Showing posts with label SplitLevel Texts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SplitLevel Texts. Show all posts

Sunday, January 26, 2020

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Martin Corless-Smith


Martin Corless-Smith was born and raised in Worcestershire, England. He studied as a painter and a poet. His books include Odious Horizons: Some Versions of Horace (Miami University Press, 2019), The Fool & The Bee (Shearsman, UK, 2019), and a novel This Fatal Looking Glass (SplitLevel Texts). A collection of essays, The Poet's Tomb is forthcoming from Parlor Press in 2020. He lives and teaches in Boise, Idaho.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My first book was a bit of a fluke (Of Piscator, U of Georgia Press). I sent it off very quickly after pulling together recent things. It had a certain whimsy about it. I suppose it got me the job I still have, so in that way it made me employable. I was of course pleased to get a book out, enjoyed the object, liked being able to give it to friends, family and poets. Actually I think what struck me most when I saw the book was that it takes some distance to read one’s own work. I think my most recent collection of poems, The Fool & The Bee (Shearsman) is more like it than anything in between, a gap of 20 years or more. It seems part of the same journey. Maybe I like Of Piscator most in some ways, because it never expected an audience.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I think poetry seemed more capable of directly engaging with emotions and thoughts: vague shapes and colours that needed some kind of immediate evocation. I never particularly worried about what genre it was. It was surrogate for painting.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

How long is a piece of string? My novel, which died many times on the table, took 7 years to put in a nearly satisfactory shape. Some books have taken only a year. My first efforts are almost always finished drafts. If they are not what I need then I don’t use them, but I tend to write the poem out in one go, even if it is a very long one. I will change places where I can’t follow my own initial attempts, but I don’t just get rid of weird and awkward moments. I very rarely make big edits. I write them by hand, which maybe gives me time to feel the poem happening the way I want it to. And if I feel they have hit on something then they shape the book they are in. I’d say 35% of my poems don’t survive to a public viewing, even if I like them as poems. It just depends what they are doing and if I feel I need that in the book. Sometimes poems find a purpose decades later.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

I’m always writing, or making notes or letting my mind wander towards a phrase or an idea or a galvanizing feeling. Books are the most common arrival point, a way of putting together and moving on (though often I don’t go very far).

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I am almost always happy to read, though I prefer to keep it short and sweet. I’ve been at too many readings where the poet ruins any sense of connection by simply going on too long. Once in a blue moon I’m sad and there seems no point in it, or in anything, but thankfully that is rare.

I will say I nearly always feel the audience isn’t there for my work in particular, more to support poetry or taking a class or being good citizens, so I often feel, especially in America, that my work is hard for them to hear. My language can be dense and the ideas difficult or opaque, so there isn’t always that easy payoff some readings give the “ahhing” and “sighing” audience. I also don’t want to explain or anecdotalise, so it isn’t always the love fest! I’m not interested in selling myself or my work to anyone, so I suppose I just hope they like it, but people very rarely come up to me after a reading and say anything, so who knows what they are thinking. They are probably thinking about getting a drink or catching a bus! I do sometimes wonder why I do it. It’s not for any obvious gratification.

That said, I write with sound as an important engine, a central element in my poems, so it is good to have to perform that.

Honestly it feels like I’m a chef and I put my heart and soul into preparing the food and I want it to be loved and consumed, and even if sometimes going out into the dining area is kind of fun and exciting, in the end it’s not really my business. No one wants a chef breathing down their neck when they are trying to taste a dish.

I would be fine never to read again, or to read more than I do. I have thought, when reading from The Fool and the Bee of dressing up in clown make-up, but I suspect I’d never want to take it off!

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I don’t separate theoretical concerns from emotional ones, or formal or spiritual ones. To me, the fact of being cuts through everything, and so my work wants to be as much about philosophy as it is about sex or sparrows. I’m very much interested in poetics and in thinking about how poems are part of the way of shaping thought and being.

Right now I want poetry to offer an alternative to capitalism! I feel poetry has a wonderful ambivalent place where it both ignored/ridiculed and somewhat held in esteem (probably this is a residual cultural effect). The fact that there is really little direct financial gain is part of that ambivalence as well.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

Writing is an essential part of culture/history/society/selfhood. We wouldn’t have a sense of culture without it. Nor who we are, and what love is, what loss is, what being is. Culture today (in the bits I mostly attend) has crawled into a terrible corner where materialism and blind accumulation, even with the truth of the emptiness of that accumulation spelled large in our faces, has replaced almost even the possibility of any alternative. It’s not just that we are shallow money grabbing assholes, it’s that we can’t really think of another way to be. Writers have to be able to write new ways of being alive to remind us of our humanity, of love, of the free gifts of being.

All epochs shift and crumble, all world-views are in flux, and poems are one thing that tells us where we are in the process.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

I did a few books with Fence, and Rebecca Wolff was really a great person to interact with. She’s very smart, and a terrific poet herself, and we’ve known each other for years, but most of all she is honest, and cannot not be, it seems. So she’s an ideal reader. She never badgered but had great questions. I don’t recall if she ever convinced me to change anything. Mostly she just wanted to know what I thought was going on. Keith Tuma was a microscopic editor to my recent Horace collection. Very handy! But in general my work is not a collaboration until it gets out of my hands and into the hands of an unknown reader. And then who knows…

I’ve had one or two good friends over the years who have read things: Cathy Wagner, Alan Halsey (also a publisher of my work), Dan Beachy-Quick, but again, did I ever change anything because they felt I should…maybe I did? I had some good teachers who read my work and took it seriously which was really important to me: Jorie Graham, Marvin Bell, Donald Revell…without their input I don’t know where I’d be, even if I fought against direct influence and suggestions, the support was vital.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

I wish I could remember.

When I was a student at Iowa, my work was getting very dark and Marvin Bell told me I had a choice to change my direction, which I did. He didn’t want me to conflate creativity with darkness, and risk unearthing some of the potential dangers that that might. It was kind and true.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I read too much shitty news. So I try to get away to my studio where I don’t have the internet. I teach, so reading is around what I am teaching. I’m lucky, very lucky, because I make up classes, and am allowed to, around topics I want to think about. So I might theme a class on Beauty, or the Soul and read a range of books about that. My writing and painting and teaching are all of a piece.

I write all the time. I have a notebook or two on the go all the time (some pocket notebooks in various jackets). Then, when they are full or I feel I have gone on a while I type them into the computer. I wait to see if a book is happening.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I don’t worry about not writing. If I don’t write for a while then so much the better for everyone else!

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Roast chicken. Fresh line-dried laundry. The leafy mulchy earth in old deciduous woods.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

Comes from anywhere you are paying attention.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

I’d never have thought to write without reading other writers of course. So many of them are dear companions. Of our contemporaries I always wait excitedly to see what Alice Notley has just made, or Lisa Robertson, or Alan Halsey, a few others. But there are always new surprises. There are wonderful presses like Canarium, Ugly Duckling and The Song Cave that keep bringing great things into the world.

Of poets from the past, Petrarch, Leopardi, Keats, Wordsworth, Herrick, Donne …makes me sound like a stuffy old white dude…huh. Virginia Woolf, Clarice Lispector, Aime Cesaire, W.G. Sebald, Vallejo, Pessoa, Trakl, Beckett …I read lots of other genres, and am always excited when Giorgio Agamben has another book translated, though they mostly prove the same points over again through a slightly different metaphors or subjects, they are brilliant reminders and filled with lovely moments and helpful formulations.


I read fiction because I don’t like TV very much very often. I feel annoyed by the silliness of much TV. Some is great of course, but not enough to keep me busy. And I can’t watch TV during daylight hours. I also never listen to podcasts, I just don’t want a voice talking at me during the day. I seem to read a lot of great fiction by young women these days.

Relationships and Nature (birds especially) are always very present in my life and in my work.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

So much. Live by the sea for an extended period. Live in another country. See India. See my son happily through college, out into the world. Maybe get rid of all of my things. Paint the interior of an atheist chapel. Die well.

If you mean as a writer, probably a short book of philosophy.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I’d have been a painter. I still might, I have a studio and I paint 3 or 4 days a week. I don’t like to sell them which is an issue. I might have to start. I was a gardener during my summers when an undergraduate, I could have stood doing that.

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I finished a graduate degree in painting in the States and moved back to London with no money and no materials. I had no studio…poetry was the closest thing I could do to painting without a studio.  

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Well I’m teaching the last two chapters of The Prelude tonight, but I suspect you mean which great book did I last read for the first time…

Recent WTF in translation: Walter Benjamin’s One-Way Street
Recent Poetry in new translation: Surrender to Night: Collected poems of Georg Trakl
Contemporary Art Theory: Cesar Aira’s On Contemporary Art
Contemporary Philosophy/Theory: Giorgio Agamben’s Creation and Anarchy

It could have been an entirely different list. These are just very recent. Last two months?

Film: Roma

19 - What are you currently working on?

A book of prose pieces about the disintegration of selfhood. I have a book of essays coming out soon, The Poet’s Tomb (Parlor Press), so I am picking out the weeds. A large oil painting of what appears to be a Victorian factory.


Sunday, September 21, 2014

Lucy Ives, The Worldkillers




1. Speculation:

We might think of description as the suppression of distance, since it brings that which is not present near.
            Language, meanwhile, counterfeits presence. (One thinks of Gide’s Les faux-monnayeurs.)
            Thus: it matters which language you use, whether it is “washed,” how prepared. The extent and location of your vocabulary. The eye remains fixed within the face and yet certain entities entice it, the anticipation of skin, something sinks in cloudy liquid. Temperature is so important in description, or that one object may hide another, at least in part.
            It is possible we mortals feel solidarity with literary “objects,” in that these carry in themselves their own negation. Nothing participates in literature in permanence. (“On Description”)

In her third trade collection, The Worldkillers (Ann Arbor MI: SplitLevel Texts, 2014), New York City poet Lucy Ivespresents a work in three sections—poem, novel and essays—each of which bleed structurally across the boundaries of form. Ives, the author of Orange Roses (Ahsahta, 2013) [see my review of such here] and nineties (Tea Party Republications, 2013), is quickly developing into a poet of sentences on par with the poem-essays of Lisa Roberston and Phil Hall for their sharp blend of lyric, thought and wit. Her collection is structured in three parts: a section of poems, “My Thousand Novel”; a novel written over the course of a day, “The Worldkilllers”; and an essay, “On Description.” Still, the form between each of these sections remains rather fluid. It remains unclear if the declarations of form (the second section is declared a novel, as the third is declared “[an essay]”) are included as red herrings, distractions or as each section’s suggested focus. As the combined press release for The Worldkillers and Maged Zahir’s If Reality Doesn’t Work Out reads:








Why “Texts”: why “SplitLevel Texts,” that is, not that we are not interested in genre, but we are not interested in saying strictly, this one, this one we love MOST (id est, poetry) cannot contain others: are we children of the theory wars: yes and we were born on the side that loved capacity and textuality even in the earth: and what about hybridity: yes, but more important more to our essence: do we look to darwin and raise a glass to hybrid vigor: yes, very much more than probably yes : so why “Level”: do we see things as balanced: of course and also of course not: oh, so is that what the “Split” is about then: do we see the balance out of balance: yes: so what about “SplitLevel”: have we ever lived in one: have you?

The poems in the first section (including the poem “Poem”) are constructed as a sequence of accumulations; lines and phrases compiled in a kind of breathless rush, much in the way of some of the pieces from Orange Roses. The first section of “Poem” opens:

She does not like that very nice man
She does not like that very nice man on wheels with the face of salt
She does not like to live for three thousand years dripping and falling over her own whisper
She does not live for a week like a dromedary, stupid fringe of crystal sticking out from her eye
If it’s what she wants
If it’s lips and teeth and tiny white hair
Why not end every adjective with an “e”

Ives appears to favour repetition and the accumulation throughout her work, and the subsequent sections share this sense of accumulation. Where the poems in the first section might be accumulations of lines and phrases, the second section is one of prose-sections, sentences and plot-movements, and the third one of phrases, quotes and logical turns. The eighth section of her essay, “On Description,” titled “Speculation:” reads:

In the foreground there are reeds—long blades that shake; closed blossoms; and now a shelf of cloud, under which pale orange.
            I write in a notebook, “I was just whistling.”

As much as anything else, The Worldkillers is a work that explores the boundaries and blurrings between the arbitrary lines drawn around particular forms, just as much as she plays with the naming of those same forms. Is the poem “Poem” a poem and nothing more? Is the essay “On Description” truly an essay and not, say, a poem-essay, or even simply a poem?


Thursday, July 31, 2014

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Karla Kelsey

Karla Kelsey’s first book, Knowledge, Forms, the Aviary was selected by Carolyn Forché for the 2005 Ahsahta Press Sawtooth Poetry Prize. Iteration Nets, her second book, was published by Ahsahta in 2010. A Conjoined Book is just out from Omnidawn. She edits & writes for The Constant Critic, &, with Aaron McCollough, co-directs SplitLevel Texts.

1 - How did your first book change your life?

Having a book in the world ends up the equivalent of having part of myself in the world in a way that, while being very otherwise than my me, my I, is nevertheless a singular, visceral intensity. I didn’t expect this or, more precisely, I didn’t expect to feel in the world a sort of flesh-made-book, particularly because while my books are of me they are not about me. My first book, Knowledge, Forms, the Aviary, led me to experience that this would be how it is for me.

How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

Preoccupations of perception and form—questions of subjectivity and source: all of these span from Knowledge, Forms, the Aviary to Iteration Nets to A Conjoined Book. So much so that I consider this a trilogy refracting through different formal/project lenses. A Conjoined Book differs in that it overtly works with narrative…the narrative of the Grimm Brothers’ tale The Juniper Tree and narrative as a question.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
This has to do with sound, wind, and dance; being outside and the trees in the same furious fit as the soul, the body used to move essence and emotion into form becomes the poem transmitting these elements as wordy flesh. I have always been acutely aware of a disjunction between narrative and visceral experience and find writing mainly in the space that begins in embodied experience and extends towards—but does not crystallize into—narrative.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
Creative language has little traction for me outside of the context of a project and so whenever I am writing I am writing either from the center of a project or towards such a center. But at the same time I do not begin with a project idea. This confluence has less to do with time than it has to do with shape, form, idea, research, texture. Language comes quickly but finding traction/context for language and training it, as one might espalier a tree, takes focus. Seeing where to cut loose the branch from its form and having the courage to do so requires inspiration and courage.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

In the beginning of a project I am working both angles at once. I can’t imagine thinking of a full project without having language units in the making to guide it. At the same time, short pieces don’t have maximum traction for me until they are placed in the context of a larger whole.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I feel readings to be essential not only to creative energy, but also to the book. Without public performance the books have a more shadowy experience of being alive in the world. In terms of creative process, I have gotten wonderful ideas from people I encounter at readings…perhaps the ideas are not necessarily for poems, but for teaching, or for thinking about writing and being in a fresh way. While exhausting, going out to give readings always energizes me much, much more than it take a toll.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?
My questions include: How can one speak from and out of  and within rather than about? How does language register the affective and cognitive experience of being? What modes of being might be cultivated through poetic processes? –But I don’t know that I am trying to answer these questions. Rather, feel I am trying to exist them more fully.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
I try to stay away from “shoulds” as I think they are fairly poisonous to freedom. It is important for there to be many different types of writers who inhabit different kinds of roles. To my mind one of the most important type/role is that of the writer who is passionately engaged with art-making regardless of whether or not culture thinks his/her form of art-making is useful. Such art allows me to question the entrenchment of practicality and to create new forms of thinking and feeling. To do so one has to be willing to be outside of the commerce of usefulness—both as reader/viewer and as writer/artist.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
I’ve had two extremely positive experiences with two different editors. Janet Holmes published my first 2 books without many changes and found a way to typeset them in a way that didn’t require compromising the work—which was quite a task. I imagine most editors would have asked me to change the poems to fit the standard size of the book, or to make the typesetting less difficult, and I have always been so enormously grateful that Janet’s approach for these books was to fulfill their visions by giving them the printed form that they required.

For A Conjoined Book Rusty Morrison gave me wonderful editorial feedback on the manuscript and read and responded to the multiple drafts I created in revision. Rusty truly helped me to work the book into the form that it needed to be. Without her input the book would not have ever reached its potential. In working with her I have grown so much as a writer.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
A view of what it might be to work towards inhabiting the possible and the impossible both. At the same time.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose)? What do you see as the appeal?
Critical prose is a struggle and I often think up reasons why I don’t need to write it anymore. Whereas poetry, even when difficult, is a deep, pulsing pleasure and when I am not working on something I am very sad. I suppose critical prose is supposed to be difficult, at least it is supposed to be difficult for me, which is one of its goods in the end: to override the impulse to only do what pleases me. Critical prose is meaningful to me as a way to participate in the larger conversation that ranges around poetry. It is also a way for me to know the books that I write about on a deep-tissue level. Generally, I believe in difficulty as an essential component to a life fully inhabited.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
Writing in the early morning is best—both to keep the writing going and for me to feel more sane as I go about my day. I have often wanted to find ways of carrying writing through the day: little processes or procedures, but these unfortunately usually only last 1 or 2 days at the most when I invent them. Also essential is physical exercise and reading: these activities can’t be separated from my writing life.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
I imagine myself to be a sculptor making a series of new forms. What do I need: clay, process, shape. Translated into writing: form, process, and language as a material are the places I turn in a stall.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Jacaranda trees and a library permeated with salt air. Ginkgo trees—their sex and death—and the must of 19th century houses. Metallic wind off the Danube, wet limestone.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
Place/space greatly influences my work. Whether that space is familiar territory or travel, both natural and architected aspects of the environment are artistically and intellectually formative, stimulating, necessary. Also: music, visual art, performance art, and film are deeply important along with feeling myself to be physically of the world.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
Philosophers, theorists, writers who work on reading the architected and natural environment: all of these are essential. Right now I read Wittgenstein on certainty, WJT Mitchell on icons, Costica Bradatan on the intellectual/political history of Russia and Eastern Europe.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Take the train from Moscow to Vladivostok. Absolutely. 

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
I would like to have been a modern dancer and choreographer á la Pina Bausch

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
Something else failed and writing delivered me to my particular form of life-making.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
The Spoils of Poynton by Henry James; Au hazard Balthazar by Robert Bresson.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;