As
a long-time follower of Marvel Comics, I’m intrigued at the idea of the announcement that came recently about “the end of the Marvel Universe,” as it
blends (or, really, crashes into) the Ultimate Universe this coming spring. Unlike
DC Comics’ “the new 52,” which everyone seems to have hated (and managed to
wreck my enjoyment of some of the very few mainstream DC titles I even paid
attention to: Hellblazer (Constantine) and Batwoman), or even the 1980s reboot of Superman, Wonder Woman and
other titles, this isn’t a reboot or a switch of any sort, but a way for the
characters and universe to develop.
I’ve
been following Marvel for quite some time, since I picked up my first issues in
the early seventies, focusing heavily on The
Amazing Spider-Man and Peter Parker:
The Spectacular Spider-Man, and eventually extending further out into The Avengers, The Fantastic Four, The Uncanny
X-Men and many others. I must have at least six thousand comics by now. Gerry
Conway on The Amazing Spider-Man. John
Byrne and Chris Claremont on the Uncanny
X-Men rebuild, or Byrne on The
Fantastic Four. Jim Starlin, really, anywhere in the 1960s and 70s. J. M.
Dematteis throughout Captain America
or just about anything Spider-Man. Wow.
There
are plenty of other examples. Obviously.
As
I saw it, the 1980s into the 90s were an interesting time for Marvel, shifting
their attentions from individual titles and individual issues to longer and
interconnected storylines, the beginnings of time travel storylines and the
experimentation with “other universes,” to the frustrations of long-time
readers like myself when Marvel would return to the “basics,” whether bringing
back Aunt May or re-breaking Charles Xavier’s legs. Think of Peter David’s brilliant run which saved The Incredible Hulk,
forced by the company to make the Hulk “stupid” again, thus erasing any
character evolution he had accomplished throughout his run (he quit the book as
a result). Think of the character Toad, who changed entirely throughout the
X-Men books to coincide with the character as it was built in the movies; done
to bring in new readers, but damned annoying to those of us who had been there
the whole time.
And
yet, how do you allow entry for new readers without forcing them to read half a
century (or more) worth of continuity to know what the hell is going on? It
made a certain sense, and at least one cynic I know in the industry claims that
the real money in Marvel is in selling bedsheets to kids and not in selling
books, so there’s only so much they can alter the characters (I hate that he is
most likely right). Death is never permanent, and returning characters from the
dead often belittles (in my mind) earlier plotlines and developments. They killed
and brought back (as a clone) Gwen Stacey (mediocre). They killed and brought
back Jean Grey (with X-Factor, which
was pretty interesting) only to kill her again (which seemed rather arbitrary,
but I enjoyed the development of Cyclops and Emma Frost). They killed and
brought back (very well done) and re-killed Charles Xavier. They killed and
brought back Norman Osborn (brilliantly, I thought). They killed and brought
back Ben Reilly, the clone of Spider-Man (very nice). They erased Spider-Man’s
marriage to Mary Jane Watson (unforgivable). They killed and brought back
Guardian (nicely done) and killed and brought him back again (very poorly
done). They killed and brought back Alpha Flight (unforgiveable; really, after Bill
Mantlo left the book after following John Byrne’s incredible run, Marvel seems
to be pushing the idea of “if we do it badly enough, readers will just stop
asking us to bring it back.” Shameful).
Some
of these deaths have actually allowed some interesting possibilities,
temporarily allowing other characters to develop more prominence, whether
Xavier’s death allowing Cyclops to develop further, or even Captain America’s
death prompting Bucky’s own version of Captain America (I was disappointed to
see that go). DC did the same when Bruce Wayne died, allowing the original
Robin, Dick Grayson (Nightwing) to temporarily take over the role (another
shift I was disappointed to see end).
Sean
Howe’s 2012 book Marvel Comics: The Untold Story, unfortunately, shattered a few long-held beliefs I’d been
carrying about how the stories at Marvel were build, shaped and told over the
long years (and it made me grieve, just a bit, for the dark, petty and even
ridiculous origins of many beloved tales).
The
strength of Marvel against DC was supposed to be in the fact that it refused to
remain fixed. A far older company, DC held to archetypes (which made reboot far
easier than rebuild, and movies far less complicated to get off the ground),
and Marvel kept developing, shifting and building. The X-Men team was never
stable for terribly long, nor were The Avengers, and yet, at some point, Marvel
decided to stop moving, perhaps to keep a non-reading audience interested in
what was happening. Teams and characters had to look familiar. It took Brian Michael Bendis destroying and rebuilding The Avengers into a decade-long arc to
break down so many standards and held assumptions (including Civil War, the
Skrull Invasion, Siege, Age of Ultron and other impossibly good storylines),
thus saving Marvel, ultimately, from itself. Suddenly, it seemed, Marvel had
the permission to change: Nick Fury no longer ran S.H.I.E.L.D. (allowing an
evolution that saw it run, variously, by Tony Stark, Captain Rogers and Norman
Osborn), Daredevil took over the territories of both the Kingpin and The Hand,
and Spider-Man was taken over entirely by Doctor Octopus. The Human Torch took
over the Negative Zone. The Shi’ar Empire saw the return of D’Ken, the savagery
of Gabriel Summers and the beginning of the reign of Gladiator. Cyclops became
an angry rebel, and Wolverine became Schoolmaster. The Black Panther lost his
throne to his sister. The Illuminati were created. The Inhumans returned to
earth and broke apart. The status quo could shift, and allow characters,
situations and stories to develop in real, permanent ways, without betraying
the central core of certain characters.
I’ve
followed a few iterations of Marvel’s alternate universes, from Jim Shooter’s “New
Universe” titles from 1986 to 1989 (including Star Brand, Spitfire and the
Troubleshooters, Nightmask, Mark Hazzard: Merc, Psi-Force, Justice, DP 7 and Kickers, Inc.), the multiple 2099 titles that ran from 1992 to
1996, the Marvel 2 titles that launched in 1998 (Spider-Girl, Fantastic Five
and A-Next, among others), the
completely terrible “Heroes Reborn” titles from 1996-1997 that directly
rebooted Captain America, Iron Man and other characters (thankfully, the entire
experiment, seen as horribly failed, was reversed) and the “Age of Apocalypse”
storyline throughout all of the X-Men titles from 2011 to 2013 (a rather good
run; rumours had at the time that this storyline might have remained, had it
been more popular). Most of these have been rather interesting, and some, like
the first three examples, simply didn’t catch on, and were seemingly cut off at
the knees. One wonders if this constant refreshing has been a matter of
attracting new readers, while attempting to keep from alienating long-time
readers, many, I’m sure, who either age out, get tired of the constant “back to
basics,” or move their comic reading out of the “big company” stuff into more independent
titles. I never have enough time or money for all of my reading, but some of
the important titles on my own shelf also include Neil Gaiman’s Sandman, Mike Carey’s Lucifer, Warren Ellis’ The Authority, Grant Morrison’s Kill Your Boyfriend, Kyle Baker’s Why I Hate Saturn, Peter Milligan’s Shade, the Changing Man and Garth Ennis’
The Preacher. And does anyone
remember Beautiful Stories for Ugly
Children?
The “Ultimates” universe, one of the main components of this new collision, was
launched in 2000, allowing new origins for a variety of characters already
familiar in the main universe: Ultimate
Spider-Man, The Ultimates (The Avengers), The Ultimate X-Men and The
Ultimate Fantastic Four (for example), and opened new readers to an
entirely different world of well-known characters. Readers could see how
Spider-Man, for example, might begin today (and the first three feature films
were very much based on Ultimate
Spider-Man storylines, as opposed to the original), or The Avengers (two animated features, again, based on The Ultimates, as are much of the
current live-action features). Because they weren’t part of the main
continuity, characters and stories were allowed to develop, and a number of
main characters have even been killed off, seemingly permanently, including
Spider-Man, Captain America and Wolverine, something the main continuity could
never imagine doing. Imagine the Hulk actually killing Wolverine, for example
(it happened).
I’ve
been reading with great interest the work that Jonathan Hickman has been doing with
The Avengers over the past couple of
years, a storyline that seems directly heading into this new collision, as is
Bendis’ incredible work in All-New X-Men.
What is impressive to me is how well some of these stories are being written,
and how the interconnectedness of it all I didn’t even see coming. There is a
very long game being played here, and I’m thrilled for it, even if I might not
agree with every single choice of every single title or character (Civil War,
for example, broke apart a stellar run on the then-new Young Avengers title, from which it never fully recovered; the
subsequent run of the book had some intriguing developments, but overall, was
mediocre at best).
What
has also been interesting about how the current Marvel continuity has developed
is how they’ve slowly brought a number of these “alternate universes” into
normal continuity, reintroducing Star Brand and a few other ideas from Shooter’s
“New Universe,” stranding Spider-Man 2099 into the present, or the current
iteration of Spider-Man (a storyline I am not entirely convinced by, as unwieldy
and as silly as the “Maximum Carnage” or “Clone Saga” storylines), bringing in
every iteration of the character that has ever been written (from Spider-Girl
and Spider-Ham to multiple new iterations).
I
wonder if this collision of universes might even be Marvel’s way of ending the
Ultimate Universe, even as they rejuvenate their main continuity. Possibly?
Okay,
Marvel: you have my attention. Just don’t mess it up.
3 comments:
Make Mine Marvel - or, er, the newly reorganized Marvel Universe. Great post, rob. Thanks!
Hardly a new concept. Even the art is reminiscent of DC's Crisis on Infinite Earths and other such iterations. Far from being an example of Marvel originality, it's just part of the endless shell-game both companies must play to hold readers' interest. A reboot by any other name would smell as rebooty.
Interesting. I seem to be a little more cautious than you are, mostly because of the train wreck that is the New 52.
Mostly because the New 52 sells better than the old DC. Meaning they were right. Meaning that what sells is what I consider bad comics.
Will Marvel do the same?
Well, as you mentioned, Jonathan Hickman seems to be leading the charge and I have really, REALLY disliked what he has done with the Avengers.
(The Avengers are pretty important to me. It was the first book I ever collected and I have the full run... back to 1963.)
But people like it. Maybe, just maybe, what this is telling me is that mainstream superhero comics are just no longer for me. After 30 years of reading them, that would kind of make me sad.
Post a Comment