Thursday, December 26, 2013

The Capilano Review announces the L A N G U A G E S issue contest!


The Capilano Review announces the L A N G U A G E S issue contest! Respond to a poem by Nicole Brossard in the spirit of our upcoming issue.
See our account of the L A N G U A G E S issue.

The three best translations and/or translatory responses to the following excerpt from a poem by Nicole Brossard -- thanks Nicole! -- will win $250 each and be published in our spring issue alongside Nicole's original. Erin Moure will judge the contest.

Nicole Brossard 
extraits d’un ensemble intitulé
Du réel nous ne connaissons que ce qui arrive à notre corps


 

comble d’amour et d’irréel
parmi les cougars et les perdrix
que sommes-nous devenues au présent
du présent prenant possession de nos éveils et vaillances
en pleine narrative d’extase
caresses et nombril du monde confondus
aux racines en nous de lecture et d’exubérance

aujourd’hui beaucoup de les bébés naissent
sous la ceinture avec un corps complet
de fille ou de garçon qui font rouler la tradition
le sentiment et la solitude à plusieurs endroits il faut
mots de vertige noms d’animaux
l’énergie du rêve qui échappe au genre

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
hier : crevettes au lait de coco, huîtres encore très salées
avec beaucoup de les étés recherchés de nos émotions
et l’horizon

*
c’est sans compter sur la démocratie
hier moi, et autrui sur Facebook en photo, regarde :
un vautour attend que le corps de l’enfant tombe
en état de beaucoup de morts
This year's contest will be judged by Montreal poet and translator, Erin Moure.

Three Awards of $250 + publication in the Spring issue, TCR 3.23.

Fee:
$35 for Canadian entries and $45 (CAD) for non-Canadian. Length: 1-2 pages per entry.
Each entry will qualify for a one-year subscription to The Capilano Review. If you already have a subscription, we will extend your subscription or sign up a friend.

Please include your name and email address on the cover letter but no identification on the pages of the poem/s.

Deadline: February 28, 2014 (post-marked)




Send poems to:
The Capilano Review
2055 Purcell Way
North Vancouver, BC V7J 3H5
TCR's L A N G U A G E S contest!

Monday, December 23, 2013

On Writing : an occasional series


In April, 2013, I happened to catch (thanks to Sarah Mangold) the website for the NPM Daily, and absolutely loved the short essays presented on a variety of subjects surrounding the nebulous idea of “on writing.” I would highly recommend you wander through the NPM Daily site to see the pieces posted there.

After reading through a number of the pieces, I decided to respond by curating an occasional series of the same over at the ottawa poetry newsletter blog, and have since solicited and posted nearly two dozen short essays. Given the nature of the site, I’d initially focused on current or former residents of the City of Ottawa, but have been slowly opening the series to include authors from further afield. A number of the pieces have been quite astounding. Just who might be next? 

Forthcoming: Eric Folsom + Rob Thomas;


On Writing #17 : Edward Smallfield : poetics as space

On Writing #16 : Sonia Saikaley : Writing Before Dawn to Answer a Curious Calling

On Writing #15 : Roland Prevost : Ink / Here

On Writing #14 : Aaron Tucker : On Writing

On Writing #13 : Sean Johnston : On Writing

On Writing #12 : Ken Sparling : From some notes for a writing workshop

On Writing #11 : Abby Paige : On the Invention of Language

On Writing #10 : Adam Thomlison : On writing less

On Writing #9 : Christian McPherson : On Writing

On Writing #8 : Colin Morton : On Writing

On Writing #7 : Pearl Pirie : Use of Writing

On Writing #6 : Faizel Deen : Summer, Ottawa. 2013.

On Writing #5 : Michael Dennis : Who knew?

On Writing #4 : Michael Blouin : On Process

On Writing #3 : rob mclennan : On writing (and not writing)

On Writing #2 : Amanda Earl : Community

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Robin Clarke, Lines the Quarry



Everything wants to live, not
even Robocop. The difference
between human, employee
hired hand & the ocean—
simply the road gets blocked, so
Carnegie built a library
sixteen hours of work each
shift your life is mined
by one way & another
bake a cake between the days,
workers, dynamite, dripping
things you don’t want to forget

headlamp, feed dog tied to post.
A history of methane
explodes one thousand feet
in your face is a ceiling
coming down? burns ninety
percent of the woman’s
disaster porn at Big Branch
coal mine, twenty-nine Do Not
Resuscitate, Mr. Blank
Blankenship throws down a rope
I’ve got my head but three years
of citation brings the whole
sputtering to today, the
rules, or all Americans
deserve to? The company (“My Father or the Prisoner Before Him”)

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania poet, activist and teacher Robin Clarke’s first poetry collection, published as winner of the Omnidawn 1st/2nd Poetry Book Prize, is Lines the Quarry (Richmond CA: Omnidawn, 2013). Selected for the award by Brenda Hillman, the book opens with Hillman’s “Judge’s Citation,” that begins:

            Robin Clarke’s inventive and brave first collection of poems is not a book that makes you feel better; it is a book that makes you feel. It does not necessarily bring comfort or spiritual discovery—though it could lead to those things. Using an approach that is both collective and personal, the poet meditates on mining culture, on the prison system, on the health care system, on corporate seizure of resources and on systematic economic failure, on attendant environment disasters; in so doing, she always keeps attention on the specifics of working people and their struggles. The three sequences here are full of detailed fragments of incidents—never completely spelled out—that allude to illness and injury, details of childhood, family history, showing humans and earth as victims of the mines and of both slow and sudden disasters, yet the result is somehow ultimately redemptive.

Hers is a collection of documentary poems built via collage, some composed using specifics directly from a series of documents, stretched out across three sections—“My Father or the Prisoner Before Him,” “In the Building Coming Down” and “Lines the Quarry.” In the first section, she writes: “The mine collapsed under the weight of its many / false documents.” These are poems composed out of striking lines pressed firmly into and against each other, all of which contain a brutal honesty, as well as a series of challenges: “The women of Harlan County used a cadillac / to stop the train. And began singing. Which side are you / on?” This book is comparable to Brian Teare’s recent title with Omnidawn, Companion Grasses (2013) [see my review of such here], for their meditative stretches, shared ecological attentiveness and their book-length units of composition, yet Clarke’s poems also seek discomfort, and almost demand the reader respond in some way. Honestly, it would be impossible not to respond to these poems. In terms of some of the structure of short phrases collaged into each other to produce a series of accumulative stretches, as well as for their shared exploration of environmentalism and personal-political responsibilities, one could even compare this to Larissa Lai and Rita Wong’s recent collaborative re-issue Sybil Unrest (New Star Books, 2013) [see my review of such here]. Very much in the territory of “eco-poetry,” Clarke depicts, describes and laments needless destruction of the natural world through excessive mining, utilizing and lifting a language of nursery rhymes and song, implicating numerous structures in the physical destruction of the earth, all of which have been created by human hands. In terms of subject matter, her work is reminiscent of other works on disasters man-made, whether pieces on Frank Slide, Alberta, the bp oil spill or even Richard Brautigan’s infamous poem on Nova Scotia’s Springhill Mine Disaster (there were actually three mine disasters in Springhill, but who’s counting?). I wonder: there have been anthologies over the past couple of years exploring “eco-poetry,” but have there been any collections or critical explorations of poems that work through environmental disasters?

Mary Harris “Mother” Jones

What to do when yellow
fever, husband, child, child
child, child? She may have lived
100,000 years, a marriage
of action verbs & explosives—
the more I think the more rad
I get—mops & brooms used to
barricade the mine entrances
nobody wants a lady
to march one hundred child workers
from Philly textile mills to the
President’s house on Long Island
so she must become the most
dangerous America itself

Clarke describes those lost who, quite literally, “line the quarry,” and is not afraid to name names and list the dead, destroyed or lost, writing out the human and environmental costs of mining, oil drilling and other exploitations of natural resources. Through the first section, the American prison system is explored as well. In the first section, she writes: “dreams say it, together / who did nothing wrong [.]” The poems in this collection explore a series of causes and effects, some of which are quite disastrous, such as the list poem “2010 Workers’ Compensation Injuries, Illnesses, Fatalities,” the opening poem “2006 Workers’ Compensation Injury Data, United States” or the seven-stanza list poem “Mining Disasters in the Month of January, United States,” that includes:

1846 Delaware-Hudson, Roof Fall, Carbondale, PA, 14 killed
1883 Coulterville, Mine Explosion, Coulterville, IL, 10 killed
1884 Crested Butte, Mine Explosion, Crested Butte, CO, 59 killed
1886 Almy No. 4, Mine Explosion, Almy, WY, 13 killed
1886 Newburg, Mine Explosion, Newburg, PA, 39 killed
1891 Mammouth, Mine Explosion, Mt. Pleasant, PA, 109 killed

Through exploring various disasters, Clarke ends up exploring memory—“the worst disaster since the last one”—writing about people lost through the prison system, disasters man-made we don’t wish to think about, and just where the accumulation of disaster upon disaster might end up taking us. “What do you love about this / world? Without what is there nothing // else to say?

Saturday, December 21, 2013

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Renée Sarojini Saklikar

Educated at the University of British Columbia (B.A., LL.B), Renée Sarojini Saklikar writes thecanadaproject, a life-long poem chronicle, in part, about life from India to Canada, by way of Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Northern Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan and British Columbia. Work from thecanadaproject appears in literary journals, newspapers, and anthologies. The first completed series from thecanadaproject is a book length poem, children of air india (Nightwood Editions, 2013) about the bombing of Air India Flight 182.

1 - How did your first book change your life? Originally, the first completed series from thecanadaproject took shape as a memoir-manifesto, about place and identity, India to Canada. Then the great rift happened, what Wayde Compton calls, rupture. And then, the voices, terrifying. The weight of it, children of air india. I don’t think I yet know how the change will be.

How does your most recent work compare to your previous? Rueful smile:  er, hopefully, it is better? I’m a slow reader, slow learner. Used to be a fast talker, lawyering into poetry.

How does it feel different? I keep falling into that fault-line, between language and lyric. For example, last year, I tried doing away with “I,” substituting the ego, the personal/confessional voice, with a colon. (  :  ). Yeah. Didn’t go over so well. Still working at it.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction? I’ve always jotted down bits of things and only much later, after many other things happened, did I start paying attention to what was coming up, and how it sounded, about texture, internal rhythm. Also, there is Incoming. No escape.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Used to be, everything was always a-starting. It were the completion that devilled me. Now, it is the getting into the poem: that is the hard part.

Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Again, this is changing. In general, fast flashes of fragment. Then, the long slow burning.

Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes? Not a chance on the former. If only! Someone please come and take away this chronicling impulse.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Usually with a rhythmic pattern found in an arrangement of words: rarely just one word; more likely, a group of them and often this pattern of words is connected to an incident and its place.

For example, this summer,  on a Saturday out in Surrey, B.C., at a brand new public library, I saw a man rant to a security guard about the fact that there were no public pay phones in that lovely new public building. The man who needed the pay phone wore his hair in a ponytail, bruises covered his tattooed arm.  The security guard wore a turban. The more the man yelled about the library not having a public pay phone the more I looked at him. The more I looked, the more he expounded. At no point did I offer the man my cell phone, because I do not own a cell phone. The man swore. He ran out the library. Almost, I ran after him. Before he left, I started to scribble his words on paper: can’t find the paper, will keep looking—anyway, it is not the words, any longer. It is their rhythm.

Sometimes the poem arrives with an image, which, usually, I have to hold close for a very long time.

Sometimes the poem will begin as notes composed in response to another poem (I’m writing a series of response poems to folks like Stephen Collis, Rachel Blau du Plessis, Bhanu Kapil).

Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning? Oh, pretty much the former, but not, perhaps, in the way one might think, because I cannot seem to write just the one thing, without it being in relation to another: a cycle of juxtapose and fragment.  Maybe one day I’ll be brave enough to title all my poems, “Coda.”

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings? Up till about six months ago, I’d have responded, “I love reading my work in public.” Also, the more I do so, the more I contemplate the nature of performance: how a written poem, spoken, can so easily veer into caricature. Was it cranky nasty P. Larkin who said he loathed poetry readings? Is there a recording of Larkin reading The Whitsun Weddings? Wayde Compton first got me thinking of performance as a site of research for my poems. I think he may have been quoting bpNichol. If I can find a way to stay true to that, then reading in public seems to help the poems.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? Yes. I believe so. I do not have the language to describe the concerns. Exegesis frightens, like so much else. (what a timid person emerges from this to and fro: still, doing the work and a member of the resistance). The doctrinal must be approached skittishly, as cat to prey, and usually via intermediaries, found through online rummaging, outside The Academy. Mantra: “We are just beginning to know nothing.” (Bruce Andrews, Lip Service).

What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are? Dear me, I am nearly fainting away for want of answering, for wanting to answer. Please see above. May my work always seek the questions.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? Now these questions strike me as important and so my first response is to shrug and think up glib responses, like, “couldn’t possibly answer.” And this first question, with its qualifier, “current,” and its descriptive, “in larger culture,” demands answer, I think: we must risk something, for the coming troubles. For the dark age ahead. Incoming has us in its grip. Who will speak to it?

What do you think the role of the writer should be?
Well, I’m so scared by what I just wrote, I’ll defer to the first part.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)? Not only essential, comforting, in an uncomfortable sort of way. Finally, the work can be taken outside of itself, and examined.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)? Transgress! (Betsy Warland/Ray Hsu). Think about the order of things (Peter Carey in a NaNoWriMo pep talk). Without hope or despair (Rachel Rose). Mere persistence can be an act of disobedience. (Sara Ahmed).

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to non-fiction)? Nothing seems to come easy. I still don’t fully understand this word, “genre.” Some days, everything elides, particularly, poetry/memoir/manifesto/essay. Other times, it is as if they are different countries, guarded by fierce borders.  I’m taking a course with Meredith Quartermain later this month, on meta-narratives. Yeah. There is some b.a. stuff there that excites. What do you see as the appeal? Because a piece of work demands cross-transference.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin? The best days are mornings, almost immediately upon rising, filled with reading and writing, while my husband is asleep and the place quiet.  After breakfast and after a set of self-prescribed house frau rituals such as making my bed, tidying up, I will sit down to do the work. I can rarely write for more than four hours at a stretch.  If I am working on a series of poems, I try and keep to a schedule. Until Incoming makes its demands. More and more, Incoming takes over the day and then discipline is a sorry thing. Sometimes, approaching midnight, again, the pulse.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration? Reading other poets, writers, that counters the fear. Also, walking, running away from the computer, doing anything with my hands, although I lack even the most basic skill to do pretty much anything else. Took me a long time to figure that out. These days, also, there is prayer, although I don’t really understand what I mean by that.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Once, in a fable, I would have written, “cardamom/ginger.” A trigger, that word, “home”: At first I have nothing to say, because the concept of home fragments. Most days, I feel without a sense of home. That sense propels my writing. Then, if I close my eyes and breathe: cedar, salmon berry. The stink of diesel. Oolichan-rot down at the New West quay.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
Yep. Pretty much all of that. Especially, the names.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work? Surprisingly (?), many of them are found on this blog.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
Find the courage to travel, because even leaving my house is a big deal, requiring ritual and deliberation. Travel again to India. Visit Ireland.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? In theory, bee keeping. Also, to be that smith, Macsen/Durga, at the forge, in the bend in the river. Also, the potter, at her wheel.

Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer? Unhappy lawyer.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else? The unexpected death of my father. Marriage and a supportive partner, who said, “get on with it.”

19 - What was the last great book you read? This word, “great,” causes me such a pause, thinking about all the great poetry books I’ve read, or thought about reading, or want to read, but still have not, many of which are listed in your blog. About two weeks ago, I read Roseanna, by Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö. I’m reading Diane Wakoski Greed, Parts 5-7.  Also, Priscila Uppal’s, We Are What We Mourn.

What was the last great film? I rarely go out and see films, my brain being so porous, the image sticks around a very long time and often, story-lines and images then blend into one long spool: Children of Men-District 9-The Hunger Games-Elysium.

20 - What are you currently working on? a novel, an essay about women in the 20th and 21st centuries, and yet another long poem, about Toronto, Paris, Baghdad. Notes on a speculative fiction-essay-poem, about politics in British Columbia.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Danny Jacobs

Danny Jacobs grew up in Riverview, NB. His poems have been published in a variety of journals across Canada, including ARC, Event, The Antigonish Review, Riddle Fence, The Malahat Review, The Fiddlehead, Grain and CV2. After living in a number of cities and towns in the Maritimes, Danny is back in Riverview and works as the librarian in the village of Petitcodiac, NB. Songs That Remind Us of Factories is his first book.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
It just came out so I guess I will have to see how much it will change my life. It is pretty surreal to finally hold the book, though. The big thing for me is working through all that post-first book writerly angst regarding what comes next.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
You could say I came to fiction first. I always wanted to write fiction and I did a fiction thesis during my Creative Writing MA in ’08 (UNB). I still love short stories but I don’t know if I am the best at writing them yet (and I haven’t tried the form in years). I wrote poetry along with fiction during that time and I just kept at the poetry—it’s what I felt was working better.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
I vary between two extremes—some poems change little from first drafts; I write them and think to myself “that’s done” and I’m happy (as happy as one can be, which is never completely). Then there’s some I continually tinker with and tear apart and rebuild and add new paintjobs to and then stand back and notice how gaudy it is and then sand blast it.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
If I’m going to be honest, I think the book that just came out is a collection of what I think are my best efforts of the last, say, six years or so. I think this is the case for many first books of poems. Or most books of poems? You find common threads after the fact.  I don’t think I have the attention span to do a full-length themed collection—I jump around too much. I like to write a poem about oxen and then jump to the Higgs Boson. 

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
I love public readings and I think it’s valuable for non-poetry readers, or occasional poetry readers, to attend them. I once had a friend who didn’t read any contemporary poetry get really excited about the sounds I was making while reading my poems. That’s a really wonderful compliment. Readings make people pay attention to the music – the rhythm and cadence – of a poem. No wonder most poets read their stuff aloud while drafting it.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?
This is a huge question. I don’t think my work could be couched in an overarching theoretical framework. Like I said, I jump around. One of the big theoretical concerns with a lot of contemporary poets right now seems to involve reconciling scientific thinking with poetic thinking. Or trying to integrate scientific terminology and concepts in their work. One thinks of Matthew Tierney, Gerard Beirne, Adam Dickinson. This kind of thing interests me a lot and makes for fine poetry. I also get a real charge out of poets who use very contemporary diction, themes, settings, etc. in poems—detritus from Late Capitalism, if handled deftly, can make incredible poetry. One thinks of Michael Robbins’ Alien Vs. Predator, a book that knocked a lot of people out.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
Most writers try to tap into the culture at large and hold a mirror up to its vulnerabilities. Great writers do a damn good job of this. They throw back at us the shit we say and do and ask us to lay with it for awhile. I think this is important, this reminding us of who we are at this tenuous stage in the game.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
Essential and, in my case, not difficult. My editor at Nightwood was fantastic and made it easy. You hear these stories about editors and writers butting heads. I didn’t have these problems.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
Read tons of shit (not necessarily in those words).

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
When I wasn’t working another job full time (and getting financial aid from a grant) I wrote in the mornings. I work full time as a librarian now so I obviously have to rework when and how I write. And I’m still dizzy from the book coming out so I don’t have much of a writing routine. I grab snatches of time when I can, but I work better with a routine so I’m still trying to figure out what that could be.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
No one particular place or thing gives me inspiration. And I think this is good for a writer— it works better when you’re attentive to your surroundings, open to let anything, at any time, bonk you on the head the right way.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
I wish I could say cow patties or haymows or freshly chopped wood but I grew up in the suburbs and I think they all smell alike—a kind of non-smell. Cut grass, maybe? What does the inside of a convenience store smell like?

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
I like to think all of those things influence my work. But I would agree primarily with Mr. McFadden: books come from books.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
My initial reaction is the clichéd one: there are too many to name. This may sound ass-kissy or something, but I consider myself lucky to be living in a country that has such a vibrant poetry scene. So many great presses have wild poets pulling things off that I couldn’t even imagine attempting. Over the past, say, 10 years, there has been so many amazing books. Our country has Ken Babstock, Don McKay, Karen Solie, David O’Meara, Matthew Tierney, Jeramy Dodds, Carmine Starnino, Elizabeth Bachinsky. To name a few. Awesome. All of these poets mean a lot to me and my writing.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Finish painting my house.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
I started school studying astrophysics but realized very early in my first year of university that I couldn’t hack it.  So being one of those guys who looks at pictures of the very early universe and writes beautiful equations on dry-erase boards all day sounds pretty swell. You use the word “attempt” and I couldn’t attempt this, but it’s a nice daydream.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
Writing is fun. It is hard at times but usually at least a little fun. I could lie and say it is often painful and gut-wrenching and it was my calling and I was compelled to it and I was like John Berryman or something but it wasn’t like that. I think for very off-the-wall geniuses (like Berryman) it’s absolutely like that but for most of us normal and very average and very minor people, it’s probably just fun most of the time and that’s why we do it.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
I’ve been picking away at Cleanth Brooks’ classic of New Criticism, The Well Wrought Urn. It’s a great book for poets—Brooks takes the springs, cogs, and screws out of poems and lays them out on a clean towel for the reader. While dusty at times, there’s a minimum of bullshit. His close readings show us that great poems, when taken on their own terms, are tiny perpetual motion machines—isolated systems that don’t wind down, each greased piece working in concert.

As for film, I caught some of Jurassic Park on TV last week. Such a cocktail of nostalgia.

19 - What are you currently working on?
I’m trying to write new poems. While I doubt a book-length themed project will ever be my thing, I wouldn’t mind the next book to be a more focused project, in terms of theme. I recently moved back to my home town, so I see some poems coming into fruition that examines the strangeness that comes with moving back to the place you grew up in.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Monday, December 16, 2013

Now available! Ground rules: the best of the second decade of above/ground press 2003-2013

Ground Rules: the best of the second decade of above/ground press 2003-2013
ed. rob mclennan

published by Chaudiere Books

poetry / $24.95
ISBN 978-0-9783428-7-6














Working out of Ottawa, poet and publisher rob mclennan's baby, above/ground press, marks a second decade of the production of broadsheets, chapbooks, magazines, and anthologies that trace out the best shapes of the best of contemporary Canadian (and, increasingly, international) poetry. From the span of that second ten of years, he has compiled this book of traceries: a selection of work by writers ranging from the likes of the late Artie Gold, and Robert Kroetsch, to the living derek beaulieu, Rachel Zolf, Eric Folsom, Natalie Simpson, etc., all collected here as representative of a decade's aesthetic count.
    from Gil McElroy's "Introduction: An Integral"
Edited by rob mclennan, with an introduction by Gil McElroy, Ground Rules features writing from the second decade of one of the most active micro publishers in Canada, selected from a series of hundreds of publications lovingly edited, produced and distributed by editor/publisher rob mclennan. A follow-up to Groundswell: best of above/ground press, 1993-2003 (Broken Jaw Press, 2003), Ground Rules includes a wide range of work by Artie Gold, Mark Cochrane, Suzanne Zelazo, derek beaulieu, Stephanie Bolster, Amanda Earl, Nathanaël, Lisa Samuels, Rachel Zolf, Sharon Harris, D. G. Jones, Julia Williams, Eric Folsom, Gregory Betts, Natalie Simpson, Aaron Tucker, Monty Reid, William Hawkins, Emily Carr, Cameron Anstee, Helen Hajnoczky, Marilyn Irwin, Stephen Brockwell, Robert Kroetsch and rob mclennan.

In August, 2013, Ottawa's Apt. 9 Press published the limited-edition chapbook (click to read the excerpt - I simply began: above/ground press at 20 [an interview with rob mclennan]) a lengthy interview with rob mclennan on the beginnings and history of the press conducted by Cameron Anstee.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Artie Gold, “doublet”

Mark Cochrane, “Rotator Cuff at 33 1/3,”

Suzanne Zelazo, “SUIT”

derek beaulieu, dream poem for dieter roth #1
derek beaulieu, untitled #3

Stephanie Bolster, “Night Zoo,”

Amanda Earl, "ivre,"

Nathanaël, “what exile   this”
STANZAS magazine, volume 1, issue #29

Lisa Samuels, "The Museum of Perception”
STANZAS magazine, volume 1, issue #33

Rachel Zolf, "the naked & the nude”
STANZAS magazine, volume 1, issue #40

Sharon Harris, “more fun with 'pataphysics”
STANZAS magazine, volume 1, issue #43

D. G. Jones, standard pose

Julia Williams, MY CITY IS ANCIENT AND FAMOUS

Eric Folsom, NORTHEAST ANTI-GHAZALS

Gregory Betts, The Cult of David Thompson

Natalie Simpson, The writing that should enter into conversation

Monty Reid, cuba A book

William Hawkins, the black prince of bank street

Emily Carr
]
& look there goes a sparrow transplanting soil
                    ]            [3 eclogues]

Cameron Anstee, Frank St.

Helen Hajnoczky, A history of button collecting

Marilyn Irwin, for when you pick daisies

Stephen Brockwell, Impossible Books
(the Carleton Installment)

Robert Kroetsch, Further to Our Conversation

rob mclennan, The creeks,

to order: add $5 for postage, and paypal (above) or cheque to Chaudiere Books, 2423 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa Ontario Canada K1H 7M9

And be sure to keep checking out the Chaudiere Books blog and Chaudiere Books Facebook group  (we're even on Twitter! @ChaudiereBooks) for plenty of updates, including our 2014 Indiegogo Campaign kick-off and announcement of 2014 titles!