Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Michael Chang, Things a Bright Boy Can Do

 

HERE WE GO FOREVER

cody who goes both ways

they say familiarity accelerates impact

in secret huddles

tender kid w/ the kind tan

poached pears

vanilla ice cream

who was wearing the flip-flops?

i’m illiterate b/c i didn’t have a high-school boyfriend

she smiled when they asked but

it’s hard to get by w/ that kind of sincerity

in the wet warm place

hand-hold ur thing iz a sandwich

free rein in the blast hole

the mary jo bang

From Manhattan-based American poet and editor Michael Chang, following titles such as Heroes (Temz Review/845 Press, 2025), Toy Soldiers (Action, Spectacle, 2024), SWEET MOSS (Anstruther Press, 2024) [see my review of such here], SYNTHETIC JUNGLE (Northwestern University Press, 2023) and EMPLOYEES MUST WASH HANDS (GreenTower Press, 2024), is the full-length Things a Bright Boy Can Do (Toronto ON: Coach House Books, 2025). I’m all for cross-border conversation, obviously, but it is always a curiosity to see a Canadian small press produce a full-length by a non-Canadian poet (which means it wouldn’t be eligible for Canada Council funding, putting the financial onus on publishing such a title entirely on the press, something few publishers are able to take on). It doesn’t happen that often, and it suggests the press is seeking to expand its reach, both in terms of foreign sales and attempting to bring an author into the Canadian literary conversation (although that might be an overly generous speculation on my part), especially given this particular title appears to be a unique edition and not, say, a Canadian edition of a title simultaneously appearing with a publisher in the author’s home country (such as with Coach House publishing a collection of essays moons back by American poet C.D. Wright, or Anansi publishing a poetry title by British poet Simon Armitage). With chapbooks produced over the past two years through Temz Review/845 Press and Anstruther Press, as well as an author biography that cites publication in Canadian journals such as Capilano Review, Contemporary Verse 2, the Ex-Puritan, The Malahat Review and PRISM International, Canadian literature is certainly paying attention to Michael Chang, as much as Michael Chang seems to be attending Canadian publishers; perhaps a move north is being considered? [edit: I have since been informed that Michael Chang is actually Canadian]

Or perhaps I make too much of this; or perhaps, even further, borders mean not what they used to when it comes to how books are seen, distributed, articulated and sold (beyond the current tariff nonsense, of course). On the surface, the poems in Chang’s Things a Bright Boy Can Do are accumulative, whip-smart, hurt and funny, sassy and queer, comparable in many ways to the work of New England-based poet and editor Chen Chen [see my review of their 2023 collection, Your Emergency Contact Has Experienced an Emergency, here], speaking first-person lyric monologues around emergencies and histories, childhood recollection and literary interveavings, violence and linguistic measure, cultural references and expansive gestures. “i detect your silence,” Chang writes, as part of “ATONEMENT,” “you you practiced // personification of ALLURE // fresh face pummelled red & teal // according to that distant sheepdog narcissa [.]” There is the sass, the casual glance and gesture of the deeply felt, deeply considered; the highly-literature “flirty to righteousness, wrathful to lackadaisical,” providing an echo between the two, but in Chang, something different, as well: something looser, almost freer, allowing for the movement of the gesture to direct the narratives. “Matthew DICKMAN was so upset he could not stand,” the expansive and gestural “BABY DRIVE SOUTH” writes, “Michael DICKMAN was investigated by another agency due to / a conflict of interes // Paul MULDOON told you his horse was larger than yours // CACONRAD sent anthrax to Betsy DeVos &  was awarded / the Medal of Freedom [.]” At turns thoughtful, joyful, meditative and silly, Things a Bright Boy Can Do offers a perspective on how one might live best and simply be within the world, within the moment, whatever else might be happening or happened, or even yet to happen. Or, as the poem “KING OF THE WORLD” writes, just at the end: “on this day // we go back to our old routine [.]”

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

12 or 20 (second series) questions with Marc Perez

A poet, Marc Perez is the author of Dayo (Brick Books) and Domus (Anstruther Press). 

1 - How did your first book or chapbook change your life? How does your most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?

I think having the experience of writing, editing, and publishing the book gave me a better understanding of my creative practice, as well as strengths and weaknesses in my writing. Practically, though, I don’t think that publishing changed my life in any way. I mean, I’m still broke. Affectively—to use the famous Alice Notley quote on my social media feed—I still have my grief.

My current work isn’t much different but a further exploration of themes and ideas I engaged with in Dayo.

2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say, fiction or non-fiction?

Ah, my earliest exposure to poetry, if I remember correctly, were riddles, or bugtong in Filipino, which were very common then. When I was in grade school, I usually bought cheap spiral notebooks that featured random celebrities and, at times, public domain poems on the cover. One such poem is “Don’t Quit” by Edgar Albert Guest. Sentimental, sure, but for the kid-me, it was moving. Actually, I revisit that poem sometimes and, in fact, read it to my wife not too long ago. Finally, or course, there were love poems. My real introduction with contemporary lyric, which influenced me henceforth, happened when I was attending Adult Ed here in Vancouver and an instructor, a poet himself, had us read poems by the great Wisława Szymborska. View with a Grain of Sand remains to be a revelation.

3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come out of copious notes?

I think I’m an instinctive writer; I mean, I try not to overthink it. Often, I write the draft of a poem fairly quickly and spend a lot of time editing it. Sometimes, a poem presents itself almost fully formed; other times, I lift from various sources—notes (loose papers, word docs, app notes), unfinished poems, literary quotes, etc. My strategy, always: reflect on what to write and how to write. When the poem isn’t coming, I don’t force it. I wait until we’re both ready.

4 - Where does a poem or work of fiction usually begin for you? Are you an author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you working on a "book" from the very beginning?

I like series poems. I look at my poems in relation to each other and my work as whole in general. With Dayo, I had an idea of themes that I wanted to touch on, and the poems in the book relate to these themes in one way or another.

5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?

I get incredibly nervous whenever I read publicly. What saves me from vertigo, usually, is the immediate reaction from the audience; I observe their expressions and reciprocate. I don’t think of reading in terms of promotion or exposure, but simply another form with which to share my work and connect with people. The orality of public reading, with its own demands and approach, I think, is a form distinct from the written word. In fact, I’ve found myself veering away from my own text at times, adding and omitting some words while reading.  

I recently had the marvelous opportunity to read Dayo in its entirety for the Whole Cloth Reading Series (thank you Elee and Bronwen!). I’m not a performer or athlete, but I think it was the closest I’ve been to something somatically sublime. I really hope such poetry reading format becomes more common and accessible.

6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What do you even think the current questions are?

I don’t go about writing a poem with theory in mind or try to answer theoretical questions. I’d write an essay instead. That said, theories, of course, also inform my poetic practice, and they figure, needless to say, in my poems. I’m concerned about alienation; neocolonialism and migration; mental health in relation to our current cultural and economic neoliberal hell-hole; revolutionary, anti-imperialist movements; liberalism and its discontents; affect; among others. Intentionally, though, my lyric poem’s emotional register is at the forefront, and not the technical jargon that inform it. Primarily, I write, as I often say, to move hearts, including mine.

7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in larger culture? Do they even have one? What do you think the role of the writer should be?

The poet’s role, first and foremost, is to write poems.

The writer, like any worker, is a political entity. What they produce, whether they believe it or not, are artifacts embedded in particular histories, cultures, socioeconomics, etc. Their words and actions have weight and consequences. In their scribbled dreams, to borrow from Delmore Schwartz, begin responsibilities.

That said, I don’t think there’s a homogenous role for writers, but like everyone else, they contribute in shaping cultural discourses in our society. Their role, however, whatever it may be, is only as good, valuable and progressive as the dictates of their values, politics, and ethics. Fascists, needless to say, also write poems.

8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside editor difficult or essential (or both)?

Editors are definitely essential, regardless of the difficulty of the process. With Dayo, I entered the poet-editor relationships from the idea that they want the best for me and my work. That was definitely true in my experience with Brick Books, and I greatly admire the attention and care they provided.

9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not necessarily given to you directly)?

There’s my usual answer of writing poems in a series. When I was attending a creative writing program, an instructor, I don’t remember exactly who, told me something I found interesting: protect your voice. It is helpful because I became much more discerning of feedback and advice, whether good or bad. If voice, simply put, means the combination one’s use of language and one’s vision, then I, who writes in English as a Second Language, must ensure, for instance, the preservation of even the tiniest inflections in my style against the hegemonic power (that is, requiring consent and coercion i.e. grading, publication, marketability) of institutionalized and normative writing conventions.

10 - How easy has it been for you to move between genres (poetry to fiction)? What do you see as the appeal?

I recently read We Do Not Part, by Han Kang and Vancouver for Beginners, by Alex Leslie (incredible work, by the way), so I’m kind of questioning if there’s an actual distinction between poetry and fiction, or if such distinction is even necessary. To me, writing in multiple genres means having more vessels to carry the content I wish to write. If a topic isn’t working as a poem, I can try writing it as a short fiction or personal essay. It broadens the possibilities.

11 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?

My writing routine is akin to Vancouver spring weather—irregular and indecisive Right now, though, my kids attend preschool and kindergarten, so I get to have a few hours in the morning until around noon to do my thing—write, edit, read, develop and scan negatives, and so on. I used to stay up late to write; now, I’m typically asleep by midnight.

12 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?

I read poetry collections and novels that I love and read multiples times. I go meandering walks and create a brain-space for both randomness and concentration.

13 - What fragrance reminds you of home?

Adobo.

14 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature, music, science or visual art?

I’m a firm believer in the dialogic nature of writing. It’s an antidote to the peerless, creative genius. I like drawing from various sources, forms that seem divergent or disparate. It’s like a random conversation with a stranger, who, I later learn, isn’t a stranger at all. I welcome serendipity and chance encounters.

15 - What other writers or writings are important for your work, or simply your life outside of your work?

Since my late teens, I’ve gravitated toward revolutionary and socialist texts—theoretical and literary—from Marx to Ho Chi Minh to Jose Maria Sison and various things in between and beyond. They are important in the way I view the world and how I see myself in it.

16 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?

I would like to become a strong swimmer; but first, quit smoking cigarettes—permanently.

17 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt, what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up doing had you not been a writer?

I like the smell of wood. I would like to be a woodworker for sure. I’ve often imagined shaving, chiseling, or hammering wood to make a table and chair. Never tried it though!

18 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something else?

I write—or make art in general—because like water or math, it is an essential, basic part of life. I don’t need any justification on why to do it. It just is. As with paid work, photography, activism, and parenting, however, writing is only one aspect of myself. I don’t feel any pressure choosing one thing over another. They coexist. The main contradiction, I think, arises from the lack of time; to resolve it, I give by best at getting better with essential skills like scheduling and time management.

19 - What was the last great book you read? What was the last great film?

We Do Not Part, by Han Kang, definitely. I was literally holding my breath while reading sections of the book. For poetry, I recently revisited The Selected Poems of Wang Wei, translated by David Hinton. I’ve read it multiple times yet don’t remember much of it, only a general feeling of longing and surrender. For film, it has to be Perfect Days, directed by Wim Wenders.

20 - What are you currently working on?

I’m working on a full-length collection of poems. I’ve also started a hybrid chapbook, composed of photographs and poetry. Mainly, I’m trying to write a collection of short stories.

12 or 20 (second series) questions;

Monday, April 28, 2025

Wayne Miller, The End of Childhood

 

AMERICAN DOMESTIC

The drone was ours
Slipping home
Toward a distant strip of earth
That was also America

While the operator
Stared into his net of pixels
Then stepped down
From the consequence of the mission
Into the dark grass

Drove the long way
Through the night air
He had to cut
With the blade of his headlights

His family waiting
Behind the heavy curtains
Of that home he’d carried with him
To work and back
As most of us do

Home that fell away
At the required moment
So he could get on with it
What do we say

When he opens the front door
And that bright interior
Flashes suddenly
Into the world

Denver, Colorado poet and editor Wayne Miller’s sixth full-length poetry collection, most recently following We the Jury (Minneapolis MN: Milkweed Editions, 2021) [see my review of such here] is The End of Childhood (Milkweed Editions, 2025), a collection that continues his lyric explorations at the collision between the dark realities of American military culture and the intimacies of home, family and childhood. “My best friend’s older brother had posters // of nuclear explosions all over his bedroom.” he writes, as part of the poem “THE LATE COLD WAR,” “At night they became the walls of his sleep.” There’s a sharpness to his lyrics, his lyric turns, able to change course mid-thought, allowing the collision of ideas or troubling connections.

The End of Childhood is a title, of course, that provides layers of possibility, from the complicated and naturally-human simplicity of emerging out of childhood thinking, from discovering that Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy don’t exist, to the realization of the failings of trusted adults, into further shades of darkness of human possibility. These are poems on multiple levels of realization, and a broadening scope. “Last week, a violent mob / of thousands stormed the Capital. // They wore sweatpants and flags,” begins the second part of his three-part “ON HISTORY,” “puffer coats and tactical gear. // If I ignore the details of their chants / and the silliness of their face paint, // they become a historical form. / That policeman on the television // being crushed in a doorway / over and over is trapped inside // of history. If you feel nothing / for him, then you are inhuman. // Yet all of us were pushing / from one side or another.” His title allows for a further suggestion of innocence, in thinking that such could not happen, could no longer happen; could not happen here. Through his articulations, Miller knows full well that he and all around him live deep within history, from the best moments through to the worst. The storming of the Capital Building, or a teenager felled by a bullet while waiting for the bus. These are poems that meet the present moment, even amid the intimacies of home and memory, children and those recollections of childhood that becoming a parent can so often prompt.

While, for the most part, these troubling elements of “America” sit at the background, almost as a shroud, they are still deeply present, even as the book as a whole writes around childhood, from his to that of his children, offering moments that stitch together that accumulate into narratives with the lightest touch across lines, one phrase carefully set upon another. Whatever the subject matter, there is such a lovely slowness to his lines, a deliberateness, offering hush and a halt amid such careful measure. “My grandfather—just a boy— / discovered his father’s body,” Miller writes, as part of “ON VIOLENCE,” “the trauma of which is why, / my grandmother would say, // he never aspired to more / than basic, menial work. // My grandmother’s father / drowned in Sheepshead Bay // after a night of heavy drinking / with the fishermen // he so admired. Foul play / was suspected, but never proved. // This was in 1920. Back then, / my grandmother told me, // things like that happened / all the time.”

Miller is remarkably good at offering poems that hold tight against the lyric, meeting the breath of a moment or a packed thought, nearly into the realm of the koan, one set against each other as a series of steps. The opening section, “TOWARD A UNIFIED THEORY,” holds even closer to that lyric ethos, a sequence of more than forty self-contained short bursts, two to a page, each of which hold a thought that itself leads into a question. The poem “ZOO,” for example: “The plexiglass / separating us from the animals // brings them closer [.]” Or the opening piece, “CHILDREN,” that reads: “Condemned to live // inside the weather / of our moods [.]”