Douglas Barbour at 70; happy birthday!
Showing posts with label Stephen Scobie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Scobie. Show all posts
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Thursday, November 06, 2008
Alberta dispatch: the University of Alberta
A few years ago I read in the transcript of Sheila Watson's preamble to her first public reading from The Double Hook, that Professor Salter had been one of her best editors. That was news, but no surprise. He was no mean scholar, but he didn’t crawl into his speciality and stay there until retirement. His reward for recognizing that a first-rate writer had an office down the hall from him in the U of A Arts Building, was a share in making a beautiful book. The Bard, too, was always somebody's neighbour, somebody's friend. Professor Salter, twenty years too late, I'm ready to listen to you on Shakespeare.In his first editorial to open the year he edited NeWest Review, "My Five Years at The NeWest Review" (Volume 6, No. 1, September, 1980), Monty Reid wrote:
— Stan Dragland, Journeys Through Bookland
I remember what began. I was a student at the University of Alberta, an unpublished poet, and wondering why there were almost no magazines in Western Canada that interested me, when I found the first issue of NeWest ReView at the bookstore in Hub Mall. What I remember most about the first issue was a short poem by Sid Marty, there in the middle of the front page. It was important to me because it had been given a significant context. The poem reverberated with the sound of the other voices around it; that front page was coming out of the country I lived in.For years, I've wandered through Edmonton during my annual or semi-annual reading tours and being impressed by the University of Alberta's English (now English and Film Studies) Department. I would usually head through alongside friends, grad students and Edmonton poets Andy Weaver and Adam Dickinson, over to visit Douglas Barbour's office, perhaps, or check out the display case that featured recent literary titles by faculty and students. Why don't all universities have these? It certainly made the department look impressive as a place that helped foster writing, with graduates and faculty over the years including Thomas Wharton, kath macLean, Weaver, Dickinson, Monty Reid, Stephen Scobie, Sheila Watson, Rudy Wiebe, Greg Hollingshead, Kristjana Gunnars, Henry Kreisel, Stan Dragland, and Professor Frederick Salter, for whom the Salter Reading Room is named. If you wander through, you can even see the little desk that used to belong to Sheila Watson, author of The Double Hook.
The Double Hook begins with this absence, and then, as Barthes comments, proceeds in its narration (its apocalyptic "unveiling of the truth") to the "staging" of that absent father. Every word of the novel stands in for the word that is not used on the first page. The male characters, especially James and Felix, are advanced (without much conviction) as substitute fathers; the female characters, not least "the old lady" herself, meet and challenge those God-like pretentions. Even, in her case, the God-like pretentions of God Himself […].It's strange to think of just how far the University of Alberta has come, one hundred years old during my school year in residence. Originally, the University of Calgary was built as a branch-plant, the U of A's Calgary campus, which seems funny, when you think that at one corner of the University of Alberta, sitting at the bottom of Whyte (82nd) Avenue, there's a more recent branch plant of the University of Calgary. Has it come full circle? Even the Banff Centre, as John Robert Columbo writes in his Canadian Literary Landmarks (1984), "goes back to 1933 when it was organized as a summer extension program by the University of Alberta."
The University of Alberta, one of the original points of contention between Edmonton and Calgary, set up against each other now for decades, in everything from white vs. blue collar to competing NHL teams (“the battle for Alberta”), starting out when the province of Alberta was invented. At least, when strips of Athabasca turned into the province of Saskatchewan, the provincial government was smart enough to put the capital in one city, and the university in the other, for the sake of balance, and, dare I say it, fairness. When Alberta was finally invented, far more of the provincial decision-makers were Edmonton-based than were Calgary, so the city was able to take both. How could Calgary not respond? How could the two cities ever get along after? With only the neutral ground of Red Deer to come between them. As Calgary author Aritha van Herk wrote in her Mavericks: An Incorrigible History of Alberta (2001):
Edmonton and Calgary. Two circling huskies, equal in size and clout, 185 miles apart and connected by the north-south ribbon of Highway 2. Books and studies and reports discuss their rivalry, blue collar versus white collar, Redmonton versus Tory-blue Calgary, Oilers versus Flames. Edmonton hosts the legislature, the civil servants, the mandarins of the latest swept-in majority government. Calgary parties with oil men and bankers and corporate head offices, 204 of them, second only to Toronto.I am writing out these images, this country of roughneck and rocky plains past. Is this simply me, being overcome by my own myths of Edmonton, of wild prose. A local reading series, run by T.L. Cowan and Thea Bowering, calls itself “wild prose country”? Why do I still allow myself to get caught up in the ideas of Kroetsch and van Herk, but not the lyric prose of Kristjana Gunnars, perhaps one of the finest prose stylists to come through this town, and someone who managed to publish at least half a dozen books of fiction, as well as numerous poetry collections? She now sits relatively silent on her British Columbia coast, painting in oil. Gunnars, apparently, only the second person to be hired full-time at the University to teach creative writing; why does she not figure more in my imagination? Why, even with new information, am I so slow to incorporate these into my old and over-worn ideas?
Professor Salter stood perhaps five foot five and had a rather weak chin. He might have looked like the pattern of a henpecked husband when he first walked into the classroom, if it hadn’t been for his smile. I remember his first words: 'Professor Orrell and I just flipped a coin to see who would take which section of Shakespeare. You lost.'
Ah, but the smile. It was another year, my third, before I got to know any of my fellow English majors, with their inside information, so I knew nothing of Professor Salter's reputation. And still that smile instantly told me that he wouldn’t have contradicted anybody who said we'd won. He knew what he was worth, but he never paraded it. Nor did he make anything of the fact that he was lecturing in pain, as we could tell whenever he winced involuntarily through his smile. There was only one allusion to the body that broke down over Christmas, so that Professor Orrell had to add our class to his in the new year: 'If I can carry my Shakespeare to class, surely to goodness you young people can manage to bring yours.'Over the years, the English and Film Studies Department has been a strong example of how a university helps a writing community develop, from the creative writing classes themselves, the hiring of working writers as faculty, and the longest continuing writer-in-residence program left in Canada. My time in Edmonton coincided with the beginnings of a creative writing program at the University of Regina. The University of Ottawa and Carleton University, on the other hand, barely have individual fiction and poetry workshops, proving yet again the bare functionality of a government town, despite the fact that we are the nation’s capital. In the mid-1990s, Ottawa's high tech industry even made public complaints about Carleton getting rid of some of their arts programs, including the language programs. We don’t want to hire automatons, they said. We want potential hirees to be able to think for themselves.
— Stan Dragland, Journeys Through Bookland
During my time at the University of Alberta, one of the most common questions I got was, what exactly does a writer-in-residence do? Are you required to teach? Those in the system, whether already having done one or just wanting to, seem to have an idea of what the job requires, but most of the time, even folk within the department don’t seem to be entirely clear on what the position means.
My office sat in the English and Film Studies Department, just on the third floor of the Humanities Centre, a building erected in 1972, and decorated with coloured skylights, bright carpets, and fifty-two painted nylon banners by Vancouver artist Takao Tanabe. With each coloured banner 4 x 13 feet in size hanging from the interior ceilings all the way down past the third floor, I noticed quickly just how the light came in through the late morning along the south end of the building, streaming coloured sunlight through the interior, along the office windows of Ph.D. and post-doc alike, possibly too busy to notice it themselves.
Buying a pack for the clumsy bag,The first few weeks, repeatedly telling me how I don’t have to be in there, I don’t have to sit in my office all day, we don’t expect you to come in but three hours a week, but where else would I end up? I’d have to work somewhere. Never office hours but whole office days, and a door that was never closed. What exactly, then, is the function of writer? What does it mean, to write, or even, to write as (seemingly) public function? American writer Joyce Carol Oates who, with her husband Raymond Joseph Smith, founded the Ontario Review during her time at the University of Windsor from 1967 to 1977, at which point they returned to the United States, taking the journal with them. Dorothy Livesay who started Contemporary Verse 2 in 1976 during her two year tenure as writer-in-residence at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, 1974-76.
zoomed to Edmonton, north, the Hostel, to beds,
to breakfast mush and supper, bummed cigarettes,
sitting dull-eyes day-long in the railway station.
Edmonton. November. Cold. Snow. I am sitting
on the edge of the bed, scribbling on paper towels,
afraid of the ostentation; broke, tired, happy.
Started at the University of Alberta over thirty years before I arrived, the writer in residence program provides a living wage for a working literary writer so they can spend the bulk of their time working on their own writing projects, as well as being available for consultation for writers and other hopefuls both at the University and within the community. Part of this also involves doing readings at the University, Grant MacEwan College, at the University of Calgary (both universities traditionally invite the others writer in residence to read at their school), as well as various book clubs and other events around Edmonton. Wasn’t I built for such a position?
What will they remember of me, if they remember anything at all?
Friday, August 11, 2006
a brief note on the poetry of Douglas Barbour
Last night I was having a drink with poet and former prairie resident Monty Reid and (since he's just about to take a new house, packing/unpacking boxes) he gave me a copy of in by one, out by four (1980), a small poetry publication with the work of Douglas Barbour, George Melnyk, Reid and Stephen Scobie. According to Reid, it was published as a response to more precious poetry publications at the time, and the whole run was published, from submission to final product, in a three hour period (hence the title), in Edmonton by what Reid called the "Instant Poetry Press," in June 1980.
Edmonton poet Douglas Barbour [see my interview with him here], roughly the same age as those Ken Norris would call "first generation Canadian post-modernism," such as George Bowering, Fred Wah, Daphne Marlatt and bpNichol, he started his own publishing a bit later on, putting him more with that second generation of Canadian poets that would include Dennis Cooley (also a late bloomer), Sharon Thesen, Ken Norris and Barry McKinnon. Still, considering the amount and quality of publishing Barbour has done over the years, it seems surprising that his writing hasn’t received the attention that it deserves. Is this a prairie problem in general? Is this due to the fact that Barbour isn’t really a self-promoter? I think the same things have happened to Winnipeg poet Cooley; both are highly respected in their individual geographic regions (watch for a new Cooley poetry collection this fall), but given short shrift in anything further. My own bookshelf of Barbour books includes (I know I'm missing a few) A Poem As Long As The Highway (Kingston ON: Quarry Press, 1971), shore lines (Winnipeg MB: Turnstone Press, 1979), visible visions, the selected poems of Douglas Barbour (Edmonton AB: NeWest Press, 1984) edited by Smaro Kamboureli and Robert Kroetsch, Story for a Saskatchewan Night (Red Deer AB: Writing West / Red Deer College Press, 1990), Fragmenting Body etc. (Edmonton AB: NeWest Press, 2000) and Breath Takes (Toronto ON: Wolsak & Wynn, 2001), as well as the chapbooks a flame on the spanish stairs (Victoria BC: greenboathouse books, 2002) and It’s over is it over: Love’s Fragmented Narrative (Ottawa ON: above/ground press, 2005), his collection of literary essays Lyric/Anti-Lyric: Essays on Contemporary Poetry (Edmonton AB: writer as critic / NeWest Press, 2001), and the collaboration he did with Arizona poet Sheila E. Murphy, Continuations (Edmonton AB: University of Alberta Press, 2006) [see my review of such here]. Other books of his (that I don’t have) include Land Fall (Montreal QC: Delta Canada, 1971; Ottawa ON: The Golden Dog Press, 1973), White (Fredericton NB: Fiddlehead Books, 1972), songbook (Vancouver BC: Talonbooks, 1973), he. &. she. &. (Ottawa ON: The Golden Dog Press, 1974), Worlds Out of Words: The SF Novels of Samuel R. Delany (Frome UK: Bran's Head Books, 1979), The Pirates of Pen's Chance (with Stephen Scobie, Toronto ON: Coach House Press, 1981) and The Harbingers (Kingston ON: Quarry Press, 1984), as well as a critical work on the writing of Michael Ondaatje (Twayne) and another on the work of John Newlove (ECW Press).
Working variations on breath and spacing, Barbour's contribution to in by one, out by four is a selection of poems from a series called "Cheque Book"; did these ever appear in a further trade collection? If not, are they worth digging out now? Reid says they were originally composed on the backs of old cheques, reminding me of the late New York school poet Ted Berrigan's A Certain Slant of Sunlight, composed entirely on the backs of file cards.
from Cheque Book:
for Robert Creeley: vancouver:
& so did here
hear him speak
the one eyed man's
a squinter but
he sees close-up
the splinter of the real
he's stepping across
touching & listening to
now. now i
listend & the voice
was quiet was
strong
what's known
is what you re/
call your
own life if you
lived it awake
i hear him
say he
did as
best he could &
the warmth of the shared
memories Mallorca
the first time & the loss
of 'history' 'you have no
history' he said & he
was right he was
wrong but he
was right & 'Let me
recite what history teaches' he
might also say
who spoke last night
smiling at his memory
his only eye
clear he
implied 'History
teaches.'
18.05.79
A former collaborator with Victoria poet Stephen Scobie [see my note on Scobie here] (the two moved away from such when Scobie left Edmonton to teach at the University of Victoria), the argument that the two were more formidable as a unit than they ever were individually obviously hasn’t taken into consideration Barbour's collection Fragmenting Body etc. (or even Scobie's ghosts or McAlmon's Chinese Opera), which is easily one of his strongest books if not the strongest and most vibrant book he's produced. Why hasn’t his work been written about? Considering the amount of critical material Barbour has produced on various of his peers, including more writing on the work on the late poet John Newlove than anyone else, it seems that Barbour got the short end of the stick. What is it that gets some writers attention and others completely ignored? I've learned long ago it has very little to do with the writing itself; is it still the geography that matters?
creature slain by Bellerophon in
the late night show
on every screen every scream
narrates a bodys parting
but that creature never existed
ever existent it haunts our nights
now more than ever
how many imagined & imaginary
odd bodies can
we afford to break
down
'the Balkanized body'
a new study in psycho somatic
engineering engineered (Fragmenting Body etc.)
Last night I was having a drink with poet and former prairie resident Monty Reid and (since he's just about to take a new house, packing/unpacking boxes) he gave me a copy of in by one, out by four (1980), a small poetry publication with the work of Douglas Barbour, George Melnyk, Reid and Stephen Scobie. According to Reid, it was published as a response to more precious poetry publications at the time, and the whole run was published, from submission to final product, in a three hour period (hence the title), in Edmonton by what Reid called the "Instant Poetry Press," in June 1980.
Edmonton poet Douglas Barbour [see my interview with him here], roughly the same age as those Ken Norris would call "first generation Canadian post-modernism," such as George Bowering, Fred Wah, Daphne Marlatt and bpNichol, he started his own publishing a bit later on, putting him more with that second generation of Canadian poets that would include Dennis Cooley (also a late bloomer), Sharon Thesen, Ken Norris and Barry McKinnon. Still, considering the amount and quality of publishing Barbour has done over the years, it seems surprising that his writing hasn’t received the attention that it deserves. Is this a prairie problem in general? Is this due to the fact that Barbour isn’t really a self-promoter? I think the same things have happened to Winnipeg poet Cooley; both are highly respected in their individual geographic regions (watch for a new Cooley poetry collection this fall), but given short shrift in anything further. My own bookshelf of Barbour books includes (I know I'm missing a few) A Poem As Long As The Highway (Kingston ON: Quarry Press, 1971), shore lines (Winnipeg MB: Turnstone Press, 1979), visible visions, the selected poems of Douglas Barbour (Edmonton AB: NeWest Press, 1984) edited by Smaro Kamboureli and Robert Kroetsch, Story for a Saskatchewan Night (Red Deer AB: Writing West / Red Deer College Press, 1990), Fragmenting Body etc. (Edmonton AB: NeWest Press, 2000) and Breath Takes (Toronto ON: Wolsak & Wynn, 2001), as well as the chapbooks a flame on the spanish stairs (Victoria BC: greenboathouse books, 2002) and It’s over is it over: Love’s Fragmented Narrative (Ottawa ON: above/ground press, 2005), his collection of literary essays Lyric/Anti-Lyric: Essays on Contemporary Poetry (Edmonton AB: writer as critic / NeWest Press, 2001), and the collaboration he did with Arizona poet Sheila E. Murphy, Continuations (Edmonton AB: University of Alberta Press, 2006) [see my review of such here]. Other books of his (that I don’t have) include Land Fall (Montreal QC: Delta Canada, 1971; Ottawa ON: The Golden Dog Press, 1973), White (Fredericton NB: Fiddlehead Books, 1972), songbook (Vancouver BC: Talonbooks, 1973), he. &. she. &. (Ottawa ON: The Golden Dog Press, 1974), Worlds Out of Words: The SF Novels of Samuel R. Delany (Frome UK: Bran's Head Books, 1979), The Pirates of Pen's Chance (with Stephen Scobie, Toronto ON: Coach House Press, 1981) and The Harbingers (Kingston ON: Quarry Press, 1984), as well as a critical work on the writing of Michael Ondaatje (Twayne) and another on the work of John Newlove (ECW Press).
Working variations on breath and spacing, Barbour's contribution to in by one, out by four is a selection of poems from a series called "Cheque Book"; did these ever appear in a further trade collection? If not, are they worth digging out now? Reid says they were originally composed on the backs of old cheques, reminding me of the late New York school poet Ted Berrigan's A Certain Slant of Sunlight, composed entirely on the backs of file cards.
from Cheque Book:
for Robert Creeley: vancouver:
& so did here
hear him speak
the one eyed man's
a squinter but
he sees close-up
the splinter of the real
he's stepping across
touching & listening to
now. now i
listend & the voice
was quiet was
strong
what's known
is what you re/
call your
own life if you
lived it awake
i hear him
say he
did as
best he could &
the warmth of the shared
memories Mallorca
the first time & the loss
of 'history' 'you have no
history' he said & he
was right he was
wrong but he
was right & 'Let me
recite what history teaches' he
might also say
who spoke last night
smiling at his memory
his only eye
clear he
implied 'History
teaches.'
18.05.79
A former collaborator with Victoria poet Stephen Scobie [see my note on Scobie here] (the two moved away from such when Scobie left Edmonton to teach at the University of Victoria), the argument that the two were more formidable as a unit than they ever were individually obviously hasn’t taken into consideration Barbour's collection Fragmenting Body etc. (or even Scobie's ghosts or McAlmon's Chinese Opera), which is easily one of his strongest books if not the strongest and most vibrant book he's produced. Why hasn’t his work been written about? Considering the amount of critical material Barbour has produced on various of his peers, including more writing on the work on the late poet John Newlove than anyone else, it seems that Barbour got the short end of the stick. What is it that gets some writers attention and others completely ignored? I've learned long ago it has very little to do with the writing itself; is it still the geography that matters?
creature slain by Bellerophon in
the late night show
on every screen every scream
narrates a bodys parting
but that creature never existed
ever existent it haunts our nights
now more than ever
how many imagined & imaginary
odd bodies can
we afford to break
down
'the Balkanized body'
a new study in psycho somatic
engineering engineered (Fragmenting Body etc.)
Labels:
Douglas Barbour,
George Melnyk,
Monty Reid,
Stephen Scobie
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
