Sofia Banzhaf is the author of Pony Castle. She is also an actress and filmmaker. Her website is HERE (sofiabanzhaf.com).
1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different? I met a lot of good people. My new work is like my old work, which is cool if you like my old work. I'm experimenting more with format. And I'm writing more for the screen.
2 - How did you come to fiction first, as opposed to, say, poetry or non-fiction? Fiction demands a precision of the imagination which I enjoy. It demands your complete investment in the world you create, for a long period of time.
3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes? I take a lot of notes. No notes, no glory.
4 - Where does a work of fiction usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning? A work of fiction begins when my need to not feel totally alone becomes overwhelming. I haven't set out to write a book because that would be creatively damaging for someone who has a resistance to authority and a tendency to self-sabotage. As long as I write or edit every day, with that being the goal itself, I feel good.
5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings? If I drink enough I will totally enjoy myself.
6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are? I think if I was conscious of those questions or concerns, I wouldn't be writing.
7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be? All of writing is a huge lake. There are great rivers that feed the lake, and there are mere trickles. All that matters is feeding the lake. I don't matter. The lake matters. You must keep feeding the lake.
8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)? Essential.
9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)? The road is long, we carry on, try to have fun in the meantime - Lana Del Rey.
10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (fiction to film to acting)? What do you see as the appeal? Moving between mediums isn't a conscious act for me. I do what I'm pulled towards and what I'm fortunate enough to have the opportunity to do.
11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin? A typical day begins with anxiety. I have a little pocket book of the Tao Te Ching which I read almost every morning and that calms me. If that fails, I'll drink a screwdriver and take a bath. I don't have a writing routine.
12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration? I read my friends' work. Something about it being so immediate/contemporary/close to me shocks me into action again.
13 - What fragrance reminds you of home? This question is borderline insane. Like, where did it come from? I like it though.
14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art? I like reality TV. I've been watching the Anna Nicole Smith show a lot.
15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work? Trevso_Electric and Audrey Wollen.
16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done? Eat a shrimp cocktail at the top of the CN tower. Defeather a goose.
17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer? Reality TV star. I'm confrontational and sex-obsessed which would probably make for good entertainment.
18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else? I possess very few real life skills.
19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film? Voyage in the Dark by Jean Rhys. Killer of Sheep by Charles Burnett.
20 - What are you currently working on? I'm working on a second book. I'm also working on a piece for the new issue of the Four Poets with Rachel Bell, Ruby Brunton and Fan Wu. That's launching in April [2016]. I'm in post-production on a feature film I co-wrote and co-directed, and I'm developing a series with JASH and Nicole Dorsey. Thank you god bless.
12 or 20 (second series) questions;
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Saturday, June 18, 2016
from the desk of rob mclennan : real pants,
I've been included in the "from the desk of" series over at Real Pants, in which I write about my desk. Why am I always writing about my desk? I seem to have done that a bunch over the past couple of years, from the "At the Desk" series in 2014 over at Open Book: Ontario, on "Writing Spaces" for The New Quarterly, and even as part of Amish Trivedi's "Where Do You Write, My Lovely?" blog (which he should really do more of). And then, of course, the same desk but my prior office. I've even done a number of "on writing" pieces over the past couple of years as well, from this one "On Attention" for The Malahat Review, a little write-up on composing my "goldfish" sequence, on composing short fiction for Numero Cinq, on writing the fragment, another on short fiction for The Town Crier, and "On Writing" for Catina Noble, as well as my more recent "my writing day" piece. Given I've been telling myself I'm attempting to complete a manuscript of short fiction amid the small children we keep building, I really do have a lot of other stuff I think I need to say...
Friday, June 17, 2016
U of Alberta writers-in-residence interviews: Marina Endicott (2012-13)
For the sake of the fortieth anniversary of the
writer-in-residence program (the longest lasting of its kind in Canada) at the
University of Alberta, I have taken it upon myself to interview as many former
University of Alberta writers-in-residence as possible [see the ongoing list of writers here]. See the link to the entire series of interviews (updating weekly) here.
Marina Endicott’s latest book, Close to Hugh,
was long-listed for the Giller Prize and named one of CBC’s Best Books of 2015.
Her last, The Little Shadows, was long-listed for the Giller and short-listed
for the Governor General’s award. Her novel Good to a Fault, a finalist for the 2008 Scotiabank Giller Prize, was a CBC
Canada Reads book and won the Commonwealth Writers’ Prize. She teaches creative
writing at the Banff Centre, U of T, and at the Augustana Campus of the
University of Alberta.
She was writer-in-residence at the University of Alberta during
the 2012-13 academic year.
Q: When you began your residency, you’d been publishing books for about
a decade. Where did you feel you were in your writing? What did the opportunity
mean to you?
A: I’d published three novels, and was working on my fourth, Close to Hugh. I don’t know if at some
point one feels steady and competent in the practice of writing novels—after
writing each novel I think okay, I know how to write that one. But the next one
is a giant mystery. The residency gave me a long vista of concentrated,
dedicated time to figure out how to write Hugh.
When I started in September I had a couple of early scenes written, but hadn’t shown
them to anyone. Each September the program hosts a reading where the new WIR
reads with the departing WIR. I read from those scenes, haltingly, even with
some slight despair. Greg Hollingshead laughed at me afterwards. “That was
interesting to watch,” he said. “You read, and you suffered, and you read, and
you suffered…”
By the end of the residency I had a complete draft of Hugh—much faster than I’d ever managed
to produce a first draft before. It was a great relief to read from the final
scenes of Hugh at the introductory
reading for Erin Mouré, who followed me as WIR. I guess somehow through the
intervening year, I learned how to write this one.
Besides the practical assistance and the relief of completing a draft,
it was an honour to sit in the fishbowl office (those windows, open to the
atrium, display every short burst of typing and every session of sweet silent
slack-jawed thought) and to join the ranks of writers I admire who have done
this venerable residency, and will do it in future.
Q: Given the fact that you weren’t an Alberta writer, were you
influenced at all by the landscape, or the writing or writers you interacted
with while in Edmonton? What was your sense of the literary community?
A: It’s funny—how do we define these things? I’ve lived in Alberta
for the past 25 years, so I guess I’m an Alberta writer. But I came late to
this country, and my thinking and experience formed elsewhere: in British
Columbia, until I was six; in Nova Scotia, where I mostly grew up; in Ontario,
where I went to school and began my adult life; in England, where I started to
write seriously; in Saskatchewan, where I found my real career and met my
husband, who shanghaied me to Alberta. I’ve been everywhere, man.
Because we lived first in Mayerthorpe, I was isolated from the
Alberta literary community, which I don’t think I’ve ever really joined. My
sense is that it’s disjointed, unlike Saskatchewan’s close-knit writing klatch.
It seems to me that rather than the kind of labour union of writers that
Saskatchewan created, in Alberta the community is looser, pockets of friends
talking to each other and supporting one another. Nothing wrong with that. We
want to work with our friends. My friends here have been the many great writers
I worked with in the library residency I started in Cochrane, including Fred
Stenson and Peter Oliva, and up in Edmonton my writing companions Lynn Coady,
Jocelyn Brown, and Jacqueline Baker. I think I’ve moved along that shifting
axis from extrovert far over to introvert, as maybe we tend to do as we age.
Once I wanted a big community—now I work better if I mostly talk to a couple of
people.
Q: Ah! I didn’t realize. I’d somehow had the impression you
arrived in Edmonton for the position from Saskatchewan, and simply remained.
You mention a library residency you founded in Cochrane: was this something
founded before or after your time at University of Alberta?
A: Before—we were in Cochrane, just outside Calgary, for 11 years,
until 2008. Longer than Peter or I had ever lived any place in our lives. Needing
a job, I went to the local librarian and said I think you should have a writing
program here, with a writer in residence. He was amenable, so I did the grant
applications and got the program started and was the first WIR of many,
including Peter Oliva, Fred Stenson and Peter Norman. I also ran a reading
series in conjunction with the University of Calgary and Canada Council, with
luminaries like Elizabeth Hay, Alastair MacLeod and Sheila Heti. Each reading
paired a local writer with the visitor. My children grew up going to readings
every week, and consequently refuse to go to a single one of mine these days.
That’s okay, they’ve heard enough.
Q: How did you engage with students and the community during your
residency? Were there any encounters that stood out?
A: The usual way: people came
trooping along the hall and handed me their stuff; I read it with care and
often with great pleasure, and then talked to them. All we can do, all that
needs to be done, is to pay attention.
Encounters that stood out: a young military officer brought in a
folder of remarkable poems; I read several really good short stories; and just
last week I wrote a blurb for Lisa Lawrence, whose YA manuscript, about to be published
by Orca, was one of the most honest and exciting manuscripts I read during my
residency.
Q: Looking back on the experience now, how do you think it
impacted upon your work?
A: One of the best things about this residency is that it demands
nothing—no socializing or scheduling events or running anything, no
administration at all. I sat in the fishbowl office and wrote my head off. When
I had written myself out, I read other people’s work, trying to see what was
best about it and how it could be better. A year of that is good for the mind
and the soul, and I believe the quiet, concentrated time to think made Close to Hugh a better book. Like that
lovely thing about the Duchess of Malfi, the residency stains the time past,
and I hope it will continue to light the work to come.
Thursday, June 16, 2016
12 or 20 (second series) questions with John Nyman
John Nyman's verse, visual, and conceptual poems and poetics have appeared in a variety of print and online publications including Rampike, (parenthetical), Cordite Poetry Review, and Hamilton Arts and Letters. His debut collection of poems, Players, was released by Palimpsest Press in April 2016. Originally from Toronto, John is currently completing a PhD in Theory and Criticism at Western University in London, Ontario.
1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
Players is my first book, and not much has changed yet. Except that I seem to spend more time writing emails.
2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
I actually came to poetry second, thinking at first that I’d find my way writing short stories. What attracted me to poetry, though, was its apparent openness to experimentation: I wanted to test the limits of language, and I considered poetry the best platform for doing so. I’m much more skeptical today about the extent to which poetry actually has this power, but the idea still informs my writing to a great degree.
3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
My answers to all of these vary depending on the poem in question. In a sense, I try to never pursue a project the same way I’ve pursued another one.
A handful of poems in Players came out of pretty memorable compositional processes. For “Naked Baby,” I started with a sort of bestiary of words that had the visual and sonic shape I wanted to represent the scene, then constrained myself to using only those words in the poem. “Myself as a Dictator” was written in a similar way, although my vocabulary for that piece was sourced from Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism. My working notes for “Love Song for Kazoo” are probably the strangest: while I had originally been experimenting with writing interlinear additions to rap lyrics, over the course of a few drafts the additions drifted from the source material and became the first stanzas of a love poem.
4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
For me, poetry is less about creation or craft than it is about invention: my poems usually begin with the question, “Can this be done?” Often, it doesn’t take much time or space to answer this question. But occasionally it takes much more. Some of my projects, especially my visual and conceptual projects, have ended up demanding monstrous amounts of repetitive, detail-oriented labour to become realities. Invention works on a timescale that has little to do with human life’s.
5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
Part of, and yes. I’ve learned a lot from attending readings, reading my own work publicly, and using readings as a platform to try things I’ve never seen anyone do before. Mostly, though, I just like to talk, and I don’t mind talking in front of others.
On the other hand, I also believe that written and spoken poetry are two different genres of art—probably more than two, actually. I enjoy them both because, in my case, their variance activates my creativity.
6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?
Yes, many. And I’m not proud to say I spend a lot more time thinking about them than I do writing.
One of the bigger questions is a familiar one, a cliché: What can words do? Over time I’ve come to believe that this question doesn’t mean much outside its particular instances, which is why I try to write.
Another question I’ve been preoccupied with lately: What does it mean to be small, or to have a small voice? I’ve heard a lot of poets describe their project as an affirmation or restoration of humanity, in a very broad sense. Personally I think this aim is silly, considering that we’re living in a world in which non-human forces—digital computation, techno-science, capital—are increasingly demonstrating they can get along fine without us. But I think it’s equally silly to turn around and proclaim an entirely post-human poetry—for example, a poetry written for the robots or aliens that’ll come to populate the future—as if humanity were in a rush to disappear. The significance of humanity, like that of poetry, is shrinking—shrinking, but not zero. If poetry has anything authentic to say, it might be about that.
Finally: It can’t be acceptable for a writer like me (white, male, straight, the list goes on) not to be concerned with the question of how to account for the exclusivity and normativity of poetry, the literary tradition, and the avant-garde—in short, of the cultural authority to claim to have something significant to say at all. I don’t have an answer to this question, though I could point out any number of people I think are doing it wrong. Perhaps most importantly, I don’t believe anyone can justify the premise that maintaining their own creative practice could only help solve the problem, that they should at least ‘keep writing’; there is nothing necessarily ethical about persistence, about equal representation for every individual who raises their voice, or even about expressing oneself in general. If I have not already done harm, as a writer (especially a publishing writer) I at least risk doing harm.
7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
“The writer” should know that words do things, understand something about how they do things, and—at the right time and place—make them do things.
8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
I love it. I love the idea of my poetry being less ‘mine,’ and I love to learn about myself from others. The more editors, the better.
9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
About writing: I’ve overheard any number of gnomic statements about the percentage of words that should be cut from a first draft, ranging from the numerically reasonable to the practically absurd. My impulses point toward the absurd.
In general: My answer is probably somewhere in the disputed borderlands between my Dad’s advice—“be good”—and my public school multiculturalist TVO Kids childhood’s advice—“be yourself.”
Finally: An out-of-context, untranslatable sentence fragment of Derrida’s: “all is not to be thought at one go.”
10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose)? What do you see as the appeal?
1) Very easy. No one spends their whole life speaking just one kind of language.
2) Why not?
11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
Very recently, I’ve worked up a habit of free-writing lines for my houseplants while listening to news radio, first thing in the morning. But over the years the only routine I’ve kept up consistently is eating breakfast every day, and I’m still not convinced that it isn’t a detriment to my writing.
12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
I don’t take an active approach to it. Perhaps I won’t write anything for a few months, then I’ll think of something new and it’ll lead me to writing. Sometimes I fantasize that one day I’ll stop writing all of a sudden—like a premature death—and never return to it. The thought doesn’t scare me.
13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Cigarette smoke (for my childhood home) and laundry detergent (for home now).
14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
In strict terms, I rarely write about or after books, at least consciously. For me the upshot of books is that they create a motivation or impulse to approach something else, and it’s most often that “something else” that I try to push back towards written language with my poetry. Some of my favourite topics are visual art, film and television, rap music, and the Toronto transit system.
On the other hand, graduate school and postmodernism have taught me that everything is book-like. So I’d like to think that poetry is right at home with anything poetry might be ‘about,’ each object being its own node of reception, communication, and distortion.
15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
I hate naming names, but some authors I’ve been into lately include Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Phil Hall, F.T. Marinetti, Erin Mouré, Rachel Zolf, Tom Phillips, Vanessa Place.
I don’t read enough literature, though. Non-literary authors I’m thinking about include Gaston Bachelard, Catherine Malabou, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jacques Rancière. And I am almost always reading something by Derrida.
16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
Shave my head.
17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
In another life, I’m an accountant who spends his nights playing grand strategy games.
18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
Writing isn’t a single act or decision, it’s just something I end up with again and again. So it depends on what else I could be doing at a given time and place.
19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
The last great book I read was Phil Hall’s Killdeer.
I haven’t seen any great films recently, so I’m going to amend the question. The last great videogame I played was Undertale.
20 - What are you currently working on?
A collection of poems written for my houseplants.
12 or 20 (second series) questions;
1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
Players is my first book, and not much has changed yet. Except that I seem to spend more time writing emails.
2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
I actually came to poetry second, thinking at first that I’d find my way writing short stories. What attracted me to poetry, though, was its apparent openness to experimentation: I wanted to test the limits of language, and I considered poetry the best platform for doing so. I’m much more skeptical today about the extent to which poetry actually has this power, but the idea still informs my writing to a great degree.
3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
My answers to all of these vary depending on the poem in question. In a sense, I try to never pursue a project the same way I’ve pursued another one.
A handful of poems in Players came out of pretty memorable compositional processes. For “Naked Baby,” I started with a sort of bestiary of words that had the visual and sonic shape I wanted to represent the scene, then constrained myself to using only those words in the poem. “Myself as a Dictator” was written in a similar way, although my vocabulary for that piece was sourced from Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism. My working notes for “Love Song for Kazoo” are probably the strangest: while I had originally been experimenting with writing interlinear additions to rap lyrics, over the course of a few drafts the additions drifted from the source material and became the first stanzas of a love poem.
4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
For me, poetry is less about creation or craft than it is about invention: my poems usually begin with the question, “Can this be done?” Often, it doesn’t take much time or space to answer this question. But occasionally it takes much more. Some of my projects, especially my visual and conceptual projects, have ended up demanding monstrous amounts of repetitive, detail-oriented labour to become realities. Invention works on a timescale that has little to do with human life’s.
5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
Part of, and yes. I’ve learned a lot from attending readings, reading my own work publicly, and using readings as a platform to try things I’ve never seen anyone do before. Mostly, though, I just like to talk, and I don’t mind talking in front of others.
On the other hand, I also believe that written and spoken poetry are two different genres of art—probably more than two, actually. I enjoy them both because, in my case, their variance activates my creativity.
6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?
Yes, many. And I’m not proud to say I spend a lot more time thinking about them than I do writing.
One of the bigger questions is a familiar one, a cliché: What can words do? Over time I’ve come to believe that this question doesn’t mean much outside its particular instances, which is why I try to write.
Another question I’ve been preoccupied with lately: What does it mean to be small, or to have a small voice? I’ve heard a lot of poets describe their project as an affirmation or restoration of humanity, in a very broad sense. Personally I think this aim is silly, considering that we’re living in a world in which non-human forces—digital computation, techno-science, capital—are increasingly demonstrating they can get along fine without us. But I think it’s equally silly to turn around and proclaim an entirely post-human poetry—for example, a poetry written for the robots or aliens that’ll come to populate the future—as if humanity were in a rush to disappear. The significance of humanity, like that of poetry, is shrinking—shrinking, but not zero. If poetry has anything authentic to say, it might be about that.
Finally: It can’t be acceptable for a writer like me (white, male, straight, the list goes on) not to be concerned with the question of how to account for the exclusivity and normativity of poetry, the literary tradition, and the avant-garde—in short, of the cultural authority to claim to have something significant to say at all. I don’t have an answer to this question, though I could point out any number of people I think are doing it wrong. Perhaps most importantly, I don’t believe anyone can justify the premise that maintaining their own creative practice could only help solve the problem, that they should at least ‘keep writing’; there is nothing necessarily ethical about persistence, about equal representation for every individual who raises their voice, or even about expressing oneself in general. If I have not already done harm, as a writer (especially a publishing writer) I at least risk doing harm.
7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
“The writer” should know that words do things, understand something about how they do things, and—at the right time and place—make them do things.
8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
I love it. I love the idea of my poetry being less ‘mine,’ and I love to learn about myself from others. The more editors, the better.
9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
About writing: I’ve overheard any number of gnomic statements about the percentage of words that should be cut from a first draft, ranging from the numerically reasonable to the practically absurd. My impulses point toward the absurd.
In general: My answer is probably somewhere in the disputed borderlands between my Dad’s advice—“be good”—and my public school multiculturalist TVO Kids childhood’s advice—“be yourself.”
Finally: An out-of-context, untranslatable sentence fragment of Derrida’s: “all is not to be thought at one go.”
10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose)? What do you see as the appeal?
1) Very easy. No one spends their whole life speaking just one kind of language.
2) Why not?
11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
Very recently, I’ve worked up a habit of free-writing lines for my houseplants while listening to news radio, first thing in the morning. But over the years the only routine I’ve kept up consistently is eating breakfast every day, and I’m still not convinced that it isn’t a detriment to my writing.
12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
I don’t take an active approach to it. Perhaps I won’t write anything for a few months, then I’ll think of something new and it’ll lead me to writing. Sometimes I fantasize that one day I’ll stop writing all of a sudden—like a premature death—and never return to it. The thought doesn’t scare me.
13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Cigarette smoke (for my childhood home) and laundry detergent (for home now).
14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
In strict terms, I rarely write about or after books, at least consciously. For me the upshot of books is that they create a motivation or impulse to approach something else, and it’s most often that “something else” that I try to push back towards written language with my poetry. Some of my favourite topics are visual art, film and television, rap music, and the Toronto transit system.
On the other hand, graduate school and postmodernism have taught me that everything is book-like. So I’d like to think that poetry is right at home with anything poetry might be ‘about,’ each object being its own node of reception, communication, and distortion.
15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
I hate naming names, but some authors I’ve been into lately include Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Phil Hall, F.T. Marinetti, Erin Mouré, Rachel Zolf, Tom Phillips, Vanessa Place.
I don’t read enough literature, though. Non-literary authors I’m thinking about include Gaston Bachelard, Catherine Malabou, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jacques Rancière. And I am almost always reading something by Derrida.
16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
Shave my head.
17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
In another life, I’m an accountant who spends his nights playing grand strategy games.
18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
Writing isn’t a single act or decision, it’s just something I end up with again and again. So it depends on what else I could be doing at a given time and place.
19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
The last great book I read was Phil Hall’s Killdeer.
I haven’t seen any great films recently, so I’m going to amend the question. The last great videogame I played was Undertale.
20 - What are you currently working on?
A collection of poems written for my houseplants.
12 or 20 (second series) questions;
Labels:
12 or 20 questions,
John Nyman,
Palimpsest Press
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Hillary Gravendyk and Cynthia Arrieu-King, unlikely conditions
I never could have come back to writing because
someone started a google doc with me, but because that person gave me the gift
of her deep care. She showed up, morning after morning, to help me get back to
myself. Our friendship was made up of all this material between us, especially
since we’d never lived in the same city. So our friendship was documents—emails,
texts, chat transcripts, google docs, photographs, and especially poems. Our friendship
was the material of poetry, which we wrote together every day. She wrote as
much as I did when I wrote, every time I wrote. And I came to understand that
the hours of writing together were most important—the poems were the happy
accident of a friend caring for another, at least at first. All my
collaborations, I thought, they are all just records of care, of friendship, of
love. The poems don’t matter.
And yet, and yet. They are everything, these
poems between us. (“Only Collaborate,” Hillary Gravendyk)
I
hadn’t realized that the poems that the late Hillary Gravendyk (March 1, 1979 -
May 10, 2014) [see my obituary for her here] was working on with Cynthia Arrieu-King had progressed as far as they had, newly released as the collaborative
poetry collection unlikely conditions
(1913 Press, 2016). Around the time Gravendyk died, there was mention of a
work-in-progress, but I had no idea that it was as developed as it was. With Gravendyk’s
short postscript “Only Collaborate” to close the small collection, I’m curious
as to Arrieu-King’s thoughts on the process of collaboration generally, and
more specifically, with a poet such as Gravendyk. While I understand, on some
level, wanting to allow Gravendyk to speak (in a powerful introduction that
speaks to how the collaboration, and specifically, Arrieu-King’s friendship,
prompted her to return to herself, as well as her own writing), this was a
collaboration, after all, of equals, equally; why would Arrieu-King not have,
possibly, included an introduction? The most she does is at the end, in the
notes, that write: “These poems were written beginning in March 2008 until May
of 2014—sometimes while we were sitting in her home in San Francisco or Los
Angeles, but mostly while she was on the West Coast and I was on the East
Coast.”
For
those unaware, Gravendyk was the author of the poetry collection Harm (Omnidawn, 2011) [see my review of such here; and some of the post-Harm poems I was fortunate enough to post via Dusie],
and Arrieu-King is the author of a number of collections, including People are Tiny in Paintings of China
(Octopus, 2010) and Manifest (Switchback
Books, 2013), with a note in her author biography that she “is working with
Omnidawn Press and its editor Rusty Morrison on Hillary’s final poems, to be
released in 2017.”
Practice
A perfect match is a cold predicament.
Imagine a stack of Necco wafers, a flock of
gray birds, schoolchildren. Arrows arrayed
against each other might look
the same, but would we call it perfect?
One perfects when one approaches
the original purpose. Our definitions say
nothing
of what, after all, we reach.
We perfect the art of things and one
is our own arrogance. But another is
failure, and a third is
approximation, and every art
perfected is a kind of love or at least a kind
of wonder.
So then let’s line up every heart in the room:
a row of wounded animals.
Let’s see who flies and who creeps.
The
short, sharp lyrics that make up unlikely
conditions are all collaborations between the two, but for three exceptions
each, listed at the back of the collection. The poems are thoughtful, introspective
and intimate, as though we are witnessing everything said between two
individuals close enough that their individual patter and patterns become
indistinguishable. I’m quite fond of collaboration [for example: here, here and
here], having seen a number of projects emerge over the years, and this might
be one of the most coherent I’ve seen, managing a solid, consistant voice and
tone throughout, making me more curious about the work of Arrieu-King, a poet
whose work I’m otherwise unfamiliar with.
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Queen Mob’s Teahouse: Three Bloody Words: an interview with Stephanie Bolster
As my tenure as interviews
editor at Queen Mob's Teahouse continues, the tenth interview
is now online: an interview I did with Stephanie Bolster on the twentieth anniversary reissue of her first poetry chapbook, Three Bloody Words (above/ground press, 1996/2016). Other interviews from my tenure include: an interview with poet, curator and art critic Gil
McElroy, conducted by Ottawa poet Roland Prevost, an interview with Toronto poet Jacqueline Valencia,
conducted by Lyndsay Kirkham, an interview with Drew Shannon and Nathan Page, also
conducted by Lyndsay Kirkham, an interview with Ann Tweedy conducted by Mary Kasimor, an interview with Katherine Osborne, conducted by Niina
Pollari, an interview with Catch Business, conducted by Jon-Michael Frank and
a conversation between Vanesa Pacheco and T.A.
Noonan, "On Translation and Erasure," existing as
an extension of Jessica Smith's The Women in Visual Poetry: The Bechdel
Test, produced via Essay Press.
Further interviews I've conducted myself over at Queen Mob's Teahouse include conversations with Claire Farley on Canthius, Dale Smith on Slow Poetry in America, Allison Green, Meredith Quartermain, Andy Weaver, N.W Lea and Rachel Loden.
If you are interested in sending a pitch for an interview my way, check out my "about submissions" write-up at Queen Mob's; you can contact me via rob_mclennan (at) hotmail.com
Further interviews I've conducted myself over at Queen Mob's Teahouse include conversations with Claire Farley on Canthius, Dale Smith on Slow Poetry in America, Allison Green, Meredith Quartermain, Andy Weaver, N.W Lea and Rachel Loden.
If you are interested in sending a pitch for an interview my way, check out my "about submissions" write-up at Queen Mob's; you can contact me via rob_mclennan (at) hotmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


