Showing posts with label The Year. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Year. Show all posts

Monday, August 25, 2025

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Hannah Brooks-Motl

Hannah Brooks-Motl was born and raised in Wisconsin. She is author of the poetry collections The New Years (2014), M (2015), Earth (2019), and Ultraviolet of the Genuine (2025), as well as chapbooks from the Song Cave, arrow as aarow, and The Year. She lives in western Massachusetts.

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My first book came out in 2014. I had the sense that something else should happen then, so I did a variety of things that now seem unbelievable to me—danced it, chanted it, etc. I haven’t pursued such activities with recent books, but the experience relaxed my relation to ideas about “the work” generally. I’d say it helped me welcome contingency, accident, potential embarrassment. Otherwise, there’s a general kind of vibe that persists across the books, sort of earthy and philosophical (I hope).

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction? 

As a reader, I came first to novels. My family took many cross-country drives when I was a kid. I read for the days it took us to get somewhere. Non-stop, fully immersed—that’s my dream. Poetry arrived in the form of my much older sister, who was a poet then (now she’s a forensic pathologist); her 90s poet life seemed impossibly glamorous. She let me hang out in bars with her and her writer friends when I was a teen.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I write a lot in notebooks, accruing language and concerns. At some point the feeling mysteriously arrives that a poem should result. The poems undulate across the many days or weeks of gathering and jots. I sort of find them there, lead them out. 

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

I wrote one book “project,” involving the essays of Michel de Montaigne. Mainly now I let reading, practice, life be my guide.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I like readings, sometimes very much. Sometimes a poetry reading will manifest and crystallize the happy, nervy, hopeful energy of people together, yearning to be.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are? 

One concern is with poetry’s rescue of discourse, where the poem, or the kind of thinking a poem is, can be a true statement, albeit one that we only very briefly inhabit or are allowed. Recently, I’m invested—to my surprise—in rehabilitating the old quarrel between Shelley and Wordsworth, via Mill, poems of the head vs poems of the heart, to ask: why choose? As in, why is that the choice we are asked to make again and again? There’s (always) questions of what reading is good for; in what ways does poetry do a kind of (moral) philosophizing; interest in humans, their behaviors and reasons (actual, believed), and the lives of creatures.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

Writers and artists and thinkers I admire tend to believe in some different or other reality, the pursuit and discovery of which language, image, aesthetic expression uniquely allow. Art is a bridge one walks on and toward—an earthy, clumsy substance and a spiritual, extravagant one. It often encodes a personal longing but it’s also social, environmental, historical, political. Who but writers and artists will honor these stubborn, modest, generous dreams?

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

I am a scholarly editor—I mean I edit monographs, edited collections, journal articles. I was an acquisitions editor for a university press full-time for years, now I do free-lance developmental editing. I have lots to say about editing and its importance, but yes, I think working with editors is essential.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

I have a poem in my latest book that includes the line “Keep going + believe = ‘advice.’” It’s a joke but not a joke.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

Most days I get up very early to write. People used to sleep differently—a first sleep, an interlude around 3:00 am, a second sleep. This historic interlude is where a lot of my work’s language arrives.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

Philosophy. Biography. Walks in the woods.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Cut grass, violet skies with a thunderstorm somewhere, slight farm.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

Working and being with animals. Listening to the anecdotes of others.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

Iris Murdoch, Marguerite Young, Lorine Niedecker, Paul Valéry, Sylvia Townsend Warner, Ernst Bloch, Paul Goodman, Wong May, Dan Bevacqua, Peter Gizzi, Emily Hunt, Sara Nicholson, Ben Estes, Alan Felsenthal, Kai Ihns, Hai-dang Phan, Patrick Morrissey.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Hike the AT. Live in France. Write a play with my husband and stage it in our house.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I frequently wish I had been an ethologist. It’s the science of, someone has said, interviewing animals in their own language.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

My other artistic talents were minimal. Other forms of more regular or professionally legible work leave me feeling half-alive.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Last great book was Unclay by TF Powys; last great film was a rewatching of The Souvenir by Joanna Hogg.

19 - What are you currently working on?

More poems and a novel about a self-taught artist in rural Illinois. 

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Wednesday, June 04, 2025

Ongoing notes: early June, 2025: Elizabeth Marie Young + Hannah Brooks-Motl,

We will see you at the ottawa small press book fair this month, yes? June 21, at the Tom Brown Arena; and the pre-fair the night prior, at Anina’s Café? You know you want to. The best of the small press in Ottawa since 1994. And don’t forget to sign up (free!) for the above/ground press substack! There’s even some further big interviews coming up on there over the next few weeks with authors such as Jason Christie, Michael Sikkema, Monty Reid, Micah Ballard and Lydia Unsworth; that’s pretty cool, yes?

Boston MA: The latest from Boston-based poet Elizabeth Marie Young, a poet I hadn’t heard of prior to this, is the chapbook-length poem 349 THINGS I DON’T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT RIGHT NOW (2024), the sixth chapbook by American chapbook publisher clones go home. This poem is exactly what the title suggests, an accumulation set as stanzas, one after another, offering a propulsion of item after item that reads as delightfully surreal. As she writes: “The Plastic Ono Band. Whether a wolf with / polypropylene teeth will drag my dad into the River of / Lethargy. The Backside Rock ‘n’ Roll. What it’s like to be / on fire.” Wonderfully inventive and playful, the poem is expansive, endlessly extensive and ongoing, and after a while, begins to read as reasoning, as mantra; as a listing of ongoing complaints and as, perhaps, a way to centre the mind, the spirit, amid all the chaos. “This is just a feeling,” she writes, a repetitive quartet across a single page, “It does not control me.”

Grandma energy. Whoever invented sin. Whoever
invented sinkholes. The unsettling glow of the
Bachquellengraben River. Open casket burials.
Indoctrination camps. Resetting interest rates to avoid
financial meltdown. Whoever invented spurs. Whoever
invented your comfort animal’s soft, synthetic fur.
Whoever invented Dolly Parton. Hacking the central
Bank of Japan. Elvira, Mistress of the Dark’s
sexual orientation.

Chicago IL: From Hannah Brooks-Motl, another poet I hadn’t been aware of prior, comes Poem Staple Collage / for Jonathan Rajewski / & Other Poem (Chicago IL: The Year, 2024), the bulk of which, according to the colophon, originally “appeared as part of a text/image collaboration originally hosted by Nina Johnson gallery as part of ‘Recreational Collage,’ a 2023 exhibition of works by Jonathan Rajewski, some of which appear here,” produced in a lovely and graceful (with letterpress covers) edition of two hundred copies. I am curious about the nature of this particular collaboration, if it a proper back-and-forth between the poet and the artist, or if more of a response project, with the poet responding to particular artworks. These poems are extraordinarily expansive, slow and meditative, composing an ongoing line that suggests itself far longer than this particular collection might hold. “The artist works at a simple machine,” Brooks-Motl writes, offering bits of text interspersed with full-colour artworks by Rajewski, “It uses pressure from which flows an arrangement of heavens wrapping around and carrying on—a hand or arm, a foot, a knee— // Pistachios and marigolds on a background of cardboard // When you look at the staple it’s catholic and scattered. An array meaning the town you appeared in with obscure talents at life [.]”

From GS we know that repetition is not just repeating since differences of emphasis always exist

There is a granular non-repetitive emphatic and continuously present view of things that liberates you from story and regret

Time in its plastic wrap and denim, stapling dried blood and dried leaves

Failure which loves holey socks and rags, walnut or rocks

Affects that appear over and over are bother, nervousness, ease

There is a velvety repetitive ambiguous and intermittent prospect—I write in a rush and then I select

The form is choosing, in order to keep choice open