Juliet Patterson is the author of The Truant Lover, winner of the Nightboat Poetry Prize and Dirge, a chapbook recently published by Albion Books. Her poems and essays have appeared in numerous magazines including 26, American Letters & Commentary, Arts & Letters, Crazyhorse, Indiana Review, Knockout, New Orleans Review, Pebble Lake Review, Rain Taxi, Redivider, Swerve, Water~Stone Review, and Verse. Her recent awards include the 2011 Arts & Letters Susan Atefat Prize in Non-Fiction, 2010 Lynda Hull Memorial Poetry Prize, a 2012 Minnesota Emerging Writer’s Grant, as well as grants from Minnesota State Arts Board and a fellowship from the Minneapolis-based Institute for Community and Cultural Development.
1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
The main difference is: work. The book enabled me to be hired to teach poetry workshops and creative writing classes at the university level, and also to be more securely employed on a part-time basis as a teacher.
I'd also say that the book has brought me out into the world a little more. I'm a fairly introverted person and need a lot of solitude and time for contemplation. Publishing a book has caused me to travel a bit for readings, workshops, etc. and keep a rather "public" schedule (relative to how I've been living my life). I've met some really amazing people and have had some great experiences seeing different parts of the country. It's been a bit exhausting, but it's changed me in the sense that I have been thinking about how we really are all connected, you know? People, in general, of course, but poets in particular. There are threads made between us that are seemingly invisible, but deeply intricate and beautiful.
My recent work compares little to the first book. At present, I’m working on a prose project. I’ve moved from fragment to sentence. Egads!
I do have a second book of poems circulating. It too, varies from the first book. The poems attempt a more contracted syntax than the first book and tackle (in general) broader subjects.
2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
Like so many other writers, I loved language from the beginning. I don’t come from a family of storytellers, nor do I remember (in particular) loving stories as a child. It was language that I loved—the element and texture of words—once I was introduced to poetry (at a young age), a whole world seemed to open up for me. I was already composing poems regularly when I entered 6th grade and then, had a teacher who began class everyday by reciting a poem from memory. These poems were never analyzed or discussed—they were instead a welcome to the day. As my teacher was also an actress, poems became synonymous for me with oral performance and I was mesmerized by the experience.
3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
Inevitably, each project has its own force of energy and (therefore) timeline. But generally speaking, I’m a rather slow, methodical writer. I make many drafts and (yes) take copious notes and (also, yes) edit rigorously as I compose. From the very beginning of my practice as a poet, I’ve been drawn to extreme brevity—as I draft, I’m trying to find my way to crystalline language—often leading to a long and arduous draft process.
4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
A poem will usually begin for me with an image or a phrase—though it may be accurate to refer to it as a disturbance—something that nags at my psyche, I guess. I am therefore generally, a writer who composes in short pieces. It’s rare for me to begin with an “idea” and/or to have a larger vision for the book, though there’s often a subversive kind of logic at play—an intuition—that often steers the content and somehow mysteriously offers a shape or thematic form to the material. In the process of drafting however, I only pay attention to the structure of individual poems and not the larger whole.
5 - Are public readings part of or counter to the creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
Stephen Dobyns says, the poet must think of the poem not as a vehicle of self-expression, but communal expression, not of private property, but communal property. He goes on to suggest that when we think of writing this way, poet emerges the servant of the poem. Certainly one way to embody this philosophy is to engage in the oral tradition and in this way, public readings have been and are very important to my creative process—both as participant and audience member.
6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think current questions are?
In general I’d say I’m interested in ideas of consciousness and perception—how do we give language to these things? How do we communicate to another what it’s like to really “see” the world from our own perspective? And perhaps more importantly, what does it mean to have a human consciousness? At a more concrete level, these ideas translate into thinking about the extraordinary and tragic movements of human beings; how we are both ingenious and ignorant, especially when it comes to our relationship with the planet and the environment, which literally (not theoretically) sustains us. At present, I’m also thinking a great deal about time and our relationship to time. As Fanny Howe has written: “Why do we always think history is full of stops and starts? The future is only the past turned around to look at itself.” I’m literally haunted by these sentences.
7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
There are many ways writers (and all artists) contribute to the larger culture. First and foremost, may be the service we offer to the awareness of language. At present, the language of the larger culture seems rather impoverished, so I think some of the work writers do—and in particular poets—is to reawaken our bodies and minds to the power of speech. That may seem like a subtle contribution, but I think it has significant power. It’s the idea of “one gesture moves a thousand waves,” and I also like what Scott Russell Sanders suggests—artists, he says, in the larger culture, work at the level of consciousness—the work is slow and mostly invisible (as opposed to activism) but (again) can potentially serve as a catalyst for enormous change.
8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
I find the process of working with an outside editor enormously gratifying. With all the changes in the publishing industry over the last few years, good editors are getting harder and harder to find.
9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
I love this from Gertrude Stein: “You always have in your writing the resistance outside of you and inside of you, a shadow upon you, and the things which you must express in the beginning of your writing this struggle is so tremendous that the result is ugly—but the essence of that ugliness is the thing which will always make it beautiful. I myself think it is much more interesting when it seems ugly, because in it you see the element of the fight—the vitality of the struggle.” This seems to me also a good process by which to live.
10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose to collaboration)? What do you see as the appeal?
11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
I find a lot of inspiration in the performing arts; film, dance, theater, music—but of course, I often turn to books and beyond arts—I’m deeply inspired by philosophy, science, literary journalism and long walks in the woods.
13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
The complete list is truly impossible to make, but a few people who’ve been very important to my poetry include George Oppen, Lorine Niedecker, Gertrude Stein, Robert Creeley and Jean Valentine. In the realm of non-fiction, I’d have to name Terry Tempest Williams, John Berger, Paul Auster, John D’Gata and Elizabeth Kolbert. And a lot of writing outside the realm of literature (philosophy, physics, biology, history) has been deeply important to my work. At present, I’m reading James Hillman’s Suicide and the Soul, which is an amazing psychological and spiritual treatise.
16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
An ornithologist or marine biologist.
18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
Last great book: Sorrow Beyond Dreams/ Peter Handke
Last great film: Searching for Sugar Man
20 - What are you currently working on?
I’m currently at work on a non-fiction project. Technically, I guess it’s a memoir, though it also straddles the realm of the essay at present. I'm writing about my family's original home--Pittsburg, Kansas--and about its history as one of the largest coal mining regions in the country. I'm also writing about the life and death of my father and both my grandfathers--all of whom died by suicide. My maternal grandfather’s family (his father and four brothers) worked throughout their lives in the coal mines. My paternal grandfather served two terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and fought for worker's rights, including those of coal miners. This is an American story that is also emblematic of a piece of history.
12 or 20 (second series) questions;
Showing posts with label Juliet Patterson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Juliet Patterson. Show all posts
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Monday, July 29, 2013
Juliet Patterson, The Truant Lover
NOTE
In the
original, the sex of the person
at the next
table is ambiguous.
The anonymous
speaker is
not an imaginary
character.
The first
version
was written
with the
title,
“Love It
More.”
Loosely
rhymed.
The speaker
encumbered
by love. Threes,
threes
& threes.
Three roses
& three
stems.
Red where in
the whorls
petal lying
in its glow,
her
immaculate white bed
mounts a
lonely street.
I’m just now
going through Juliet Patterson’s first trade collection, The Truant Lover (Beacon NY: Nightboat Books, 2006), thanks to the
author’s generous gift through the mail, after I recently reviewed her Albion Books chapbook [see my review of such here]. The Truant Lover is an absolutely magnificent and startling collection
of poems. What appeals immediately is the silence and slowness that radiate
from her lines, and her fragments each force a pause that strikes, deep into
the heart. Patterson manages to compose poems that contain just about
everything—from Lorine Niedecker, Francesca Woodman, origami, small splashes of
blue—and the density of her language sends breathless chills down the spine. With
her repeated poems referencing and working variations on portraiture—“Who is
her Other a Figure in the Picture Attending,” “Self-Portraits (after Francesca
Woodman),” and the two poems titled “Study for Self-Portraiture”—she highlights
her use of the poem as explorations of the portrait, composing studies that
explore a series of designations, and a series of studies on what portraiture
allows. We might not know what a particular subject (whether the self or other)
might look like, but we understand full well what the subject contains.
STUDY FOR SELF-PORTRAITURE
If it had no
pencil, would it try mine—now dull & tender
& sweet. If
it had no word, would it make the daisy
most as big
as I was when it plucked me.
Would those
eyes see even less than the tiny nostrils
Breathe. Would
the penis be slighted, its tip flush
with the contour
of thigh if the forearm left
the torso to
swing into space, narrow in the grass.
If it came to
rest just where you might expect
a signature,
would steep rows of white seats swell
for a pencil,
a drawing hand. Would the grass divide
as with a
comb. Would the penis suggest the conceit of another
pun, for
example, genitals = genius, penis = pen
or I’m
nobody! Who are you? Would everything work
by
repetition, telling each to each: you, you & you.
Would the eye
then demand horizon, or more precisely,
would the eye
knot & bite its thread. Would it lay an emphatic
thumb with
the flutter of something really happening.
Would it be
the funeral loose in my body so long it seemed
yesterday across
the threshold on the next page.
How does such an open, fragmented poetic manage to be so damned precise? These poems, on the
complexity of living and being, accomplish a remarkable precision, even as they
display considerable emotional risk. Everyone should be reading this remarkable
book: can I make that any clearer?
AMERICAN REVERIE
We are
thinking of the tender mouth of the rabbit pulling
at blades of
grass. A flower,
if you blink,
from bowel to breast.
We want to be
so beautiful.
If we wanted,
we could remember
anything. The
eyes of the rabbit
might be open
or closed. There is Friday
& then
Saturday. A season changes, years
Pass. The long
grass lays itself down.
What may be
better & what may be
worse &
what may be lover
nobody knows.
Yes, there is a rabbit on the lawn & the wish
comes true
before you make it.
Do you know
what you’ve seen?
Do you know
what to do?
Friday, June 28, 2013
Ongoing notes: late late June, 2013
[evil sleepy Lemonade, sleeping upon his new perch, across on my black jacket]
I presume you’ve
been properly checking out the above/ground press, Chaudiere Books, ottawa poetry newsletter and dusie blogs for their various updates? I don’t always have space
to tell you everything here (I mean, really). But watch for an upcoming reading
by Jessica Smith, Amanda Earl and Marilyn Irwin on July 13 as part of The Factory Reading Series, and another collaborative reading by myself and
Christine McNair (our second annual, after last year’s appearance at The Dusty Owl Reading Series) at the In/Words Reading Series on July 31st.
Philadelphia PA: Some of the most attractive
chapbooks I’ve seen out of the United States have to be Brian Teare’s Albion Books, the most recent of which, the first volume of the fifth series, is a
double-binding, including Rachel Moritz’ “ELEMENTARY RITUALS” alongside Juliet Patterson’s “DIRGE.” There doesn’t seem to be any obvious reason why these two
texts are paired, perhaps the authors are collaborators or close friends,
writing poems in tandem? Or simply the editor/publisher has joined the two.
The first
bridges were probably made by nature—something as simple as a log fallen across
a stream.
The original
base of the word, bruw, or ‘log-road.’
Through the window
you think of these words standing in the blunt arms of morning: stage, landing, gangway.
*
Your father
was found hanging from a concrete footbridge
a few miles
from your childhood home. The bridge
twenty-seven
feet high, stretched over a busy thoroughfare, linking
a golf course
and a wooded park. (“DIRGE”)
Juliet Patterson’s striking sequence “DIRGE” works through a meditation on the death
of her father (or, the narrator’s father; since I know nothing about Patterson,
one should never presume) from suicide. Her “DIRGE” scrapes out the heart in
long, languid lines. Why haven’t I heard of Juliet Patterson before this? On
the other side of the same chapbook, Rachel Moritz’s “ELEMENTARY RITUALS” is
another small meditative work, composed out of six longer poems that stretch
the loveliest lines that take up small spaces but a large attention. Her rituals,
one might say, are startlingly precise, one that is the perfect blend of lyric
language and absolute clarity:
In a clearing
between loss and literal day-
light, his
frame stood empty.
Kudzu trailing
the base foundation.
Gutters bedded
in leaves.
We passed a
threshold the key given
us at the
funeral parlor from his pocket,
his wallet,
his coat.
Nevertheless,
stirring lights how oddly they flared, as if
shy of
inhabitants.
Then it was
done, going through an event
so event
became abstracted.
Further
titles forthcoming in the fifth series include works by Frank Sherlock (5.2),
Jean Valentine (5.3) and CA Conrad (5.4).
Mt Pleasant ON: From kemeny babineau’s Laurel Reed Books comes CHORTLING AMERICAN SHOW GOO: thirty three poems by Toronto poet, editor and small press publisher Daniel f. Bradley (2012). Bradley has been an active writer and small press
enthusiast for years, author of numerous small press publications going back
two decades, including publications by curvd h&z, BookThug, tapt, Outland,
Produce Press, above/ground press and many, many others. Given his years of
publication, it might be interesting to see someone attempt to wrestle with his
years of output for the sake of either an essay on his ongoing work, or a
selected poems, to get a sense of just what he has accomplished over the years,
through dozens of small-run missives. The opening poem to the collection nearly
gives a description of what follows, asking the question of what this might be,
as though the author is learning through the same process as the potential
reader:
i suppose i
could hot wire this thing
flat bread their
is no escape
perfect for
your boneless
wings failed
your highness
you were right
you were
right about me
i love my
loll pop separated
at the feet
almost
empty
ignition switch
light reflecting
metallic
what’s this
all about
everything in
a bag
that feeds me
a secret
life
The sequence
of pieces that make up the untitled poems of CHORTLING AMERICAN SHOW GOO: thirty three poems feel akin to the
poems of American poet Kate Greenstreet for their fragmented structure and
collage-aspect that accumulate into something larger, yet difficult to
articulate, as the form itself is less static than constantly shifting. As Nic
Coivert writes in his review of the collection (included inside the back of the
chapbook) from Canadian Poetry Previews
Magazine, “These poems are like smashed dreams.” Bradley’s poems also have
a dark edge of surrealism, perhaps one more abstract and less of the obvious humour
than others in the informal “Toronto surrealists” group, whether Lillian Necakov, Stuart Ross or Gary Barwin. In some of the pieces, there’s something
of the single line-breath, as though they’re meant to be read quickly, without
break.
three thousand
an hour upgrade your family
back into the
vault the new death toll
in bad taste
this is cronyism all the way
more comedy
who grew my soup good bye
horse pills transformation
my bathroom of
freedom
scurrying people panic setting in
stories of
survival washed away telling
the tale
twisted areas scrap the idea more
more that not
the bottom line two hundred
thousand
homes and worth the cost who’s
ruining the
economy he broke the door
good old
fashion hard work all back
to back snow
Lincoln NE/Portland OR: To
understand how much I enjoyed American poet Matthew Rohrer’s small chapbook A SHIP LOADED WITH SEQUINS HAS GONE DOWN
(Dkembe Press, 2013), you have to experience the first poem I did in the
collection:
He wrote
amazing poems because he
was fucking a
wizard. This perspective
mutilated all
his expectations
and he was
naked. The wizard threw him
a small thin
towel to cover himself with.
I’m sitting
in a small bar in Brooklyn
discussing his
next move: surely his wife
will climb
the pyramid and leap off it
because she
is a butterfly. He is
everywhere
down there, in the air. Inside
a tiny black
bean. It’s not necessary
to live like
this, we decide. We crumble
into our
highballs, the city outside
consumes
things like an enormous creature. (“SONNET”)
In Rohrer’s
six-poem chapbook, four of which are three-sonnet pieces, each titled “SONNET,”
that twist the language of the first piece into the second two section,
re-working the lines of the first to create entirely different poems with the
same language, as here, the second part of the three-part “SONNET” (the first
part is quoted just above):
I’m sitting
in a small bar in Brooklyn
because she
is a butterfly. He is
into our
highballs. The city outside
mutilated all
his expectations
to live like
this, we decide. We crumble
everywhere
down there, in the air. Inside
he wrote
amazing poems because he
will climb
the pyramid & leap off it.
Discussing his
next move: surely his wife
was fucking a
wizard. This perspective
consumes
things like an enormous creature.
And he was
naked. The wizard threw him
A tiny black
bean. It’s not necessary.
a small thin towel
to cover himself with.
Bookending the
collection are two longer poems, each composed with short phrases that complete
a single, fragmented, seemingly-endless and confused sentence, endlessly
continuing. Throughout the poems here, is Rohrer attempting to shock, startle
or confound? These poems require a shift in perception and perspective, one
that playfully pokes at expectation and collision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

