Sunday, October 27, 2019

Queen Mob's Teahouse : Jeremy Luke Hill interviews Karen Houle

As my tenure as interviews editor at Queen Mob's Teahouse continues, the latest interview is now online, as Jeremy Luke Hill interviews Governor General's Award-nominated poet Karen Houle. Other interviews from my tenure include: an interview with poet, curator and art critic Gil McElroy, conducted by Ottawa poet Roland Prevost, an interview with Toronto poet Jacqueline Valencia, conducted by Lyndsay Kirkham, an interview with Drew Shannon and Nathan Page, also conducted by Lyndsay Kirkham, an interview with Ann Tweedy conducted by Mary Kasimor, an interview with Katherine Osborne, conducted by Niina Pollari, an interview with Catch Business, conducted by Jon-Michael Frank, a conversation between Vanesa Pacheco and T.A. Noonan, "On Translation and Erasure," existing as an extension of Jessica Smith's The Women in Visual Poetry: The Bechdel Test, produced via Essay Press, Five questions for Sara Uribe and John Pluecker about Antígona González by David Buuck (translated by John Pluecker),"overflow: poetry, performance, technology, ancestry": kaie kellough in correspondence with Eric Schmaltz, Mary Kasimor's interview with George Farrah, Brad Casey interviewed byEmilie Lafleur, David Buuck interviews John Chávez about Angels of the Americlypse: An Anthology of New Latin@ Writing, Ben Fama interviews Abraham Adams, Tender and Tough: Letters as Questions as Letters: Cheena Marie Lo, Tessa Micaela and Brittany Billmeyer-Finn, Kristjana Gunnars’ interview with Thistledown Press author Anne Campbell, Timothy Dyke’s interview with Hawai’i poet Jaimie Gusman, Hailey Higdon's interview with Joanne Kyger, Stephanie Kaylor's interview with Kenyatta JP Garcia, Jaimie Gusman’s interview with Timothy Dyke,Sarah Rockx interviews Gary Barwin, Megan Arden Gallant's interview with Diane Schoemperlen, Andrew Power interviews Lauren B. Davis, Chris Lawrence interviews Jonathan Ball, Adam Novak interviews Tom Stern, Eli Willms interviews Gregory Betts and Jeremy Luke Hill interviews Kasia Jaronczyk, Karen Smythe and Greg Rhyno, Chris Muravez interviews Ithica, NY poet Marty Cain, Róise Nic an Bheath interviews Kathryn MacLeod, Heather Sweeney interviews J'Lyn Chapman, Lisa Birman interviews Portland, Oregon poet Claudia F. Savage, Justin Eells interviews Eric Blix, Luke Hill interviews Claire Tacon, Jeremy Luke Hill interviews Adam Lindsay Honsinger, Jeremy Luke Hill interviews Marianne Micros, Jennifer Zhou interviews emerging poet Kristin Chang, Ruby Nangia interviews Medha Singh, Vannessa Barnier interviews short story author Zalika Reid-Benta, Melissa Eleftherion interviews Mariel Fechik, Michelle D'costa interviews Mehdi Kashani and Sivakami Velliangiri, Jeremy Stewart interviews Calgary poet Nikki Reimer, and Medha Singh interviews Arun Sagar.

Further interviews I've conducted myself over at Queen Mob's Teahouse include: City of Ottawa Poet Laureate JustJamaal The Poet, Geoffrey Young, Claire Freeman-Fawcett on Spread Letter, Stephanie Bolster on Three Bloody Words, Claire Farley on Canthius, Dale Smith on Slow Poetry in America, Allison Green, Meredith Quartermain, Andy Weaver, N.W Lea and Rachel Loden.

Saturday, October 26, 2019

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Jennifer Houle

Jennifer Houle’s work has appeared in numerous literary magazines, most recently The Northern Review and Poetry is Dead. Her first book, The Back Channels, was published by Signature Editions in 2016. It won the J.M. Abraham East Coast Literary Award for best book of poetry and was shortlisted for the Gerald Lampert first-book award. Her second book, Virga, also with Signature, was released in 2019. She lives in Hanwell, New Brunswick, with her family. 

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
My first book pulled me out much more into the world of readings and connecting with the wider literary community, which has been invaluable.  It went on to win an East Coast Literary Award and be nominated for the Gerald Lampert Award.  This recognition was astounding to me, and had the effect of really humbling me and making me want to try even harder.  It also gave me a little more credibility, I think, and with that came a sense of some kind of liberation. My second book is rawer than my first. Braver.  It was put together over a much shorter period of time, and there's an intensity to it. It deepened my sense of myself as a writer with a distinct vision and voice.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
I don't know for sure, but I suspect it had a lot to do with having been utterly enchanted by the rhythms in an old university book of my father's, when I was about eight years old and read Edgar Allan Poe's The Sleeper.  I still hear it: Softly dripping, drop by drop/Upon the quiet mountaintop. . . There's a musicality and magic to poems that will always call me back. They're talismanic.  In writing poetry, I work out my own thoughts. I go deeper than I do when writing prose. Layer upon layer of meaning can be intertwined and crafted into something more than the sum of its parts.  I know this can also happen with prose, but for me, it is much more immediate with poetry.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

Oooof.  Once in awhile, a poem comes to me fully-formed, requiring very little revision. More often, however, I get a spark, a hint of an idea, or a line occurs to me, and I ruminate on it for some length of time.  I do have copious notes, spanning decades.  My second book emerged almost entirely from those notes. But every project is different.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
I think I'm with Keats, believing that poetry should be ''proved upon our pulses.'' Poems begin for me with something deeply felt, a spark of inspiration, intense emotion, serious confusion, or rarest and best of all - a line somehow springing up, unbidden, in my mind, like a wildflower, and demanding that I follow it. Right now, I’m working on a book, but it’s certainly disjointed, and that suits me fine.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
I love to do readings.  They can be awkward, as when only a handful of people attend.  But even then, I love having the opportunity to interact with an audience. The struggle for me is to take myself seriously enough, to believe that I am worthy of their time and attention.  The more readings I do, the more confident I become, and I couldn't be more grateful to those who attend.  How many people get to stand in front of a group of readers and thinkers and share the things that have inspired them to create something – and the work created? That's a gift.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?
I would say there is always some sort of theoretical concern behind my work. Very, very rarely do I write a piece only for its aesthetic or aural quality. It’s fun to get lost in wordplay, but unless I’m working something out, then it probably won’t hold my attention very long. I seem to always circle back to material that concerns identity and meaning-making in a convoluted, pre-existing culture fraught with contradictions and cruelties, even when all seems light. I would say I am also interested in ecopoetics and my work often includes careful considerations of the landscapes I inhabit. I think about the human relationship to the natural world a lot – about what can move a person to act, to risk, to change – or not change.  I don’t necessarily write about climate change, but it’s there, haunting everything. I would argue that it is the most pressing question, currently. An emergency that will come to define us more and more.  I also write a lot about women, space, stars. . . the old gods and goddesses.  I think, no matter what, it’s important to keep in touch with the numinous and mysterious. What we don’t know remains vital. . . I follow a lot of white rabbits towards what I don’t know.  I always want to peel things back, get to the next layer of meaning, go deeper.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

There are so many different kinds of writer that I’m not sure how to answer this. However, the pen is mightier than the sword and writers wield the words. They craft the stories, and it is stories that change the world. What about poets?  They are storytellers too. Meaning-makers. They certainly don’t have enough influence in Canadian culture, and their voices aren’t often included in public discourse, but who knows what leaders they inspire in quiet hours? You have novelists, documentarians, journalists, copywriters, songwriters, screenwriters and playwrights, all having myriad conversations with their audiences.  Pretty sure not all of us are the unacknowledged legislators of the world, but hey. A couple might be. So, I would say that the role of the writer is to engage readers, move our collective story forward, and deepen that story – make it matter more and make it better, kinder, and wilder. Then there’s the quest for truth and the critical need for truth-tellers, though I struggle with the word “truth,” particularly as pertains to the big picture.  Maybe “honesty” is a better word than “truth,” given the shiftiness and tendency to transform and evolve of the latter.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
I’ve been lucky to work with great editors to date.  I’ve always found it to be helpful. I’m pretty stubborn, but I don’t think I’m precious about my work.  Every editorial suggestion is an opportunity to improve, or at least think again. Especially when I’m trying new things.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
A former supervisor once said “be good to your profession, and your career will take care of itself.”  I remind myself of that almost every day.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I have two young children. My routine is their routine. I also work full-time. So I write when I can, in the moments between everything else. Maybe someday I will have the luxury of a writing routine, but for now, it’s all by the seat of my pants.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
Poetry. Astronomy.  Dreams. The ocean. The woods. My loved ones.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Concrete after rain. Cedar.  The musty smell of a hardware store. Salt air. And a very specific scent generated by wooden bannisters in older buildings. I have no idea what compounds that smell is comprised of, but it transports me right back to childhood.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
Everything. People! Friends. Conversation. Nature, music, and visual art are also especially inspiring for me.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
Too many to list. Right now, I am deeply interested in women writers of the 18th and 19th century, particularly Germaine de Staël. She, I would say, is my longest running muse. I also still love Erica Jong and will be forever grateful to her early novels for sparking a raucous sense of literary (and lived) questing in me.  The poetry of Wisława Szymborska blew my sense of what poetry could be open wide, so she has also been a tremendous influence.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
Ride in a hot air balloon.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I do have another occupation – I have worked in the public affairs and communications industry for almost 15 years.  My greatest regret is that I never studied sciences, particularly astronomy and botany, two fields that fascinate me. I read as much as I can about both.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
Genes or divine ordinance, not sure. Mercury was in Sagittarius when I was born? The Moon was conjunct Jupiter? A great-aunt of mine was also a writer, maybe we share a genetic predisposition? Luck? I happened to spend a lot of time in a basement full of books as a child and something was triggered?  Because I have a lot to say, I am curious about many things, I like to think on the page, and I cannot resist.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
The last great book was the novel Circe by Madeline Miller. I just devoured it. As for film, I honestly haven’t seen a great film in years. Most of the movies I watch are with the kids. I appreciate many of them, but. . .   I will say this:  I binge-watched Russian Doll on Netflix recently. I thought it was great

19 - What are you currently working on?
I’m working on a project that has been simmering with me for all of my adult life, born of a deep interest in the French Revolution, 19th century literature and thought, our current political climate, the need for more women and minorities in politics, my own identity as a writer, and the concept of literary foremothers and legacy.  I’m going really deep with this project, but I have to admit – I have no idea how it will turn out.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Friday, October 25, 2019

Myung Mi Kim, Civil Bound



arches  │  vermillion



platform of movable objects



for live spectacle



arch of armaments and charts



stronghold    │    prowess



a link of people sorted—size, strength, age






bellflower broth, liver broth



hemispheric lust

I’ve long been aware of the work of Myung Mi Kim, but the first book of hers I’ve properly gone through is her latest, Civil Bound (Oakland CA: Omnidawn, 2019), a title that follows her Under Flag (Kelsey St. Press, 1991), The Bounty (Chax Press, 1996), DURA (Sun and Moon, 1999), Commons (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002) and Penury (Omnidawn Publishing, 2009). As the press release for the book informs: “In Civil Bound, Myung Mi Kim turns a keen ear to language as the mechanism by which society operates. The poems engage multiple methods to make sense of this pervasive tool, its powers, nuances, and influences over the structure of our civilizations. Through investigations of ecology, capitalism, military powers, colonialization, and supremacy, the book uncovers patterns in the ways that language is active in perpetuating inequality and binding its subjects to the will of those in positions of authority. In questioning systems of oppression, the poems also offer the hope of forging new paths through the connecting power of language.”

There is something quite striking in the sequence of untitled sequences presented here, each composed as a suite of accumulative, precisely dense and halting lyric fragments and phrases. She composes what could be argued as a book-length line as singular points on an expansive grid, articulating and gesturing towards both physical space and duration, and accumulating against empty space into something both large and incredibly small, detailed and complex. The effect is striking, even if a bit disorienting, as she writes: “arbitrariness intermittence with which the gates to the safety zone open votg / […] / tanktainer hoyer evergreen itawa ttx triton k-line phosphorous intersexed / […] / species vestigial faces on stone pillars pig iron head wounds slick [.]” Her lines explore and interrogate speech, write out a myriad of definitions, and accumulate lines and phrases via collision, how one word plays off another. How do, as her poems offer, syllables of speech end up creating or perpetuating whole universes?


Thursday, October 24, 2019

Alex Leslie, Vancouver for Beginners



POSTCARD HOME FROM ENGLISH BAY

Nostalgia is a territory. Chain-smoking seagulls do yoga on the horizon at dawn. English Bay organized into lanes with flaming buoys for swimmers to do their drive-by banking. The bridge shut down for candidates who launch down the inlet on robotic wings, competing for votes. People tread water below to witness, swallow the new Pacific vaccine. The famous building with the tree growing out of its roof drinks rainwater, spits mercury into the teacups for developers. Acid rain rainbows the parade tie-dye, the marchers photograph their chemical shadows and post in Renaissance filter, reflections in oil paints. Pride bellyflops into a harbor of profit. The portrait artist hired by the mayor works until sunset, then lies down in the surf and dissolves, skin floating off clear as a jellyfish, black formal tails trailing ink. It is so beautiful here. This child will draw your caricature for free by throwing a glass of coins in your face and raising his fingers to catch the bent light that arcs off your cheekbones. Blink and you’ll miss the moon inspecting its own bruises, reading Captain Vancouver’s letters home by the lights of a thousand rigs, miniatures available in bottles for collectors and investors. Visit soon.

Having seen some examples of her prose poems in various places over the past couple of years, I was curious to see Vancouver writer Alex Leslie’s full-length poetry title, Vancouver for Beginners (Toronto ON: Book*hug, 2019), following on the heels of two short story collections, as well as her full-length prose poetry debut, The things I heard about you (Gibsons BC: Nightwood Editions, 2014). I’ve written on such more than a couple of times and places (including here), but I’ve long been fascinated at just how often Vancouver is depicted in full-length poetry titles, perhaps more often than any other Canadian geography (which is, by itself, saying quite a lot), and even a quick shortlist of examples would make a hefty list, from George Bowering’s George, Vancouver (Kitchener ON: Weed/Flower Press, 1970) and Daphne Marlatt’s Vancouver Poems (Vancouver BC: Georgia Straight Writing Supplement, 1972) to more recent titles such as Michael Turner’s Kingsway (Vancouver BC: Arsenal Pulp Press, 1995), Oana Avasilichioaei’s feria: a poempark (Toronto ON: Wolsak & Wynn, 2008) [see my review of such here], Meredith Quartermain’s Vancouver Walking (Edmonton AB: NeWest, 2005) and Nightmarker (NeWest Press, 2008) [see my review of such here], George Stanley’s Vancouver: A Poem (Vancouver BC: New Star, 2008) [see my review of such here], Sachiko Murakami’s The Invisibility Exhibit (Talonbooks, 2008) [see my review of such here] and Rebuild (Talonbooks, 2011), Daphne Marlatt’s rewritten Liquidities: Vancouver Poems Then and Now (Talonbooks, 2012) [see my review of such here] and Cecily Nicholson’s From the Poplars (Talonbooks, 2014) [see my review of such here], among multiple others. What is it about Vancouver that prompts so many poets to respond? A far more complex question, I’m sure, than I have the tools to unpack.

In an interview posted earlier this year, conducted by Isabella Wang for Room, Leslie describes the pieces in Vancouver for Beginners as “prose poems, free verse poems and pieces that could be read as microfictions or prose poems.” The fluidity of form and approach is curious, as though the structure of the collection is less a montage of form than an exploration between the arbitrary distinctions of genre—microfiction, the prose poem and the more traditional free-verse lyric—and the divisions that exist on either side of the contemporary prose poem. There were moments throughout the collection that I wanted her lines to be tighter than they were, but when they work, they are remarkable. While Leslie does seem far more comfortable on the prose side than on the lyric or line-break, the most compelling pieces are those that exercise a further density through whatever short form she is attempting. A poem such as “LAND REGISTRY,” as well, might be composed with short, accumulative lines, but lines that are sharpened down to bone, as the poem begins: “Every new arrival gets / a free upload.” Further on, she writes: “Diction is mineral. / Press your finger to the screen, / take it, take everything / you want, fingerwhorl stamped / in concrete.”

Vancouver exists as backdrop, but one that is explored, described and critiqued in great detail, including multiple development decisions to build, tear-down or rebuild, from the response to the Great Fire of 1886, surveyor’s maps and the infamous Woodward’s squat. As she writes to open the poem “BARTER”: “In the news today: Vancouver is tearing down the art gallery that / used to be the land registry. The barge that unloads the hybrid / cars leaves full of cedar, fat roots like fingers in the oil slick due / north. The trawler’s hold unloads flash-frozen salmon, departs / full of clouds and tickets.” The questions of Leslie’s Vancouver for Beginners seem very much to explore how a resident of Vancouver might retain their humanity in the face of so much trauma and inhumanity, from the many development decisions that seem to be actively crushing communities and individuals of that same humanity, to writing around Robert Picton, seasonal affective disorder and the list of murdered and missing women and girls, as in the poem “INTERSECTION,” that begins:

Nobody stopped to watch. They
erected a coffin in the centre of the
intersection at Granville and Georgia
while the Missing Women’s Inquiry
was taking place in the office towers
above. When I walked to work from
the train station, the coffin was
surrounded by a zoo of commuters,
suits, some protesters. Three
concentric rings around the coffin:
placards, navy police uniforms, then
the scarves and blankly beaming
screens of passersby who had come
to warm their hands in the glow of
tragedy, or were only curious. Maybe
they didn’t know what they were
looking at. Cold-weather tourists.
The news was everywhere.


Wednesday, October 23, 2019

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Paola Ferrante


Paola Ferrante's work has appeared in The Puritan, The Fiddlehead, CV2, Room, Joyland and elsewhere. She won Room Magazine's 2018 prize for Fiction and has a chapbook with Anstruther Press. Her debut full length poetry collection, What To Wear When Surviving A Lion Attack, was published Spring 2019 by Mansfield Press. She is the Poetry Editor at Minola Review and resides in Toronto, Canada.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
Aside from the fact that my first book changed nothing about my day to day life, it changed everything because it gave the confidence to really think of myself as a writer, and to call myself that.  It was like when I was a little kid, you sat at the kid’s table for big family dinners, and then all of a sudden, one Christmas or birthday, you got invited to sit with the grownups. I feel like having a first book was the birthday where I got to sit with the grownups.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction? 
I came to poetry last actually. I had wanted to be a writer since I was maybe eight years old but it was always fiction; I was the kid in grade school who was writing 10 page murder mystery short stories that my teachers kept begging me to type because they couldn’t read my handwriting. The first poetry I ever wrote was much later on, in university, after I got into the Creative Writing Program at York University with Priscilla Uppal. She was the one who gave us a prompt to write a poem about “what you can’t write a poem about.” And I thought, maybe poetry could be really cool. Much later, it was Robin Richardson who really mentored me when it came to poetry.  I brought a poem into one of her workshops, which she ended up publishing in Minola Review. That led to many workshops, two years and 80 poems which became my first book, What to Wear When Surviving a Lion Attack, which just came out July 2019 with Mansfield Press.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
That process varies wildly depending on whether we are talking poetry or prose.  For poetry, on the most part, there’s a concept, or a line, or an image that starts the poem that ties into a theme of a larger work. One line or one image leads to more lines, and those get moved and broken in different ways depending on how they sound.  For most poems, I’m done a working draft in two or three days. In most cases, the draft, aside from some edits, is very close to the final poem.  I find if I need to substantively rework a poem in the editing phase, I just end up writing a new poem, with maybe a few lines cannibalized from myself here or there. So on the most part, my poetry drafts look close to my final drafts.
For prose, I don’t tend to write notes as much as I tend to rework a scene, over and over, until I like how it sounds and I think I have a beginning or strong concept for a story. I’m terrible with outlines because I find they always change. When I’m in the middle of a story, I might text myself ten or fifteen times a day with lines or ideas for the next scene.  I might end up with 10, 000 words in a document that then get whittled down, once I think I know what I’m actually talking about, to become a 3000 word story.  Rarely do I write a short story from beginning to end, unless it’s flash fiction.

4 - Where does a poem or work of prose usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
With both my first book of poetry and the collection of short fiction I’m working on now, I’m definitely someone who starts writing a few pieces, and then ends up going book length. As I mentioned before, with What To Wear When Surviving A Lion Attack, my debut poetry collection from Mansfield Press, I started with one poem in a workshop run by Robin Richardson. She was like, “you should probably write a series.”  Somehow, around poem eight or nine, that turned into, “you should write a book.” I definitely had to think of it as one poem at a time though—the thought of trying to write 80 poems was way too daunting. 


5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
I actually love doing readings, mostly because I love performing. As a child, I wanted to be an actress and that led to lots of dance recitals and then music lessons and band in high school. To me, readings are essential to the creative process, because they offer a sense of community, the feeling that your words aren’t written in a void, and the chance to see and feel when your work is making an impact. I also love attending them, again for that sense of community, and because I have discovered so many incredible writers that way—generally I leave readings with the seed of an idea about my next poem or short story.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are? 
 Most of my first book of poetry, What to Wear When Surviving A Lion Attack, was born in the #MeToo era, and I honestly feel like one of the things I keep trying to answer, again and again, is how women’s bodies are treated in terms of the boundaries placed on them, and the trauma and abuse that often results from living in a patriarchal society.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one?
What do you think the role of the writer should be? I think writers, by telling our stories, have the responsibility of holding up the mirror to the difficult truths about ourselves and our society. As a writer, one of the things I like to think we should do is create empathy through our work.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)? 
Editors, for me, have been absolutely essential. I’ve been lucky in that the editors I have worked with have been instrumental in seeing the potential of the work, and pushing me to realize it.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)? 
The best piece of advice I’ve heard about writing is from a mentor and friend, Robin Richardson, and it was simply “remove the ego.” I think that’s critical when it comes to writing—you need to be able, after the initial messiness is on paper, to stop thinking that you’re not good enough as a writer, and worry only about the work needs.  If you’re doing it right, it means you start to want to hear someone else tell you what’s not working, and what you could do to make the work the strongest it can be.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to fiction)? What do you see as the appeal?  
 I actually find it necessary to my own creative process to move between genres, mostly because I don’t think I’m the type of writer that can just do one thing. Now that I’m working on finishing a short fiction collection, I’ll spend two months predominantly writing a story, but then I absolutely have to go back to poetry because I feel sort of creatively tapped and need to come at things from a different angle.  When I was working on my poetry collection, What to Wear When Surviving a Lion Attack, there would be times when I just felt I didn’t have ideas for a poem, and would take a month or two off, and write a piece of fiction from beginning to end. By the time that was done, I’d all of a sudden feel the need to write poetry again. For me at least, I find that one form feeds the other.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
Saturdays and summers are my best writing days because, if left to my own devices, I would like nothing more than to start writing before I am fully awake. When I can do this, I can trick myself into not thinking about how good or bad the piece is going to be and actually get down to the writing. Usually though, my writing day starts at 5 or 6, after I’m home from my day job. If I’m writing poetry, I usually start with a phrase I’ve texted myself at some point during the day, and then it’s hours of research about homing pigeons, or physics, or the cast lists of classic slasher horror films to distill twenty-odd lines or so. I alternate between prose and fiction (I’ve found I have a hard time just doing one or the other), but prose days are always slower. With prose, I usually start with a sentence or two, maybe three, stare out the window. Beginnings are the worst because I usually can’t bring myself to move on from the first paragraph of a short story until it sounds right.  In general, I alternate between research for a scene, and actually writing it. And research has meant everything from desperately texting a friend, needing to know the name of a particular alcohol served on top of a hill in Korea, to re-watching episodes of Star Trek Voyager to nail down a voice for a sentient robot.  On one notably slow day, research also included convincing myself that dinner at a dak galbi place on Bloor was completely necessary (the story itself was later published in Joyland, so I guess I did something right). In general though, “research” or not, I try to write (and by that I mean force myself to be actively engaged at my desk) for at least two to three hours a day.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
Generally, when I’m stalled I just read journals and get a sense of other contemporary writer’s works.  One thing I currently like to do is surround myself with short stories and collections with which I feel my work is in conversation (currently that's Carmen Maria Machado's Her Body and Other Parties, Zolitude by Paige Cooper, and the short story “Orange World” by Karen Russell). For me, it makes the process of developing a piece a lot less lonely. I also find enrolling in workshops really helpful. Kathryn Mockler’s flash fiction and short fiction workshops I’d highly recommend, and I honestly wouldn’t have written my first collection without Robin Richardson’s poetry workshops. I find workshops keep on track, because then I feel accountable. They also get me out of that worried head space, that fixates on whether my work is any “good,” which I think is the wrong question to ask when you’re writing, and let me focus on how the work is working. And in general, when I get a piece workshopped, I feel relieved, because then I know what to do next, rather than just thinking that something is definitely wrong.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home? 
I don’t want to say ferret, which has it’s own distinct musk, but that’s the case sometimes, since I do have two of them as pets!

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?  
Ask anyone who’s ever been in a writing group with me, and they will tell you I’m pretty obsessed with weird facts about animals, particularly birds. A lot of my poetry and fiction comes from these weird facts (thankfully my climbing partner and fellow writer Kate Finegan also shares this obsession so I get great tidbits about salamanders and bees in people’s eyes from her!)  When I’m writing poetry, I find that reading nonfiction articles about animals often leads to the best metaphors.  Science also plays a big role in my poetry. My first poetry collection could not have been written without researching classic studies in psychology and thinking about classical and operant conditioning, as well as physics.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?  
This one’s always hard because there are really, so many. When it comes to poetry, Anne Boyer’s Garments Against Women, actually inspired my first collection because of the way she uses science in her writing to talk about feminist ideas.  I am very fortunate to count Robin Richardson as a mentor and friend, and her poetry has gone a long way in teaching me about honesty in the work and direct, punch-you-in-the-gut imagery. When it comes to fiction, I deeply admire Carmen Maria Machado for her ability to blend horror and lore and genre writing into some of the most masterfully crafted short stories I've ever read.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?  
Rock climb outside (and not be terrified at the mere thought of it!).  Visit Osaka in Japan during the cherry blossom festival.  Write a novel (and not be terrified at the mere thought of it...)

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
Like most writers, I have a day job, which is teaching a high school care and treatment program for girls. If I didn’t do that, I’d probably be doing some kind of social work, which honestly, is not that far removed. But I can’t really envision doing something else “instead of” writing, as opposed to “along with” writing. I guess, there is a part of me that would like to try computer programming, just to see if I could understand the patterning, but again, I think that’s just the poet in me talking.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?  
Probably my general introversion, my inability to carry a tune and my height made writing a more realistic career than say, acting, which is what my middle school self would have said she was going to do. In all seriousness though, as soon I read The Chronicles of Narnia when I was seven or eight, I thought, I want to write books. And I really haven’t stopped thinking that since then.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film? 
The last great book I read was Her Body and Other Parties by Carmen Maria Machado. She essentially inspired my next project, which is a collection of short fiction, much of it in the magic realist and speculative fiction vein. The last great film I saw was a bit of a while back, but it would have to be The Favorite. A friend billed to me as “it passes the reverse Bechdel test:” i.e. only one of the conversations held between the female protagonists even mentions a man. I appreciate it, not only for its dark humour, but because I’m fascinated by work that shows unsympathetic, even unlikeable, female protagonists.

20 - What are you currently working on?
As I mentioned before, I'm writing a collection of thematically linked short fiction with the working title, Her Body Among Animals, which explores the boundaries placed on women's bodies. The stories all use animal metaphors and are a blend of magic realism, science fiction and some horror. And of course, I've started working on the next poetry collection. I'm also currently the Poetry Editor at Minola Review (minolareview.com), which is an online journal that, going into its fourth year, publishes quarterly and represents the strongest, most courageous writing from women and non-binary writers. Currently, I've just finished putting together the details for our inaugural poetry contest, which, along with our fiction contest, closes Dec. 1, 2019.