Showing posts with label Amelia Martens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amelia Martens. Show all posts

Sunday, March 03, 2019

Ongoing notes: early March, 2019


[our two young ladies before school earlier this week, in their self-proclaimed (and self-chosen) ballet outfits; Rose chose her outfit, in part, for the sake of Pink Shirt Day]

A new year, but January was a wash, it would seem; between overload of work, various house-illnesses and a couple of snow days, all of which managed to take up the first half of February as well. At least I started another poetry manuscript during the final week of January, which I think I’m quite pleased with so far (poems here and here, so far; hopefully more to come).


March! I turn 49 mid-month. Bah.

KY: Given just how deeply Kentucky poet Amelia Martens’ full-length debut, The Spoons in the Grass are There to Dig a Moat (Sarabande Books, 2016), resonated with me [see my review of such here], I was eager to see her new chapbook of prose poems, Ursa Minor (elsewhere, 2018). Winner of the 2017 elsewhere poetry chapbook prize, as judged by Lance Larsen, Ursa Minor is made up of twenty prose poems around “the little girl and the bear,” extending the fable of the archetypical characters, as well as using the two as a way to speak to and around further possibilities. As she includes on her website:

In his response to the work, judge Lance Larsen wrote, “I was surprised how the author could take an archetypal pair . . . and put them through all sorts of situations, such that I started to care about them. The language was funny and ironic . . .”

I like very much how Martens’ pieces hover in that nether-realm between prose-poems (Sawako Nakayasu, Rosmarie Waldrop) and lyric fiction (Sarah Manguso, Lydia Davis). There is much here to enjoy, and I’m curious to see if this title is part of an eventual larger book-length manuscript, whether as a section of something larger, or if the adventures of little girl and bear are extended further.

PB & J

The little girl and the bear are making sandwiches. Peanut butter and jellyfish, because the coral reefs are dying. Even Daryl Hannah is being replaced by a man, and women in Japan still buy skin bleach. Please god, they write on paper towels as the bear wraps their sandwiches: Please God. And the little girl doesn’t know if this means, please god, or please, god. And she thinks about the sisters buried under concrete in Italy and then it means Please! God! But the bear doesn’t abide punctuation. Next sandwich, the girl will use the marker to write Dear God, because a letter is an opening and the bear brought her a branch of butterfly bush today, a purple pompom on the end, and said: Here, this is for your body, it’s called The New Testament. The girl is tired of tests. And everything people say that is supposed to be meant.

Toronto/Northern Michigan: Recently, online poetry journal where is the river began producing chapbooks online, with a limited edition of print copies distributed gratis, through the individual authors (full disclosure: I was one of those initial authors). Also on that list of first titles includes WELCOME TO THE LAST EARTH SHOW (2018) by Michigan poet, editor and publisher Michael Sikkema, a sequence of nineteen untitled fragments:

We were making good time
hoping to descend into an interesting
meadow when the industrial bullfrogs
I can hook you up with
five gallons of sublime
future for the price of
a working atmosphere
but I can’t help you
translate the owls for
fucks sake leave them be

There is an oddly surreal quality to Sikkema’s lyrics, held together as a sequence via collage, both standing as singular, almost koan-like poems, and an extended poem, neither of which entirely solidify as overt narrative, but manage to skim across a fine line of meaning. His poems (or: poem) concurrently demand the reader’s attention and exist as they unfold, allowing readers to take in what they will. And my question around this work of Sikkema’s is equal to that of Martens: is this a stand-alone, a section of a larger structure, or a poem sequence that might emerge as something book-length?


Monday, September 11, 2017

Spotlight series #17: Amelia Martens

The seventeenth in my monthly "spotlight" series, each featuring a different poet with a short statement and a new poem or two, is now online, featuring Kentucky poet and editor Amelia Martens.

The first eleven in the series were attached to the Drunken Boat blog, and the series has so far featured poets including Seattle, Washington poet Sarah Mangold, Colborne, Ontario poet Gil McElroy, Vancouver poet Renée Sarojini Saklikar, Ottawa poet Jason Christie, Montreal poet and performer Kaie Kellough, Ottawa poet Amanda Earl, American poet Elizabeth Robinson, American poet Jennifer Kronovet, Ottawa poet Michael Dennis, Vancouver poet Sonnet L’Abbé, Montreal writer Sarah Burgoyne, Fredericton poet Joe Blades, American poet Genève Chao, Northampton MA poet Brittany Billmeyer-Finn, Oji-Cree, Two-Spirit/Indigiqueer from Peguis First Nation (Treaty 1 territory) poet, critic and editor Joshua Whitehead, and American expat/Barcelona poet, editor and publisher Edward Smallfield.

The whole series can be found online here.

Monday, December 19, 2016

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Amelia Martens



Amelia Martens is the author of The Spoons in the Grass are There To Dig a Moat, a book of prose poems selected by Sarabande Books for the 2014 Linda Bruckheimer Series in Kentucky Literature. Her chapbooks include: Purgatory (Black Lawrence Press, 2012), Clatter (Floating Wolf Quarterly, 2013), and A Series of Faults (Finishing Line Press, 2014). She met her husband in the Indiana University MFA program; together they have created the Rivertown Reading Series, Exit 7: A Journal of Literature and Art, and two awesome daughters. 

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
My first book, which came out in April 2016, makes me feel like I moved up a level, like I belong here, being a writer. My first chapbook had a similar influence and helped validate my work. Now that the book is out, I’ve been invited to panels, to teach at conferences, and to give readings. The book feels different because people react to it differently, because of my own investments in the idea of a book, because it’s a tangible example of my capabilities. 

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
Being a twin, words have several meanings and those meanings are flexible within a structured code. Maybe that’s true for all humans, I don’t know. I think my twinship influenced me to use fewer words than other people because I was linguistically intimately understood. Poetry is concentrated—each word matters. Fiction seems to need people, need development, arcs, and lots of moving pieces. My first year of college I wrote a good-sized short story—with no dialogue, and that sort of confirmed things. Non-fiction is a growing interest for me as I see some topics that I don’t think I can convey in poems the way I’d like to—they might lend themselves more to micro-essays? We shall see. 

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
I’m damned the moment I start thinking about my writing as a project. I can see and talk about my work in project terms after I’m finished (or think I’m finished). If I can just write and make a pile of pages and pretend that all it is, then I write fairly quickly. If I think too much about the project, it’s over. I’m trying to nurture my drafting process. My first draft is usually close to final, or it goes into the discard pile. I know there are a lot of good bits and pieces sitting in that pile, if I had the patience to get them back out and work them over.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
Many poems being for me in sound, a phrase said aloud an odd juxtaposition of images. I also mishear people all the time and it’s wonderful.

I’m working on one poem at a time and I’ll keep writing in one vein until that goes dry, then get hooked by something else and follow that along. I could not have written a book if I thought it was a book while I was writing the poems.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
Reading aloud is a great chance to celebrate the poem’s sound (rhythm, spacing, etc.). I love to do readings because I learn about the poems. I have to admit a word or piece of punctuation doesn’t work or come to an understanding that these poems read well to an audience and these are better to look at alone on the page. When people read the poems to themselves it’s a different experience; they’re celebrating the visual arrangement, the look of the words in addition to the sound in their heads.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?
I am interested in women’s voices and the complex experiences women, especially mothers have that are not regularly discussed. Holly Iglesias has suggested that the female prose poem might be it’s own separate form. I wonder how much what we think of as the standard form, any standard form, is really just the male standard. In every sector, women have been mistreated due to their non-conformity to the male-norm; from heart attacks to a lack of pockets, women are the constant other—what does this look like in poetry?

I am trying to answer my own questions, and they are big ones: Why are we here? What are we doing? How are we going to survive? What does it mean to be a female American human in the twenty first century? What parts of life need more attention and how do I show those to readers in ways that are compelling?

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
I see the writer as vital meaning-maker, meaning-reflector, question-asker, holder-of-signs, recorder-of-woe-and-wonder. Who knows what of our groups of human will get passed on—what will be our cave-paintings? Maybe language. Maybe these symbols we ascribe so much meaning that people kill and are killed for the side of a word they come down upon. The writer is a processor of experience, the spark of insight, one way we communicate human experiences across time; in this area writers and artists are the same.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
Terrifying in the way you know something is good for you. Change is hard and painful. Being edited is being told you need to consider change. I had a fantastic and vital experience with Sarabande; nearly every poem had some edits suggested. I was unprepared for this experience; I somehow thought I was done with the book once it was accepted for publication. So not true. Sarah Gorham, Jeffery Skinner, and Kirsten Miller all read my manuscript and made suggestions. Then it went through a more proof-level stage of edits—did I mean this word as a verb? And on the flipside: the book came out with no threads sticking out. Those poems needed other eyes upon their lines. Essential, though not painless.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
Related to writing: Make room for the reader in the poem. Think about where a door can be made, a window opened, a spot for the reader to join in the image/meaning-making exchange.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose)? What do you see as the appeal?
I tend to write everything like a poem, so even when I’m working on a book review it leans toward sounding like a poem and some times I have to go back and pull it apart a little more so there are actual sentences. Other than reviews, I haven’t much tried to move between genres and I hope, when I try this, it works out. I have some ideas that seem like they might need to be in essay form to be properly illuminated.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
With two young children, several part-time jobs, an everlasting mountain range of dishes, laundry, and dust bunnies—I’m doing my best to get to my desk at any random moment and write down what’s in my head. I also take notes and this keeps me losing idea threads, which kills me when it happens. A typical day begins with our 3 year-old poking me in the face with my glasses and telling me it’s morning time! (Kid, those are streetlights!)

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
Other poets. I read, read, read. Fiction. Non-fiction. I turn on the radio; I listen to people’s passing conversations. I start looking for threads in images that come into vision throughout the day. I go outside and dig a hole and remember I’m just a person on Earth.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
The smell of the ocean. The smell of the dryer. The smell of bread baking. The smell of about-to-rain and the smell of wet dirt.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
Yes. All of the above. I am enthralled by the details of science, and by the variety and imagination of visual art. The power to make images across language barriers, which is part of the magic of visual art and of music—a poem does something else. It is both visual and auditory, but it is limited by language. I love museums. I love watching people work in their talent area, whatever it might be, to see passion at play is powerful.  

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
Travel extensively outside the United States. And learn to play an instrument well enough to just be able to pick it up and play enjoyable music.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
My mom always said I’d be a lawyer. I need to do meaningful work, so if I wasn’t writing, I would need to do something helpful—to other people, or for the environment. I’ve always thought I’d make a good park ranger.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
The solitary and public experience of language. The sound of words has always been important. Probably being a twin is crucial to me being a writer; wordplay has been ongoing since there was always someone with which to make and test language. The ability to support my point of view was incredibly important growing up in our house; your argument had to be sound and therefore, your word choice was critical. I am also terrible at math.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
I just finished A.M. O’Malley’s Expecting Something Else (University of Hell Press, 2016); I read O’Malley’s collection in one sitting—when I was suppose to be going to sleep and I couldn’t put it down.

Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012); we have two young daughters, so this is the last film I can remember seeing in a theater and it was fantastic.

20 - What are you currently working on?
Poems. Life. Kids. Tolerance.

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Amelia Martens, The Spoons in the Grass are There to Dig a Moat




THE APOLOGY

And the apology I made for you came from a willow tree. From a lemon. From some mud I found in the living room. Our daughter thinks you are a giant. She asks you to lift the house, so she can put her dolls in a timeout. There is a crack in the back of my mind and I am filling it up with forget-me-nots and sailor’s knots and do nots. There is a place behind my retina where I am fragile. If I see a sun, if I see a squid, if I see something shiny, I should pick it up. I should turn my head. I should stop watching you while you sleep because I am going to wake you up. I am going to wake up. I am sorry and you have gone to buy more mousetraps.

I am curious about the short pieces in Kentucky poet Amelia Martens’ first full-length poetry collection, The Spoons in the Grass are There to Dig a Moat (Louisville KY/Brooklyn NY: Sarabande Books, 2016). Composed in striking, self-contained sentences that accumulate into delightful single-paragraph narratives, the pieces in this collection seem closer to (select) works of fiction by Gary Barwin, Ken Sparling, Sarah Manguso and Lydia Davis than “poems,” causing me to read the book as a delightfully rich collection of very short, dense, occasionally dark and even whimsical stories. While one can argue that naming is certainly important, at the same time, it is also completely irrelevant. As she responds in a recent interview for The Cloudy House:

After our first daughter was born, the prose poem started coming to me in full force. Simply, I did not have time to fret over the line and was so desperate in my need to write under the duress of new-motherhood, that I ran with what was coming so as not to shut progress down via the editor in my mind. As I investigate the prose poem more fully, I see that there are likely several reasons, beyond the time constraint, that the prose poem came to me. This form is versatile, subversive, narrative, allows for play with the structure of a sentence as a rhythmic unit. And women writers have been creating a much wider range of poems in this form than I was previously aware—see Holly Iglesias’ Boxing Inside the Box. The Jesus poems are a result of living in the hyper-religious landscape of western Kentucky and in this time. The “our daughter” poems are fragmented glimpses into daily living with our two daughters, Thea and Opal. These two main threads allowed me to switch my approach and move to another way of looking if the poem wasn’t working.

There’s an intimacy these poems allow, in talking about children, farming, Jesus and other immediate concerns, situations and ephemera. The poems are charming, direct and unsettling. In the interview, she speaks of a shift in her writing due to motherhood, and it makes me curious to see the writing she was doing prior to this collection, just to understand the differences; are the differences, for example, structural only? What does her take on the “prose poem” offer that her prior work hadn’t yet caught? Either way, these poems have the best qualities, one might say, of classic children’s literature: tales both light and dark, writing out wars, spirituality, domestic matters, and, as The Cloudy House tells us, “push between the extraordinary ordinary, our little and big world problems, and direct attention to the surreal mesh of our realities.”