Showing posts with label The Muses' Company. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Muses' Company. Show all posts

Monday, October 27, 2025

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Melanie Dennis Unrau

Melanie Dennis Unrau [photo credit: Jason Unrau] is a poet, editor, scholar, and climate organizer of mixed European ancestry from Winnipeg, Manitoba, traditional territory of the Anishinaabeg, Ininiwak, Anishininewuk, Dakota Oyate, and Dene peoples and the homeland of the Red River Métis. She is the author of the literary study The Rough Poets: Reading Oil-Worker Poetry (McGill-Queen’s UP, 2024) and the poetry collection Happiness Threads: The Unborn Poems (The Muses’ Company, 2013). A former editor of The Goose journal and Geez magazine, Melanie also co-edited I’ll Get Right on It: Poems on Working Life in the Climate Crisis (Fernwood, 2025). Her latest title is Goose (Assembly Press, 2025).

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

I don’t know if the first book changed my life—that was Happiness Threads: The Unborn Poems (The Muses’ Company, 2013). I mean, I wrote the book about things that changed my life—almost becoming a parent, then becoming one. And I wrote it while I was doing a one-year MA program, researching and writing about feminist poetry about motherhood, and getting involved with a group of women visual artists I would collaborate with for the next ten years. And then it was published while I was working for a scrappy magazine I loved, but which I would soon leave to go back to grad school again. I suppose that book gave me credibility as a poet. It taught me I could write a book. It marked a shift from more typical prairie lyrics into something more experimental, and after it was published I decided to lean even more into visual poetry, found text, research, and collaboration. I’m super grateful for that book. Also, of course, the chapbooks I have published with you, rob, and elsewhere.

I think it’s funny that my first book was about motherhood and my new one, Goose, is in a sense about fatherhood. Both are feminist books, and this new one is more overtly anticolonial and antiracist. Goose feels different because the first book was very personal. Some of the poems in The Happiness Threads were impossible for me to read aloud because they were still so painful. Goose is intentionally and ironically impersonal. It’s difficult to read aloud for its own reasons—because it’s visual poetry and doesn’t always work that way. Although The Happiness Threads is funny at times, and it’s about a wide range of emotions, the dominant mood is quite sad. With Goose, the silliness is at the forefront, with deep critique and sadness in the background. Both books ask a lot of questions about what we love, and why, and how.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I honestly don’t remember. It’s just always been that way. I love reading, language, sound, and ideas. I had to memorize a lot of Bible verses as a kid, and I read a lot of flowery and archaic and difficult language as part of a strict religious upbringing. Maybe that? I remember writing playground rhymes, limericks, jingles, and parodies all the time when I was young. I used to believe that I could write pretty much anything, but I don’t think that anymore.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I can write lyric poetry quickly. Early drafts of Goose were lyrics, written in the evenings while visiting “father of the tar sands” S.C. Ells’s fonds at the National Archive. Poems like that just come sometimes, and I jot and revise them in my journal, but I don’t really assume that they will turn into anything I would want to publish or turn into a bigger project. I’m glad I wrote those lyrics about Ells, capturing my strong sense of his presence haunting the archive, trying to control it even then. But those poems kind of got digested into the visual poetry, so that eventually I felt the project didn’t need them anymore. And the visual poems developed more slowly. rob, you published early drafts of these poems—the lyrics, then the word-processed found poetry that would eventually lead into the hand-tracing method I eventually figured out. It took a long time to land on what this project—or at least the book version of this project—would be. I don’t usually start writing poems with notes, but for this book I kept a list of concepts for poems on a sticky note inside a copy of Ells’s Northland Trails. It took several years for Goose to come together.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

Until I know I am working on a project or a book, poems begin as words, phrases, ideas that I put in my notebook (which I try to write in every night). I am best at making poems when I am busy doing other things like reading, editing, researching, etc. I am terrible at setting myself the task to create something when I have no idea what I want to write, and I hate doing creative writing on a computer. So I do a lot of rolling things around in my mind before I write them down. With both books, there came a moment when I knew I was making a book, and then things started to make sense. With Happiness Threads I knew at the same moment how I was going to make it—I listed out the titles of all the remaining poems I was going to write, and those would become the main part of the book. With Goose, it took longer to figure that out. Once I know what the project is and how to do it, I make one poem or more every day if I can.

Goose poems start as an idea about Northland Trails—like I’m going to find every adjective used to describe geese, or I’m going to make a deconstructive reading of this one poem that highlights how sexist it is. Then I start tracing words and images and see how my poem shapes up. If I make a mistake, or change the procedure/method for the poem, I start over. Each poem gets remade several times. Depending on how complex the poem is, each version can take an hour or longer.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I’m honoured to get to do readings, but I am a quiet and private person, and readings are challenging for me. I do like being part of a community of writers and readers, so I do them. And I do them to honour the work.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

Yes, always, but I try to keep these in the background—I’m not interested in writing theoretical or philosophical poetry. I would say I wrote Goose with literary-critical and environmental concerns. It is a reading or interpretation of Ells’s Northland Trails that does its work by making poems with and about Northland Trails. The questions it asks are questions like: What if Sid Ells liked to think of himself as a goose? How would I use his creative works to “prove” that, and what could I do with that evidence? What would it say about him? Do the geese or the land or the northern peoples in Northland Trails exceed or undermine what Ells tries to make them say, and how might I highlight those voices? What values and ideas and land relations were foundational to the tar sands industry, and are they still at work in the industry and in Canada today? What do we do with the legacies of “founding fathers” like Ells in the time of decarbonization and decolonization? Who speaks for the land? How can the image of this honking founding father serve as a warning or a corrective to the “great men,” grandiose plans and “nation-building projects” that are being sold to us today?

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

It’s a writer’s job to pay attention, to reach for ways of expressing things that are happening right now in the world and in our cultures, and, while resisting silly or grandiose ideas about the impact of art or literature, to try to write ethically and in ways that matter. 

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

Both, but more essential than difficult. I would not publish a book without being edited, and I’m so grateful for the editors who have worked on my books with me—who have helped me see and fine-tune what the books are doing, and who have taught me so much. Much gratitude and love to you, Catherine Hunter, Clarise Foster, Jordan Abel, Andrew Faulkner, and Leigh Nash. And thanks to the other editors who alternately encouraged my projects along and rejected them when they were half-baked.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

Jordan Abel said something in a mentorship session at a Banff Centre writing residency—something like “I would never take on a project that I couldn’t enjoy.” That advice changed Goose and my perspective on making poetry, even so-called experimental or visual or difficult poetry.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose)? What do you see as the appeal?

Easy. For me, poetry was an unintended byproduct of grad school and scholarly writing, editing, and publishing. I would write the scholarly version of what I was working through, but I would also be compelled to write the poetry version. Eventually, I learned to let the poetry infect the scholarly writing, and I wrote some neat creative academic work as a result. I think I’m finished being an academic now, and what I’m most proud of about my scholarly work is that I did it like a poet.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I don’t really have one. I have never been only a writer—always an editor or student or scholar who also made time to write. I usually wait until I have an idea before devoting much time and attention to my creative writing. I used to go for a run to figure out writing tangles, and now walking every day is good for me and my writing. And I know it helps to write in my journal every night. I’m a neurodivergent person, and I don’t think I’ll ever be able to focus only on one project. I will probably always do lots of other things, and those other things will somehow also help me write.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

Hmm. The everyday? The world? Environmental activism? Or I read, or I throw myself into some other project or editing someone else’s writing. I don’t worry very much about this. 

13 - What was your last Hallowe'en costume?

I bought a box of cheesy, vintage homemade costumes at a yard sale, then wore the one my kids didn’t want to wear. I think it was a lion.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art? 

I am not a bird-watcher, but I have paid more attention to geese while making Goose. I LOVE them, in a very unscientific and silly way. And I have visited the Athabasca River several times while making this book, also the Assiniboine River almost every day, so I think of my writing as being in relation or conversation with these beloved rivers. Visual art, especially by the artists I have collaborated with through Mentoring Artists for Women’s Art (MAWA) in Winnipeg (Yvette Cenerini, Brenna George, Sandra Brown, Carolina Araneda, to name a few). Other influences for Goose include COVID-era Zoom meetings and podcasts, and lots of music (two songs to highlight: Tanya Tagaq’s “Retribution” and John K. Samson’s “Vampire Alberta Blues”). And the other forms I want to mention are DIY and amateurish aesthetics—zines, comics, the self-published, the protest poster or slogan or song.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

Where to begin? And end? Books: Kate Beaton’s Ducks, Alvena Strasbourg’s Memories of a Métis Woman, Lindsay Bird’s Boom Time, Lesley Battler’s Endangered Hydrocarbons, M. NourbeSe Philip’s Zong!, K.B. Thors’s Vulgar Mechanics, Layli Long Soldier’s Whereas, Kazim Ali’s Northern Light, Douglas Walbourne-Gough’s Crow Gulch, Richard van Camp’s Godless but Loyal to Heaven, Evan J’s Ripping Down Half the Trees, Joanna Lilley’s Endlings, Matthew James Weigel’s Whitemud Walking, Owen Toews’s Stolen City, Max Liboiron’s Pollution Is Colonialism. And writers: Jordan Abel, Madhur Anand, Billy-Ray Belcourt, Jenna Butler, Dionne Brand, Di Brandt, Moni Brar, Warren Cariou, Rina Garcia Chua, Ariel Gordon, Stephen Collis, Marvin Francis, Samantha F. Jones, Katłıà, Kaie Kellough, Sonnet L’Abbé, Christine Leclerc, Cecily Nicholson, Jamie Paris, Shane Rhodes, Kelly Shepherd, Kate Siklosi, Dani Spinosa, Jennifer Still, Michael Trussler, Katherena Vermette, Joshua Whitehead, Rita Wong, Syd Zolf.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done? 

I would like to be a writer in residence. I will do that this fall at the University of Manitoba’s Centre for Creative Writing and Oral Culture. With that happening, and two books launching this fall, I honestly haven’t thought much further ahead.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

When I was young I said I wanted to be a librarian. That would work. I don’t know, I have already done a lot of things—communications work, university student services, magazine editing, journal editing, poetry editing, copy-editing and proofreading, teaching, research/scholarship. I’m focused now on attempting primarily being a writer for a change.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else? 

I write and do something else. But my something else is often pretty close to writing.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film? 

I’m reading Kate Briggs’s This Little Art right now. It’s fantastic. Before that it was Smokii Sumac’s Born Sacred: Poems for Palestine, which is powerful, beautiful, and heartbreaking. I recently attended a screening of the film YINTAH and was blown away. Everyone in Canada should watch it, and it’s now on Netflix.

20 - What are you currently working on? 

I’m preparing for the launches of Goose and the poetry anthology I co-edited, I’ll Get Right On It: Poems on Working Life in the Climate Crisis. I have a little chapbook project with one more sequence of poems about S.C. Ells. It didn’t fit with Goose so I set it aside to finish later (now). There is an ongoing research project with the McMurray Métis and Emily Eaton at the University of Regina that is related to Goose. I’m continuing my work as part of the Manitoba Energy Justice Coalition, including a public-art collaboration with visual artists Natalie Baird and Toby Gillies where we have been facilitating poster-making workshops that document the experiences of “wildfire season,” evacuations, smoke, and ongoing climate denial and delay in our province. And I’m getting ready to facilitate workshops on visual poetry and work-and-climate poetry as part of my upcoming writing residency.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Michelle Elrick



Michelle Elrick is an award-winning Canadian poet and artist. She is the author of two books and creator of a limited-edition topographic poem which maps the memories of her late grandfather across a text-generated landscape. Her work has been published in Geist, CV2, Poetry is Dead and other journals, and has been broadcast on CBC television. Her new book, then/again (Nightwood Editions, 2017), is a poetic inquiry into the occasion of “home,” tracking the borderline between unfamiliar spaces and intimate experiences of place. She will be touring Central Canada with then/again in November 2017. Find her at www.michelleelrick.ca .

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
My first book, To Speak, didn’t change my life in the ways I (naively) expected it would. I’d dreamt of influence, opportunities, membership in a elite literati and an audience of keen readers, but these quickly faded into the quiet reality of the struggling writer. There were a few glitzy moments and some really wonderful opportunities to read, tour and take on more ambitious projects, but there was no neatly packaged career on the other side of the publication. Looking back I can see that my life has changed quite dramatically, albeit in ways and through means I didn’t imagine. Publishing then/again has been a completely different experience. I am more realistic about the book’s potential and more relaxed about how it is received. I’m also more confident as a writer at this point and I know how the book is remarkable and how it is not. This time around, I find myself caring much less about what readers think the book says about me. What I care about now is that the poetry finds its readers, so that together, meaning can be made from my little text creations.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?
I wouldn’t say I came to poetry first. I wrote a lot of non-fiction essays and several drafts of a novel before publishing any poetry. I’ve published mostly in poetry, though, and I think that’s because I’m still experimenting with form and style. The freedom of contemporary verse allows my ideas to get past any real or imagined structures of correctness and propriety.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?
It really varies. Often my first drafts already have the structure of the final product. Sometimes I will collage early drafts into long-form narrative lyrics and then refine from there. My poems tend to be either moments or ideas; as such, they usually arrive intact, though in need of a good polish.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?
At some point I go through my recent notebooks and see what I’ve written, flag anything with a nugget of promise and move those pieces onto the computer, then I start editing with an eye for any thematic threads. When I get to this point I usually have a book in mind. I prefer to write poetry organically and responsively rather than to a particular theme or end.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
I love giving readings. I find them to be some of the most satisfying moments of my writing life. That being said, I wouldn’t consider it part of my creative process. Performance is part of my commitment to the public nature of my art—to art as communication. Not everyone reads. Few people read poetry. Performance is one way to surprise people with a poetic encounter under the guise of entertainment.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?
I have so many theoretical concerns its sometimes difficult to get started! I recently reread What is Literature? by Jean-Paul Sartre. He articulates many of my concerns about the situatedness of literature, of its potential, its efficacy, also its ability to distract, oppress, and apathetize readers. But on a smaller and more personal level, the questions that have always driven my creative work are along the lines of how to be? what is real? what is this wondrous anomaly we call time? My most recent book, then/again, asks the question where does “home” occur? If I were to venture a guess as to what questions we are currently grappling with as a society, I’d probably say what do we do now? where do we go from here? how do we tell a human story in the anteroom of the apocalypse? or something like that.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?
As Sartre says in that essay, all writing is an appeal to the freedom of the reader. I agree that writing relies on the free participation of readers in order to fully become an artwork. In light of that, one role that us writers have is to honour the readers’ freedom and seek to extend it rather than limit it. I worked for a few years in small magazine circulation departments where I had to write a lot of ads and marketing copy. That type of writing—which is found in doses and hues all over books and screen-based entertainment—limits freedom.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?
Both. It can take me a bit of time to come around to recognizing the wisdom of my editor on certain critiques. I’m lucky to have had excellent editors so far in my career and each has helped make me a better writer.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?
Anne Carson chose this quote from Samuel Beckett as the inscription for Red Doc>, “Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” I like that.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to visual art/installation)? What do you see as the appeal?
Moving between genres and forms has always come very naturally to me and has proven to be essential for my creative development. I don’t think one form fits all ideas. The appeal is toward efficacy.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
My ideal writing day begins with reading—usually some philosophy or critical theory, then often some poetry—followed by a walk. I sit down mid-morning and write for 3-5 hours. When deep in a manuscript, I’ve been known to write for 8-10 hours at a time, sleep in my studio, work through the night and through the weekend until I am exhausted. Lately, I work a fair bit in my other career as the owner of a small bookkeeping business, so my writing time is fixed more rigidly in the first half of the day. With the exception of a few blissful seasons, it’s always been a juggling act for me between time for paid work and time for creative work.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
I turn to walking—slow walking in the forest or along the sea. Then I go back to the point in my writing where I started to feel lost and I look for wrong turns.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Rain, the wet forest floor.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?
I try to be sensitive to my environment and allow myself to be influenced by nature, art and everyday human life. My creative mind is often jumpstarted by reading philosophy or by watching popular science and nature documentaries.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?
Whitman, Tranströmer, Zwicky, Carson, Calvino, Ondaatje, Sontag, Dillard, Rilke, Neruda, Buber, Garcia Marquez, Wittgenstein—these are some of the authors on my bookshelf. In my life, many writer-mentors have been remarkably generous, supportive and inspiring and have helped me find my way.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
I would say I’m quite satisfied with what I’ve done in my life. Now, I’d just like to do more of the same: live more, write more, love more and read more.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?
I would love to be an architect.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?
Desperation. Writing was the only method of honest self-expression that I had as a young person. It showed me myself, but also helped me understand the world. I wrote to make sense of grief, loneliness and to articulate my curiosity.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?
I’ve read a lot of good books lately! Labyrinths by Borges, The Place of Scraps by Jordan Abel, Genome by Matt Ridley. I have a terrible memory for films, but I love the Koker Trilogy by Abbas Kiarostami, which I watched in 2014.

20 - What are you currently working on?
It’s hard to say! I have a lot of work in progress right now and am writing to see what will come of it.

Friday, October 30, 2009

12 or 20 questions: with Chris Hutchinson

Chris Hutchinson was born in Montreal and has lived in Victoria, Edmonton, Nelson, Vancouver, and Phoenix, Arizona. He now resides in Kelowna, where he teaches English at Okanagan College. The author of two books - Other People's Lives (Brick Books, 2009) and Unfamiliar Weather (Muses' Company , 2005) - his poems have been translated into Chinese and have appeared in numerous Canadian and U.S. publications. Over the years he has led poetry workshops in college, high school, and elementary school classrooms.

1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?


My first book did not change my life. Perhaps a few people took me more seriously because my poetry now came as a product with a barcode. I did get the chance to go on a brief tour, reading in a few cities across the country, which was a blast. But then, after about two weeks of gallivanting around and playing poet, I was back to my job as a short order cook.


With my second book I was thinking more architecturally, more in terms of prosody; and I was reconsidering some of my assumptions vis-à-vis the lyric mode. I wanted to try new things, play around a bit, take some risks. I had decided that much of contemporary Canadian poetry was boring, including many of my own published poems, and that, if nothing else, I didn’t want to be boring.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

I did not come to poetry first. Back in the day, I tried to write long, sprawling, self-mythologizing novels. It was the early nineties, I was living in Victoria, but I imagined I was living in Paris in the twenties. And in a way, I was. Poetry came later, and then the real trouble began.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

My first drafts are pig slop. It usually takes me at least twenty drafts just to redeem myself. There are exceptions of course. Occasionally there are gift poems, the ones that miraculously appear perfectly healthy and fully formed.

4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

A poem for me almost always starts with a line that floats in from who-knows-where and touches down on the page. If the line is good, if it’s a line I really like, I’ll try to write it a companion line, something to keep it company; and it goes on like that. Really, it’s a process of continual self-delusion. But the longer I fool myself, the more lines I write, and thus the more raw material I will have to toy with later.

I’ve been working on longer, book-section-length pieces lately, and this has required a bit more preparation and forethought than the writing of individual, discrete poems. But I’m not sure if the day will ever come when I deliberately sit down to write an entire book about ‘X’. I don’t like knowing what I’m doing or where I’m going. I can’t even stay in the same job or city for more than three years it seems. The fun of writing poetry for me is the not knowing of it all, the unpredictability of the process and the outcome, and the strange places poetry takes me. It’s a hard thing to try to explain on a Canada Council grant application form.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I enjoy the act of reading poetry aloud in front of people. I don’t mind a little attention now and then, a little company. Though there is something weird about moving from the solitude of writing to the public stage of performance.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

Yes, all my work starts with the assertion that language is nothing more than a delivery system for political ideology.

I jest, but only partly. I am fascinated by theory, in a purely amateur sense—literary, political, social, etc. My readings in other disciplines have no doubt influenced my attitudes and beliefs about a great many things, including language and poetry.

I was recently talking with this young guy who is an accomplished academic and a talented poet, who told me, after much premising, that he wrote poetry in order to “redistribute wealth”. Ever since, I’ve been meaning to ask him if he was serious or joking, or if I heard him right.

For me, the current questions are: “What is poetry?” and “What can poetry accomplish?” and “Who the hell am I writing for anyway?”

In this they resemble the old questions.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

In my Ideal Republic, the poet would play the following roles:


1. IIconoclast

2. Jester

3. Pirate

4. Recipient of large amounts of praise, money and affection

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?


I think it’s essential to have another set of eyes look over my work near the end of a project. I have certain idiosyncratic blind spots.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

Expect nothing. Write poems for the sake of writing poems. Eat well, and get some exercise.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to critical prose)? What do you see as the appeal?

I don’t move around that much, genre-wise. Occasionally, I’ll write a light-hearted book review or a close reading of a poem I like. I used to write fiction, but over time my prose lines morphed into poetry. I have friends who have encouraged me to write more critical prose, to enter that arena. But for now, I’d rather write poetry.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

I get up at six in the morning and ride my bike to campus where I plan a variety of lessons for the day. I teach four different English courses, and I have over one hundred students. For the first time in fifteen years, I don’t have a writing routine. I have a teaching routine. So I write in between things now, sneak a few lines onto the page when I can. It continues to haunt me, this writing addiction; it finds a way.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

My writing itself hardly ever ‘stalls’. But my relationship with my writing certainly gets derailed from time to time: life gets complicated and messy. But a writer’s task is to write through it all, regardless. I find inspiration in the act of writing.

13 - What do you really want?

I want to move on to the next question.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

Dear David McFadden,

Books come from books, and poetry begets poetry, and money makes money—but what makes money make money? If poetry did not exist, would it be necessary, or even possible, to invent it?

Other forms that influence my work? I’m fascinated by the linguistic expressiveness I hear in certain jazz phrasings. And it makes me happy when conceptual artists make raids on fallacious cultural assumptions, values or beliefs. I love fashion and design, film, photography, architecture.... In terms of my own work, I don’t know how much I’m directly influenced by other forms, but I’m thrilled and delighted by any artist who can make my world bigger, stranger.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

My life outside of my work?

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

Receive a Canada Council grant.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I’ve always envied painters, their tangible creations, their well-lit studios, the physicality of the labour itself. Yes, for us lit-theory types, there is something called the “materiality of the signifier”; but whoever first dreamed this up probably had painter-envy.

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I’m terrible at everything else. God knows how many other things I’ve tried to do and failed at miserably.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

Last great book: Rae Armantrout’s Versed. Last great film: Charlie Kaufman’s Synecdoche, New York.

20 - What are you currently working on?

Other than marking college English papers, I’m plugging away at a new collection of poems that will undoubtedly puzzle editors, Canada Council Jury Members, and anyone who enjoyed my first two books. I’m hell-bent on obscurity these days. I should have been a pirate.

12 or 20 questions (second series);