Showing posts with label Airlie Press. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Airlie Press. Show all posts

Friday, October 09, 2026

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Ching-In Chen

Ching-In Chen is a genderqueer Chinese American writer, community organizer and teacher. They are author of Shiny City, recombinant (2018 Lambda Literary Award for Transgender Poetry) and The Heart's Traffic: a novel in poems as well as chapbooks to make black paper sing and Kundiman for Kin :: Information Retrieval for Monsters (Leslie Scalapino Finalist). Chen is co-editor of The Revolution Starts at Home: Confronting IntimateViolence Within Activist Communities. They are a Kelsey Street Press collective member, Airlie Press editor and Nonfiction Coordinator for Best of the Net. They serve on the Governing Council of Seattle's Cultural Space Agency and on the board of Seattle City of Literature. They received fellowships from Kundiman, Lambda, Watering Hole, Can Serrat, Imagining America, Jack Straw Cultural Center, EmergeNYC, Intercultural Leadership Institute and the Academy of American Poets Laureate Fellowship as well as the Judith A. Markowitz Award for Exceptional New LGBTQ Writers. They collaborate with Cassie Mira on Breathing in a Time of Disaster, a performance, installation and speculative writing project exploring breath through meditation and environmental justice. They teach in the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences and the MFA program in Creative Writing and Poetics at the University of Washington Bothell.

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

I had no idea about poetry publishing when I sent my first book, The Heart’s Traffic: a novel in poems, to Arktoi imprint editor, Eloise Klein Healy. I taught myself to write the book by following the story of the main protagonist and teaching myself to write in various poetic forms as prompts to move that story forward as well as creating my own forms that I made up along the way. When I heard Eloise talking at a conference about the Arktoi imprint and about her goal to make a seat at the publishing table for lesbians, I had an intuition that I should keep that slip of paper with her contact information. In my first quarter as an MFA student at the University of California Riverside, I was in a class called “The Writer’s Life,” where we had to send our work somewhere. It was free to send to Eloise so I sent it, not expecting anything to come of it. I was very surprised when I got an e-mail from Eloise on my 30th birthday, asking me if the manuscript was still available. Throughout the next year, I worked one-on-one with Eloise on the revisions on the book, learning along the way as she advocated for my artistic choices. My most recent book, Shiny City, is more experimental but still maintains that spirit of teaching myself about the project while I’m writing. I chose to send my book to Airlie Press because of its cooperative model – to learn more about the publishing process – so I do feel like I’m following in Eloise’s footsteps with my intention to contribute to the field.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I wouldn’t say I came to poetry first because I hated the poetry I was exposed to in high school. What we were asked to read in class felt very far from my life, but I was always interested in reading stories and wanted to be a writer. I wrote a few stories, but I don’t think I had the experience, dedication and community support at the time to grow my interest into a more sustained creative practice. So I will say that I came to poetry publication first. I came of age as a community organizer in the Bay area, learning equally about direct action and spoken word, and how they both contributed to the movements I became part of. At that time, writing poetry fit best in my life – I could write in short bursts on public transit going to my non-profit job, and there was a community of open mics where I could share my work.

3 – How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

No project has been the same, but I often write in small flashes which slowly accumulate. The initial generating is quick, but the sequencing and order of the larger project – figuring out its shape and intention – is usually what takes the most time.

4 – Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a “book” from the very beginning?

I’m an author of short pieces that accumulate. When I first start writing, I am often responding in the moment to daily life and don’t have an idea where it’s going, but I figure it out along the way.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

Readings are an important part of my process. I enjoy hearing how an audience responds to the work. Some of the mentors I’ve worked with and have been influenced by, such as Sharon Bridgforth, work with improvisation and audience conduction. I started developing a process of multi-directional reading. If I am able to use projection so that the audience can see what the poem looks like on the page/screen, I often use that opportunity to choose a different direction or variation to read the poem, against the grain of audience expectation. In this way, I often discover new meanings and layers within my work.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I’m always thinking about what our relationship to each other has been and could be, both on an interpersonal level, but also on an intra-community level as well as an intra-species level. Much of what I’m wondering about now is how to survive this current moment and how can we dream of more sustainable futures, especially for those of us who are targeted and deemed unworthy of care.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

There are so many different kinds of writers so I think, similar to organizing roles, there could be a multitude of roles for writers – writers who reflect the reality of what is currently going on in our society, writers whose work helps us dream and imagine into the future, writers who help us grapple with our past.

8 – Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

It’s been an important part of the process for me to consider editorial feedback, especially from an editor who understands what my work is trying to do. It was especially important for my first book because I hadn’t gotten a lot of feedback prior to submitting the manuscript. For my second book, I had two editors – Emgee Dufresne and Anna Morrison – who helped me shape the trajectory and journey of the manuscript, which was also very helpful.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

I completely changed my life after hearing Justin Chin on a panel about the writing life say, “Make your life fit around your writing, not your writing fit around your life.” After that, I made a commitment to my writing practice – of trying to figure out how to keep myself writing as much as possible.

10 – What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I try to do the morning pages (from The Artist’s Way) as a way to get the sludge out of the way before I delve in. When I have gone a long time without returning to the pages, I can usually tell something is off in my life, usually a time of deep stress and chaos. I tend to do better when I write in community so I often look for ways to plug into co-writing times if possible. Right now, I have a writing group I write with virtually in the mornings regularly. For years, I also have participated in the Daily Grind, an accountability group I was invited to by Matthew Olzmann, where I sign up every month and commit to sending a draft daily to the group by midnight every day. This year, in starting a new speculative prose project, I decided to adopt Jami Attenberg’s 1000 words a day prompt and attach it to writing exercises from Alice LaPlante’s Write Yourself Out of a Corner and am currently writing through a first draft.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I turn to reading or experiencing/listening/looking at art. Also, sometimes chopping vegetables helps.

12 – What fragrance reminds you of home?

The fragrance I associate with home is my family’s cooking, often meals which need to be made together – dumplings, hotpot, soup.

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

I often write in response to visual art and other art forms such as film and music. More recently, I have also participated in a project called Writing the Land. Poets are matched with land from nature preserves and then write poems in response to the landscape there.

14 – What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

Writers like Larissa Lai, Cathy Park Hong, and Alexis Pauline Gumbs who blend history and lineage with speculation have been cornerstones of my work. I also learn from writers who transform my understanding of what a book can do such as Salvador Plascencia in The People of Paper.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

I would like to travel more to places I haven’t been – and to spend extended time in Asia.

16 – If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

Adopting two dogs into the family during the pandemic really changed my life for the better – and helped my writing because it constantly pushed me to examine life from a different perspective. I find learning about the behavior of dogs so interesting that if my dogs had come into my life earlier in my education, I might have chosen something dog-related instead of writing-related as an occupation.

17 – What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

Since I’ve been young, I’ve gotten lost in stories as a comfort and escape. Through that experience, I realized how much power I had to the ability to shape my own reality and future through being skilled with working with words. As I kept writing, this became a way for me to understand my own experiences and the world around me.

18 – What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

I just read Rajiv Mohabir’s Cutlish for the Sealey Challenge. Much of the book is written in a form after Caribbean chutney music, which I found innovative and beautiful. The last great film I saw was Hamnet –  I loved the way the actors used their bodies to embody these huge emotions of the characters and how that pushed me to experience this wide arc of emotions, from joy to grief.

19 - What are you currently working on?

For the last few years, I’ve been working on Breathing in a Time of Disaster, which is focused on community breath stories. I’ve also been writing poem-spells and inviting the audience to breathe with me when I share them. They have been slowly accumulating and I’m currently thinking about a larger thread and sequence to gather them into a book. In the last few months, I’ve also begun a speculative novel which wrestles with the question of what kind of self-determination is possible under a deep repression for trans families.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Ching-In Chen, Shiny City

 

american syntax

The teacher straightback,
face me off, her eyes.
            My face in cleave of
her shoulder, my bones
sitting high my cheek.
            The word proper
arrives in hall. The order
of things, rolling
neat into pine drawers, dead-
clean. Squeezed juice of greedy
sponge.
            Her teeth not match.
One chipped. The corner lifted,
peeking a window, furtive.
            The other, pearl, round
and perfect, looming above my
Arched head. About to bite.

I’m intrigued by the way Redmond, Washington-based “genderqueer Chinese American writer, community organizer and teacher” Ching-In Chen’s latest poetry title, following a couple of chapbooks and full-length collections The Heart’s Traffic (Arktoi/Red Hen Press, 2009) and recombinant (Kelsey Street Press, 2017; winner of the 2018 Lambda Literary Award for Transgender Poetry), is Shiny City (Portland OR: Airlie Press, 2025). According to the cover blurb, Shiny City is a collection that “examines the ‘real’ and imagined history of Riverside, California’s Chinatown, juxtaposed with a speculative shiny city of the global future. Word by word, syntax by syntax, Chen projects the essential and unrecorded voices of the Chinese immigrants who picked and packed fruit in Riverdale’s citrus groves and worked as house servants in the late 1800’s through the 1930’s, as well as the travelers and inhabitants of ‘shiny city’ as they navigate its accelerated process of growth and decay.” Wonderfully expansive, Chen’s lyric assembles into a collection via collage, setting poem-against-poem, offering multiple perspectives across generations. There’s a way that Chen utilizes physical space and pacing across the page I find intriguing. The poems are expansive, composing constellations across each page through collage, setting words, pause and breath in open space, such as the poem “switchboard operateor,” that offers:

lady wants my face                                                       $53,655
                                                                                    pinned
to nudge memory at dry day end 

 

she says her long path                                            ordinances of murder
      I wont understand                     break a fail flee
 

witness strike mines   close twenty-eight

 

 

                                                                                    summons    separate set of stairs
murdered by white
                        other ladies in her twirling                               arms

 


Shiny City has shades reminiscent of Vancouver poet Wayde Compton’s 49th Parallel Psalm (Vancouver BC: Arsenal Pulp Press, 1999) or even Daphne Marlatt’s Steveston (Vancouver BC: Talonbooks, 1974; Vancouver BC: Ronsdale Press, 2001), attempting to articulate a geographic space through a particular group of inhabitants. Chen works through archive and memory, articulating the immediacy of a physical and cultural landscape that moves back generations. “man whose name drown in photograph,” Chen writes, to close “chinese workers at usda lab, 1904,” “all I have                   his upper body / grasping hand            beyond this America // belly tree full of dust       my father sell / vegetables grown from home [.]”

 

 

Saturday, April 04, 2026

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Nicole Zdeb

Nicole Zdeb is an editor at Airlie Press, a consulting astrologer, and a writer. Originally from Vermont, Nicole spent her formative years on the East Coast before settling in the Pacific Northwest with her husband, writer Jamie Cooper. Nicole holds an MFA from the Iowa Writers' Workshop and works at the University of Kansas. Her first full-length collection of poems, The End of Welcome, was published by Airlie Press in 2025. www.nicolezdeb.com

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
This is my first full-length book so I am experiencing  how my life is changing. It came out the same year my father died, so it’s been a year of initiations.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
Poetry is the genre that has the strongest grip on me. It calls me back, continuously. It reflects the natural state of my thought process - elliptical, associative, elusive, and fragmentary.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
Starting? I am a quick starter. When drafting, the words flow like cheap merlot. I turn my executive mind off and my receiving mind on and enter the current, banging away with utter freedom. But that’s not how I polish, revise, or craft. There’s a great divide between the drafting process and the rest of it. 

When I was working on The End of Welcome, I collated all the versions of the poems in it and that manuscript was close to 800 pages. So the process with The End of Welcome included wrestling with an 800-page tiger. 

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
The End of Welcome was individual pieces that found themselves cohabitating in the same manuscript. The manuscript evolved over a period of about six or seven years. The manuscript I am working on right now has started as a book - it’s thematically linked and being written with the end shape in mind. The methodology is project dependent. 

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I find readings enchanting. There’s something ancient and nourishing about humans gathering to hear other humans. 

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

The End of Welcome has social concerns around abuse of power and tyranny. It engages in questioning who has agency, who controls progress and our bodies, and who dictates the direction of our collective hope. The name itself is a nod to that - the age of America as a welcoming agent to the dispossessed, the searching, the poor and resilient is over. It’s becoming a plutocratic dystopia. Who belongs? 

Here are a couple of the questions on my mental altar:
How do we keep world-centric and human-centric without becoming cynical, exhausted, and hopeless?

How do we keep ourselves tender enough to rest and eat good food and laugh when the emperor is running around naked and stark? 
7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
I don’t know what the role of the writer is in larger culture - we are treading in waters that reject the intellectual, complexity, liberalism, and the humanities. Throw AI into the mix and it’s a watershed moment. Society is reshaping and so is the role of its gatekeepers, champions, and pillars.

In terms of the ideal writers role, it depends on the writer. If the writer is a small-minded bigot from Dogpatch who uses their platform to spew orange vomit, then a NPC role would be preferable.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
Personally, I’d rather stick my tit in a Cuisinart. 

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
I am allergic to advice. 

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to stories to essays to reviews to visual art)? What do you see as the appeal?
Its natural to glide between painting, photography, poetry, fiction, essays, and reviews, but I can’t sing or dance, and that’s why I never made it as a Rockette. 

The appeal? There’s pleasure in multiplicity. Different genres let you do different things, offer different quests, and present different challenges.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
I’ve been writing for 41 years and I don’t have a Routine. I have provisional routines. Sometimes they will last a week, sometimes a month, sometimes a season. I’m in flux.

Right now, this is my routine: Monday through Friday, get up at 6 am and write for 1.5 hours in the morning before work. When I am done with my work day, I need to unfold my mind and let it flutter on the breeze. I am in bed by nine pm, so there’s no night writing sessions anymore. But thirty years ago? I’d be writing till dawn’s wine-stained fingers ripped the pen out of my fist.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
Astrology. I have a system where I use horary charts (charts of the hour) to unlock when I get locked up. I engage with the universe as a creative partner.  

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Pierogies and onions and Emeraude.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
Visual art - I get juiced when I am at a gallery or museum. Spending time with visual art changes my brainwaves and unlocks escape hatches and secret doors. 

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
For my life outside of my creative work, I read a lot of astrology since I have been a consulting astrologer since the late 90’s: William Lilly, Liz Greene, Demetra George, Chris Brennan, Renn Butler, and Steven Forrest are a few of the names on my shelf.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
Build a yurt.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
Perfume designer.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
Absolutely no choice in the matter. Makes me wonder about free will, tbh. I’ve been writing creatively since I was 11 years old. In a dynamic life filled with reinventions, writing is the throughline.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
I’ve been on a Han Kang kick lately and was absolutely blown to bits by Human Acts. 

20 - What are you currently working on?
A fun project that marries my two favorite things: poetry and perfume. I spent about a season waking up early and starting each day with a perfume. I’d sit in the semi-dark and smell the perfume, put it on my body, smell it as it developed, and then write about it. Then I explored what the public was saying about each perfume and what the perfume house itself was saying. I’m layering those three axis of language around each scent: the personal, the social, and the corporate.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Mia Kang

Mia Kang is the author of All Empires Must (Airlie Press, 2025), which won the 2023 Airlie Prize, and the chapbooks Apparent Signs (Ghost City Press, 2024) and City Poems (ignitionpress, 2020). Her writing has appeared in Gulf Coast, Poetry Northwest, Pleiades, wildness, and elsewhere. Named the 2017 winner of Boston Review’s Annual Poetry Contest, she has also received awards and residencies from Brooklyn Poets, the Academy of American Poets, the Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown, Millay Arts, and University of the Arts. Whatever prizes she has won, she paid for three-fold in submission fees. www.miaadrikang.com

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

My recent book All Empires Must is my first full-length, and I'm not sure if its publication has changed my life. My main feelings toward its release have to do with the strangeness of being nearly a decade removed from the process of writing it. The years I spent working on those poems (2015-2017), however, certainly changed my life. It was my first experience working on a project at that scale, and it was also my deepest experience with writing to date, in the sense that I discovered how an immersive conceptual engagement could process personal experience into something else. I think the book is more serious, maybe braver, than what I've written since, but it's also less honest, or self-accountable. I guess that's the description of being young.

The best way of describing the difference between my recent work and my previous is probably to say I have become less precious about poetry. Part of that is that I've become less ambitious, in the sense of some external idea of "achievement" as a writer. I want to be serious, but I do not want to be prestigious, which I desperately did want when I was younger. That allows me to be looser, to try more varied approaches, and to let things take the time they take.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

As a kid, I actually tried to write fiction first. But I could never get a story to go anywhere. I would get mired in description. Plot held no interest for me. When I first started getting serious about poetry, after I moved to NYC in my late teens, I also tried to write non-fiction intermittently. I could only really do it in email form. There's a trove of long emails I wrote to family members from the years I was 17 and 18, plus a bunch I wrote to a mainly email-based lover the years I was 18 through 20 or so. But I've never succeeded in connecting with the essay as a form for my own thinking. I have the vague memory––possibly fabricated––of my first poems being written on scraps of paper. Poetry writing, in that sense, was easier to hide. Haha. 

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

Total variety. I tend to start from some kind of fixation. I've probably grown more attuned over the years to what kind of fixation might be likely to hold up as the basis for writing and what might not, but I still get surprised. I think I used to be closer to writing on a day-to-day basis; I used to find that first lines or sticking phrases would pop up and I would go from there. Since having my relationship to reading and writing completely reconfigured by various engagements with institutions (that's the avoidant way of saying graduate school), I've had to work much harder to make space for language to show itself. I'm not very disciplined about it, frankly, and sometimes I feel bad about that.

The poems in All Empires Must often came in a single sitting, but each poem (and the book as a whole) was at one point or another completely taken apart, edited, and reformulated. Some of the early drafts would eventually kind of splice into each other and become different poems. My second manuscript (unpublished, titled PERISH / ABOLISH) arrived more intact––individual poems still required refinement, but not in the same "down to the studs" kind of way. More of the thinking was done exterior to the poetry, in the second book. Also I was really, really, really angry all the time. Poems would get spit out in an already hardened state.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

I guess I jumped the gun and answered the first part of this above. I'm always thinking in terms of projects, whether the project is a "book" or something else. I can't stomach the notion of a poem that stands alone.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

Still trying to figure this out! I do enjoy readings, kind of. I like the physical act of reading aloud, and I'm interested in the thing that can happen when that happens with an audience. However, I am also someone who finds it hard to track a poem when I'm listening to it being read aloud. I greatly prefer reading from the page. I know not everyone is like that, but it always makes me feel weird about reading publicly myself.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

Yes. What is writing? Why am I doing this? Who am I doing it for? What does writing do?

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

See questions in answer above.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

I can't say that I've had too much experience working with an outside editor on poetry. With my first chapbook, City Poems, I got some great edits from the folks at ignitionpress. There was one long poem in particular that they helped me refine over several versions. At the time, I hated the process, but it absolutely made the book better, and I think I would be much more appreciative of that kind of editing now. I wish I had had the chance to work with an editor on All Empires Must. It won a book contest, so it was published basically exactly as I submitted it.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

I don't know if I think it's the best piece of advice, but it's the first thing that comes to mind: don't give up on a piece until you've gotten 100 rejections. Sadly, much about publishing is a numbers game, given the total lack of infrastructure for poetry.

10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

Alas, I have no routine. My day begins with feeding cats and making coffee. From there it unravels.

11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

To writers and books I love. I'll reread the poetry books that have been most important to my writing life. I'll especially turn to the work of dear friends. But also, and maybe more importantly, I need to go outside of writing. Learning something new helps, as does engaging with the material world (cooking, gardening, cleaning). Visual and performance art have often been the things that get what's stuck to move.

12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Copal. 

13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

My study of art history has run alongside my writing since the beginning, I guess. Architecture moves me more than probably any other visual form. Watching and thinking about and sometimes making dance and performance have been central to my writing as well.

14 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

Wayyyyy too many to name, so I'll just say Cam Scott because everybody knows it already.

15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

You're catching me in August, and I've been to a lot of baseball games recently. I really, really want to be able to walk on the field at the Phillies' ballpark, with few or no other people on it. Maybe this is the memory of the proscenium; I just feel I need to experience this.

16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I'm a nonprofit administrator, occupation-wise. I'm also qualified as an art historian, though I'm not teaching much these days due to the terrible conditions of that occupation. I'm working toward sitting for a CPA license. I wish I could be an NBA player (I have never played basketball at all). I estimate I will attempt 5-7 more occupations before I die. 

17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I do many things else. Mainly else. I started my life as a dancer, and I got injured. Writing is less expensive than say, painting, which I have no talent for anyway. Language is a source of pleasure and the stupidest kind of cage (the one you make yourself!). Everything is writing.

18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

The last great book was Emily Skillings' second book, Tantrums in Air, which came out recently from The Song Cave. I first read it in manuscript form over a year ago, and it is beyond fantastic and everyone should read it. I barely watch movies. The last great film I watched was probably Scarface, because I watch it once or twice a year, and I don't think Center Stage (with which I maintain a similar schedule) counts as a great film.

19 - What are you currently working on?

I am working on a book tentatively titled Rookie of the Year. The book centers around a long, overdetermined metaphor between my failed engagement and the so-called Process, the strategy by which the Philadelphia 76ers have been trying to build a team and win a championship since 2013. I'm still early on in the project, but I think the book is really about the beauty of devotion and the incongruity of the devastation by which it is accompanied. Several basketball-related poems from the project have appeared on The Rights to Ricky Sanchez podcast over the past year or so. None of these are published in a normal way yet, but you can hear Spike Eskin read "Breach of Promise," or you can see me give a live performance on the occasion of the NBA Draft Lottery. I have a lot of problems. Daryl Morey, please give me a press pass so I can write this book.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;