Showing posts with label Roxanna Bennett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roxanna Bennett. Show all posts

Monday, June 22, 2026

Roxanna Bennett, We Gladly Feast on Those Who Would Subdue Us

 

II

& forgetting what you’re after &

      The pliers were used to open her mouth,
      was refusing to speak

    its keeper kept it supplied

in a ‘mental’ hospital. More radically than anywhere else in the outside is invalidated
as a human being. Must remain until the label is 

untainted by hate a necklace of 54 skulls
on my screen

 

 

myriad strange specimens

 

& the space he occupies is no longer of his own choosing. After being subjected to degrading
ceremonial known as psychiatric examination 

 

      the government indulges (“The Oxford Dodo vs. The Anatomical Venus”)

The fifth full-length poetry title by Roxanna Bennett, following The Uncertainty Principle (Toronto ON: Tightrope Books, 2014), unmeaningable (Guelph ON: Gordon Hill Press, 2019), The Untranslatable I (Gordon Hill Press, 2021) [see my review of such here] and uncomfortability (Gordon Hill Pres, 2023), is We Gladly Feast on Those Who Would Subdue Us (Gordon Hill Press, 2026). Moving beyond the sonnet-shapes of prior work into more of an expansive collage structure, We Gladly Feast on Those Who Would Subdue Us furthers Bennett’s work across “disability poetics,” a conversation I would be curious to see the author extend, also, into the form of the essay. I know Toronto poet Therese Estacion [see my review of her debut here] has a new collection, Jelly, Baby: Essays on Disability and Vulnerability (Toronto ON: Bookhug Press, 2026), but I have yet to go through such. The poems are gestural, composed with great flourish and a sly and subtle wit. “Sound n,” Bennett provides, within the second section, “an impression of somebody / something formed from / but significant / especially /// thigh. The subtle body / wrote / GOOD BYE /// accommodate, make / would ever curse us / word, you can find out if /// can’t be both.”

What is interesting about Bennett’s book, beyond being produced sideways—which I always find irritating, admittedly, as a reader; why not just make a wider book? I think back to Méira Cook’s Slovenly Love (London ON: Brick Books, 2003) [see my review of such here] or Stephen Collis and Jordan Scott’s collaborative Decomp (Toronto ON: Coach House Books, 2013) [see my review of such here]—opens with a page of “acknowledgements & process notes” and a three-page list of “influences, references, & sources,” material usually held for the back of any collection. As Bennett’s “acknowledgments & process notes” includes:

Many of these are ‘found’ poems using text from various sources. We had originally set out to write about the divine shadow feminine but She will not be intellectualized, only embodied. As various illnesses took away my ability to use electronic devices & think & speak & write with coherency, She invited me to turn inward, dance deeper into Madness, & to use unconscious analog art-making methods such as cut-up, collage, & chance operations. &—although I don’t love this term, it smacks of the hospital, preferring instead to be divinely guided rather than operated upon—as adaptation.

The result is this rough beast before you.

Thank you for reading.

Assembled across three sections, each of which are constructed as extended lyric sequences that interconnect—“The Oxford Dodo vs. The Anatomical Venus,” “The New Bodily Ethos” and “Excavation of the Colossal Mother”—there is something interesting in how one might see Bennett’s prior engagement with the sonnet as attempting to find order within a particular kind of chaos. Through the use of found material set in collage, a different kind of order, Bennett works a lyric structure more overtly chaotic, or, more likely, one that allows for a coherence through the chaos itself. Working with, and not against, what Bennett’s own possibilities provide. And in which Bennett’s compositional approach evolves from composing a poem with one’s own material, to being able to discern where the poem might already exist, within that same material. The pastiche provides Bennett a way to think through their improvisations to achieve something entirely fresh. Or, as Bennett themlseves write, towards the end of the second section:

      I rise & become one
in new shapes

 

 

Sunday, August 08, 2021

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Roxanna Bennett

The disabled poem-making entity known as Roxanna Bennett gratefully resides on aboriginal land. As a settler, they thank the many generations of Indigenous people who have taken care of this land from beginningless time. They are the author of the award-winning poetry collection Unmeaningable (Gordon Hill Press, 2019), unseen garden (chapbook, knife | fork | book, 2018), and The Uncertainty Principle (Tightrope Books, 2014).  

1 – How did your first book or chapbook change your life?

It made me realize that publishing a book was not going to magically fix my issues and illustrated how fixated I was on that idea. It was, in short, the most anti-climactic experience of my life.  

How does your most recent work compare to your previous?

I don’t know, I don’t compare my work to my work.

How does it feel different?

I used different words….I’m not sure I understand this question.

2 – How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I had amassed more poetry than fiction or non-fiction to begin submitting to publishers.

3 – How long does it take to start any particular writing project?


It depends on the project. Sometimes years, sometimes instantaneously.

Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process?

The initial writing, once I am able to sit down to it, often comes quickly but reshaping and editing and finalizing can take years.

Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

It depends on the pieces. I enjoy unwriting my work as much as I do writing it, I will create dozens of iterations of the same poems and pieces and rearrange them ceaselessly until someone forces me to publish.

4 – Where does a poem usually begin for you?

At the first line? I don’t understand this question.

Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

My first book was an “everything and the kitchen sink” where I threw all the pieces I had into a book shape, the others are intentionally books from the beginning.

5 – Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process?

I cannot for the life of me figure out what readings have to do with writing books. I am terrified of public speaking and have weak throat muscles and therefore, weak vocal cords. Public readings are torture. Exercises in humiliation. And have, until the pandemic, usually taken place in spaces that were inaccessible to me.

Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I find them excruciating.

6 – Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing?

I am often writing in response to other disabled poets. I read a lot of disability theory and works by Buddhists so some of that probably makes it into the work.

What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work?

None. I have no answers and am continually trying to unlearn what I think I do know.

What do you even think the current questions are?

I have no idea what other people wonder about.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture?

I try to avoid larger culture, it’s boring and bad for my health.

Does s/he even have one?

Entirely up to the individual.

What do you think the role of the writer should be?

Whatever they think it should be.

8 – Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

I’ve done it so rarely that it’s still novel.

9 – What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

I like a lot of the Buddhist lojong slogans. Maintain an awareness of the preciousness of human life, be aware of the reality that death comes for everyone, be grateful to everyone, don’t expect applause.

10 – What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one?

I can’t keep a writing routine because my health fluctuates so much that I try to live moment by moment as much as possible.

How does a typical day (for you) begin?

Between 4 and 6 a.m. with pain.

11 – When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

Fortunately I have not experienced this yet.

12 – What fragrance reminds you of home?


What do we mean by home?

13 – David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

I don’t understand what McFadden meant. Everything I experience makes it into the work in some fashion. Cartoons, miniatures, collages, squirrels and blue jays, clouds, cardboard boxes, Victorian medical tracts, nursery rhymes, commercial jingles from the 70’s, prescription medication instructions, yoga teachings, meditation insights, moss and mycelium, comic books, horror movies, geology, gardening, breathing…

14 – What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

Pema Chodron, Thich Nhat Hanh, the Dalai Lama, Brene Brown, Alan Watts, Diana Beresford-Kroeger, Robin Wall Kimmerer, Lewis Carroll, Alan Moore, Douglas Adams.

15 – What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Die.

16 – If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be?

Is this a legit occupation? Suck it, accountants!

Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I’ve never felt as though I had a choice in the matter.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I literally can’t do anything else. I can barely do this.

18 – What was the last great book you read?

I so rarely read books I would qualify as “great”. Why Buddhism is True by Robert Wright is a good one, though.

What was the last great film?


The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (the 1947 original, not the rubbish remake with whatshisname).

19 – What are you currently working on?

Too many things! Myself most of all.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Sunday, April 25, 2021

Roxanna Bennett, The Untranslatable I

 

Purplefish Key: The Lost Dodo

        Is Anne Carson autistic or am I
projecting understanding & if you
       
find that offensive—why? Did you think

sanism was the only narrative. Or did you think
               
to think. To think is overrated, or am I

       
overthinking again? Ask the vegetables
in the salt mine, E. razes some prospects

               
in this prospectus. Protect us from formulas
       
1 to 10. Protect us from counting cards again.

Don’t ask us to count you among us, nothing
       
about us without us. Synchronous or schizoaffective

depends on your affect. Are you pretty,
       
are you smiling? Translate: go quietly

or we’ll replace you with a replica skeleton.

Roxanna Bennett’s third full-length poetry title, after The Uncertainty Principle (Toronto ON: Tightrope Books, 2014) and unmeaningable (Guelph ON: Gordon Hill Press, 2019), is The Untranslatable I (Gordon Hill Press, 2021), a further exploration of what has been dubbed “disability poetics,” writing both the visible and the invisible. Across forty-three first-person lyric narrative poems, Bennett writes a suite of prefixed titles, repeating prefixes such as “Travel Diary,” “Purplefish Key,” “CBT Worksheet,” “Postcard from the Bottle City of Kandor,” “Gratitude Journal” and “Babelfish Key,” referencing the fictional fish one puts in their ears to simultaneously translate spoken language as it moves through the ear, from Douglas Adams’ infamous The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Bennett writes around and across explorations of the untranslatable self, exploring what Virginia poet Susannah Nevison describes as well, in a quote included at the opening of the collection: “Explaining disability is like speaking two languages, and it is it the disabled person who is required to translate for the able-bodied world.” In the poem “Babelfish Key: Stairs & Whispers,” as Bennett writes: “Can we make peace / of the many pieces a cracked keepsake makes // or keep making the same mistakes uncaring / whose being we break, identity not their commodity / but a story rewritten continuously, no body embodies // meaning more than another one?”

Through pop culture references, and navigating the difficulties of what so many take for granted, Bennett utilizes a tightness of line and form to articulate what might otherwise be impossible, and I am curious to see what becomes of their essays-in-progress, referenced as part of a recent interview conducted via The League of Canadian Poets. As they write to open the poem “Travel Diary: So Long, & Thanks for all the Fish,” “‘I’m disabled’ I blurt when Steve’s long-lost / fancy BBC cousin asks what I do for a living, / gulping wine to drown the silence, // intimidated by class signifiers, / lost, clinging to conventional island, / safety of shared fandom, The Hitchhiker’s / Guide to the Galaxy instructs Don’t Panic / but I am Marvin, brain the size of a planet / on fire with self-hatred. Or I’m Arthur Dent, // adrift in a hospital gown, ever alien, / never at home in this unsound skin.”

Tuesday, October 08, 2019

Touch the Donkey supplement: new interviews with Dwibedy, Izsak, Duncan, Alvergue, Clayton, Bennett + Drescher,

Anticipating the release next week of the twenty-third issue of Touch the Donkey [a small poetry journal], why not check out the interviews that have appeared over the past few weeks with contributors to the twenty-second issue: Biswamit Dwibedy, Emily Izsak, Aja Couchois Duncan, José Felipe Alvergue, Conyer Clayton, Roxanna Bennett and Julia Drescher.

Interviews with contributors to the first twenty-one issues (over one hundred interviews to date) remain online, including: Michael Cavuto, Michael Sikkema, Bronwen Tate, Emilia Nielsen, Hailey Higdon, Trish Salah, Adam Strauss, Katy Lederer, Taryn Hubbard, Michael Boughn, David Dowker, Marie Larson, Lauren Haldeman, Kate Siklosi, robert majzels, Michael Robins, Rae Armantrout, Stephanie Strickland, Ken Hunt, Rob Manery, Ryan Eckes, Stephen Cain, Dani Spinosa, Samuel Ace, Howie Good, Rusty Morrison, Allison Cardon, Jon Boisvert, Laura Theobald, Suzanne Wise, Sean Braune, Dale Smith, Valerie Coulton, Phil Hall, Sarah MacDonell, Janet Kaplan, Kyle Flemmer, Julia Polyck-O’Neill, A.M. O’Malley, Catriona Strang, Anthony Etherin, Claire Lacey ,Sacha Archer, Michael e. Casteels, Harold Abramowitz, Cindy Savett, Tessy Ward, Christine Stewart, David James Miller, Jonathan Ball, Cody-Rose Clevidence, mwpm, Andrew McEwan, Brynne Rebele-Henry, Joseph Mosconi, Douglas Barbour and Sheila Murphy, Oliver Cusimano, Sue Landers, Marthe Reed, Colin Smith, Nathaniel G. Moore, David Buuck, Kate Greenstreet, Kate Hargreaves, Shazia Hafiz Ramji, Erín Moure, Sarah Swan, Buck Downs, Kemeny Babineau, Ryan Murphy, Norma Cole, Lea Graham, kevin mcpherson eckhoff, Oana Avasilichioaei, Meredith Quartermain, Amanda Earl, Luke Kennard, Shane Rhodes, Renée Sarojini Saklikar, Sarah Cook, François Turcot, Gregory Betts, Eric Schmaltz, Paul Zits, Laura Sims, Stephen Collis, Mary Kasimor, Billy Mavreas, damian lopes, Pete Smith, Sonnet L’Abbé, Katie L. Price, a rawlings, Suzanne Zelazo, Helen Hajnoczky, Kathryn MacLeod, Shannon Maguire, Sarah Mangold, Amish Trivedi, Lola Lemire Tostevin, Aaron Tucker, Kayla Czaga, Jason Christie, Jennifer Kronovet, Jordan Abel, Deborah Poe, Edward Smallfield, ryan fitzpatrick, Elizabeth Robinson, nathan dueck, Paige Taggart, Christine McNair, Stan Rogal, Jessica Smith, Nikki Sheppy, Kirsten Kaschock, Lise Downe, Lisa Jarnot, Chris Turnbull, Gary Barwin, Susan Briante, derek beaulieu, Megan Kaminski, Roland Prevost, Emily Ursuliak, j/j hastain, Catherine Wagner, Susanne Dyckman, Susan Holbrook, Julie Carr, David Peter Clark, Pearl Pirie, Eric Baus, Pattie McCarthy, Camille Martin and Gil McElroy.

The forthcoming twenty-third issue features new writing by: Robert R. Thurman, Alyse Knorr, Michael Cavuto, Denise Newman, Shelly Harder, Franco Cortese and Dale Tracy.

And of course, copies of the first twenty-two issues are still very much available. Why not subscribe?


We even have our own Facebook group. It’s remarkably easy.