Showing posts with label Juliet Patterson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Juliet Patterson. Show all posts

Sunday, October 20, 2013

12 or 20 (second series) with Juliet Patterson

Juliet Patterson is the author of  The Truant Lover, winner of the Nightboat Poetry Prize and Dirge, a chapbook recently published by Albion Books. Her poems and essays have appeared in numerous magazines including 26, American Letters & Commentary, Arts & Letters, Crazyhorse, Indiana Review, Knockout, New Orleans Review, Pebble Lake Review, Rain Taxi, Redivider, Swerve, Water~Stone Review, and Verse. Her recent awards include the 2011 Arts & Letters Susan Atefat Prize in Non-Fiction, 2010 Lynda Hull Memorial Poetry Prize, a 2012 Minnesota Emerging Writer’s Grant, as well as grants from Minnesota State Arts Board and a fellowship from the Minneapolis-based Institute for Community and Cultural Development.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
The main difference is: work. The book enabled me to be hired to teach poetry workshops and creative writing classes at the university level, and also to be more securely employed on a part-time basis as a teacher.

I'd also say that the book has brought me out into the world a little more. I'm a fairly introverted person and need a lot of solitude and time for contemplation. Publishing a book has caused me to travel a bit for readings, workshops, etc. and keep a rather "public" schedule (relative to how I've been living my life). I've met some really amazing people and have had some great experiences seeing different parts of the country. It's been a bit exhausting, but it's changed me in the sense that I have been thinking about how we really are all connected, you know? People, in general, of course, but poets in particular. There are threads made between us that are seemingly invisible, but deeply intricate and beautiful.

My recent work compares little to the first book. At present, I’m working on a prose project. I’ve moved from fragment to sentence. Egads!

I do have a second book of poems circulating. It too, varies from the first book. The poems attempt a more contracted syntax than the first book and tackle (in general) broader subjects.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
Like so many other writers, I loved language from the beginning. I don’t come from a family of storytellers, nor do I remember (in particular) loving stories as a child. It was language that I loved—the element and texture of words—once I was introduced to poetry (at a young age), a whole world seemed to open up for me. I was already composing poems regularly when I entered 6th grade and then, had a teacher who began class everyday by reciting a poem from memory. These poems were never analyzed or discussed—they were instead a welcome to the day. As my teacher was also an actress, poems became synonymous for me with oral performance and I was mesmerized by the experience.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
Inevitably, each project has its own force of energy and (therefore) timeline. But generally speaking, I’m a rather slow, methodical writer. I make many drafts and (yes) take copious notes and (also, yes) edit rigorously as I compose. From the very beginning of my practice as a poet, I’ve been drawn to extreme brevity—as I draft, I’m trying to find my way to crystalline language—often leading to a long and arduous draft process.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

A poem will usually begin for me with an image or a phrase—though it may be accurate to refer to it as a disturbance—something that nags at my psyche, I guess. I am therefore generally, a writer who composes in short pieces. It’s rare for me to begin with an “idea” and/or to have a larger vision for the book, though there’s often a subversive kind of logic at play—an intuition—that often steers the content and somehow mysteriously offers a shape or thematic form to the material. In the process of drafting however, I only pay attention to the structure of individual poems and not the larger whole.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to  the creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
Stephen Dobyns says, the poet must think of the poem not as a vehicle of self-expression, but communal expression, not of private property, but communal property. He goes on to suggest that when we think of writing this way, poet emerges the servant of the poem. Certainly one way to embody this philosophy is to engage in the oral tradition and in this way, public readings have been and are very important to my creative process—both as participant and audience member.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think   current questions are?

In general I’d say I’m interested in ideas of consciousness and perception—how do we give language to these things? How do we communicate to another what it’s like to really “see” the world from our own perspective? And perhaps more importantly, what does it mean to have a human consciousness? At a more concrete level, these ideas translate into thinking about the extraordinary and tragic movements of human beings; how we are both ingenious and ignorant, especially when it comes to our relationship with the planet and the environment, which literally (not theoretically) sustains us. At present, I’m also thinking a great deal about time and our relationship to time. As Fanny Howe has written: “Why do we always think history is full of stops and starts? The future is only the past turned around to look at itself.” I’m literally haunted by these sentences.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
There are many ways writers (and all artists) contribute to the larger culture. First and foremost, may be the service we offer to the awareness of language. At present, the language of the larger culture seems rather impoverished, so I think some of the work writers do—and in particular poets—is to reawaken our bodies and minds to the power of speech. That may seem like a subtle contribution, but I think it has significant power. It’s the idea of “one gesture moves a thousand waves,” and I also like what Scott Russell Sanders suggests—artists, he says, in the larger culture, work at the level of consciousness—the work is slow and mostly invisible (as opposed to activism) but (again) can potentially serve as a catalyst for enormous change.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
I find the process of working with an outside editor enormously gratifying. With all the changes in the publishing industry over the last few years, good editors are getting harder and harder to find.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
I love this from Gertrude Stein: “You always have in your writing the resistance outside of you and inside of you, a shadow upon you, and the things which you must express in the beginning of your writing this struggle is so tremendous that the result is ugly—but the essence of that ugliness is the thing which will always make it beautiful. I myself think it is much more interesting when it seems ugly, because in it you see the element of the fight—the vitality of the struggle.” This seems to me also a good process by which to live.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose to collaboration)? What do you see as the appeal?

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I find a lot of inspiration in the performing arts; film, dance, theater, music—but of course, I often turn to books and beyond arts—I’m deeply inspired by philosophy, science, literary journalism and long walks in the woods.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

The complete list is truly impossible to make, but a few people who’ve been very important to my poetry include George Oppen, Lorine Niedecker, Gertrude Stein, Robert Creeley and Jean Valentine. In the realm of non-fiction, I’d have to name Terry Tempest Williams, John Berger, Paul Auster, John D’Gata and Elizabeth Kolbert. And a lot of writing outside the realm of literature (philosophy, physics, biology, history) has been deeply important to my work. At present, I’m reading James Hillman’s Suicide and the Soul, which is an amazing psychological and spiritual treatise.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

An ornithologist or marine biologist.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Last great book: Sorrow Beyond Dreams/ Peter Handke

Last great film: Searching for Sugar Man

20 - What are you currently working on?

I’m currently at work on a non-fiction project. Technically, I guess it’s a memoir, though it also straddles the realm of the essay at present.  I'm writing about my family's original home--Pittsburg, Kansas--and about its history as one of the largest coal mining regions in the country. I'm also writing about the life and death of my father and both my grandfathers--all of whom died by suicide. My maternal grandfather’s family (his father and four brothers) worked throughout their lives in the coal mines. My paternal grandfather served two terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and fought for worker's rights, including those of coal miners. This is an American story that is also emblematic of a piece of history.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Monday, July 29, 2013

Juliet Patterson, The Truant Lover



NOTE

In the original, the sex of the person
at the next table is ambiguous.

The anonymous
speaker is not an imaginary

character.
The first version

was written
with the title,

“Love It More.”
Loosely rhymed.

The speaker encumbered
by love. Threes, threes

& threes. Three roses
& three stems.

Red where in the whorls
petal lying in its glow,

her immaculate white bed
mounts a lonely street.

I’m just now going through Juliet Patterson’s first trade collection, The Truant Lover (Beacon NY: Nightboat Books, 2006), thanks to the author’s generous gift through the mail, after I recently reviewed her Albion Books chapbook [see my review of such here]. The Truant Lover is an absolutely magnificent and startling collection of poems. What appeals immediately is the silence and slowness that radiate from her lines, and her fragments each force a pause that strikes, deep into the heart. Patterson manages to compose poems that contain just about everything—from Lorine Niedecker, Francesca Woodman, origami, small splashes of blue—and the density of her language sends breathless chills down the spine. With her repeated poems referencing and working variations on portraiture—“Who is her Other a Figure in the Picture Attending,” “Self-Portraits (after Francesca Woodman),” and the two poems titled “Study for Self-Portraiture”—she highlights her use of the poem as explorations of the portrait, composing studies that explore a series of designations, and a series of studies on what portraiture allows. We might not know what a particular subject (whether the self or other) might look like, but we understand full well what the subject contains.



STUDY FOR SELF-PORTRAITURE

If it had no pencil, would it try mine—now dull & tender
& sweet. If it had no word, would it make the daisy
most as big as I was when it plucked me.
Would those eyes see even less than the tiny nostrils
Breathe. Would the penis be slighted, its tip flush
with the contour of thigh if the forearm left
the torso to swing into space, narrow in the grass.
If it came to rest just where you might expect
a signature, would steep rows of white seats swell
for a pencil, a drawing hand. Would the grass divide
as with a comb. Would the penis suggest the conceit of another
pun, for example, genitals = genius, penis = pen
or I’m nobody! Who are you? Would everything work
by repetition, telling each to each: you, you & you.
Would the eye then demand horizon, or more precisely,
would the eye knot & bite its thread. Would it lay an emphatic
thumb with the flutter of something really happening.
Would it be the funeral loose in my body so long it seemed
yesterday across the threshold on the next page.

How does such an open, fragmented poetic manage to be so damned precise? These poems, on the complexity of living and being, accomplish a remarkable precision, even as they display considerable emotional risk. Everyone should be reading this remarkable book: can I make that any clearer?

AMERICAN REVERIE

We are thinking of the tender mouth of the rabbit pulling
at blades of grass. A flower,
if you blink, from bowel to breast.
We want to be so beautiful.
If we wanted, we could remember
anything. The eyes of the rabbit
might be open or closed. There is Friday
& then Saturday. A season changes, years
Pass. The long grass lays itself down.
What may be better & what may be
worse & what may be lover
nobody knows. Yes, there is a rabbit on the lawn & the wish
comes true before you make it.
Do you know what you’ve seen?
Do you know what to do?

Friday, June 28, 2013

Ongoing notes: late late June, 2013



[evil sleepy Lemonade, sleeping upon his new perch, across on my black jacket]

I presume you’ve been properly checking out the above/ground press, Chaudiere Books, ottawa poetry newsletter and dusie blogs for their various updates? I don’t always have space to tell you everything here (I mean, really). But watch for an upcoming reading by Jessica Smith, Amanda Earl and Marilyn Irwin on July 13 as part of The Factory Reading Series, and another collaborative reading by myself and Christine McNair (our second annual, after last year’s appearance at The Dusty Owl Reading Series) at the In/Words Reading Series on July 31st.

Philadelphia PA: Some of the most attractive chapbooks I’ve seen out of the United States have to be Brian Teare’s Albion Books, the most recent of which, the first volume of the fifth series, is a double-binding, including Rachel Moritz’ “ELEMENTARY RITUALS” alongside Juliet Patterson’s “DIRGE.” There doesn’t seem to be any obvious reason why these two texts are paired, perhaps the authors are collaborators or close friends, writing poems in tandem? Or simply the editor/publisher has joined the two. 







The first bridges were probably made by nature—something as simple as a log fallen across a stream.

The original base of the word, bruw, or ‘log-road.’

Through the window you think of these words standing in the blunt arms of morning: stage, landing, gangway.

*

Your father was found hanging from a concrete footbridge
a few miles from your childhood home. The bridge

twenty-seven feet high, stretched over a busy thoroughfare, linking
a golf course and a wooded park. (“DIRGE”)

Juliet Patterson’s striking sequence “DIRGE” works through a meditation on the death of her father (or, the narrator’s father; since I know nothing about Patterson, one should never presume) from suicide. Her “DIRGE” scrapes out the heart in long, languid lines. Why haven’t I heard of Juliet Patterson before this? On the other side of the same chapbook, Rachel Moritz’s “ELEMENTARY RITUALS” is another small meditative work, composed out of six longer poems that stretch the loveliest lines that take up small spaces but a large attention. Her rituals, one might say, are startlingly precise, one that is the perfect blend of lyric language and absolute clarity:

In a clearing between loss and literal day-
light, his frame stood empty.

Kudzu trailing the base foundation.
Gutters bedded in leaves.


We passed a threshold the key given
us at the funeral parlor            from his pocket, his wallet,
his coat.


Nevertheless, stirring lights how oddly they flared, as if
shy of inhabitants.

Then it was done, going through an event
so event became abstracted.

Further titles forthcoming in the fifth series include works by Frank Sherlock (5.2), Jean Valentine (5.3) and CA Conrad (5.4).

Mt Pleasant ON: From kemeny babineau’s Laurel Reed Books comes CHORTLING AMERICAN SHOW GOO: thirty three poems by Toronto poet, editor and small press publisher Daniel f. Bradley (2012). Bradley has been an active writer and small press enthusiast for years, author of numerous small press publications going back two decades, including publications by curvd h&z, BookThug, tapt, Outland, Produce Press, above/ground press and many, many others. Given his years of publication, it might be interesting to see someone attempt to wrestle with his years of output for the sake of either an essay on his ongoing work, or a selected poems, to get a sense of just what he has accomplished over the years, through dozens of small-run missives. The opening poem to the collection nearly gives a description of what follows, asking the question of what this might be, as though the author is learning through the same process as the potential reader:

i suppose i could hot wire this thing
flat bread their is no escape
perfect for your boneless
wings failed

your highness you were right
you were right about me
i love my loll pop separated
at the feet almost
empty ignition switch
light reflecting metallic

what’s this all about
everything in a bag
that feeds me a secret
life

The sequence of pieces that make up the untitled poems of CHORTLING AMERICAN SHOW GOO: thirty three poems feel akin to the poems of American poet Kate Greenstreet for their fragmented structure and collage-aspect that accumulate into something larger, yet difficult to articulate, as the form itself is less static than constantly shifting. As Nic Coivert writes in his review of the collection (included inside the back of the chapbook) from Canadian Poetry Previews Magazine, “These poems are like smashed dreams.” Bradley’s poems also have a dark edge of surrealism, perhaps one more abstract and less of the obvious humour than others in the informal “Toronto surrealists” group, whether Lillian Necakov, Stuart Ross or Gary Barwin. In some of the pieces, there’s something of the single line-breath, as though they’re meant to be read quickly, without break.

three thousand an hour upgrade your family
back into the vault the new death toll
in bad taste this is cronyism all the way
more comedy who grew my soup good bye

horse pills transformation my bathroom of
freedom scurrying people panic setting in
stories of survival washed away telling
the tale twisted areas scrap the idea more

more that not the bottom line two hundred
thousand homes and worth the cost who’s
ruining the economy he broke the door
good old fashion hard work all back
to back snow

Lincoln NE/Portland OR: To understand how much I enjoyed American poet Matthew Rohrer’s small chapbook A SHIP LOADED WITH SEQUINS HAS GONE DOWN (Dkembe Press, 2013), you have to experience the first poem I did in the collection:

He wrote amazing poems because he
was fucking a wizard. This perspective
mutilated all his expectations
and he was naked. The wizard threw him
a small thin towel to cover himself with.
I’m sitting in a small bar in Brooklyn
discussing his next move: surely his wife
will climb the pyramid and leap off it
because she is a butterfly. He is
everywhere down there, in the air. Inside
a tiny black bean. It’s not necessary
to live like this, we decide. We crumble
into our highballs, the city outside
consumes things like an enormous creature. (“SONNET”)

In Rohrer’s six-poem chapbook, four of which are three-sonnet pieces, each titled “SONNET,” that twist the language of the first piece into the second two section, re-working the lines of the first to create entirely different poems with the same language, as here, the second part of the three-part “SONNET” (the first part is quoted just above):

I’m sitting in a small bar in Brooklyn
because she is a butterfly. He is
into our highballs. The city outside
mutilated all his expectations
to live like this, we decide. We crumble
everywhere down there, in the air. Inside
he wrote amazing poems because he
will climb the pyramid & leap off it.
Discussing his next move: surely his wife
was fucking a wizard. This perspective
consumes things like an enormous creature.
And he was naked. The wizard threw him
A tiny black bean. It’s not necessary.
a small thin towel to cover himself with.

Bookending the collection are two longer poems, each composed with short phrases that complete a single, fragmented, seemingly-endless and confused sentence, endlessly continuing. Throughout the poems here, is Rohrer attempting to shock, startle or confound? These poems require a shift in perception and perspective, one that playfully pokes at expectation and collision.