quick-sketch. The poems sparkle for that immediacy, one that only really emerges through the craft.

lost in a very small maze

my resolve is to solve her public
smile. stemmed from his shoulder clap
her pat has a thumb dug in as a warning.
 

much is in the spin. my axle is mercy,
dizzying mercy. feeling a drop run
down my leg I think blood. Sweat, I think.

my unconscious has been leaking again.

even when he doesn’t look
the looking away is as much of a telltale.
yet he would blindfold her too.

if looks could melt steel, a molten river:
her claim staked. her beefcake.
who I could nourish, protect behind my gates?

her
from herself, or him from her?

 

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

ottawater #16.0 [the final issue]: Ottawa's annual poetry pdf journal

Ottawa’s annual pdf poetry journal
edited by rob mclennan



It might be ten months late (oh, what a year), but the sixteenth and FINAL ISSUE of ottawater is now online, featuring new writing by a plethora of current and former Ottawa-based poets, including Susan J. Atkinson, John Barton, Dessa Bayrock, Frances Boyle, Ronnie R. Brown, Mike Caesar, Anita Dolman, Amanda Earl, Doris Fiszer, Mark Frutkin, Shoshannah Ganz, Bob Hogg, Jenna Jarvis, Kathleen Klassen, a.m. kozak, Mary Elizabeth Long, IAN MARTIN, Karen Massey, Robin McLachlen, rob mclennan, Colin Morton, Pearl Pirie, Sarah Priscus, Claudia Coutu Radmore, Monty Reid, Sonia Saikaley, Ronald Seatter, Rachel Small, Lesley Strutt, Lauren Turner, Tomasz W. Wiszniewski, Jean Van Loon and Yuan Changming.

http://www.ottawater.com

Founded to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the City of Ottawa, Canada's glorious capital city, "ottawater," and its chemical formula/logo "O2(H2O)," is a poetry annual produced exclusively on-line, in both readable and printable pdf formats, and found at http://www.ottawater.com. An anthology focusing on Ottawa poets and poetics, its first issue appeared in January 2005, 150 years after old Bytown became the City of Ottawa.

As well, all previous issues remain archived on the site. Thanks to: designer Tanya Sprowl, for her stunning design work and excellent visual art curation; the ottawa international writers festival, one of the finest organizations our town has; and Randy Woods at non-linear creations (I owe you much for this, sir) for their continuing support on this project. I really couldn't have done any of it without you.

Tuesday, October 20, 2020

P-QUEUE 17 : Movement

 

today the news
stays
     
won’t you?
 

I have been possible
     
once
     
and for all
 

I who can’t fight
     
feel it
   
  even name it

anymore

that’s how it has to feel

or I have thought so
I have thought
     
that

out of the light
comes what I think
 

and what I think
is I
     
would

love you (Rachelle Toarmino, “What Kind of Love is That”)

Anyone who has been paying attention to my reviewing over the years already knows that I’m an admirer of the annual journal P-QUEUE out of SUNY-Buffalo, having reviewed most of the volumes-to-date (see reviews of sixteen, fifteen, fourteen, ten to thirteen, seven and eight, and five; and I’m still hoping that copies of the first few volumes might be possible to find at some point). Edited by incoming editors Dana Venerable and Zack Brown, P-QUEUE has always provided a high quality of experimental writing by an interesting mix of emerging and established writers, in no small part, I’m sure, due to the strong writing program that exists at the university (and issues deliberately don’t repeat authors). For similar reasons, I used to be a big admirer of the annual Headlight anthology as well, produced through Montreal’s Concordia University, another university with a strong creative writing program, but I haven’t seen an issue there for about two years [see my review of the last ones I saw,here]. This issue of P-QUEUE includes work by Nathan Alexander Moore, Aimée Lê, Julianne Neely, Tracie Morris, Claire Tranchino, Will Alexander, Edwin Torres, Rachelle Toarmino, Amy Catanzano, Julie Patton and Jiwon Ohm, most of whom I had been previously unfamiliar with. For their introduction, editors Venerable and Brown include an exchange between them on their thoughts on approaching the issue, and on the work they’ve chosen to include. The conversations reads as a bit long and meandering, but provides an interesting overview of what they’re working towards as editors, writers and simply creative humans living in the world (all of which becomes even further relevant when one considers that most editors of the journal-to-date are involved in editing multiple issues, suggesting an attention and aesthetic towards not only what we are currently reading, but what is to come). As Venerable writes as part of their exchange:

[…] The movements of judgement, of racism, are too urgent, too forceful, too violent. Dare I/we go on? Ohm shares that we must. Lastly, in “Apologies…” Ohm’s list of revisions / revised thoughts—emphasis on #11 and #12—inspired by T.S. Eliot moves through a constant state of stability within instability, something that I think about a lot within my own life and writing. “The rock which forms in your throat when you look at one’s back.” Is this “love,” always in flux?  I agree with Ohm’s notes that I may also never grasp what poetry is, but it is that searching for meaning, that processing, that allows for poetic conversations, musical dialogues of care, very much present in this volume. The task at hand, or at body, is to put as much work into our actions, our ethics, our lifestyles as we do in our artistic creations.

Z [Zack Brown]: Agreed! The pieces in this volume, each in their own way, work at the fulcrum between language and body, which shows (to circle back to the beginning of our discussion) that political life and poetic life are perhaps not the same, but nonetheless forcibly entangled. What we do with our bodies is guided by our language. […]

One of the first pieces in the journal to jump out at me was the  ten-part sequence “An Elegy for Unsaid Things,” by Nathan Alexander Moore, a recent SUNY-Buffalo graduate currently pursuing a doctoral degree from the University of Texas. The fourth poem in the sequence reads:

What does it mean to be moved?

To run from the present?

To move toward uncharted geography?

To pack your life into parts,

                        Leaving behind big & small moments,

                        Dumping all your desires & detritus into boxes

                        Affixed with the promise of packing tape?

To remember to not say goodbye?

To know you will fade into a barely realized recollection?

To get into a car & refuse to hold (back) your tears?

To wonder if the future even exists

                        As you watch the present crumble

                        Into a fine point in the rearview mirror?

To ponder how you will get to the other side of the horizon?

I am also very taken with (and amused by) Vietnamese American writer and artist Aimée Lê’s selection of prose poems, such as the piece “WHY AM I ALWAYS FALLING OFF A CLIFF?” that opens: “Why did I think if you missed a meal, you might die? I asked, ‘When you’re diabetic and you miss a meal, do you, like, die?’ Notice I only said that after the banana was secured in your jaw. I am very brave. I don’t like to be a cause of panic. I walk very calmly out the door and then break into a run. I didn’t used to run during the day because I was scared that the drivers of cars would see me trying too hard. Why do all these insects, flower petals and ash keep sticking to me? Do they think I am an altar?” I clearly need to read more work by both of these authors. Award-winning poet Julianne Nealy, author of chapbooks through Slope Editions and Garden Door Press, includes this note at the end of her poem “Miracle”: “After learning of the theme—MOVEMENT—I was interested in learning about what it takes in our bodies to actually make a movement occur. What I quickly learned through an overwhelming amount of dense and abstract scientific language, that is a miracle our bodies move at all. This is the meditation on that, that follows.” Her poem includes:

Side of muscles acting on either biaxial
Or without bending of

Articulation allows for rotation causes
The ulna into contact with a

Type of a circle it laterally away from
Circumduction is suddenly

Movement that take place within the
Contraction or thigh either the

That help to stick out the limb laterally
Away from side

Produced by the limb superior rotation
Causes the opposing movement such

Synovial joint returning the neck or elbow
Allow the elbow knee

Joint gives the ball and involves a joint
Allows the coronal

Determined by combination of inversion
Than eversion of inversion is extension

Structural type while adduction and gives
The summation of movements identify

And so on, moving at quite a pace for a number of pages. While it would be entirely possible to move through the whole issue, suffice it to say that this is worth picking up. You should probably pick up a copy. Why haven’t you picked up a copy?


Monday, October 19, 2020

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Deborah-Anne Tunney

Deborah-Anne Tunney is a poet, short story writer and novelist who was born in Ottawa. Her linked short story collection, The View from the Lane was published in 2014 by Enfield and Wizenty, who also published her novel Winter Willow which came out December 2019. Her latest book, A Different Wolf, come out in June 2020 from McGill-Queen’s University Publications. She was a Communication Officer at the National Research Council of Canada for years, and in the evening studied at Carleton University, University of Ottawa, and the Writing Program at Humber College. She lives in Ottawa with her mate, André Savary, and their three cats.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My first book was a collection of stories, entitled The View from the Lane, a collection I worked on with my mentor, Isabel Huggan. It’s hard to express how happy it made me feel to see it in print after so many years of working on it, and certainly it helped to validate, especially to myself, that I was indeed a writer, and a writer for whom a publisher (Enfield and Wizenty) was willing to use their resources to champion. I was frankly honoured by that. Then they also published my novel, Winter Willow five years later, which made me doubly grateful.

            My most recent work is my first collection of poetry, A Different Wolf. I had been writing these poems on the life and work of Alfred Hitchcock for over a decade. And again, I am so grateful for the faith McGill-Queen’s has shown and for their support of A Different Wolf. Robert Graves once said that his prose books “are the show dogs I breed to support my show cats, poetry” and that seems to me an apt way to distinguish between them.  I’ve always found poetry to be as contrary, unruly and beautiful as cats, and prose to be some sort of an attempt at order, as beautiful as that can be (to give dogs their due).

2 - How did you come to fiction first, as opposed to, say, poetry or non-fiction?

Actually, like many writers – my first love being words and their power to evoke emotions and empathy – my first writings were poetry. That’s when I was young, when I had not yet recognized the entrenched patterns that I later would want to explore through prose.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I am a slow writer, a writer who depends upon editing to make evident the topic or theme of a particular work. Only through reworking and thinking about where the initial impulse came from will the larger import of the work become known. There is a lot of putting it aside, and thinking about it, or just forgetting it for a while. I usually have multiple projects on the go, so that I will be working on poetry at the same time as writing short stories, or longer works. In this way when I stall, I can work on something else, and come back to the original project when I’ve eliminated some of the stumbling blocks. I do wish though, that at a certain point, I’d feel a piece was finished and further editing unneeded. That does not seem to happen, as the editing never feels done.

4 - Where does a poem or work of fiction usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

I find the impulse to write poetry different from the impulse to write prose. With poetry something will strike me, and I will need to put it into words quickly. I am part of a wonderful poetry group that meets on Tuesdays called the Ruby Tuesdays, and every week part of our meeting is devoted to a writing exercise. Sometimes these exercises can produce poems that I will keep and rework. But prose usually comes about because of either an image or a feeling that will not leave until I capture it through writing, or at least attempt to. It does not have the same urgency to write as a poem, but will nag until I do something with the memory, or with the character, or whatever it is that will not leave me alone. I’m also part of an invaluable short story group, which meets monthly and includes some wonderful local writers.

            When I began my short story collection, it was by writing separate stories that I only realised later related closely enough to each other to be considered linked. It took a while, but at some point it became clear that there was a sort of gravitational pull between them. I had to work to make the links obvious but gradually, as planets and stars start to circle and exist in relation to each other, the stories settled into a form that was cohesive and interconnected.

            Unlike poetry, which tends to find its themes after the writing of the poems, my novel Winter Willow began as an experiment, where I knew, in broad strokes, what would happen. There were surprises that came about in the writing, of course – that it grew to be novel length, being one – but writing it was more a matter of ploughing through after establishing the underlying structure, and then, of course, years of editing.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

Readings are difficult for me. Although, I don’t feel they are counter to my creativity, I never feel comfortable doing them. What I do enjoy though is the venue where these readings happen, when I get to be with my friends and like-minded people. At times, this is even worth the agony of reading.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

This is such a complex question. My writing is in answer to the need to explore why life falls into certain patterns through time. It tries to tame experience into something that can be held, examined, and hopefully at the same time be recognizable to other people. I feel I am merely scratching the surface to say that writing (mine and others) attempts to give something like cohesiveness to the chaos we live with and within. It telescopes a moment and lets it stand in for all moments – and in so doing tells us that there is indeed meaning to be uncovered (or some would argue, created), that can link us with empathy, and, as Kafka famously said, attack the frozen sea within.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

Oh yes, I believe writers have an almost sacred role, and that’s to show the reader how we are all linked by our humanity. I remember when I was younger thinking that I’d be better off and more productive if I could build something, like a house, that could be used by someone. But now I see literature as a way to show how similar we are, how through empathy and the use of imagination, both that of the writer and reader, we can expand our awareness beyond our own life and circumstances, in essence building a mental structure where the mystery of life can be explored and shared. Plus I do not possess the skills to build a house (regrettably).

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

The editor at Enfield and Wizenty, Ingeborg Boyens, edited both my book of short stories and the novel. I very much enjoyed the back and forth of working with her, and especially enjoyed having someone who was as invested, as I was, in making the work the best it could be. For the poetry manuscript I worked with Allan Hepburn at McGill University, and again the editing process was a gift in that I felt supported and that the work was viewed as valuable, worthy of the care he showed it. He made some brilliant suggestions for the placement of the poems, and for that I am especially indebted. So, basically my experience of working with editors has been immensely positive and has helped to improve the final product of the books.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

I read that when Eudora Welty was asked what her advice to a young writer would be, she said, “If you can stop, stop.” And seeing I cannot stop, well, that seems a sign I must continue. Also my mentor Isabel said once that the world does not need another mediocre book, so make it good. I’ve tried to live up to that dictate.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to fiction)? What do you see as the appeal?

As I mentioned, I started by writing poetry when I was young, but by my twenties I had started writing prose. I realized then that in order to write well, I had to appreciate excellence in writing, and so I started university in the evening, studying English Literature and Language. I always wrote poetry but felt it was mine alone and seldom, if ever, shared. I concentrated on writing short stories for years. Then the opportunity to join the poetry group came up (thank you, Jean Van Loon), and I thought it would be a perfect opportunity to not only get back to writing poetry on a regular basis, but also to write about the topic of Alfred Hitchcock and his movies. This group, started by Lise Rochefort, Frances Boyle and Laurie Koensgen, amazing poets and friends, welcomed me and my project. The group provided an ideal combination of support and structure that allowed me to complete the collection, and for that, and much more, I am grateful.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I try to write every day, be it editing or new writing. It would be an unusual day that I do not write in my diary, and I usually do that in the morning. Creative writing (and that’s not to say there is no creativity in keeping a diary, of course) often happens later in the day, notably in the evening, probably a throwback from my years of working when that was the time open to me. Saying this makes it sound like I have some sort of routine, but that is not the case. I do not believe a writer must wait for divine inspiration, and do believe that they have more control than that. But my writing does not adhere to a routine, in that I may write solid for a day or two, and then not for the next week. But then so much of writing is thinking and letting the situation of the work sink in, so what may look like inactivity can be in fact highly productive.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

Often writing in my diary will help. When I am feeling stalled it usually is because something has become dense, impenetrable in the writing (this is also often a sign that it is worth pursuing), and writing about it often helps to untangle it, like pulling a weave looser so you can see its pattern. Reading also helps, as it takes me away from the problem without taking me away from writing. Sometimes I give myself a break too – I’ll cook something complicated, or go for a walk, or just complain to a friend about it. I also love to paint and sketch, and will turn from writing to work on a visual project and often find the shift will help to clarify and inspire, so when I return to the writing it is with a new perspective and renewed energy.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Cinnamon. The smell of cinnamon cooking reminds me of the kitchen in the house where I grew up, when, as a child, I was allowed to make cinnamon and brown sugar rolls ­ – probably the first thing I created that someone liked.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

There is a route I take when I run by the river that ends at Green’s Creek in the east end of the city, and I find being there mesmerizing ­– almost like meditating. If I am struggling with a story that will not come together, often by the end of the run I will have suggestions or a new perspective which might help in the writing. At times I am overwhelmed by the beauty there, as it moves through the seasons, and that alone seems to heal any discord so that I can approach writing with a renewed calmness and focus. I believe to be able to write means being able to open yourself to common beauty and influences that surround us always, that it is only by being sensitive to these elements that you can bring something to the writing that a reader may recognize and value.

            In a concrete example of how another art form can influence writing, A Different Wolf was inspired by the movies of Alfred Hitchcock, by their themes and preoccupations, but modified and expanded upon through my personal reaction to the movies.

            I have synesthesia and so certain music creates a sense of color melding together, and although the experience is non-verbal, it often provokes memories, or a sense of another time, which in turn will demand a representation in words.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

I studied early twentieth century writers at university, and particularly love Virginia Woolf, Katherine Mansfield, T.S. Eliot, among others of the era. When I was very young, it was by stumbling upon Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock that I first encountered what was for me the new element of poetry, and marvelled at how it could help explain and expand the world through the beauty of language. And I knew then, at the age of twelve, that I would always want to have that in my life. At the same time there was a new vitality to Canadian writing, particularly in poetry. The poetry that most inspired me from that time was from writers such as Gwendolyn MacEwen, Raymond Souster, Margaret Atwood, Leonard Cohen, among others. At the same time the prose writers which particularly influenced me were Alice Munro, Isabel Huggan (with whom I was lucky enough to develop a mentorship and then friendship), Audrey Thomas, and from Quebec, Marie-Claire Blais, Anne Hebert, and later Monique Proulx. Non-Canadian writers I came to love included Philip Larkin, Sylvia Plath, Anne Sexton, Robert Lowell, among others.

            Lastly, I am often inspired by the writers in my poetry group, the Ruby Tuesdays. The experience of being part of this group has allowed me to see how each writer has a unique relationship to language and how their poetry can express their equally unique apprehension of the world.  

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

There are places in the world where I would like to visit – a trip down the Nile, or on the Orient Express (seems the novels of Agatha Christie have had an affect on my travel dreams). Also I’d love to visit South Africa and I’ve never been to Portugal or Russia. In fact, there are many places left for me to explore.

            As for writing projects, for years I have wanted to research the life of Archibald Lampman with the aim of writing a novella based on his life. There were so many thing I felt I could relate to about his life ­– the desire and need to write, while working in the government, the fact that he fell in love at work, and how disruptive that was for other aspects of his life, and that he lived in Ottawa, the same place I was born and where I have lived most of my life. All these things I can relate to and would love to write about, and so it is my plan one day to do exactly that.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I’ve often thought I’d have liked to be a teacher. To be able to introduce young students to the work that opened up the world of literature to me, I think would have very rewarding.

            For years I worked in a lab setting and I’ve thought how I’d have liked to be a research scientist, obsessed with finding the answer to a problem that could take years. The individual quest, the dogged determination, answered (if you are lucky) by a breakthrough which would be of value to the world. What satisfaction that would give.

I also love to paint and sketch and think I could devote my life quite happily to being a visual artist (but then, I know who I am would mean the writing would always interfere).

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I really didn’t feel I had a choice. I was and am compelled to write, it’s a need only answered by trying to explain experiences through words. I’m not sure where that bend of my mind comes from, but it’s been there a long time, and it seems impossible to ignore. At times the only writing output I have in a day will be a diary entry, but I always have either a short story or poem nagging me. As I’ve mentioned though, it takes a lot of ignoring it, of letting it steep, before it finds its shape, and then leaves me alone.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

I just finished the Collected Poems of Bronwen Wallace, edited by Carolyn Smart, and I was blown away by her poetry. I felt I’d met a kindred spirit and find it heartbreaking that she is no longer with us. I’ve also greatly enjoyed new collection from fellow members of the Ruby Tuesdays, and am especially anxious to read Frances Boyle’s short story collection, Seeking Shade, which will be out soon.

            With the pandemic I have not been to a cinema in months. The last movie that stayed with me, and I believe lived up to its hype, was Parasite. Lately I’ve come to rely on movies or series that I can get on demand at home. One I especially enjoyed was the series After Life with Ricky Gervais. It struck me how juxtaposing a comic apprehension with the weighty topic of death can give us moments of pathos which can also be highly entertaining. Also I still revisit some of Hitchcock’s movies, and when I do, there’s always something new to appreciate, which I suppose is the mark of a work of genius.

20 - What are you currently working on?

As I mentioned, I work on different types of projects at the same time. The poetry collection which has been occupying me is a series of poems on yards – the yard from my childhood, those where I’ve lived over the years, and the yard behind the house where I currently live. I am also working on a collection of stories, entitled It Is What It Is. Some of these stories have been published or will be published in The New Quarterly, Threepenny Review, Exile, Narrative, South Carolina Review and Event. I’m also working on a larger piece based on my experience of a trip to Dublin. So, I am busy, or could be very busy, at least.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;