Showing posts with label Autumn House Press. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Autumn House Press. Show all posts

Sunday, July 20, 2025

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Anthony Immergluck

Anthony Immergluck is a poet, publishing professional, and musician out of Madison, Wisconsin. His debut poetry collection, The Worried Well, received the Rising Writer Prize from Autumn House Press, and his work has been widely published in journals including Copper Nickel, Pleiades, Beloit Poetry Review, and TriQuarterly. Immergluck holds an MFA in Creative Writing (Poetry) from NYU-Paris and works for W. W. Norton.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My debut book hasn’t been out for very long, so it’s a little early to say if or how things will change materially in my life. But I certainly feel different post-book. It’s always meant a lot to me to get a book professionally published and out in the world, which isn’t necessarily a healthy way to think about writing. I believe, and I’ve always believed, that the value of someone’s art and artistic practice has nothing to do with any external measure of “success.” But despite my own advice, I put myself through plenty of dark nights of the soul, wondering whether I was wasting my life chipping away at a vain folly. The years of rejection really wore on me. But ever since the book got accepted for publication, I’ve felt like I have a broader capacity to focus more of my energy in positive, external directions.

I’m also trying to reacclimatize to becoming a somewhat more public figure now that the book is out. Independent debut poets aren’t movie stars, of course, but I’ve always been a very private person. After decades of desperately trying to avoid too much public exposure and embarrassment, it became trivially easy, literally overnight, for coworkers, relatives, and strangers to access the types of vulnerabilities I’ve only ever shared with four or five people over the course of my entire life. Obviously, this is the path I pursued knowing exactly what I was getting myself into, so I don’t regret or resent it. I’m deeply grateful for it, and I think it will probably make me a kinder and happier person in the long run. But it doesn’t come naturally to me. I’m going to have to learn how to navigate this awkward new social reality in which anyone I meet has the ability to get know me in this radically intimate but totally one-sided way.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I’ve always written poetry, but I wouldn’t really say I came to it before other types of writing. As a kid, I wrote silly little fantasy epics. Songwriting was a major passion for most of my teenage years and early twenties. I’ve dabbled in criticism, drama, essays, and short stories, and I’m currently writing a novel. But poetry has always been the most constant and consistent creative outlet for me, no matter what else I’m working on. Other projects ebb and flow, but If I go a few days without writing or reading poetry, I get twitchy.  

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I’m a slow poet. Ideas have to germinate for a long time before they ever make it to a page. Then, I overwork the hell out of everything. Drafts on drafts on drafts on drafts. Multiple documents with different edits over the course of months. At any given point, I have ten or twenty poems rotating in and out of the grinder, and it takes a long, long time for me to feel comfortable submitting anything for publication. The Worried Well actually contains a handful of poems that had existed, in some form, for ten years or so. To be honest, I’m a little afraid it will take me another ten years to pull my second collection together.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

The poems in The Worried Well weren’t originally written as a “book,” for the most part. They existed as individual pieces first, and I tried to assemble them into lots of different book-length projects with different titles, structures, and themes. I have dozens of manuscript drafts buried in document folders that technically contain many or most of the poems that wound up in The Worried Well, but they’re barely recognizable as part of the same process. Once I discovered what I truly, finally wanted the arc of book to become, I cut out a lot of poems, wrote some new ones, and edited nearly all of them to engage in a richer conversation with one another. So, I guess the micro-projects generated the macro-project, which then reflected its influence back onto the component parts that made it.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I’ve only recently started giving public readings, at least for the first time since my early twenties. They terrify me, but I also find them deeply fulfilling and enriching, especially when I have the opportunity to talk shop with other writers and readers. I gather a lot of inspiration from public events, so hopefully the stage fright will subside over time.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I think pretty obsessively about theory in the revision process, but I also try to remember that poems should always start and end from a place of emotion. Poetics, and art theory in general, is a lot of fun for those of us who have already bought in to its world, but it’s only really useful insofar as it helps us describe and understand our relationship with the things that move us. I have a lot of theoretical questions I hope my poems ask or address, but I don’t really think I would be doing my job as an artist or art lover if I were attempting to answer any questions.

For example, I noticed early on that my poems tend to feature a lot of refrains. I didn’t “choose” this technique at first, necessarily. It just felt right to me, perhaps as a carry-over from my parallel interest in songwriting or my love for the poetic forms of Old Testament prayer. But as I started to seriously analyze my poetic voice, I interrogated the function of this style more intensely. I came to appreciate how the inclusion of refrains imposes a loose form upon contemporary free verse. Repetition implies a rhythmic structure and allows for a tighter control over emphasis via assonance and rhyme. But more importantly for a book about anxiety, it replicates the cyclical, recursive nature of intrusive thoughts and other forms of neurodivergent experience. As I put this manuscript together, I taught myself how writing or reading a poem can formally mirror, reframe, or elucidate the disorders and imprecisions of the mind. I’m far from the first poet to tackle this idea, but I’ve been leaning into it heavily, both in my writing and reading projects.

I’m also very interested in how the lessons of other artistic media can be applied to poetry, and I spend a lot of time asking myself how I might approach a problem in a poem as if it were a photograph, stage play, etc. For example, I’ve discovered that I really prefer poems with some element of the character conflict we expect in fiction. If my poems are written in the first person, I want the voice to demonstrate the types of “flaws,” hypocrisies, and idiosyncrasies we would expect in a good novel or memoir. I want the reader to feel like they’re walking in on the “I” of the poem in the midst of some kind of moral or emotional uncertainty. And I want to be sure that moral or emotional uncertainly is unresolved at the end of the poem. If anything, I want it to end with further complications. Mise-en-scène is important to me. Shot composition. What is in the room, and how is it framed relative to the action? I wouldn’t say I want my poems to “tell a story,” necessarily, but I do want them to appear as though they exist within a story. I want them to imply, insinuate, and ripple.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

This is an important question, but I’m afraid it’s one I can’t really answer to my own satisfaction. I struggle with this a lot, especially in an era when reactionary, fascistic politics are snowballing across the world and the arts are becoming increasingly automated, mass produced, and algorithmically commodified. A part of me wonders whether it’s wasteful to write about anything other than urgent human rights abuses or environmental degradation. But another part of me feels that, while I respect and love plenty of explicitly “activist” art, there’s also something to be said for the creation and consumption of art that deals primarily with the abstract or interior. Poetry addresses those things so well, and we need those things addressed.

Sometimes, writing a poem about my dumb little feelings seems like such an indulgence. Like I’m standing next to a burning building full of screaming people, and I take the opportunity to make s’mores. Other times, I remember how existentially crucial other people’s art has always been for me. That includes impassioned, well-researched exposés of injustice, but it also includes monster movies and songs about breakups. I don’t want to take it for granted that my own art could meaningfully enrich someone else’s life one day, but I also don’t want to rule out the possibility.

I definitely believe all art is inherently political, but I don’t think I believe all art necessarily has to be “activism” in order to be valuable or even to affect political change. I think the primary function of good art, and good writing in particular, is for authors and readers to communicate empathetically, back and forth with one another and the people around them. When we read and write, we’re honing our ability to relate to other people on an emotional and cognitive level. We’re asking ourselves to parse the difference between what was said and what was meant. We’re engaging with the power of omission and emphasis, order, syntax, implication, reference, etc. We’re always exploring what if, why not, so what? And I think those skills are roundly applicable to local and global politics. I don’t want to imply that people who love literature are in any way superior to people who don’t, but I will swear by literature as an effective method for broadening and deepening one’s perspective on being a human and sharing a planet with other humans.

So maybe I’m naïve, or maybe I’m just trying to inject some self-importance into this thing that takes up all my time. But I hope and suspect that the literary arts – and the humanities in general – make a positive cultural impact just by virtue of existing. I know this has been a rambling, contradictory answer, but I promise it’s much less clear in my own head.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

Both, but with a special emphasis on essential. I’m as sensitive and stubborn about my work as anyone else, and I’m not immune to having my feelings hurt. But I’m a strong believer that the writing only really gets good once it’s been opened up to constructive criticism. My editors at Autumn House Press have been spectacular to work with, and my book would never have gotten accepted for publication in the first place without the wisdom of the friends and peers that read early drafts. Writing is a lonely pursuit, and it often benefits from the singularity of vision it represents. But the intimacy we all have with our own work easily transforms into codependency, and we lose our ability to evaluate it with the kind of clarity a good edit requires. You don’t always have to take outside advice, of course, but it’s only ever healthy and productive to receive and consider it. Even when you feel like your readers or editors are missing the point, it’s invaluable to understand where the experience of your work isn’t landing how you’d intend or expect it to. Notes can be painful, but they’re necessary for creative growth.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

I’ve heard a lot of variations on the idea that inspiration follows from writing, not the other way around, and I totally stand by that. If you wait for your best ideas, they’ll never come. They generate in the process.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to songwriting)? What do you see as the appeal?

As I mentioned before, I write pretty fluidly between genres. Poetry absolutely occupies the majority of my time and output simply because, for whatever reason, most of my ideas happen to take shape in the form of poems. But I love all the arts, even the ones I’ve never spent any time with, and I wish I could live for thousands of years so I could dabble in everything. I resent that I won’t be able to explore woodworking and tango dancing and oil painting to the extent that they deserve. My problem isn’t fluidity – it’s focus. I have to train myself to stop pivoting to writing a short story or a song midway through writing a poem, or vice-versa.

All literary genres are load-bearing. Poetry is unique in its ability to reframe language and open the mind to new conceptual bridges. Song lyrics, at their best, are able to interact with their melodic and rhythmic structures in ways that transcend the sum of their parts. Theatre can play with artifice and the chaos of live human interaction in a way that nothing else can. The novel offers a type of depth and complexity that can only be achieved through time, and words, spent. There’s no weak or redundant genre.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I have a day job and a family and several chronic health issues, so I just need to find little cracks in my day and cram in as much writing as I can. Early mornings work well, and I try to set aside time on the weekends. I also travel a lot for work, and airports and hotel rooms can offer the type of isolation and boredom that tend to be conducive to writing. I’d love to have a more regular schedule, but it’s not usually an option.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

Reading! It takes me forever to read a great collection of poems, because I’m constantly getting new ideas that I have to go jot down.

13 - What was your last Hallowe'en costume?

Samwise Gamgee

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

Absolutely. All the above, really. As I touched on before, I draw inspiration across the arts. Music is my secondary creative love after literature, and I see the two disciplines as operating in constant conversation. I keep books of my favorite visual artists, like Hokusai and Klimpt, right on my desk and I regularly leaf through them for motivation and stimulation. I find video games to be extraordinarily meditative and centering, and I often find that the “flow states” they generate help me disentangle the knots I write myself into.

Outside of the arts, I get a huge amount of inspiration and joy from nature and travel. A quiet walk in the woods with my wife and dog will almost always generate poetry later on. And I think the ability to transplant oneself into a cultural environment one isn’t used to does wonders for the imagination. I know we’re not all lucky enough to travel the world whenever we want, but even spending some time in unfamiliar parts of our own communities can really refresh and rekindle our excitement for the world around us. I’m also profoundly inspired by animals. I think watching another form of life closely, trying to understand how its patterns of motion and behavior echo or contrast with our own, is very similar to the process of reading and writing poetry.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

The book that made me fall in love with literature was The Lord of the Rings. And although I read and wrote poetry as a hobby since childhood, the book that made me realize I wanted to “take it seriously” as a life pursuit was Actual Air by David Berman. As a teenager, I basically just wrote rip-offs of his poems and songs. These days, some of my favorite poets are Mary Ruefle, Tracy K. Smith, Solmaz Sharif, and Larry Levis. But that’s just a tiny excerpt of an enormous and ever-changing list.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

I’ve never taught poetry formally, and I’d love to give that a go one day. I’ve done lots of tutoring/mentoring/manuscript consulting, etc., but I wonder how I’d do with a college class or writers’ workshop.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

When I was younger, there came a point at which I did sort of choose writing over music. The stage fright and imposter syndrome hit me hard, and I felt safer developing my skills in a medium that didn’t require such a heavy performance component. I don’t regret focusing my energy on literature whatsoever, but I’ve always reserved a bit of grief for the opportunity cost. I write as a serious vocation, and I play music as a serious hobby, but there’s a significant part of me that wonders how life would have progressed if that focus had been flipped. I know it’s silly, but I get desperately jealous of great musicians, particularly ones whose musical practice is an integral, scheduled part of their lifestyle. I realize I could always try to reopen that avenue one day, but I’d have to shake off a lot of cobwebs and put a lot of other projects on the backburner. Also, I’m pretty over-the-hill by musician standards, and I’m only getting sleepier and achier. Sometimes I try to look up which of my favorite musicians released their first albums in their thirties or later, and it’s not an encouraging list. Leonard Cohen was 33. I’m older.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

Again, I wish I could spend a lifetime with all the arts. But writing has always felt obvious to me. Unavoidable. It’s just the way I process thoughts and emotions whether I like it or not. That’s not to say writing comes easily or that I think I have any natural aptitude that other people don’t have or can’t learn. It’s just to say that I can’t imagine what a non-writing life would feel like.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

The last great book I read was Late to the Search Party, the debut poetry collection from Madison’s poet laureate, Steven Espada Dawson. I can’t possibly overstate how brilliant this book is. How moving, how delicate in its craft, how dynamic and singular its voice. This is the type of book that inspires people to become poets, and I urge everyone reading this interview to order their copies immediately.

I’ll also join the chorus on Sinners. One of the most purely entertaining movies I’ve seen in years, but also one that’s just dripping in depth and passion. It’s a crazy mish-mash of genres, overflowing with references to history, music, folklore, and other movies. But it maintains such a clear and focused vision, with so much to say and so much love for its characters and world.

20 - What are you currently working on?

I’m currently working on a novel! It’s a fairly big and ambitious project, at least for someone who’s more accustomed to writing poems. So it’s slow going, but I’m giving it my love and attention.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Tuesday, April 26, 2022

12 or 20 (second series) questions with John Foy

John Foy’s third book of poems, No One Leaves the World Unhurt, won the Donald Justice Poetry Prize and was published this year (2021) by Autumn House Press. His second book, Night Vision, won the New Criterion Poetry Prize (St. Augustine’s Press, 2016). His poems have been included in the Swallow Anthology of New American Poets, The Raintown Review Anthology, and Rabbit Ears, an anthology of poems about TV. His work has appeared widely in journals and online. He lives in New York.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My first book taught me about savagery. You have to cut away what doesn’t work. There may be poems you love about your mother or father or your dog or your political views, but if they don’t work as poems, they have to go. You need, I think, to bring together only those poems that come through the blast furnace, and then see what it is they require to complete the picture. I did go on to write well about my mother, father, and dog, and those poems found places in my books, but it took time, tempering, and revision. My most recent work is broader in scope and tone. It includes more dark humor and pays closer attention to form. The newer poems are, I think, less self-consciously “poems.” Playful but deadly.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

When I was a child, my mother read poems to my two sisters and me. One she always read was a haunting poem called “Some One” by Walter de la Mare (1913). The shiver stayed with me. Few words, all simple, magically frightening. That’s how it began. In ninth grade (I was 15 years old), I had an English teacher who changed my life. His name was – is – Peter Balakian. Our class discussions on “Skunk Hour,” by Robert Lowell, and “A Refusal to Mourn,” by Dylan Thomas, were defining moments. At that time Peter himself was an aspiring poet in his mid-twenties. He got us talking about Bob Dylan lyrics, which he’d write on the board. It was clear he enjoyed what he was doing. He moved around the room with the easy confidence of an athlete, and his teaching style was the same. He was not “an English teacher” but a friend who wanted to share with the class the writings he loved. He wanted to talk about them and hear what we had to say. He confessed that he had decided against Law School to pursue teaching and poetry. He had been a baseball star and football star in his student days. I was a middling athlete, at best, but I could relate. I thought, well, I want to be like him. (I began publishing poems in our high school literary magazine.) He went on to do a PhD at Brown on Theodore Roethke, and he became an eminent poet and a world-renowned scholar of the Armenian genocide. He won the Pulitzer Prize in Poetry for Ozone Journal in 2016. He has long been the Donald M. and Constance H. Rebar Professor of Humanities at Colgate University, where he is also the Director of Creative Writing. He published some of my early poems in the Graham House Review, which he edited with the poet Bruce Smith. He wrote a blurb for my second book. I see him sometimes when he comes down to NYC, and he has hosted me as a featured reader at Colgate. So thanks to Peter Balakian, I began to write poetry.  

My first published poems appeared in Canadian magazines, for which I remain grateful. I was studying English Literature at McGill and submitting to journals like The Antigonish Review, the Quarterly Review, and Poetry Canada Review, edited by Clifton Whiten. He included me in an anthology called, unsurprisingly, New Voices. I also had poems published in McGill’s literary journal, Scrivener. It was at McGill, and in Montreal generally, that I met Louis Dudek, Peter Van Toorn, Ken Norris, and Stephen Brockwell (a fellow student at the time).

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I can’t say I have projects. The poems come one by one, month by month. I’ve never had a grand vision. I just write whatever feels necessary at the time. If a vision emerges, it comes as a revelation from the work, as a result, not as part of a pre-conceived plan. The inspirations come quickly, the writing goes slowly. Final poems rarely look like the first draft. I keep copious notes in my notebooks, which are always close at hand, so I consult them whenever needed. I also keep an extensive archive of drafts on my computer. I always have something to work on, fast or slow.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

Well, I trundle out the old clichés because they’re true. The show usually begins with something I’ve come across that I like: a word, an image, a phrase, a line from another poem, an idea from some other work, a news headline (serious or inane), or a thing I’ve heard someone say. Sometimes it comes from the name of a street in Paris or a bird or some piece of advanced military weaponry. These are the way in. I work a poem up from these simple beginnings. It might happen over the course of a week or a month. It might happen over the span of 10 years. I don’t throw anything away. I don’t care about time.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

Yes, public readings have been important. Before the pandemic, they were live, which was thrilling and essential. During the pandemic, they’ve been on Zoom, which is a bit bloodless but better than nothing, and I thank those who have hosted them. Because Zoom readings are not bound by location, they will likely be the way of the future. And that’s good, up to a point. The fact is, though, there’s no bar! No face-to-face camaraderie. I want to be in a room with poets and a bar. I’m happy to say I just was! I co-curate a reading series uptown in NYC called the Morningside Poetry Series (with Linda Stern and David M. Katz – we were formerly known as the Red Harlem Readers). We’ve been doing this for over 12 years. Our events are currently held at a bar called Suite on Amsterdam Avenue at the corner of West 109th Street. On Sunday, September 26, 2021 (last weekend, as I write this), I hosted our first live event in over two years. It was an open-mic free-for-all. A great re-commingling of poets and friends. We had over 20 people. Folks are hungry to get back to the real thing. Everyone was vaccinated, and you had to show proof of vaccination to get in. The drinks were cheap, the mic was working, and the poetry was excellent.

I would not say that public readings were part of the creative process because “creating” a poem comes well before reading it in public. But readings are important because they help you gauge how your poems come across. You have to be able to stand up and talk to people in a room in a way that makes sense to them and respects their intelligence. You are not reading “at” people (that’s kind of disgusting). I like to think you are reading “for” people. Poems need to be at home on the page and the stage. They need, I think, to have the snap and vitality of a hook by Johnny Cash and the blinding, intuitive insight of a line by T. S. Eliot. They also need to be read well. This assumes that the poet-reader has at least an entry-level degree of competence in front of a microphone. This, alas, is not always the case.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

Theories are interesting, and I like to read about them. I believe, though, that they have little to do with writing. Or, I should say, they have little to do with craft. Craft is how you lay down a line, put words on a page. People in the water don’t need a theory. They need to know how to swim. So maybe my approach is about praxis, by which I mean an exercise of skill. I believe in technical discipline. To me, this is the same as saying that a guitarist needs to know how to finger an E minor chord. It’s about humility. It’s good to know how to play the English language, to submit yourself to its beauties, requirements, and complexities. I’m interested in loading common speech with as much meaning as possible. I want to make it cut and bleed, and I can’t see a better way of doing this except through the love of meter, sound, and syntax. I’m committed to the chord book of English prosody. Poets, like musicians, must know how to play their instrument. Miles Davis would agree. Shakespeare too. The current florescence of theory is good in a social and political sense. All voices need to be heard, all truths need to be told, and we need to enact social policies to help the marginalized and the disenfranchised. A poetry based on sociology and politics, however, risks losing value over time. It can also risk becoming boring. A poet still needs to lay down a good line. Subject matter alone does not make a poem.

The questions I’m trying to answer usually emerge after the fact. The poem, when it’s done, will reveal whatever questions I may have been trying to answer.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

I can’t prescribe anything for anyone. But if you ask, I would offer the thought that a poet only needs to write well. Your work may then last, and you will help the larger culture understand itself. When I say “to write well,” I am, indeed, begging the question. As Louis Armstrong said, “If you have to ask what jazz is, you’ll never know.” In practical terms, the poet needs to keep a bit of distance from the larger culture to better interrogate it, skewer it if needed. It does no good to blow up the car if you’re riding in it. You can’t rail against capitalism and love Kim Kardashian, the NFL, and Twitter. I like what James Joyce said: “silence, exile, and cunning.”

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

It has been an excellent experience for me. My recent book, No One Leaves the World Unhurt, was published by Autumn House Press. I had the honor of working with Christine Stroud (Editor in Chief) and Mike Good (Managing Editor). Both are fine poets in their own right and committed to the cause. It was a dream. I needed them, for sure, and I think they needed me. They helped me find an appropriate title for the book, which was traumatic at the time but a big win in the end. Throughout the editorial process, I worked closely with Mike Good. His granular line-by-line insights helped me avoid many slip-ups and added great value, and his patience was extraordinary. I was lucky to work with people like this. Poet-editors! Many thanks to Christine, Mike, and their team at Autumn House Press.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

“Most of you will fail.” I took this as a challenge. The insight was offered to a gathering of students in an expensive MFA program by a well-known poet. He was not sued or cancelled for saying this. It was before the feel-good days. His honesty was bracing. Folks, somewhere, had paid handsomely for these young, would-be poets to sit at his knee, but here they were taking the bitter pill. I was not discouraged. I doubled down, for years. He also said that if you consistently allocated 45 minutes per day to your poetry, you’d be doing well. Back then, 45 minutes sounded paltry. Now, I know otherwise.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose)? What do you see as the appeal?

It’s been relatively easy. I like writing essays and book reviews. It exercises a different part of the mind, it clarifies your thinking about what is important, and it brings you into the larger conversation. I’ve done a lot of that. But it’s time-consuming. Also, when you write reviews, you can sometimes make enemies. That’s OK, but it is not optimal. Poets on a sinking ship should not club each other in the knees. Now, I inscribe my critical ideas into the fabric of poems, so I don’t need to write essays. My thinking is embedded in the writing, demonstrated in the execution.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I work outside of academia, so I don’t have a predictable teaching schedule or semester calendar. I carve out time wherever I can. That is to say, I don’t have a routine. I do, though, have a method. I keep a notebook at hand. I always have something to write on, even if it’s a folded piece of paper in my pocket when I’m outside. Now, with an iPhone, I use the Notes app to input thoughts, phrases, etc. while I’m walking around. Whenever time permits, I sit down with my notes and mull over my jottings, consolidating them into drafts. I can do this either in a notebook or on a computer, whichever is more convenient at the time. The recording feature on the iPhone is also good. I record phrases and poems to hear how they carry on the voice.

For a long time now I’ve been working from home, even before the pandemic. In our living room, there are two computers: my work computer (used exclusively for work) and a big, desktop iMac. During a typical workday, I jump back and forth between computers to work, edit, compose, revise, etc. Also, our bookshelves are in the room, so I can pull down whatever book I need at any time, without losing a beat in my work-work or my poetry-work.

(To support myself and my family, I work as a senior financial editor. The only way we can afford to live in Manhattan, which is where we want to be. When people ask me what I do, I say “I’m the language guy in a house of numbers.” I’m immersed in language all day, albeit language in the service of things merely going up and down. Still, this keeps me knee-deep in the mysteries of the English sentence, its grammatical structures, its articulations, its maneuverability, and the beauties of its precision. I’m lucky. This kind of employment is not inconducive to writing poetry.)

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return to (for lack of a better word) for inspiration?

My writing never gets stalled. When I feel the need to start something new, I turn to my notebooks or to poems I love. I might drink a glass of wine and walk my dog. Maybe watch the news. I might go to a local bar on Broadway, where I sometimes hang out with a painter named Sean Clancy who loves Coleridge. I never complain.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

- freshly mown lawns in summertime

- gasoline

- marijuana on a golf course at night

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

All of the above. Also architecture, technology, war, louche Internet sites. Nothing is off limits.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

Well, that’s a long list. The short list includes T.S. Eliot, Robert Frost, Robert Lowell, Elizabeth Bishop, Seamus Heaney, Philip Larkin, Marilyn Hacker, William Matthews, Rhina Espaillat, and A. E. Stallings. The poets Peter Van Toorn and Stephen Brockwell in Canada have also kept me excited about poetry for a long time. Stephen is still writing, and his brilliant, incisive poetry demands and rewards close attention. Going further back, I would include Thomas Wyatt, Ben Jonson, George Herbert, Keats. Throw in some Shakespeare.

Among my cohorts, there is much excellent work being done. To name all the poets would be a long list. Besides Rhina Espaillat, A. E. Stallings, and Stephen Brockwell, there are talented poets to my left and right generating significant poetry. They’re a phone call away, or an e-mail, and some even live in my neighborhood. Some are in academia, and some are not. I am blessed to be living among these poets.

Also important to me are the letters of Vincent van Gogh to his brother Theo and the letters of Elizabeth Bishop. Recently, I’ve been riveted by a book of essays by James Baldwin called Nobody Knows My Name – More Notes of a Native Son. James Baldwin is James Baldwin, and he cuts like a saber, unapologetically. The book is a first edition, from The Dial Press, New York, 1961, purchased from Adrian King-Edwards at The Word Bookstore on Rue Milton in Montreal.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Read Remembrance of Things Past. Become proficient in Spanish (I already speak French and Portuguese). To speak Spanish in New York is a social grace and a tactical advantage.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I suppose I would have liked to be independently wealthy. I have also dreamed of being a professional, world-class cellist like Yo-Yo Ma (though I’ve never touched a cello) or a gardener in a remote monastery in Kentucky or somewhere in France. Given my personality and skill set, the second option would be best.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

- existential terror and despair

- psychological/emotional necessity

- the prospect of getting closer to intelligent women

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

The last great book I read was Moby Dick. Some good ones I’ve read recently include Just Kids, Patti Smith’s memoir about her youth in New York City with Robert Mapplethorpe in the early 1970s (she’s a fine prose writer), and an autobiography by some fellow named Bruce Springsteen – the guy has a way with words!

I don’t watch a lot of movies these days. There are too many, and most are second rate, at best, in the grand scheme of cinema. The last great film I saw was One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975, directed by Milos Forman, based on the 1962 novel by Ken Kesey, and starring Jack Nicholson). Also, I’d have to include The Deer Hunter (1978, directed by Michael Cimino) and Glengarry Glen Ross (1992, directed by James Foley, adapted by David Mamet from his own play).

One recent movie I did like was Paterson. It stars Adam Driver and Golshifteh Farahani, directed by Jim Jarmusch (2016). It’s an exquisitely moving film in which almost nothing happens! No sex, violence, car chases, cannibalism, or political posturing. I won’t say anything about the relevance of the title. Please just see the movie! I’ve watched it five times.

20 - What are you currently working on?

I’m working on some poems about garbage and pollution, including plastic. I’ve been thinking about the Gowanus Canal, in Brooklyn, which is reputedly the most polluted stretch of water on Earth. I can feel a poem coming.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Friday, May 07, 2021

Dennis James Sweeney, In The Antarctic Circle

 

66°13’S 110°36’E

I believe in Antarctica the way I believe in God’s white palm. The way it brims with snow. The way the night ice is new to the morning ice. I believe that the moon shines down on a union, that somewhere in this tundra two are frozen into one.

Some day: I believe in that day.

In my life, a desperate insect drags lint across the living room floor.

Not a single memory fills me. I remember the beach. The flags we covered ourselves in. The beer we drank. No snow. The sky pretended to go on forever but stopped just beyond the eyes.

Forever was only an idea then, something someone said to someone and both quickly forgot. Waiting there for us.

Amherst, Massachusetts poet and editor Dennis James Sweeney’s full-length poetry debut is In The Antarctic Circle (Pittsburgh PA: Autumn House Press, 2021), a book of absences and solitudes reminiscent of the geographic lyrics of Ottawa poet Monty Reid’s The Alternate Guide (Red Deer AB: Red Deer College Press, 1995), with both titles writing out alternate takes on specific geographic locales across a contained stretch. “Scan the snow for objects of love and wonder.” Sweeney writes, to open “74°0’S 108°30’W,” “Boil seal meat, stirring / with both arms.” For Reid, the boundaries of his specific map were the province of Alberta, and for Sweeney, he writes the Antarctic circle, but one as a space of shadows, legends and imprecisions. He writes an open space upon which the emptiness allows him to mark and remark as he wishes, putting on his own particular imprint, writing love, heart, hearth and environmental crisis. How does one love during a crisis? How does one allow a benefit of doubt? Even the shadows, one might say, betray. As “76°20’S 124°38’W” writes: “You will learn: Negative sixty degrees is not absolute zero. // You will learn: In a whiteout you cannot see shadows, but that does / not mean the edges are not there.”

 

Let’s suppose the world never ends. Let’s suppose we’re here into perpetuity, cooling heels at the rim of the great gone-cold hot tub. I throw in the towel. It begins to sink. Hank dives in, reaching one heroic hand out of the water where he’s drowning, the towel clutched in it. Soaked. Drying for only a moment before his weight pulls it down to the bottom.

We enact the cycles. We buy in, whether we want to or not, to biotic recursion, watersheds, the boogaloo. But we haven’t forgotten silence, not with as much armchair in front of us as we’ve got. The silence doesn’t circle. Rather lurks, impatient, then jumps on whatever slows. (“67°31’S 64°37’W”)