Showing posts with label Tonja Gunvaldsen Klaassen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tonja Gunvaldsen Klaassen. Show all posts

Sunday, September 27, 2009

12 or 20 questions: with Tonja Gunvaldsen Klaassen

Tonja Gunvaldsen Klaassen is originally from Saskatchewan. Her first collection of poetry, Clay Birds, was shortlisted for the Gerald Lampert Award, and won a Saskatchewan Book Award in 1996. Ör, published by Brick Books in 2003, won a John V. Hicks prize and was shortlisted for a Pat Lowther Award. In 2005, her poems received a CBC literary Award. Her third collection of poems, Lean-To, is new from Gaspereau Press. She lives in Halifax with her husband James and their three boys.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

I’ve always liked the hunch and brainstorm of beginning, I like to be open to various styles, and that hasn’t changed, but maybe the transitions from the way of thinking in one poem to the next are more open or fluid, the poems themselves less self-contained than when I started writing.

While I was working on my first poems, I met other poets – Sylvia Legris at Sage Hill, Hilary Clark and Elizabeth Philips in Saskatoon – conversations with them have been an important part of thinking my way through the inner works of poems and life in general.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

My uncle Victor is a great story-teller with an infectious laugh; my uncle Peter had a deep voice and a Norwegian accent, he and my grandpa spoke several languages and talked about Kafka; my grandmothers worried and whispered about religion and what trouble somebody’d got themselves in – as a kid I loved to listen to it all, much of it misunderstood or unheard – around the corner, picking at the weave of cloth on the arm of a chair or mentally tracing the lines of the doorway.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I don’t know how long it takes, a long time I guess. All the stages feel good – aimless, wondering, reading, note-taking, composing – sometimes they overlap, sometimes a single word feels urgent. Most of the poems or sequences in Lean-to are several pages long – it was a pleasure to be inside the pieces for a long time, I felt completely engrossed.

I like to open a new book of poems in a bookshop to see how the poet’s thoughts are shaped, where that might take me. I don’t think about form too much when I get started, but try to be alive to shapes suggested by the raw thoughts. Drafts of “South Shore” came out of journal entries, so the final shape is similar to early notes. The “August” poems are more crafted – they needed a taut line, but my notes were all over the place. While writing “Sidhe of the city”, I was concerned about how the world is affected underneath by what happens at the surface, and I was more deliberate in thinking from page bottom (as bedrock) up.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

Bits and pieces at the beginning; there might be a glimmer of “book” which I have to let go…

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

Sometimes the transition from private writing space to a public venue is difficult – I feel grateful to other poets who go about the business of publishing their work so people can read it. I heard Don Domanski read like it was an intimate conversation in a room full of acquaintances – and Phil Hall alters me every time I hear him.

Reading aloud in public is a good way to re-enter the writing. I worked with the cellist Norman Adams on a performance of the “August” suite of poems, and it was fantastic to develop a kind of ‘conversation’ between two – instruments? disciplines? – two people with sometimes similar responses to the poems, sometimes in argument or discord about what had happened or what was ‘said’.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I don’t have a design. I try to go where I feel afraid to go. I had been thinking of “wife” for example, since I am one – it’s an old word, it’s dirty and eschewed, it has a long history of implications: domestic and sexy. It’s a charged kind of word that makes people angry, so I guess it’s current, dangerous territory; the required bond demands an internal turbulence, a wilderness, and I wanted to go further in there.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

‘Verse’ comes from Latin versus a furrow, and vertere to turn: a digging in, and preparing for new growth. I think we’re all starting to wake to a damaged earth, the world is alive with mistakes.

Everyone has a part in this. Observing and recording the natural world is a vital undertaking, as is a poetry which speaks directly to environmental and social concerns. And there are subtle ways the larger culture is fundamentally shaped or expressed by verse too: in song, howl, patterns. The return to traditional forms (sonnets, haiku, ghazals, Seamus Heaney’s Beowulf) and revival of dying languages (Robert Bringhurst’s translations of Skaay and Ghandl for example) shows a respect for an earlier way of life, forms that once fit our mental paths, and it’s a thrill to find that they still do. There is also a need for innovation, to experiment, to follow strange routes of thought, or thought-paths we tread every day but seldom pay attention when we’re there. Socially and scientifically, the language itself is changed, charged, deconstructed, reconstructed. Culture is endlessly generative, by its nature a process of growth which includes the origin of our relationships with one another, with language, with the earth and air, and in ongoing variations.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult oressential (or both)?

I try not to be too bull-headed…

Lean-to is full of repetitions and returns, can (I think) be read as one long poem, and when I was close to the end, I needed someone who hadn’t read it in bits and pieces, who could give me a fresh sense of the whole. Hearing Kate Kennedy’s response at Gaspereau Press was an extremely helpful gauge – a well-placed hmm from her made all the difference (Oh, I said)...

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

“Gainsay who dare” is the battle cry of the McDonalds and Curries.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
I don’t have much time – my kids are small, it’s been about 12 years of no time to read or write or think or sleep. Our youngest is three, so still a couple years left in this routine. I work on weekends and when James takes holidays – we throw our tenting gear in the car and set up camp in a different place each time, James takes the boys out on explores. I used to work at the picnic table or in the tent, but now I have a card table so I don’t have to pack papers and dictionary away when the beans come out.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I like reading English written as a second language, and translations. I'm reading some Ted Hughes translations – his commentary and letters to poets are wonderful, as are the poems which he altered less and less from original 'inter-linear cribs' – the “oddities”, the strange arrangements of thought in foreign grammar left increasingly intact. He hurts and buoys me with this in equal measure.

12 - What fairy tale character do you resonate with most?


13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

I was invited to participate in a ‘continuum’ of artists whose work was shown at the Anna Leonowens Gallery in Halifax, and it was good to think of the poem as visual art; the result (“Hurtling”) was influenced by almost all of the above. One of the pieces I was shown was a weaving by Kaija Harris – an abstract ‘map’ of Saskatchewan. I’m from Saskatchewan and had returned from a fraught visit home, was charged by the recent trip and again by the gorgeous weaving. I was thinking of the twist of Harris’s weave, I was thinking of family bonds and the structure of DNA, I was thinking of the bonds in the chemical skeleton for common herbicides; I had a broken storm window with six panes – these considerations suggested a larger ‘form’. The ‘double-helix’ lines had to follow or overlap cracks in the panes. For the first time I moved my work off the page and on to a larger space of wall – it felt strange and great. The poem was printed on overhead transparencies on the glass windows; hung and lit, the couplets were repeated in shadow on the wall behind – the shadow was one of those exhilarating strokes of luck.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simplyyour life outside of your work?

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

This is a dangerous game – I’ve played it before. A prairie kid who thought it would be good to live by the ocean, and before I knew it I was finding my way in Halifax. I should be – am – terrified, but I don’t think I’ve finished with it yet – want to live closer to ocean still.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I love to cook, love to read recipes, never follow recipes. I’d be a chef. But I’m no good in someone else’s kitchen, not an entrepreneur, would be irritated with customers and whoever hired me…

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I might have been a painter, but something invisible turned me away.

I read “Counterparts” by James Joyce in Grade 9 and understood something about my grandfather that had scared and puzzled me – it was electrifying to find that someone could articulate it.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Lisa Robertson’s Magenta Soul Whip; Anne Simpson’s The Marram Grass; Roast Chicken by Simon Hopkinson; Hold Everything Dear by John Berger – all good.

Last year’s Man on Wire, and Seraphine; The Hairdresser’s Husband and Northfork are favourites I keep watching.

19 - What are you currently working on?

Reading... in the midst of Pound’s Pisan Cantos, not very methodical about it, not trying to piece together every historical or political reference. The leaps thrill me – I landed at “forthwith” and have been suspended there since.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Ongoing notes: some journals

Saskatoon SK: It’s been a while since I’ve gone through an issue of Grain magazine, but the new issue (volume 36, no. 3/spring 2009), subtitled “melt,” heralds the first under new management, with editor Sylvia Legris, along with poetry editor Mari-Lou Rowley and fiction editor Terry Jordan. Speaking of such, when do we get to see another book of fiction from Jordan, pray tell? I’m intrigued at how this issue is structured, under three subheadings—doused against gravity, dissent balloons and stories from the ground. Where is it Grain is taking us? As Legris writes in her “Editor’s Note”: “With future issues, instead of a Poetry Editor we are going to move to having one revolving/evolving editorial position or consultant, a change that will make Grain a more dynamic publication, that will allow us to be more adventurous, to infuse the magazine with electric sensibilities.” Over the past few years, what few issues have come my way have certainly been more than worth it, and the editorial by incoming editor Legris promises that there is certainly more to come. Does anyone remember when the journal used to include non-fiction pieces, including short histories of various prairie publishers?

I’ve started looking forward to new poetry by east coast poet Tonja Gunvaldsen Klassen, after discovering her third collection, Lean-to [see my review of such here], so able to read seven new pages, her poem “Sidhe of the city,” is a delight. If only the spacing didn’t make it so difficult to replicate online. Another highlight came from Jim Johnstone, author of the recent The Velocity of Escape (Guernica Editions, 2008), through his “Abattoir Ghazals”:

Matted fur and spoiled blueberries—a black
bear circles our camp, hounds the dusk.

Gripped fist, his nose can tell where our hands
have been. The lake ruined, clear.

Knives out, your lungs are dissident balloons,
winter gloves inflated with fingers.

Drunk again. The blush of warm lips behind
the subway’s false front, weak knees.

Underground, rain diffuses on rail, burrows
into sheets of limestone and clay.

Your stop is a synapse, the gradient between
olive and azure. A bare nerve.

Good to see some more worthy ghazals out in the world; there’s been a plethora of them lately, and they haven’t always been worthwhile, with some notable exceptions being Rob Winger, for example, and even Mari-Lou Rowley.

Las Vegas NV: I try to keep away from talking about journals that I’m actually included in, but I can’t help but mention this new double issue of Interim (Volume 27, No. 1 +2), with a rather large and impressive Canadian poets feature edited by Vancouver poet Jen Currin, including one of the last interviews with Vancouver poet Robin Blaser before he died (the issue was going to press as news of his death emerged). I’m hoping that, after some time, there might even be some other interviews perhaps emerge, or this one be made more available to those of us up north?

Defend the Zero

I don’t know
if they’re worth the money
quieter than forever

that’s the “new” style
we have doctors
in tears, right

but you’re the client
as far as you’re concerned
you’re a best buy

a handy brand
promptly, promontorily
burning up, toast. (Fred Wah)

Before Currin sent out her original call, I hadn’t actually heard of this journal before, and now, after seeing the broad range of authors and work included inside, I’m wondering just what rock I might have been hiding under, with familiar names including translations of the work of Erik Lindner (who read at the ottawa international writers festival a number of years ago) and Hoa Nguyen, as well as a whole slew of unfamiliar names, attached to some interesting bits of poetry and fiction.

Fieldguide

is it red one it is
desert paintbrush it is skyrocked
is it a pink a purple
shooting star is it a wild rose
primrose a morning glory
is it growing on top of a cactus
so prickly pear is it cold
out still glacier lily
can you blow the petals poppy, orange
desert dandelion blown while
it is a weed nonnative pull it
it is this or it is that one
I saw a purple bell upside down
and the width of two fingers
I’ve never seen anything
like that way out here (Kathryn Cowles)

What I like about Currin’s selection is the range of authors, and the fact that she’s not working through “best” or “emerging” or anything like that, but a grouping of authors from, in or previously lived in this northern clime, some thirty-four poets an average American poetry audience might be completely unaware of, including Christian Bök, Jason Christie, Erin Moure, Christine Leclerc, Nicole Brossard, Stuart Ross, Rita Wong, Richard Van Camp, Sina Queyras, Ken Babstock, Kim Minkus, Jeff Derksen, Lisa Robertson, Eve Joseph and Alexandra Wilder. As Currin writes in her intro to the section:
Saying yes brought me to this next issue: What is a “Canadian”? I mean, was I supposed to ask each contributor to send a copy of their passport along with their poems? What about poets who live in Canada, but are citizens of other countries? What about Canadians who live in Brooklyn, Paris, Arizona? And, as Rita Wong notes in “alpha bets,” aren’t most of us living on land “stolen through lies, deceit, conceit” anyway? I finally decided that, for the purposes of this section, “Canadian” meant Canadian citizens as well as people who have lived here for several years and plan to stay.
It seems pretty reasonable to me.

REMOTE SILOS

I wear a gas mask
and crouch in my basement.
A lady makes sponge cake
up in the kitchen.
The lights all go out,
because of the lightning.
The plastic castle
has plastic guards
and a plastic moat.
I can’t remember if
I’m a man with a wife
and three kids or
if I’m a kid. Lately,
I think of bombs.
I run towards me
in slow motion.
Someone asks
if I’m a commercial. (Stuart Ross)

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Tonja Gunvaldsen Klaassen, Lean-To

Looking for an approach.



The road rutted, water standing, trees barely standing aside.

It sends, simple. The car stopped, for a long time.



For a long time, we just listen to wind whining a mile from ocean, listen to the little boys in the back seat sing—where we are, where are we, where are we, where are we. (“South Shore”)
A few months ago, I saw some poems by Halifax poet Tonja Gunvaldsen Klaassen that I hadn’t been expecting. Poems in the journal Riddle Fence that wrote out long lines in the most evocative way, moving through what I so rarely see in Canadian poetry; my own increasing envy, poems that are included in her third poetry collection, Lean-To (Wolfsville NS: Gaspereau Press, 2009). The author of two previous works, Clay Birds (1996) and Or (2004), she also won the CBC Literary Award in 2005 for the series “August: An Anniversary Suite,” later published as a chapbook by Gaspereau. But awards and previous works aside, it is through the poems in Lean-To that Klaassen has finally arrived, transcending her own previous writing.

A penny for your thoughts. The peripheral
blue conductors—turquoise, azure—of Waskesiu.

I have a hunch, squinting
out from the blue-lined sunder of lacy shade on clay

shadows—or are they shadows?—
not quite able

to make out what you’re looking for.
The lake a dead giveaway of dark glasses glancing off

to where swimmers with Frisbees shriek and laugh and
trendy yellow two-pieces

are all that’s left
of the tanned invisibles.

What I’m looking for is
electric and dangerous,

sinking past the glitter, out of reach. Our blues
separated by the hard-packed rut of beach

just beyond the concrete
breaker. (“August after August: 9. CLAY”)

When did her writing become so long, languid, lovely and so porous? What I admire about the poems in this collection, this collection, is how Klaassen makes the long line stretch, and stretch out; how she stretches out the poem and the poems and the collection as the spaces of a taffy-pulled-out long poem. This is a series of single moments stretched, and one of the few examples, as well (apart from someone like Sylvia Legris), of a Canadian poet really comprehending space on the written page, and using it properly, in interesting and evocative ways, and ways appropriate to the poem itself, as opposed to merely arbitrary. This is the extended lyric stretched out into the pace and singularity of breathing.

How to get up into the trees, that high up? Boots and bicycles underneath.

They want the ropes, the broken pole—

They drop the ropes and climb the trees and study the facts and actual and squirrels—articles pertaining to how do some things fall down and some things get lost. Let’s say a woodcutter travelled through thunder with an axe and a map. What might fall? Scratched and solemn, almost invisible. Open the camera: no film. First they need to find a pulley, a lasso, they already have the map. Then down to get the axe (no!) and back up again, notes stashed, and then everybody down again, off to find the Fundy, one tree mystery solved, happy, all in all. (“Five Islands”)