As my tenure as interviews editor at Queen Mob's Teahouse continues, the twelfth interview is now online: "overflow: poetry, performance, technology, ancestry": kaie kellough [pictured] in correspondence with Eric Schmaltz. Other interviews from my tenure include: an interview with poet, curator and art critic Gil McElroy, conducted by Ottawa poet Roland Prevost, an interview with Toronto poet Jacqueline Valencia, conducted by Lyndsay Kirkham, an interview with Drew Shannon and Nathan Page, also conducted by Lyndsay Kirkham, an interview with Ann Tweedy conducted by Mary Kasimor, an interview with Katherine Osborne, conducted by Niina Pollari, an interview with Catch Business, conducted by Jon-Michael Frank, a conversation between Vanesa Pacheco and T.A. Noonan, "On Translation and Erasure," existing as an extension of Jessica Smith's The Women in Visual Poetry: The Bechdel Test, produced via Essay Press, and Five questions for Sara Uribe and John Pluecker about Antígona González by David Buuck (translated by John Pluecker).
Further interviews I've conducted myself over at Queen Mob's Teahouse include: Stephanie Bolster on Three Bloody Words, Claire Farley on Canthius, Dale Smith on Slow Poetry in America, Allison Green, Meredith Quartermain, Andy Weaver, N.W Lea and Rachel Loden.
If you are interested in sending a pitch for an interview my way, check out my "about submissions" write-up at Queen Mob's; you can contact me via rob_mclennan (at) hotmail.com
Sunday, July 24, 2016
Saturday, July 23, 2016
Jennifer Zilm, Waiting Room
My review of Jennifer Zilm's Waiting Room (Toronto ON: BookThug, 2016) is now online at The Small Press Book Review.
Labels:
BookThug,
Jennifer Zilm,
The Small Press Book Review
Friday, July 22, 2016
U of Alberta writers-in-residence interviews: Minister Faust (2014-15)
For
the sake of the fortieth anniversary of the writer-in-residence program (the
longest lasting of its kind in Canada) at the University of Alberta, I have
taken it upon myself to interview as many former University of Alberta
writers-in-residence as possible [see the ongoing list of writers here]. See the link to the entire series of interviews (updating weekly) here.
Minister Faust is a novelist, print/radio/television journalist, blogger, sketch comedy
writer, video game writer, playwright, and poet. He also taught high school and
junior high English literature and composition for a decade.
He
was writer-in-residence at the University of Alberta during the 2014-15 academic
year.
Q:
When you began your residency, you’d already produced fiction, plays, stage
writing and sketch comedy, as well as video games. Where did you feel you were
in your writing? What did the opportunity mean to you?
A:
I was comfortable with my writing and I appreciated the opportunity to teach
people, which I had done for ten years.
Q:
What do you feel your time as writer-in-residence at University of Alberta
allowed you to explore in your work? Were you working on anything specific
while there, or was it more of an opportunity to expand your repertoire?
A:
I had the chance to plan and research several projects, and spent a great deal
of time working with local writers on meeting their goals, as well as promoting
local artists through the Authorpaloozas and launching MF GALAXY to talk with
writers about the business and craft of writing.
Q:
Were there any encounters that stood out?
Everyone
stood out. One person I’d like to mention Tweeted that he was grateful for all
the help I’d given him on his story, which had gotten published. My advice was,
“Don’t change a word.”
Q:
Was this your first residency?
A:
Yes.
Q:
The bulk of writers-in-residence at the University of Alberta have been writers
from outside the province. As an Edmonton-based writer, how did it feel to be acknowledged
locally through the position?
A:
I strongly appreciated the opportunity to work with local writers to help them
build their skills and their reach, and to publicize the outstanding literary
community we have here.
Thursday, July 21, 2016
12 or 20 (second series) questions with Randy Lundy
Randy Lundy is a member
of the Barren Lands (Cree) First Nation, Brochet, MB. Born Thompson, in
northern Manitoba, he has lived most of his life in Saskatchewan. He grew up
near Hudson Bay, SK, just a stone’s throw from the confluence of the Fir,
Etamomi, and Red Deer Rivers.
He completed a B.A. (Hons.) and an M.A. in English at the
University of Saskatchewan, where he studied religion, philosophy, and
Indigenous literatures, completing a thesis on the plays of Tomson Highway.
He has published two books of poetry, Under the Night Sun and Gift
of the Hawk. 2016 will see the publication of a third books of poems, Blackbird Song.
His poetry has been widely anthologised, including in the
seminal texts Native Poetry in Canada: A Contemporary Anthology and An Anthology of Canadian Native Literature in English. His poetry has appeared in
anthologies in the United States, New Zealand, and Australia.
He has also published scholarly articles on writing and on
the work of Tomson Highway and Daniel David Moses.
Randy writes short stories and is currently working on a
manuscript, Certainties, for
publication.
1 - How did your first book change your life? How does your
most recent work compare to your previous? How does it feel different?
Well, my first book, Under the Night Sun, probably
only inflated my ego. But it did offer me the opportunity to teach creative
writing, which has been a great blessing to me. Some amazing students who have
taught me more than I ever knew about writing. It's something I have been doing
now since 2000. You know, when the book came out, I thought the writing was
amazing. Now (and that was in 1999), I look back at it and see that there are
only a couple of decent poems. I am glad for those decent poems, but I guess I have
just matured a bit. I hope.
I did some bad things in Saskatoon when I was going to
university, just silly young man things, and I fell in and out of love and all
that stuff is in that book.
Under the Night Sun and Gift of the
Hawk are composed of lyric poems. I know that's unfashionable these days,
but it's what I can do. Blackbird Song will be more of the same. My
first teachers were the critters both in and around where I grew up. Those and
the trees and stones and rivers etc. After those teachers, it was Archibald Lampman's nature sonnets and then later Patrick Lane, Atwood, Cohen, and the
whole crew.
In the midst of editing the first book, Patrick suggested I
was a bit of a romantic, and of course he was right. Still am, always will be.
2 - How did you come to poetry first, as opposed to, say,
fiction or non-fiction?
Good question. Well, I understand how the long sentences
one can construct in prose might be seen to represent a river or a ridge, I
used to sit on the rocks in the middle of the Red Deer river and listen to the
water running. To me, it sounded full of syllables, but short, tumbling. The
bird calls were not prose but poems.
I guess I am still trying to imitate that as best I can.
3 - How long does it take to start any particular writing
project? Does your writing initially come quickly, or is it a slow process? Do
first drafts appear looking close to their final shape, or does your work come
out of copious notes?
Writing is not a project me. It’s just how I live. So I
don’t ever stop writing, in my head that is. Getting it down on paper is always
hard, and then comes the endless process of revision. That’s tough business.
Luckily for me, if not for the reader, generally the first drafts are fairly
close to the final version.
But that’s an oversimplification. First drafts are carried
inside my bones before they ever become first drafts. Everything else gets thrown
away.
4 - Where does a poem usually begin for you? Are you an
author of short pieces that end up combining into a larger project, or are you
working on a "book" from the very beginning?
Poems always begin with an image that I have to find the
idea to express. Or it’s the idea I have to find an image to express. The two
are constantly united, melded.
I am definitely a writer of shorter pieces (at least for
now) that combine into something I could not anticipate. I know the use of the
term ‘organic’ is way to overused, but the work does figure itself out. Then you
just have to look and listen.
5 - Are public readings part of or counter to your creative
process? Are you the sort of writer who enjoys doing readings?
I love reading to people. And I love being read to. Reminds
me of childhood. And I guess like many I like being the center of attention and
having eyes on me.
Then again, that’s not what it’s about. To refer to Patrick
Lane again: “It’s the poem that matters.” So if readings keep me from writing
or make me forget why I am doing it, then that’s a problem.
6 - Do you have any theoretical concerns behind your
writing? What kinds of questions are you trying to answer with your work? What
do you even think the current questions are?
Theoretical concerns. Well, I have a problem with
post-structuralist / post-modern theories that would have it that language is
about language and never reaches the world. I think it’s malarkey. The same
world, the same earth, that gave birth to us gave birth to our various
languages. Language is a marriage between human consciousness and the world.
Of course, I am Cree (not to the exclusion of my paternal
ancestors) and I am interested in the earth and all of its various creatures because
they are truly our kin.
So for me, I am interested in how we are formed by the
world. We’re just a part of it, looking from inside it. If that doesn’t point
us toward current questions, then we are in deep trouble, as we seem to be.
7 – What do you see the current role of the writer being in
larger culture? Does s/he even have one? What do you think the role of the
writer should be?
Well, we are certainly not “the unacknowledged legislators
of the world,” as Shelley put it in his defense of poetry. I think our roles as
writers should be to engage people in dialogue.
I do not really feel qualified to answer the question, but
I am certain that writers have a role. Maybe many would disagree.
8 - Do you find the process of working with an outside
editor difficult or essential (or both)?
Working with an editor is definitely difficult and
essential. For my first two books I was lucky to work with Patrick Lane and
Daniel David Moses, and I learned much from each of them. Different things, but
I learned much. Important to get out of our own heads, I suppose.
9 - What is the best piece of advice you've heard (not
necessarily given to you directly)?
This is turning into a Pat Lane tribute, but the poem is
what matters so just get your own ass out of the way. Look and listen. Another
of my favourite poets, Jane Hirshfield, has a chapter in her book Nine Gates
titled “The World Is Large and Full of Noises,” so just shut up dummy and
listen.
And I guess I have to credit the Buddha for letting me know
to just be where you are.
10 - What kind of writing routine do you tend to keep, or
do you even have one? How does a typical day (for you) begin?
I don’t really have a writing routine, except I walk and look
and listen and see what is offered to me. A typical day begins with a
cigarette, coffee, getting the dogs fed and watered, and then rushing off to
teach. The dogs are good people. They have taught me much about what it means
to be human.
11 - When your writing gets stalled, where do you turn or
return for (for lack of a better word) inspiration?
Inspiration. Well, of course, one of the meanings is to
breathe in, rather than expire. So I turn to the birds—the merlins and doves
and hawks. Also, I turn to writers I respect: Louise Gluck, Joanna Klink from UMontana, and especially Charles Wright. I cannot even get through a single
Charles Wright poem without having to sit down and write. Mostly I just steal
from him.
12 - What fragrance reminds you of home?
Hmm, well, the smell of freshly baked bread in my Irish
grandmother’s kitchen. My Irish kohkum, Reta, always was and is my home. And
the smell of garbage in the burning barrel at my aunt and uncle’s farm north of
Hudson Bay. Old Spice aftershave on my father.
And the “fragrance” of the bush in the spring.
13 - David W. McFadden once said that books come from
books, but are there any other forms that influence your work, whether nature,
music, science or visual art?
Nature I’ve said enough about. I’m starting to sound like a
pagan. Guess I must be one.
Music? Don’t get me started. I like hand drum music, Delta
blues, outlaw country, to name a few favourites. Science and visual art I
understand are indispensable, but I don’t really understand those disciplines.
The kinds of music I enjoy celebrate the rhythms of the natural world and
humans and human bodies as part of that.
14 - What other writers or writings are important for your
work, or simply your life outside of your work?
I’ve already been name dropping here, so I’ll try to keep
this brief and mention a few folks I haven’t already. There are a great many
damned fine Indigenous writers I would be remiss not to name: Maria Campbell,
Louise Halfe, Gregory Scofield, Armand Ruffo, Linda Hogan (whose book The Book of Medicines should be required
reading for poets), Sherwin Bitsui.
Also, I have to name Gary Snyder, Tim Lilburn, Don McKay,
Jan Zwicky, Sheri Benning. Also Don Domanski is fantastic.
Recently bumped into a small book by Elena Johnson, Field Notes for the Alpine Tundra, which
is a really special book.
Probably I should stop there before I get carried away.
15 - What would you like to do that you haven't yet done?
Climb Macchu Picchu, visit the Deer Park where Buddha had
his enlightenment under the Bodhi Tree, have dinner with Pablo Neruda and
Jean-Paul Sartre—none of which are likely to happen.
16 - If you could pick any other occupation to attempt,
what would it be? Or, alternately, what do you think you would have ended up
doing had you not been a writer?
Any other occupation? Stand-up comedian, graffiti artist,
whitikow, or Professional Trickster.
If I had not ended up being a writer, I would have ended up
working in the bush or at a mill in Hudson Bay. The economy wouldn’t have kept
me gainfully employed, so then I would have ended up drinking too much and
smoking too much weed.
Maybe this sounds silly, bit I feel like writing and
teaching are vocations for me. Just what I should be doing.
17 - What made you write, as opposed to doing something
else?
Oh heck, I think I just answered that. Nothing else I
wanted to do.
18 - What was the last great book you read? What was the
last great film?
The last great book I read was David Hinton’s Hunger Mountain: A Field Guide to Mind and Landscape. Last great film I watched was something on Netflix: Jumbo Wild,
about the competing interests of development and natural / spiritual integrity.
19 - What are you currently working on?
Well, new manuscript of poetry trying to explore the
connections between Indigenous sensibilities, Buddhism, and the nature of
memory.
That and some short stories, which I am just fooling around
with because for me it’s a new genre and I don’t feel like I should know what I
am doing in the same way I put myself under pressure when trying to write a
poem.
Labels:
12 or 20 questions,
Hagios Press,
Randy Lundy
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
Ongoing notes: the ottawa small press book fair (part two,
Did you see my prior series of notes here? Or, really, my notes from the fair prior to that? I have so many notes on so many things. Should I even possibly start
thinking about the dates for the fall fair? So much to do, so much to do.
[Kyp Harness, listening intently to Claire Farley at the Canthius table] Ottawa/Toronto ON: The second issue
(spring/summer 2016) of Canthius, a
journal of “feminism & literary arts” [see my recent interview with co-editor Claire Farley at Queen Mob’s Teahouse],
includes, at the offset, a short note from the editors:
As editors of a new literary journal, we are
still negotiating how best to promote gender equity. While our association with
feminism could obligate us to publish works with overtly feminist themes, we’ve
opted instead to offer a diversity of women and genderqueer writers space to
share experiences and perspectives, no matter what those may be.
Now
that they’ve two issues of their semi-annual journal under their belt (and
seeking work for a third), one can’t help but be impressed by the clarity of vision
editors Cira Nickel and Claire Farley have for Canthius, a journal of poetry,
fiction and visual art. This new new issue includes new writing by an
impressive list of writers both new and emerging, including Catriona Wright,
Jacqueline Valencia, Sandra Ridley, Chuqiao Yang, Frances Boyle and Mary Ma, as
well as artwork by Mary Grisey. In a certain sense, it’s far too easy to
produce a first issue: the hard part is in producing a second, and a third;
this becomes even more difficult without having a clear sense of what you wish
to accomplish before you even begin, and their mandate is focused, open and
incredibly straightforward, even as they, as they say, still work to negotiate
the ways in which they can assist in promoting writing, thinking and
conversation. As they infer in their introduction, if one wishes for a proper
conversation of any sort, one requires the input of more than a select few.
We fail to name this right / without the words
For lapsing / lilies / wilted / in the
beginning
Wind caught nothing / but your leaf unfurled
To fall. (“Dirge,” Sandra Ridley)
Given
the limitations of a semi-annual journal, they’ve also been opening up their blog for further materials, including notifications, interviews, poems and non-fiction.
So far, they’ve held launches for each issue in both Ottawa and Toronto (where
each of the co-editors live). It will be interesting to see just how this
journal continues to grow over the next couple of years.
[Meagan Black, sitting the Arc Poetry Magazine table]
Toronto ON: From Jim Johnstone’s
Anstruther Press comes Toronto poet Jessica Popeski’s Oratorio (second edition, thirty copies; just how small might the
original run have been, I wonder?), the first of two chapbooks the press
produced by her in 2015 (the other, which I have not seen, being The Wrong Place). According to her online
bio, Popeski is a Classical Voice and Creative Writing graduate from Brandon
University, and her dense and dexterous lyrics are heavy with not only a
musical tone, but musical language (and even the occasional musical score). Just
listen to the opening of the poem “Home Visit,” that reads: “The cat curls a
lick-wet paw behind an ear, makes a straw- / skinny mew for milk. String-darned
socks smoke like kippers / on the radiator, space heaters strategically
sprinkled.” While certainly not pretending to be a language poet gymnast,
Popeski isn’t writing a complete straight line, either, allowing her phrases
and sentences the occasional pop and sing, allowing each line a bounce in its
step.
Mother-in-Law’s Tongue
on the counter, reeking
Lysol. Middling green
rug moss between toes.
Wall, cerulean sky.
Cosmos contained in a
computer screen square.
Blue-headed vireos
belong in books, and
ruby-crowned kinglets,
white-breasted nuthatches.
Aurora Borealis clotting
over prairie suburb sprawl
will be watched on television. (“Last Child in
the Woods”)
With
Oratorio edited by Dionne Brand, I’m
curious to know if Popeski’s second chapbook was as well; and if a debut
full-length collection (whether by McClelland and Stewart, where Brand edits,
or anywhere else) might be far behind.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



