THE FOLLOWING IS
PLAINTEXT. the poem uses no metaphors. the poem uses no irony. the poem uses no
figurative language whatsoever. the poem uses no humor. the poem uses no
appropriate eye contact. the poem has a monotonous voice. the poem has
difficulty repairing communication breakdown & restarting conversation. the
poem uses language in an eloquent but inarticulate way. the poem knows the
emperor has no clothes. the poem knows squares don’t have cousins. the poem
chews on things that are not edible. the poem is unusually loud. the poem
creates jokes that make no sense. the poem creates its own words & uses them
with great pleasure in social situations. the poem interprets known words
literally. the poem interrupts others. the poem tells no lies. the poem not
single spies. the poem has impairments in prosody. THE PRECEDING IS CIPHERTEXT.
(“Domestic Cryptography Survey I”)
Philadelphia poet Pattie McCarthy’s fourth trade poetry collection is Nulls (Grand Rapids MI: Horse Less Press, 2014), which is, as the
back cover suggests, a four-section “collage of possible meetings which
ultimately lead to birth [.]” I’ve only seen a couple of titles from Horse Less
Press over the past couple of years, but this is easily the most attractive,
and showcases the fact that this is a press worth paying attention to. The
first section, “scenes from the lives of my parents,” appeared as a chapbook earlier this year with Bloof Books, and the short poems that make up the
section each begin with a small asterisk and opening line. In many ways, the
entire suite of short pieces in the first section is constructed as a sequence
of footnotes, broadening the scope of information presented within an unseen
source. Perhaps the footnotes exist as the real story, the important moments,
between the mundane pieces of living. Perhaps it doesn’t matter.
*scenes from the lives
of my parents:
my father shaved his
head in order to write
a letter upon his scalp
& waited
(for his hair to
regrow)—whereupon
he set off for my
mother & there shaved
his head again to
reveal the message.
this was a period of
history that tolerated
a certain lack of
urgency.
Many
of McCarthy’s poems over the years have been composed in part from her apparent
love of research into medieval subjects, topics and sources, blended with
contemporary, personal and familial references, including her children, all of
which come through with an incredible, staccato ease (something she recently discussed in an interview posted at Touch the Donkey). Her poems bounce and leap and have such a wonderful sense of sound
and play that I don’t see in most other writers (Sylvia Legris, perhaps, or
Emily Carr), as well as playing off a repetition and accumulation that build up
to something quite magnificent. As she writes to open one of the pieces in the
second section: “WHEN I SAY go TAKE
THESE SENTENCES ONE AT A TIME—the / poem may laugh inappropriately. the poem
may engage in / sustained and unusual repetition. the poem may prefer to be
alone.” And yet, as much as McCarthy’s poems can exist as individual units,they are very much built to live with and even against each other, as Michael Ondaatje wrote in the introduction to The Long Poem Anthology (Toronto
ON: Coach House Press, 1970): “Poems should echo and re-echo against each
other. They should create resonances. They cannot live alone any more than we
can […].” It is as though McCarthy’s work is slowly evolving as a larger,
ongoing, singular work of interconnected works, each composed as book-length
units.
FOR yes—PLEASE
PRINT FIVE OF YOUR
CHILD’S LONGEST & BEST SENTENCES
I can’t do this orally,
only headily.
my sleep today was long
but thin.
I don’t like the
blinding sun, nor the dark, but best I like the mottled
shadow.
but the butterfly is
snowed, snowed with snow.
the long green grass
with be yours & yours & yours . (“Domestic Cryptography Survey I”)
The
four sections of the collection—“scenes from the lives of my parents,” “Domestic
Cryptography Survey I,” “a poem including a brief history of autism” and “Domestic
Cryptography Survey II,” as well as a section of “Sources”—extend many of the
threads of McCarthy’s prior concerns, structures and subjects, blended together
in such a way that expand on what she’s previously accomplished. Her interplay
between medieval and contemporary ideas of women, children, birth, courtship
and marriage work their ways through four sections, each of which focuses on a
different point in a narrative from courtship through to marriage, childbirth
and child-rearing, with the additional thread of autism. As she writes as part
of the third section:
John Langdon Down, in
his 1887 Mental Affections of Childhood
& Youth described a type of child ho, when first dentition proceeding, lost its wonted brightness; it took less
notice of those around it; many of its movements became rhythmical &
automatic; […] anxiety was felt on
account of the deferred speech, still more from the lessened responsiveness to
all the endearments of its friends. Down notes other children who at second dentition suffer crises of
intelligence having night terrors
& not unfrequently loss of speech.
after my third child
was born, I worried about post-partum depression. my ‘irrational fear’ was that
someone was going to come & take the baby away. but if I confessed my irrational
fear to the doctor, would that mean that someone would come & take the baby
away? would the fear of someone coming to take the baby away be a reason to
come & take the baby away? when I read the history of autism, I can taste
that fear again.
it is as tough all of
my skin can taste it.
Part
of what has long appealed about McCarthy’s work is the way in which she manages
to combine research and confessional in such a visceral, personal way, pushing
inventive language poetry to very personal spaces (something Ottawa poet Brecken Hancock has been doing lately as well, such as in her recent series of pieces at Open Book: Toronto or in
her Broom Broom [see my review of such here]). McCarthy is adept at writing about parental fear and anxiety, subjects
that still somehow have the sheen of taboo, despite the growing list of poets
managing to write such with incredible power, including McCarthy, Rachel Zucker
and Arielle Greenberg. The poems in Nulls
are composed with such a primal force over an extremely large and complex
canvas, and delve both historically and personally deep. “[A]ll words in fact
have private meanings,” she writes. As one of the poems in the second section
begins:
to give her something
to be anxious about, she was taken to the shock room, where the floor is laced
with metallic strips. to give her something to be anxious about, two electrodes
were put on her bare back, & her shoes were removed. to give her something
to be anxious about, z-process. to give her something to be anxious about,
re-birthing. to give her something to be anxious about, he was shot to death in
the arms of his aide. to give her something to be anxious about, some children
will need more than ninety hours of listening. to give her something to be
anxious about, a bit like a radio station going in & out of frequency &
will change from left to right ear. to give her something to be anxious about,
the process of removing heavy metals.
No comments:
Post a Comment